New All-Star 2B ?
Just wanted to post an outside the box thought about filling a weak link with a young talented hitter athletic enough to make spectacular plays at 2B. I'm not talking about Hoff, Ryan, or anyone else that might come to mind.
I think the man for the Job is....
Barton.
His noodle arm is a non-issue at second base. He has the athleticism to cover 2B. He is young enough to learn a new position. His bat will play above average at 2B. You put all that together and you have a perrenial All-Star.
Please Mo if your reading this see what you can do about Tony giving the kid a shot at 2B. I know Oquendo can shape Barton into an everyday 2B given the chance.
45 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I like the idea...
by DD502DK on Mar 6, 2008 10:10 AM EST reply actions
whoa, whoa, whoa
Which brings up a question
Brian Barton rule V pick...
Yeah....
Kelly Johnson
So I see his transition to 2b being MUCH smoother than a potential Barton transition.
forgot to note...
2b easier?
the only complexity for 3b is bunts. the rest is pretty straight up.
as far as skills. 3b requires more arm, more quickness, less range than 2b.
Of course
That's a great point...
You know the old "he's so intelligent he gets bored easily when he's not challenge thing"
That sort of thing.
I love it!
It's worked with several players -- I don't see why it couldn't for Barton. We need a second basemen, but definitely don't need another OF.
Secret Weapon
I was just thinking about 2009 outfield with Duncan, Rasmus and Ankiel. Where would Barton fit? Second base was not what I had in mind, but I like it. And I would really love, if they mature, a Barton-Rasmus 1-2 while maintaining the (potential) power of Duncan and Ankiel.
Barton
Rasmus
Pujols
Duncan
Glaus
Ankiel
Yadi
P
Ryan
1-7 would alternate R-L. Tony would go nutty.
Keep Barton up this year as a bench player.
If they keep him in the outfield and his arm is a problem he will just bounce around the league as a 4th and 5th outfielder till his legs go and then he is done.
This would be good for the ball club and good for Barton.
Mo call Tony and make it happen.
Not a bad idea
by redbirdnation8206 on Mar 6, 2008 12:21 PM EST reply actions
I would think 2B
Once Detroit locks up Miggy I may have one last melt down
2B
I just think it's not going to ever happen.
2B would be harder on the knee as there are a lot more start/stop moves required at that position. You have to back up a lot of plays, and you have to be able to go very hard in one direction, stop, plant, push, and throw. Also you have to crouch down into a ready position for every pitch. Watch the outfielders they do "get ready" but they don't get the same knee bend as infielders.
I just think it's not a likely thing.
I agree IC it's a long shot but
All I'm saying is stick him at 2B and see what he looks like...
It could even be a simulated game.
I would rather try and fail than to not try at all.
Red Blazer
It is worth while to see what position guys can handle as you never know.
I just think its tough if Barton has never played infield before. Heck he seems athletic, so maybe it would be a matter of simple reps and learning the footwork.
Your idea is by no means stupid Red Blazer. I call it thinking out of the box and seeing what ya got!
Sure
by flynn on Mar 6, 2008 12:52 PM EST up reply actions
RULE 5
by cardsfansince1982 on Mar 6, 2008 1:44 PM EST reply actions
Ryan stays put...
Judging from this spring training so far
The myth of Oquendo
If the Cardinals want a right handed bat at 2B just use Hoffpauir. We're short of RH bats in the OF right now, moving Barton doesn't make sense to me.
Agreed
by mikedallas23 @ Viva El Birdos on Mar 6, 2008 2:26 PM EST up reply actions
What myth are you gonna take away from me next?
Jose Oquendo once taught a field mouse to turn double plays with a glove weaved from the hairs of his face and shoes carved from his large toe nails.
Okay, I got your answer
Last year, I made the opposite switch, learning the CF position as our starter went down, but that is different. In the Outfield, and I'm not by any means saying its easy or anything, you track balls and hit cutoffs. Not nearly as much to remember.
Also, it would be tougher on a injured knee at 2nd. Can't say that the infield dirt is tougher than the outfield grass, but the cuts & pivots you make are more likely to aggravate the knee than running to catch fly balls.
As much as I'd like for us to find a spot for this kid on the team as a Rule 5 player, speaking from experience, I think it may be tough and not worth the risk. Just my opinion.
Very nice assesment of the situation
Nice screen name as well.
Still I am curious to know how Barton would look at 2B.
Thanks
by Pujols Is A God on Mar 6, 2008 7:25 PM EST up reply actions
Agreed.
It's not the same as shifting Duncan out of the outfield to 2B.
Imagine that.
It would be like a moose in china shop.
biggio part duex?
Not really...
Not to mention
Hmm...
It's definitely an interesting idea. Probably a long shot, but still.
like it
sorry
NO!
What I'm saying is give him a look and if he has a propensity to the position of 2B train him while using him as a back-up outfielder. Deploy him in blowouts or games we have large leads to take the pressure off.
That way he gets familiar.
Then you send him to winter ball to play 2B and nothing more.
Next year you keep him as a back-up outfielder and 2B....maybe even 1B as a defensive replacement for Pujols.
By 2010 he is ready if he hasn't all ready taken the position of 2B.
Also if Duncans defense still ends up being a liability move Barton to our leftfield and trade Duncan.
The cost per year isn't damaging so if by then he isn't a second baseman trade him to a team who needs a LF if his offense holds up.
It only costs us 1 year of holding back a prospect. Push back say Mather or even Rasmus to start the season. Hell DFA Kennedy. Might as well cause he only has one more year & he won't sign a deal more affordable than Bartons.
Play Hoff until Barton is ready. If Hoff rocks break out the "Hoffinator Tee Shirts" and trade Barton.
The potential upside is huge and the chance for loss minimal.
And if you think calling 2B a premium positon your insane.
The defensive mind of a second basemen is a very intellectual mind. They aren't always the best athletes. If you get one that is a good athlete along with a strong mind you have an all-star.
But then again he might not look good at second base. That's why you give him a look.
Because it's free.
Great minds....
Red has seen a few infielders come and go in his day, 60 years or so. Likewise Oquendo and McKay. You're thinking like a scout or coach! Good job!
I think other factors involving trades, injuries or roster spots will prevent it from ever being a consideration. Not all Rule 5's stick. Cleveland knows that from the guy they got from us for our rental in 06. FREE is ALWAYS good, I like your thinking there! So does Mo.
Where's Hector Luna?
I wouldn't mind seeing Luna at 2B
Toronto...
by cardschinmusic on Mar 8, 2008 4:15 AM EST up reply actions

by 
















