Viva El Birdos: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: RSL Soapbox for Real Salt Lake Fans!

Anthony Reyes "Officially" out of rotation

 

Link

Well, this makes a whole hell of a lot of sense:

 

JUPITER, Fla. — The Cardinals issued a tacit statement Friday, all but declaring Brad Thompson the winner over Anthony Reyes as fifth starter in their season-opening rotation.

Technically the matter remains unresolved.

 

Of course, I must have been a moron was under the stupid impression that Anthony Reyes had pitched well enough to be in the starting rotation and that Brad "1 Spring Start' Thompson hadn't exactly been anointed anything.



Manager Tony La Russa and pitching coach Dave Duncan made no announcement, though Duncan thought the indicators "obvious to anyone who's been paying attention."

 

Once these stubborn old men make their mind up about something, it's pretty much set in stone.  Outside of Anthony throwing a perfect game in relief if he ever pitches this spring again, or Thompson imploding against the Nationals, this thing is over.


La Russa confirmed that he and Duncan have defined the rotation but quickly added that "impressions can still be made. The competition is close enough."

Official word is likely to wait at least until after Thompson's start Monday.

 

I guess I just don't get it.  Wellemeyer AND Thompson stay in the rotation over Reyes?   I mean, am I the only one concerned with this teams talent evaluation process right now?

2 recs  |  Comment 101 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Complete and utter

in the words of Penn and Teller, BULLSHIT!

Rasmus or bust.

by Zoop on Mar 22, 2008 4:12 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

What's the Outrage For?

Usually, the complaint is that TLR set up a fake competition. Well, in this case, the competition appears legitimate, and Thompson is winning it.

Player …………...W... L... ERA... G... GS... IP... H... R... ER... HR... HBP... BB... SO
A Reyes…… STL .1.. 1... 4.85 ... 4... 4... 13.0... 17... 7... 7..... 3........ 0....... 2.... 11
B Thompson STL 1... 0... 2.38... 4... 1... 11. 1... 9.... 3... 3..... 2......... 0....... 3.... 10

Reyes has what should be a simple assignment. Outpitch Wonderbrad. So far, he hasn't.

Moreover, his failure to restore the velocity on his fastball is, I think, a big red flag. At some point Reyes lost 3 to 6 MPH on his fastball, and he's never been quite as successful since then. That problem still hasn't been fixed

by Titus Pullo on Mar 22, 2008 10:31 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Most of Thompson's Numbers

are in relief, and they had plenty of opportunities to start him if they wanted it to be a legitimate competition. They had games wherein they started minor leaguers, while Thompson stayed in the bullpen. That indeed makes it look like one of the "fake competitions" to which you refer. They gave him one start, he did fine, and they celebrated like he was the return of Carpenter. This creates the impression that Thompson's good outing was exactly what they needed--cover to say Thompson won the fake competition. It's not too far out in left field to assume that if Thompson and Reyes had the same amount of starts their numbers would be even, if not Reyes coming out on top. But that appears to be a situation TLR and Duncan wanted to avoid.

by k randolph on Mar 23, 2008 9:56 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If anyone should be complaining about the number of starts...

It's Thompson. He had to pitch in inter-squad games and late innings to compete. It's silly to think that Dave and Duncan would come up with a "scheme" to cover a fake compation. Izturis staying the starting SS clearly shows that. He just doesnt care about the media/fans opinions enough to spend the effort to cover something like that up.

And it's not too far out in felft field to assume that if Thompson and Reyes had the same about of starts Thompson whould have far out preformed Reyes...

by Evilfrog on Mar 23, 2008 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

herein lies the most glaring discrepancy in this "competition"

You're right that Brad should be outraged - except that he "won" this trumped up competition.

Pitching in split-squad games, pitching in late innings, Thompson was facing predominantly AAA and even AA talent. These were not major league hitters that he was putting up his superior numbers against. Moreover, Thompson made his one start against the Orioles, who will be one of the worst teams - if not THE worst team - in the majors this year, and a team that has scored the fourth-fewest runs in baseball this spring.

Meanwhile, all Reyes has done is throw strikes this spring. He's shown command of all his pitches and just completed four scoreless against the Braves' starters, who've got one of the more potent offenses this spring.

My hope is that he tosses a big "fuck you" to the Cards' coaching staff with six or seven scoreless this Tuesday, and raises his stock enough for a trade - perhaps to the Nats or Orioles, two teams who desperately need major league pitching.

"Attaway to stomp 'em. Stomp the piss out of 'em. Stomp 'em when they're down. Kick 'em and stomp 'em. Attaway to go boys. Pound that old Budweiser into you and go get them tomorrow." -- Joe Schultz

by taiko on Mar 23, 2008 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You knew I would agree with you, now didn't you?

I have no real problem with Thompson in the rotation as a stop gap. I do have a problem with Looper and Wellemeyer in there.

If there is one manager in baseball who might help Mr. Reyes turn it around, it's Manny Acta. He is absolutely terrific in finding what it is that you can do, then setting you loose to do it. He will not sit around and moan about what you can't do. Go look at last years' Nats roster and tell me how could he manage to finish out of the cellar. His rag tag pitching staff performed better than our rag tag pitching staff too.

The Nats don't care if he sucked last year. That won't scare them at all. All of there players except Cordero, Zimmerman, and Rauch sucked somewhere else the year before too. They seem to no longer want Felipe Lopez. Trade Reyes for him.

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Mar 23, 2008 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

go back to last year...

and if you look at the start-by-start information, if I recall correctly, Kip Wells had a sub-2.00 ERA in relief and an ERA over 6 otherwise.

I don't mind Thompson being in the rotation, but this team has a chance to compete pretty much only if Reyes delivers on his talent. And beyond that, relief stats don't compare to starting stats.

by mtalken on Mar 23, 2008 10:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually...

Thompson was better starting than in relief accordin to DG

Thompson was 6-4 with a 4.66 ERA as a starter, 2-2 with a 4.91 ERA in 27 games in relief

That was in 17 starts.

by Evilfrog on Mar 23, 2008 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm in the minority on this one..

You know, it's not like A-rey hasn't been given the opportunity to establish himself. The guy has been given 37 starts in the last 2 seasons, with a 7-22 record and an ERA of about 5.50. I think the reasoning behind this decision is more based on Larussa/Duncan still thinking that in a month they'll be adding Pineiro and Clement back to the rotation and it's easier to remove a Thompson/Wellemeyer/Looper than it is Reyes because they'll have to send him down. Personally, I dream of a rotation with no Reyes/Thompson/Wellemeyer/Looper. I think all these guys are sub-.500 pitchers with ERA of 5.00 +. To put it simply, I don't think it really matters a whole lot because they all suck.

Let's hope we'll be talking about a July rotation of

Wainwright
Carpenter
Mulder
Pineiro
Lohse/Clement

"Ding-dong the wicked witch is dead!" - Wayne Hagin after the cardinals snapped a losing streak

by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Mar 22, 2008 4:26 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

one more thing..

I think they are hoping that A-Rey will dominate AAA to get his trade value back up.

"Ding-dong the wicked witch is dead!" - Wayne Hagin after the cardinals snapped a losing streak

by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Mar 22, 2008 4:28 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hit the nail on the head

They're thinking ahead. In a few weeks, one of Mulder or Piniero is going to come back and it's easier to move Brad to the bullpen. Reyes has been Reyes. Good game, bad game. And I believe they only have one more option on him so they can't afford to bounce him back and forth between Memphis. Frustrating player, but don't feel too sad for him. There are pitchers in the HOF who don't have what he has, a world series ring and a WS victory.

Right now Brad is the better player, IMHO. Maybe Reyes has a higher ceiling, but eventually you have to do it on the field and do it consistently. Best thing for him is probably a change of scenery, preferably in the AL where we don't have to see him again.

by O'Fallon Park on Mar 22, 2008 8:14 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's not the way options work

You can send him back 5 times this year and it only counts as one option. Even if he starts in AAA, they have to option him to get him there.

How is it easier to move Brad to the pen in a month than having him be in the pen the whole time? When one of the other pitchers come back and if Reyes is struggling at the time, that's when you send him down where he continues to be a starting pitcher in the minors. Both pitchers roles never change then.

by outraged on Mar 22, 2008 9:47 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Stats

A quick look at the career numbers of the Cardinals 10 starters:

Wainwright - 3.61 16-13
Looper - 3.88 46-44
Thompson - 4.00 13 - 8
Carpenter - 4.10 100-69
Mulder - 4.18 103-60
Clement - 4.47 87-86
Pineiro - 4.47 65-60
Lohse - 4.82 63-74
Wellemeyer - 4.98 9-10
Reyes - 5.42 8-23

Of course, I didn't post these stats to illustrate that Thompson and Wellemeyer are more deserving. I posted them to illustrate that Reyes just simply hasn't gotten the job done. I personally think his days wearing the birds on bat are over, but I'll always remember game 1 of the W.S. and that near no-hitter against the white sox.

"Ding-dong the wicked witch is dead!" - Wayne Hagin after the cardinals snapped a losing streak

by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Mar 22, 2008 4:49 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

With all due respect...

First, W-L is one of the worst stats to evaluate a pitcher.

Second, you provided career stats, which include innings pitching in relief. Yes, I know Wellemeyer had better than average stats as a starter last year, but the sample size was simply too low, and if I recall he got a ton of run support.

And Thompson's career numbers out of the bullpen are better than as a starter..hence we should keep him in long relief.

by Fred Head on Mar 22, 2008 10:14 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I still think

that Reyes will go in the rotation, and Thompson or Wellmayer (or both) in the pen. They are much more useful there, due to the few starts for the 5th starter in the first month, and due to the uncertainty of some starting pitchers (Looper, Pinero).

GO CARDS!!!

by SuperSeve on Mar 22, 2008 5:55 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I am not surprised.

I probably should be because Mr. Mozeliak was quoted in the PD that he wanted Anthony Reyes in the rotation. So much for what he wants.

This idea that you can send him to AAA to increase his trade value is false. Because what they are saying is that we think Looper and Wellemeyer and Thompson are better pitchers than Reyes. What do you think the market is for Looper, Thompson and Wellemeyer? If he is not in the opening day rotation, they should trade him before they break camp.

I know he's had his difficulties here. He may never get it figured out. He wouldn't be the first one to flame out; nor would he be the first one to break out. Let me just direct you to this:

http://stlcardinals.scout.com/2/714067.htmlou

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Mar 22, 2008 7:24 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Okay, now. That didn't work.

I'm pretty stupid when it comes to anything more than a key tap or a mouse click. Sorry. It's like the fear of math some folks have........

If someone can help me out here, I'd appreciate it. The article is by Dustin Mattison of scout.com. It's title is the case for keeping Anthony Reyes.

Thank you.

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Mar 22, 2008 7:34 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Guess Ridgsee....

Ridgsee's eyes didnt SEE the link posted twice right below where he posted the URL....but zatshokay, help is always nice even in bunches....thanks Ridgesee, we'll just call you ridgs now leave the "see" part out ....... ; )

"Son, we'd like to keep you around for the season but we're gonna try to win the pennant." Old Casey

by cardschinmusic on Mar 22, 2008 10:54 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Anyway, I thank you both for helping me.

Some things are just too darn hard for me.......

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Mar 22, 2008 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No

the links were moved further down when I came along. I did scan down some and didn't see anything, then posted, but you are right I am old and don't see too well. Forgive me for living so long. My Grandson will will replace me soon, so just hold on.

by ridgesee on Mar 22, 2008 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

These damn kids..

Get off our lawn!

If everything seems to be going well, you have obviously overlooked something.

by cardsrul on Mar 22, 2008 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not to be concerned...we need all the help we can get!

No one will ever replace you Ridgesee!!!....your help is all fine and good anytime you want to leave it and anywhere you want to leave it.......I guarantee it! Ya just cant get enuff help these days! cardschinmusic

"Son, we'd like to keep you around for the season but we're gonna try to win the pennant." Old Casey

by cardschinmusic on Mar 23, 2008 6:02 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

point being..

He's more attractive putting up a 2.50 era in AAA..than a 5.50 era in the majors. They've already tried shopping him to San Diego. If he gets another 10-15 starts and does poorly he lose whatever trade value he currently has. I personally wouldn't mind seeing him get another chance. As I said, I think they all suck so it doesn't really matter as far as wins and losses are concerned so you might as well see if he can turn it around. And sure, he could bust out like Haren, but at this point its looking less likely. BTW the Cards didn't trade Haren because they didn't believe in him. In fact Duncan pleaded that he not be traded. They traded him because they wanted Mark Mulder. In Reyes' case I think its a matter of Larussa/Duncan not believing in him. I do believe that Tony truly believes the Cardinals have a chance this year. I think he truly thinks that Wellemeyer, Looper, and Thompson give him a slight edge over Reyes so he's going with them. As far as their trade value is concerned...they have none. Thats not really a secret and it doesn't really matter for the argument being made because any of them could be shuttled to the bullpen and be useful. Hell, if need be Thompson and Wellemeyer could be unconditionally released if we needed the room on the roster. If all the pitchers return as expected and Perez and Motte continue to do what they are doing, they are gonna have nearly 20 major league pitchers buy the end of July.

Wainwright
Carpenter
Mulder
Clement
Pineiro
Lohse
Looper
Thompson
Reyes
Wellemeyer
Kinney
Johnson
Villone
Flores
Isringhausen
Springer
Perez
Motte
Franklin

7 of those guys are gonna have to go.

"Ding-dong the wicked witch is dead!" - Wayne Hagin after the cardinals snapped a losing streak

by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Mar 22, 2008 8:24 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He will not improve his value by pitching well in AAA

His spring stats are better than Jake Peavy's. Did you know that? If we are making our decision on spring stats, he beats Looper for sure. His trade value has been permanently hurt by them not wanting him in their rotation. They cannot take back the negative comments, nor the perception or reality of that simple fact.

Plus, what if he gets hurt? Then they really get nothing. I know he didn't pitch well here. But they are in this situation because they haven't committed to keep him or trade him. Limbo ain't the place for him either.........

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Mar 22, 2008 8:35 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

trade value..

2-14 6.02. Thats what hurt his trade value. His spring stats are better than a lot of pitchers, but not Wellemeyer's or Thompson's. Thats who he's competing with. He's not competing with Looper (though he should be). I guarantee if he's pitching lights out in AAA he has more value than if he's getting rocked at the big league level.

"Ding-dong the wicked witch is dead!" - Wayne Hagin after the cardinals snapped a losing streak

by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Mar 22, 2008 8:41 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I respectfully and emphatically disagree.

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Mar 22, 2008 8:43 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

a couple names that come to mind

Dewon Brazelton and Edwin Jackson significantly hurt their value by continuing to pitch in the majors

"Ding-dong the wicked witch is dead!" - Wayne Hagin after the cardinals snapped a losing streak

by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Mar 22, 2008 8:52 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

We now have Dewon Brazelton. If the Rays wanted to send Edwin Jackson

our way, I hope they'd have enough sense to say "Yes, Thank You." I would not be willing to throw him away just yet either.

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Mar 22, 2008 8:59 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yea i know we have brazelton

we signed him as a minor league free-agent thus illustrating my "no trade value" point. Hey if they wanna do Reyes for Jackson straight up I'd be okay with that too.

"Ding-dong the wicked witch is dead!" - Wayne Hagin after the cardinals snapped a losing streak

by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Mar 22, 2008 9:04 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I see that as illustrating my point. They held onto him hoping

he'd improve. He didn't. Reyes has 11K/2BB this spring. Someone out there is watching that. Just find out who it is and get the deal done.....Phillies, Indians, Padres, if they wanted him in the fall, he's done nothing to make them not want him in the spring. Make the best deal and be done with it.

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Mar 22, 2008 9:11 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cardinals asking price...

I'm sure their asking price was too high if they didn't get a deal done after discussions. It certainly wasn't because of the Cards unwillingness to trade him. Thus building on the theory that they want improved trade value. and not sure how the brazelton thing illustrates your point as my point was that keeping him on the team pitching poorly and hoping he improves hurts his value.

"Ding-dong the wicked witch is dead!" - Wayne Hagin after the cardinals snapped a losing streak

by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Mar 22, 2008 9:25 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And my point is why take that risk? Trade him right now.

Why risk him hurting himself in AAA or not pitching well again here. He's shown enough in spring to have caught someone's attention.

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Mar 22, 2008 9:28 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed on that

100 % agree to trade him now. but I thought the cards were having trouble with getting decent return on a deal. Anyways, fun debate but i'm one of those poor bastards that has to go to work on saturday mornings so I'm done.

"Ding-dong the wicked witch is dead!" - Wayne Hagin after the cardinals snapped a losing streak

by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Mar 22, 2008 9:33 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well then..... Thanks for playing.

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Mar 22, 2008 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not with the part that he's pitched poorly and that has hurt his trade value.

Yes. That's true. But how they handled him has hurt just as much. The demotion will hurt to.

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Mar 22, 2008 8:53 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And I don't know how this comment ended up way down here.

It was supposed to be way up there........

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Mar 22, 2008 9:24 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm on the 'trade now' page

I'd even offer Reyes straight up to the Indians for Grady Sizemore.
I'm not sure where we would play the Sizemore kid, but maybe we could find a spot.

by the Tewk on Mar 23, 2008 1:42 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sure. That kind of deal would, and should

cost Mark Shapiro his job.

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Mar 23, 2008 8:50 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hopefully this does the trick.....

http://tinyurl.com/2kjurd

"Son, we'd like to keep you around for the season but we're gonna try to win the pennant." Old Casey

by cardschinmusic on Mar 22, 2008 7:39 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Hopefully this will work...

http://tinyurl.com/2kjurd

"Son, we'd like to keep you around for the season but we're gonna try to win the pennant." Old Casey

by cardschinmusic on Mar 22, 2008 7:40 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Sorry...

Dunno how the double happened......

"Son, we'd like to keep you around for the season but we're gonna try to win the pennant." Old Casey

by cardschinmusic on Mar 22, 2008 7:41 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thank you-and you even know how to tinyurl.....

I'm mightily impressed. Thanks again.

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Mar 22, 2008 7:45 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Welcome!

My first post didnt show up, or I somehow missed it...so better not brag on me! : )

Interesting article...think Duncan will see it? Admit it if he did....?

"Son, we'd like to keep you around for the season but we're gonna try to win the pennant." Old Casey

by cardschinmusic on Mar 22, 2008 8:20 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I've been a Reyes supporter

but it's beginning to look like LaDunc may be right on this one. As detailed above, he has been given double digit major league starts the past two seasons and hasn't done much with them.
On another note, did you catch the info. on Clement topping out at 85 with his "heater?" We better not be counting on his coming to the rescue. It's beginning to look like he may be done, at least in the short term, and maybe permanently.

by vinniefromjersey on Mar 22, 2008 8:34 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I did read that

and it is troublesome. However, I think if he can get it up to 88 he'll be on the mound in saint louis. Thats another thing about Larussa/Duncan: mis-evaluating injuries. uggh...just let them recover and if they don't get back to at least over 90 percent healthy then keep them out.

"Ding-dong the wicked witch is dead!" - Wayne Hagin after the cardinals snapped a losing streak

by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Mar 22, 2008 8:37 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I hoped

And I know it was just wishfull thinking, but I hoped Looper was out and Reyes and Thompson both made the roatation. It seams to me that bewtween the three of them it is Loop that should loose the spot, and go to the pen.

by nybirdfan on Mar 22, 2008 8:44 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Well

I guess we now know who officially wears the pants in this family.

by mikedallas45 on Mar 22, 2008 8:44 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Oh, Snap!

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Mar 22, 2008 8:45 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't really have a problem with Wellemeyer & Thompson in the rotation. The dumb thing is the fact that Looper has been a "lock" for the rotation despite the fact he sucked last year and he has sucked horribly in Spring Training. The guy was a so-so relief pitcher. He's an ugly starter with NO upside. Sigh.

-- GOOCH

by GOOCH24 on Mar 22, 2008 9:51 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

you complain that Looper doesn't belong in the rotation

b/c he "has no upside" and yet you think it's OK that Thompson's in the rotation? What, exactly, is his upside? He's a serviceable major-league reliever at best -- an 11th or 12th man who can come in and eat up a few innings when you're getting blown out. He's not one of the 5 best pitchers on the team -- on any team -- even one w/ a pitching staff as poor as ours is.

by chuckb on Mar 22, 2008 10:19 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

What I don't get

It's been pretty obvious to anyone who's been coherent for the last 2 years or so that Duncan, in particular, and LaRussa also just doesn't like Reyes. They never have really had any intention of giving him major-league starts unless they were forced into doing it. It's astounding that beginning the year w/ Wellemeyer and Thompson in the rotation doesn't constitute being "forced" into starting Reyes, but I guess it doesn't.

What I don't get is this insistence that we not try him in the bullpen. There's this CW that says he's not going to do well in the 'pen but now...what do we have to lose? Could he not, w/ a hard fastball and a changeup make himself into a pretty good reliever? Why not? Is the injury risk still that great -- considering it's been about 5-6 years since he was injured? It makes no sense to send him to AAA to have him start games again. We know what he can do in AAA -- he's been much better than Thompson and Wellemeyer, BTW. Let's see if he can make himself into a setup man or possibly even a closer. What is there to lose?

by chuckb on Mar 22, 2008 10:24 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

curious idea

Reyes may never make an effective starter for anybody... after La/Dunc tweaked him out of his natural pattern.
My take on this long, sad saga is that Anthony was a powder river flame-thrower. But no, they had to "teach" him to keep the ball down and throw some sinkers.

And he doesn't even look like Greg Maddux. I will always wonder why they didn't just say, "here's the ball, son, go out there and 'throw'"

by the Tewk on Mar 23, 2008 1:56 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I also think that what you've

seen from Looper is what you"ll get from him going foward, somewhat erratic with occasional good starts.

I would also like to see Reyes get a full opportunity to prove he can't be a winner. In his whole time with the Cards, he has had to feel like a bird in a cage or a monkey on a hot seat.

My only concern with Reyes is he works to slow and deliberate. I think he out thinks himself. He obviously has minor league confidence but hasn't gained major league confidence...and the Cards have seemed not to recgonized or done anything to help in the matter.

I think if Reyes could end up with a team that is not hunting all over hell and creation for for a starting five, and was given a slot to prove himself, he would slowly come around and be better than a league average starter.

I just hope he doesn't throw his arm away trying to impress before that happens. I wouldn't mind seeing Looper move back to the pen as long relief and ocassional spot starter and Reyes get his shot now. That would end all speculation and controversy.

by ridgesee on Mar 22, 2008 10:30 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Here's my favorite part

of the article. As many know, I'm not exactly a huge Wellemeyer fan. I think he'd make an OK reliever, but he was poor as a starter last year. In the article, Duncan states, of Wellemeyer, "I like what I've seen so far with him. One of our concerns was (elevated) pitch counts. He's done a good job controlling those."

Shouldn't the concern w/ Wellemeyer be his career 5.62 BB/9 IP or his 4.10 BB/9 as a Cardinal last year? This spring he's walked 9 batters in 15 IP. That's 5.4 BB/9 IP -- entirely consistent w/ the rest of his career. I suppose those 4 pitch walks do provide the benefit of helping to keep the pitch count low!

by chuckb on Mar 22, 2008 10:41 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

yep...

... get a ground ball on the next pitch, and it's a double play! see? two outs in 5 pitches. remarkably efficient.

(i'm being sarcastic.)

by kindred on Mar 23, 2008 12:22 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Over the winter

there were rumors of WonderBrad being traded. THis could be an attempt to bolster Brads resume. What I am driving at is are they making Brad out to appear better, which in turn raises his value to other teams? If anything, Brad is the easiest replaceable cog in the machine. THere are several options in the minors that could take his place in the bullpen, and Reyes can take his place in the rotation. THis is a very plausible course of action. What I think is hilarious about this whole situation is how polar opposite they handled this situation compared to Ankiels. I'm not saying they were the same caliber, but they were both top prospects and they babied Ankiel and not Reyes. Kinda interesting if you ask me...

"It is easy to be brave from a safe distance." - Aesop

by OKCardsfan on Mar 22, 2008 12:52 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Eh

Reyes hasn't pitched particularly well. They send him down and keep Thompson.

whatever.

The real story is how absolutely god awful our rotation is. We are sending out 3 replacement level or worse starters in Looper, Thompson and Wellemeyer. The first two have no outpitch and the last one can't get the ball over the plate. That is a shit-tastic rotation. We haven't seen anything this bad in a while and it's going to be eye opening to fans when things start to go bad. It's not going to go a little bad -- it's going to implode in the apocalyptic sense.

by azruavatar on Mar 22, 2008 1:28 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Well, two of those guys are placeholders

for Piñeiro and Clement. Not that that's a great rotation, but last years' was pretty horrid, too, no?

"You say the world has lost it's love. I say embrace what it's made of" - Dar Williams

by Valatan on Mar 23, 2008 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

true

I just wonder when they'll be back, how effective they'll be once back and how long they'll stay healthy. I'm just very pessimistic about our starters this year.

by azruavatar on Mar 23, 2008 6:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

The best case scenario almost seems to be that Carp comes back and at least is able to hold 2004 performance, and Clement performs adequately, and the team at least has some hope for 2009.

"You say the world has lost it's love. I say embrace what it's made of" - Dar Williams

by Valatan on Mar 23, 2008 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Here's my problem

I feel it's all about comparing their value. Maybe Thompson can put up slightly better numbers as a starter, but we KNOW he can pitch in relief, Reyes may turn out to be awful in relief. He's not a relief pitcher while Thompson is used to that role. So doesn't it only make sense to keep Thompson in relief (and I'm someone who enjoys seeing Thompson as a starter). This reminds me a lot of the Ryan Franklin situation. Sure, he could do better than some of our current starters, but we trust him in relief over a lot of the other guys, so we keep him there.

But then again, who knows, maybe Reyes will be a star set-up man by year's end . . .

On with the (good) youth movement!

by aet15 on Mar 22, 2008 1:35 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

franchise direction

The problem, as I see it, is that the franchise does not know where it's headed. They canned Walt because he was perceived as unwilling to change his ways, to value youth and talent over experience. But they didn't get rid of Tony, who doesn't want to participate in the rebuilding process. So, they're trying to renew and compete at the same time.

Maybe it's possible, but the stars would have to align perfectly for it to happen. The rotation would have to stay/get healthy and suspect pitchers like Looper/ Thomson/Piniero/Wellmeyer etc. would have to produce. Albert and Glaus would have to stay healthy. They 'll be relying on a corps of outfielders as green as the grass they patrol. And they'd have to get something out of the least inspiring middle infield most of us can remember. Maybe they'll surprise me, but my hopes are low.

Assuming they won't compete for the division, why not tell Reyes that he gets to go out there every five days until Carp and Mulder are back in form? Tell him the job is presumptively his. With Wellmeyer and Thomson, we all breathe a sign of relief when they labor through five and give up only three runs. There's no upside there. They just fill space and it's difficult to fathom why LaDuncan believes otherwise. There's upside with Reyes. We've all seen it. Even if Reyes busts, it likely won't be the difference between making and missing the playoffs. Why not give him the shot? (the answer isn't 'to build up his trade value;' three good months in Memphis won't get it much higher than it is today; he's proven himself in the minors; he won't be worth anything till he does it in the bigs)

by EasternCardsFan on Mar 22, 2008 4:23 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Reyes has already busted...

... many many many many many times over the past two seasons.

by kindred on Mar 23, 2008 12:29 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

least inspiring middle infield most of us can remember

man, do you have THAT right. Not to throw creds around, but I have been knowledgeable following my Birds since 1957, and I cannot recall a bleaker SS/2b situation EVER.

by the Tewk on Mar 23, 2008 2:05 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly

Rec Rec Rec Rec Rec Rec Rec Rec. That is all.

by mikedallas45 on Mar 23, 2008 8:40 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The real potentially stupid roster decision...

is this - http://stlouis.cardinals.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20080321&content_id=2448842&vkey=spt2008news&fext=.jsp&c_id=stl.

Just because Ryan is out for a couple of days doesn't justify Jimenez all of a sudden making the roster, does it? I don't think Ryan has lost his upside like Reyes has. Plus, in no way has he played himself out of a job. He hit .289 last year and was an average defender, and has hit 120 points higher than Jimenez this Spring.

by kblakestl on Mar 22, 2008 5:48 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Chill.... Tests proved no broken bones

Ryan will be on the bench in St. Louis come March 31. I think we're not use to having so many strong contenders from AAA to keep pressure on the guys in the BIGS to keep their roster spot. I think most managers like this to keep the players sharp and focus. It will be a busy season on this board as we all say who should be on the 25 man roster and who shouldn't be there, not to mentioned trades, DFA's and what not. Should be interesting.

by OKCARDSFAN_411 on Mar 22, 2008 7:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is retarded.

This is why TRL should never have been brought back, the Cardinals have no shot of finishing .500, let alone competeing. As an organization the owe it to themselves to see what Reyes can do over a full season of consistent starts. If they never had any intention of doing this they should have dealt him months ago.

"You know, as that was coming out of my mouth, I knew that it was wrong."

by JI on Mar 22, 2008 7:46 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

as an organization...

... they "owe it" to themselves, the fans, and the players to field the best 25 man roster that they can. and, since Thompson is a better player than Reyes up to this point in their careers, they will be doing that if they give the spot to Thompson.

as for trading him, Mo tried. but apparently nobody thought very much of him. maybe it's because every other team has seen him be one of the worst pitchers in baseball the past few seasons.

you can argue that Reyes' problems are due to Dunc's tinkering if you like. but you can't argue that he's been really, really bad. at this point, i don't know what team in the majors would give him a spot in the starting rotation. and certainly, nobody will trade anything of value for him.

by kindred on Mar 23, 2008 12:32 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

wrong

Playing the best 25 guys won't accomplish anything this year. Do you honestly believe there is a tangable difference between winning 74 games instead of 70? What's the point? The Cards are stuck in the mud and they need to what's best for the organization going forwards.

Reyes still has pretty decent upside. Players like Thompson and Wellmeyer are roster filler with no upside, if they commit to them over players with potential upsideand they will continue to spin their wheels. Not only that but I bet if Reyes were given the chance I bet he'd likely outpitch both of them (which isn't saying much). The Cardinals are basically in the same place the Mariners were after the 2004 season-- the buy AND build philosophy is almost a guaranteed recipe for repeated 78 win seasons.

Reyes hasn't been great, but he hasn't been as bad most would believe. W-L ERA are junk stats, they only tell us about what a pitcher has done, and not what he is likely to do. Don't use them when evaluating pitchers.

"You know, as that was coming out of my mouth, I knew that it was wrong."

by JI on Mar 23, 2008 10:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not to mention

Winning 70 games instead of 74 could also spell a better draft slot.

Not that it's something to shoot for, but it's a nice side effect of the inevitable bit of suckage that comes with player development.

by mojowo11 on Mar 23, 2008 11:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

if you'll notice...

... in all my posts regarding Reyes/Thompson, i've never once used W/L records. not once.

and i'll rest my case by simply noting that you are literally advocating playing inferior players because you think that will move the organization forward. i don't know what kind of monkey syllogism you created to reach that conclusion, but it's one i've never seen before.

i'll try applying that line of thinking to another roster decision, and we'll see how you like it: we know that Brendan Ryan's skill set is limited, and he probably played above his head last year. therefore, we should play (inferior player) Miles instead of Ryan at every opportunity, in order to move to organization forward.

pretty absurd, see? it's called a non sequitur.

also: see my post below about "upside". "upside" is a nebulous concept, akin to "grit". it doesn't help you win games, and people who use it as an argument in favor of one particular player are doing so in order to make their way around the statistical evidence. "upside" doesn't last forever, and Reyes will turn 27 in Oct. at what point do you just say that he, like many many prospects before him, just wasn't as good as the projections thought he'd be?

by kindred on Mar 24, 2008 12:18 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No I'm not advocating that at all.

I'm not sure what you mean. Why is it stupid to bench Ryan, while it's ok to bench Reyes for Aaron Miles' pitching equivalent? Explain please. The killer is that Ryan's upside--his ceiling-- is an inoffensive, cheap, league average SS, Reyes upside is much more valuable. I think you know what I mean by playing "the best 25" so spare me the BS huh? If the Devil Rays had tried to field their "best 25" over the past 2-3 years they wouldn't be in position to be a yearly contender.

So do you actually think Wellemeyer and Thompson have more potential than Reyes?

Reyes not only has more upside, he gives us the best change to win right now.

Let's just assume for a second that somehow Reyes produces the results he did last year, let us also assume that Wellemeyer, despite his clearly inferior skillset, somehow repeats what he did last year (even though he only averaged 4.45 IP/GS) some how posts a 3.50 ish ERA over the course of the season, the net gain on this is probably 3-4 wins at most?

Here's the thing, Reyes is better than Wellemeyer RIGHT NOW. Reyes was ok last year for the most part, his biggest problem was that he was absurdly bad with runners on base. In fact, he was so terrible with runners on the he couldn't possibly be that terrible again. Reyes doesn't walk a lot guys, doesn't give up a ton of hits, he gets his fair share of Ks, and he can last more than 4 innings a start. No he's not an ace in waiting, but the potential is there for him to be an above average pitcher, if only TRL would stop jerking him around.

Todd Wellemeyer, should he crack this rotation, would be one of the very worst starters in baseball. Hell, the .500ish Mariners have better starting pitchers at the back end of their bullpen and they employ Jarrod Washburn.

"You know, as that was coming out of my mouth, I knew that it was wrong."

by JI on Mar 24, 2008 12:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not impressed at all

with the way this organization has handled Reyes. I am not going to argue statistical projections (which I personally think are WAY overused, especially for young players) I just like the guy. I like his 4-seam fastball and his changeup. I wish he had a better curve (and I believe it will come around). I am sad to see him go, but I do believe he will not start another game for the Cards. It's shame, but at least maybe he will get a fair shake somewhere else.

Oh yeah, I almost forgot, I have been a closet Miles fan for the last year and this is my official coming out. I understand why many don't like him and I respect that, but I like the way he plays the game. I would rather have him start at short than Izturis (I realize that isn't saying much).

There, I feel better. Go cards.

Billy Crystal is a tougher out than Izturis.

by tangledbrett on Mar 22, 2008 9:56 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I have never understood their attitude. Ever.

I'm even madder at Mr. Mozeliak. I really am. He said he wanted him in the starting rotation. And he's not. And they announce it a few days after he pitched 4 scoreless innings against the Braves. And yeah, T.Man, Kelly Johnson and Chipper Jones were in it. I suppose you could say Wellemeyer has pitched better if you don't mind 9 BB in 15 innings and hitting a batter in the face. There is no way you can say Looper pitched better. None.

I figured that Mr. Reyes would be traded when LaRussa and Duncan were coming back. When he wasn't I thought maybe they all had some kind of new understanding of each other and could go forward and try to get his issues worked out, It's obvious that's not the case. Mr. LaRussa gets what he wants and now the only thing Mr. Mozeliak can do is trade him to whoever makes the best offer.

I don't know if he's going to turn it around; he might, he might not. This just seemed like the year to find out.

Honestly, I'm not a big fan of Aaron Miles, but he's fine as long as he's not over exposed. No. I do not want him playing shortstop. Not even one inning.

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Mar 22, 2008 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

"Want" is a strong word...

I wouldn't say I "want" miles starting at short, I would just prefer him to Icky-2. I agree that overexposure would severely damage the scrappy Miles. His value is in a limited role.

Peace,
I'm outta here.

Billy Crystal is a tougher out than Izturis.

by tangledbrett on Mar 22, 2008 11:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hitting in the face...

Great point there. I remember a couple instances last year. Someone on the Reds had a ball get away from him and almost took one of our guys heads off. Maybe it was Harang, not sure. But that's not the point.

The point is that after the game, Tony put his macho hat on and brought his fungo bat to the press conference and said something to the effect of that he understands people get hit, but throwing near someones head is unacceptable. He adds that there should be a 2 week suspension anytime it happens, accidental or not because big leaguers should have better control than that.

Fast forward a few months to the one that got away from Andy Cavasos. I felt bad for Andy really, because it was absolutely unintentional and I am sure it shook him up. But I was curious what LaRussa would do. Well Tony put him out there a little later on. Certainly less than 2 weeks.

And now Wellmeyer had one slip. I don't really think he should be benched. But that's what Tony said he'd do when things went the other way around. Oh the hypocrisy!

by Merry CRasmus on Mar 24, 2008 1:20 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Im pretty sure I remember Tony saying

He wouldn't do it because it's not a rule. And he doesn't expect other teams to do it because it's not a rule. Just that it should be a rule.

And Tony can be pretty rough on his guys when they hit someone in the head. He has a dog house is apparently hard to get out of.

by Evilfrog on Mar 24, 2008 10:15 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Todd Wellemeyer is our #2 starter

LaRussa announced today that Todd "Hey, let's try pitching around this guy" Wellemeyer will get the ball in the second game of the season.

Hope Wainer has a good first game or else we'll be staring down 0-2 and then probably 1-4 REAL quick.

Still looking for 1985 Regular Season games on DVD/VHS

by Hardcore Legend on Mar 23, 2008 12:01 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

maybe we will get lucky

and go 0 and 10... and then 2 and 18
Then maybe the necessary re-building will start sooner. Seven/eighths of a re-building year is better than half a year, or none at all.

... spoken by one who believes PLAY THE KIDS.

by the Tewk on Mar 23, 2008 2:20 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Reyes...

... why people still think he has so much "upside" is beyond me. yeah, his AAA numbers were great and he pitched two good games in high leverage situations, but he's lost 3-5 mph on his fastball, he's lost control of his change-up, and he's never had a major-league quality breaking ball. not only are his performances sub-par, but his stuff isn't even any good anymore.

i also never understood the notion that this mystical "upside" quality is a reason to give someone a roster spot ahead of someone else who is playing better. give the job to the best player.

Thompson has simply been better than Reyes, for whatever reason, in the past couple of seasons. in 241 career IP, Thompson has an ERA+ of 109. in 206 IP, Reyes has an ERA+ of 81. yeah, i know, relieving is different than starting, yadda yadda yadda. but i'm not sure you can convince me that it's 28 ERA+ points different. in nearly 92 IP as a starter last year, Thompson put up a 4.66 ERA; Reyes pitched 104 innings with a 5.71 ERA. Reyes had twice as many Ks, but more BBs and HRs allowed. Thompson also averaged more innings per start despite not conditioning for the role.

to this point in their career Thompson has simply been a better pitcher than Reyes. he was two years ago, he was last year, and he has been so far this year. TLR and Dunc have noticed this, so they're giving the spot to Thompson. and why not? he's earned it. Reyes hasn't.

by kindred on Mar 23, 2008 12:48 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

this mystical "upside" quality

is some reason (such as the extra 3-5 mph Reyes used to have, some error you can point to that a pitcher could possibly learn to correct like improving pitching with men on base, simply being younger than 27 or 28) to believe that the player can do better than he currently is doing if he gets the chance to get more acclimated to the major-league game. I agree that there isn't much reason to believe that Reyes has much of this quality, but your doctrine of "give the job to the best player" is definitely overly simplistic. Giving Juan Gonzalez at-bats over anybody less than 30 in a season where you're NOT going to get to the playoffs is a waste of time even if Juan Gone gets 20 points more OPS than said player this season. Giving Brad Thompson starts over anybody who could still develop into a decent starter is a waste of time even if Puppy Kicker gets 0.20 lower ERA in his starts this season.

Like I said, though, I agree Reyes isn't particularly likely to do much better. He needs that 3-5 mph back on his fastball, and whether he needs another pitching coach or another medical staff, he needs the h-e-double hockey sticks out of this organization. At this point I don't even care about trying to get anything back for him. A low-A second base prospect is fine with me. DFA him and let the Nats pick him up rather than send him back to AAA. He has -0- to prove in AAA, except conceivably that he's not injured.

"Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals." --Churchill

by lordsummer on Mar 25, 2008 9:20 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

How come...

Reyes is considered still developing at young age of 26 and Thompson is a finished product at ripe old age of 26?

by Evilfrog on Mar 25, 2008 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

talent

Signatures are for Communists.

by JI on Mar 25, 2008 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The other two things I mentioned in parentheses at the beginning of the post.

Look, I only told you twice that I don't think Reyes is actually going to get better (here, for sure), plus an additional time where I said there's no point in sending him to AAA. I don't think he's still "developing"--why send him back to the minors, then? I don't believe he'll pitch well in the Cardinals rotation. Too many things would have to go spectacularly right. But that's pretty true of Thompson as well. In fact, it's more true of Thompson, because he would have to magically grow new pitcher ability that he's never had, rather than magically regain the extra zip on his fastball that Reyes at least used to have. That's not development or growth; that's repair and salvage.

That's not to say that, in the much more likely event that they both pitch about the way they did last year, that Thompson will stink any more than Reyes will. If those are your only two choices, with Duncan, LaRussa, and everything else around them that should affect their performance staying pretty much the same, I'd pitch Thompson.

"Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals." --Churchill

by lordsummer on Mar 25, 2008 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think Thompson will be really awful,

and considering the short outings we going to be getting from most of our starters, I think he should go back to long relief where he'll really be an asset to this club.

Signatures are for Communists.

by JI on Mar 25, 2008 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Reyes

I'm a Reyes supporter and heres why. LaRussa and Duncan have been jerking him around since 2005. Despite the limited sample size, he pitched well when they called on him in 05. Then in 06 they forced him to throw a pitch that went against everything he had normally and lost the sham contest to Ponson (I'm not saying he should have won but Wainwright was by far the best performer and only got a bullpen spot out of it). After that he's been on the bus between Memphis and STL never really guaranteed he wouldn't lose his job. And yes, when life gives you an opportunity you have to grab it or its all gone, but some people don't perform best under those situations. I don't think that he's "lost" those MPHs on his fastball or the control of his change but I think he's lost his heart for this team.

And thats what kills me about Reyes, I feel as though the talent is still there, it's just that he's lost his motivation for this team. I think he's in the same category as Danny Haren, if we let him go he might not be an all star but he will definitely become at least a league average third starter (someone who blossoms after leaving). Just as Percival said when he left the team, if you get on LaRussa's bad side then you don't really have a good chance to contribute (or something like that) and thats how I see it at least.

by Chicago Cardinals on Mar 23, 2008 2:37 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I don't quite agree that he's lost his heart or motivation for this team.

He did his work in the off season. He came in to spring training in good shape. He came in throwing strikes. He went out on one of those 2 day three stop caravans and mingled with the fans. I think what ever that "list" Mr. LaRussa has of all the things he must do to pitch for this team has things on it that he can never do. And there's something sad when D. Goold writes that we will never know his true talent until after he's gone. Things don't always quite add up either. Last year he gets demoted after he pitches one of his better games against the Mets. This year the announcement comes after he pitches 4 scoreless innings against the Braves. Now if you think there's a lack of motivation, maybe it comes from that. It might be more accurate to call it frustration than motivation.

What I don't understand is why if they won't pitch him, they haven't traded him either. His record here has been awful-they claim they can't get "value" for him. Any player you might use has more value than a player you won't.

He may never figure it out. But I think he's got a chance to if he gets with an organization that evaluates him in terms of what he can do instead of what he can't. And that has never happened here.

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Mar 23, 2008 8:33 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Is it possible to be mad about

the way Reyes has been treated, and believe he just ain't very good? Because both statements are true about me. I don't know how many more chances he needs to show that he can go out for perhaps 3 starts in a row and just get through the first 3 innings without coughing up 4 runs. I hope one of two things happens: 1) Reyes gets traded and almost immediately becomes a stud, so incontrovertibly good that everyone can rub it in LaDuncs' faces over and over; or 2) he gets traded, gets treated fairly and yet never develops into anything special. One way or another, he ought to go somewhere else so we can just stop talking about it.

by MdRedbirdFreak on Mar 23, 2008 6:27 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

well I don't think he's an ace

but I think there is #3 type potential there

If they let him pitch he'll probably be the second best starter on the team. (which isn't saying much)

"You know, as that was coming out of my mouth, I knew that it was wrong."

by JI on Mar 23, 2008 10:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

That's a valid point. Whether or not he was ever going to pan out, he hasn't exactly had anyone putting faith in him. Some people might say he should just suck it up, but I think that they should've given the guy a legit chance with some solid backing -- at no point has anyone ever told him, "You're our guy.".

And I disagree that he couldn't be good. Ever since I sat in the stands at US Cellular Field and watched him 1-hit the White Sox (and lose 1-0 on a Thome homer) a few years back, I've wondered why they won't put some stock in him.

by mojowo11 on Mar 23, 2008 11:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Reyes...

... has been given 37 regular season starts for the Cards in the last two years. that's more than anyone else in the organization.

you can't honestly that he's not been given his chances. everyone knew that he was getting a rotation spot last year out of ST, he was given that slot, and he blew it. he'll likely get another chance this year at some point, but he's not owed anything.

by kindred on Mar 24, 2008 12:24 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The point is that they wouldn't stick with him last year

even though we were a terrible team desperate for starting pitching

"You know, as that was coming out of my mouth, I knew that it was wrong."

by JI on Mar 24, 2008 12:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

we were desperate for pitching...

... partially because he (and Wells) was so bad.

i'll say it once again: Reyes has had more starts than anyone else in the Cards' organization in the past two seasons. if your argument is that he hasn't been given opportunities, then you've got to answer that point.

by kindred on Mar 24, 2008 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

they why wouldn't they pitch him

when they were out of contention last year?

why won't they pitch him now when the rest of the rotation is horrible?

And two years is sort of an arbitrary period.

Wainwright is younger and made his debut later, Carpenter missed a whole season. Much of the roster had mediocre veterans that were turned over and replaced with different mediocre veterans.

It not that he hasn't been given any opportunities, it's that NOW in the PRESENT TENSE they've given up on him in favor of vastly inferior options.

"You know, as that was coming out of my mouth, I knew that it was wrong."

by JI on Mar 24, 2008 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, you silly man. We will never stop talking about it.

How long have you been coming here?

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Mar 24, 2008 11:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Reyes

I thought he got shut down last year because his shoulder was sore??

I think he got skipped at one point but it's not like the Cards shut him down last year. I seem to remember Reyes complaining about shoulder stiffness and he was shut down for the season some time in August.

by ICbirdfan on Mar 24, 2008 6:11 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Reyes gone by the end of the week?

Strauss believes so. Figures about half of the MLB teams will have scouts watching the game tomorrow. If there is any time Reyes needs to pitch for himself this is it.

by Evilfrog on Mar 24, 2008 7:00 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Half the major league teams will have scouts there?

Well, that lies to rest the idea that no one is interested in him, now doesn't it? For his sake, I hope he gets the hell out of town.

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Mar 24, 2008 7:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.
Start posting about the Cardinals »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Avatar_small
How to EASILY make tables for Fanposts
1753738656_110919ebe9_o_small
2010 Hot Stove Post #1: CHONE hitter projections

Recent FanPosts

Arch_small
Number 15
Small
Some thoughts on Holliday (and potential replacements)
Small
Ok let me try this again...
Knights-09_small
Disenchanted Blue Jays Fan Looking For A New Team
Painterlance_small
The Holliday Dilemma (Rocks Fan Perpsective)
375830-r1-025-11_011_small
Anybody read Bob Gibson's new book yet?
Flanders_small
Yadi2first
Small
40 Man Question..

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Jack_benny_small DanUpBaby

Editors

Bender1_small azruavatar

Adam1_small chuckb

Kid-a-bear_small the red baron