Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Raiders' GM Begins The Purge

Hot Stove fanspost 12-4-12-12 or 250 comments whichever occurs first.

 

Wow big news this week

  • Khalil Greene  is flying into St. Louis and flying to San Diego will be 2 relief prospects.
  • Trever Miller Deal Finally Finalized 1yr 2mil max including incentives.
  • Winter Meetings start Monday

The Greene News is from the New York Post so I take it with a grain of salt but the last time I did a Headline like this It took two weeks for it to come to fruition.

 

 

 

Poll of the Week

Poll
Which need will MO fill next?
2B
74 votes
Closer
24 votes
Loogy
38 votes
5th Starter
86 votes
other (specify in comments)
4 votes
none (all aquisitions have been made)
6 votes
I almost forgot Tony's Impact Bat
7 votes

239 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 279 comments  |  4 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I was going to say 5th starter

but then I realized I wanted to say 2nd or 3rd Starter. also, Moz will want to go chronologically I think, and keep concentrating on middle infield. whether that means Felipe Lopez or not is anyone’s guess. I just hope we get another starter (trade the farm for Halladay!)

this line is dedicated to '09

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Dec 4, 2008 1:21 AM EST reply actions  

I agree with the 5th starter

I’d rather it be a 2-3 starter. I voted for that one, taking it to mean the fifth starter on out roster, not a #5 starter. I think that Greene is going to be our only big MIF acquisition so I say a starter is the new priority. I’m content with a Kennedy-Greene combo with a little grit thrown in once in awhile. Then instead of 4 MIFs on the roster we can have Freese…

Two goldfish are in a tank. One of them turns to the other and says, "You man the guns, I'll drive!"

by thegodfather on Dec 4, 2008 4:35 PM EST up reply actions  

yes

Freese…

this line is dedicated to '09

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Dec 4, 2008 5:02 PM EST up reply actions  

I voted 5th starter as well

thinking it meant a 5th starter to our rotation. I’m also okay with an AK-Khalil MIF but I still fear a potential Floppy signing….bad dreams…

Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...

by RunninRedbird on Dec 4, 2008 6:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Signing Floppy is a bad dream

Izzy closing again is a horrid, unimaginable nightmare

Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...

by RunninRedbird on Dec 5, 2008 4:34 PM EST up reply actions  

+1

"No matter where you go, there you are" Buckeroo Bonzai Across the 8th Dimension

by sportsman on Dec 8, 2008 10:09 AM EST up reply actions  

Looks like a fantastic deal with Greene.

My gal always called him “Uglier Eminem” years ago. I told her “Hey hun, guess who we got?” and she joked “Khalil Greene? ’Cause if I have to look at his ugliness in person, he better hit .350” and I was like “…Well, yeah. Khalil Greene.”

It’s not what you are on the outside, Khalil. Play hard and get in scoring position, and we’ll love you no matter what white rapper you look like.

Miles in '08

by Zoop on Dec 4, 2008 3:30 AM EST reply actions  

Also, I voted 2B

I’m reeeeally big on Hudson, though I know not everyone is. He’s my pipe dream this winter.

Miles in '08

by Zoop on Dec 4, 2008 3:30 AM EST up reply actions  

Isnt' Hudson a Type A player?

I wouldn’t want to give up our draft pick for him. I don’t know what we could do to fill that hole, but I don’t think that Hudson, while good, is worth the pick. Even letting Ryan play the position would be preferable to me.

by JBagKY on Dec 4, 2008 8:11 AM EST up reply actions  

Hudson...

Is overrated IMO. Yes he is a good ball player but dont shell out 10 million for an injury prone second basemen who is not worth anywhere near that kind of money. I’d rather keep Kennedy or even bring Grudz back for 1 year and platoon him with Miles or Ryan.

Trade Ankiel instead of Luddy!!! Why go buy an impact bat when we got one?

by Ibeatanorexia06 on Dec 4, 2008 1:47 PM EST up reply actions  

I see from the following article that Khalil Greene is coming over for....

some pitching. Anyone know which pitcher(s) the Cards are giving for him?

Link:

http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/2008/dec/03/padres-cardinals-agree-deal-will-send-greene-st-lo/?padres

People ask me what I do in winter when there's no baseball. I'll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring.-Rogers Hornsby

by thegashousegang on Dec 4, 2008 6:58 AM EST up reply actions  

Update

Mark Worrell (who went ape**** in a recent interview) and a PTBNL.

by mojowo11 on Dec 4, 2008 4:17 PM EST up reply actions  

thank you!

I just went and looked up that interview and I can see why the Redbirds traded him…. thanks for the info!

People ask me what I do in winter when there's no baseball. I'll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring.-Rogers Hornsby

by thegashousegang on Dec 4, 2008 4:50 PM EST up reply actions  

I say 2b -- it's now the biggest question mark.

Mo is not going to want to drop big coin on a starter or closer knowing that he may be pricing himself out of a good trade for a salary dump 2b. The market, especially for starters, is pretty deep and likely to move slow. St. Louis is a desirable destination for FA pitchers, too.

It would also help to sell Kennedy so we know how much salary we have to eat there.

LOOGY is also a good answer — the market is smaller and likely to move faster. The prices are less likely to fluctuate.

by tom s. on Dec 4, 2008 6:14 AM EST reply actions  

Dave Duncan Fodder

Link

"He has four pitches and three are above-average pitches," Duncan said during an interview with "The Sports Edge" on KFNS (590 AM). "That’s what you look for in a starting pitcher. I’m of the belief Kyle McClellan has the attributes to become a starting pitcher, and a good one, at the major league level."

If I could rec that comment, I would.

The Cards must add an established closer. If Mozeliak can’t land one, Duncan would be open to giving Jason Isringhausen another look in that role in the spring.

"If he does everything he has to do to recover from the injuries he had and he wants to give it a shot, I’d vote ‘yes’ to giving him a shot," Duncan said. "I know he’s interested in trying to continue pitching."

The lead in to this isn’t a quote so maybe Gordo is adding his thoughts (gasp!) to Duncan’s quotes. If Duncan is really of the opinion that a) we need a proven closer and b) Izzy is a viable option, than we’ve gone two steps back from his previous step forward.

If the Cards started the season without a proven closer, Duncan would use a "mix and match" approach in the bullpen, deploying Perez, Motte, Kinney, Ryan Franklin and the best late-inning lefty according to the situation.

Can we just leave the last name out of the mix. We know that doesn’t work.

by azruavatar on Dec 4, 2008 9:04 AM EST reply actions  

what they need is another Putz in the pen

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2008/12/mariners-make-p.html thye’d probably require alot and he did have issues last yr..

I can't believe i gave up a homerun to that punch and judy hitter-major league 2

by punchinjudy on Dec 4, 2008 12:45 PM EST up reply actions  

He's going to end up with the Mets, I'd imagine

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Dec 4, 2008 12:55 PM EST up reply actions  

McClellan

I like McClellan as a #5, if he will be able to handle the load.

I don’t like that next year’s pitching staff seems to be set. Assuming three things: 1) McClellan in the 5 role, 2) Carpenter as OUT, and 3) it’s a 12-man staff, here’s what it looks like to me:

Adam Wainwright – a good #1
Kyle Lohse – a below average #2, unless his season is like last year’s
Todd Wellemeyer – an average #3, unless his season is like last year’s
Joel Pineiro – a very bad #4 last year, a below average #5…unless he reverts closer to his career norms, not good.
Kyle McClellan – possibly a very good #5, possibly a good #4, possibly an average #3…could pitch 100 innings and his arm be kaput for the rest of the year.

Boggs – #5 if/when McClellan goes down or someone else fails
Thompson – other long reliever
Perez
Motte
Miller
Flores/Manning/TJ
Franklin

by stlfan on Dec 4, 2008 4:31 PM EST up reply actions  

I said 2B and I'm hoping for...

…a trade with the Angels for Howie Kendrick.

by sabertooth5185 on Dec 4, 2008 9:36 AM EST reply actions  

I'd be all for that

except that I’m afraid of the effect it would have on hardcore legend’s sanity…

god, i love baseball. -roy hobbs

by SleepyCA on Dec 4, 2008 9:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Then he was out of our price range...

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Dec 4, 2008 12:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Am I the only one

who thinks it’s a good thing we didn’t end up with Renteria (esp at that price)?

"A genius is a guy like Norman Einstein." - Joe Theismann

by Futility Infielder on Dec 4, 2008 4:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Lemme try that again: Let's put it this way

He got $9 million+ per year from Sabean, the same GM who gave Zito $18-20 million per year through 2014.

Don’t worry, all the sane people of the world agree with you. $9 million+ is insanity for Renteria. Sabean is a nut.

by mojowo11 on Dec 4, 2008 4:50 PM EST up reply actions  

it only takes one BSI GM

I imagine 29 others are shaking their heads right now, saying “wtf!”

god, i love baseball. -roy hobbs

by SleepyCA on Dec 4, 2008 9:52 PM EST up reply actions  

No, that's way more than he's worth right now

That’s only $2M less than what the Tigers could have optioned him for — and that was only for 2009! The Giants are on the hook for another year after that!

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Dec 4, 2008 5:29 PM EST up reply actions  

I have a feeling that...

Greene will be sold to us as the “big” acquisition for the MIF. I’m ok with that as long as the 2B is AT LEAST AS GOOD as Felipe Lopez and we don’t trade Ryan Ludwick. I don’t think anyone can deny being more excited about a K. Greene/ Lopez combo than an Izturiz/Kennedy combo.

Lopez on a 1 year deal wouldn’t be horrible, and it doesn’t tie the team down long term or cost the cardinals Ryan Ludwick.

Is the difference between Lopez and Kelly Johnson so much that we’d be willing to give up Ludwick? Or is everyone just writing Ludwick’s MONSTER season as a fluke? I don’t think its a risk worth taking.

I think the cardinals next moves should be more focused on ditching players (Kennedy, Pineiro, Flores). Once we can do that, it should clear up more money to determine what kind of 2B/Starting P combo we’d be able to go for.

I hate winter!!!!

by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Dec 4, 2008 1:46 PM EST reply actions  

I like the Greene Deal

He has the defense that we need at the position and offensive potential. Honestly, last year no one besides Gonzalez was good on the Padres offense last year. Bad offense can be contaigious. I think Greene will bounce back and have a good season for us. I expect .265/ 15 HR/ 70 RBI out of him. Which is fantastic production and a big upgrade over Izturis.

If we trade Luddy for anything less than a number 2 starter and a prospect, I will be mad.

Trade Ankiel instead of Luddy!!! Why go buy an impact bat when we got one?

by Ibeatanorexia06 on Dec 4, 2008 1:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Is Lopez the only FA 2B worth signing?

Willie Bloomquist (31)
Craig Counsell (38)
Ray Durham (37)
Damion Easley (39)
David Eckstein (34)
Mark Grudzielanek (39) – Type B, offered arb
Jerry Hairston Jr. (33)
Orlando Hudson (31) – Type A, offered arb
Tadahito Iguchi (34)
Jeff Kent (41) – Type B, not offered arb
Felipe Lopez (29)
Mark Loretta (37) – Type B, not offered arb
Ramon Martinez (36)
Pablo Ozuna (34)
Nick Punto (31)
Luis Rivas (29)

I think the answer is yes unless you are okay with giving up $50 for 5 years for Hudson and a 1st round pick

I hate winter!!!!

by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Dec 4, 2008 3:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Ugh

What a list….

"A genius is a guy like Norman Einstein." - Joe Theismann

by Futility Infielder on Dec 4, 2008 4:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Actually

If you could get Ray Durham on a one year contract for around $3M-$4M that might not be a bad deal. He gets on base at a good clip, but doesn’t have the speed or power that he used to have. He has lost a step defensively, but you could still carry Kennedy on the roster as a defensive replacement in the late innings. Durham would provide a MI that could lead-off, especially against lefties, and allow the club to play Mather or Duncan (hopefully) more in the outfield.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Dec 4, 2008 3:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Need bench MI to play SS and 2B

The bench MI needs to be able to play SS so Kennedy as the bench MI would result in another spot taken by Miles to act as the backup 3B/SS/2B. This would repeat this year’s lack of bench power and ability to spot start a true 3B to rest Glaus. The roster this year must include a 3B who can hit the ball out of the infield without bouncing it off the mound first.

by ubeddie on Dec 5, 2008 1:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Kennedy could play SS in a pinch

He came up as a SS. I have a feeling that Freese will be on the roster filling the Speezer role from 2005 and 2006. Ideally, you could trade Kennedy and pick up $2M of his salary, sign Durham to lead off, deal Schumaker in combination with someone (Kennedy, Mather, Anderson, etc.) to fill a need in the rotation or bullpen, and would open up a spot for Rasmus or Mather to get a lot of AB’s as a member of the starting OF in 2009. In that situation, Miles or Brendan Ryan can be the utility man.

To be honest, the D-backs have shown interest in Kennedy and need a productive corner outfielder, so why not trade them Schumaker, Anderson, and Kennedy for someone like Micah Owings or Max Scherzer?

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Dec 5, 2008 2:54 PM EST up reply actions  

micah owings...

went to the reds to complete the adam dunn deal

I hate winter!!!!

by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Dec 5, 2008 5:15 PM EST up reply actions  

I must have missed that piece of info...

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Dec 6, 2008 11:27 AM EST up reply actions  

if we could get scherzer for that

I’d be quite happy. Delerious, really. No way in the world it happens, though.

god, i love baseball. -roy hobbs

by SleepyCA on Dec 5, 2008 5:50 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm for...

signing Lopez (incentive deal if possible) and letting go of Kennedy and using Miles and Ryan as backups. Then get rid of Pineiro any way possible… then if we on the stance of going younger or staying young… we should see some more of these young pitchers in starting roles? Why not… or am I being naive?

Wainy
(Sign/Trade 2nd or 3rd SP)
Loshe
Welly
Combo McLellen/Boggs/Motte

It's not what you do, It's who you do...

by pattimagee on Dec 9, 2008 2:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Well in theory that could be good

But it just doesn’t make sense to just dump Kennedy and Piniero when we would still owe them so much in salary. Kennedy can still be productive enough to get by if he gets playing time. I want no part of Floppy in ‘09, sorry. I wouldn’t mind moving Piniero to the bullpen and have him be out spot starter/mop-up guy as to minimize his effect on the game, but at least he is still on the roster so that justifies paying him. We’d have to let go of Puppy Kicker to do this (sorry gdm). If we can address the rotation by signing another starter (be it: Johnson, Sheets, Burnett, Looper….etc) I’m all for that.

Waino
(Insert an above name here)
Wellemeyer
Lohse
Boggs (I think K-Mac should stay in the pen, and Motte’s arm would fall off if he started)

Then if Carp is healthy enough, he starts instead of Boggs. (By the way I’d like to see us go after either Sheets or Johnson)

Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...

by RunninRedbird on Dec 9, 2008 4:00 PM EST up reply actions  

That sound viable

I would feel comfortable with Piniero in the bullpen… I’m just frustrated with wasted $$…

It's not what you do, It's who you do...

by pattimagee on Dec 9, 2008 11:12 PM EST up reply actions  

re: motte

i think you usually need to be able to throw more than one pitch to start.

the naysayers question whether a man with a beautiful fastball and not much else can be expected to get three outs. I don’t know anyone who says he could be expected to get 20.

by tom s. on Dec 9, 2008 4:50 PM EST up reply actions  

miscellaneous ramblings

best predictor for ludwick next year, is ludwick last year. i’m much less worried about his health than ankiel’s because luddy’s past problems were broken bone type things, but ankiel’s (and carp’s) are muscular. these things don’t just go away if one continues the same activity.

floppy should go somewhere else. typical boras trying to get a multiyear deal for a guy with two good months at the plate while remaining a crappy fielder. i’m good with the current stance on ak. accentuate the positive is best for all. if he goes, then look inside at the beginning. tell hoff, greene, ryan, barden, etc. there is a job to fight for and then sort out the best one(s). miles will be there no matter.

i’m also ok with going with the loogies we have. only one of manning et al needs to work out now that miller is on board. not opposed to picking up one in the rule 5 either (see future redbirds for options).

for sp, i really think penny is who we’ll end up with. between him and carp, maybe they can make one good shoulder.

no to any external closers also. keep the powder dry for st or mid season.

what to do in las vegas besides play golf?
1. gamble on one or two high upside, but risky (cheap) fa players for the rotation and/or as loogy.
2. find some way to convert the outfield logjam into something. my preference is schu and or ankiel. would the braves take ankiel and ak for johnson? would the rays take ankiel for bartlett or sonny?

 this is where mo needs to spend his time, mining our surplus for our needs.

"No matter where you go, there you are" Buckeroo Bonzai Across the 8th Dimension

by sportsman on Dec 8, 2008 10:31 AM EST up reply actions  

Yea

They’re talking in the NY Post about Ankiel… wonder what MO might see in NY?

It's not what you do, It's who you do...

by pattimagee on Dec 9, 2008 11:19 PM EST up reply actions  

If Luis Pedermo

is one of the pitchers in this deal, would that justify the Reyes trade for everyone? I think it would satisfy me. Reyes and Worrell for Khalil Greene seems fair. Reyes for Pedermo was an awful trade.

I hate winter!!!!

by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Dec 4, 2008 2:16 PM EST reply actions  

Nope.

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Dec 4, 2008 5:21 PM EST up reply actions  

mlb.com reports...

…Mark Worrell and a player to be named later.

by sabertooth5185 on Dec 4, 2008 2:22 PM EST reply actions  

i'm guessing its their choice of...

Pedermo
Salas
Samuel
Gregerson
Fiske….

I think the smart choice would be Salas

I hate winter!!!!

by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Dec 4, 2008 2:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Were they both relievers

I thought the report specified 1 RH reliever and another prospect.

by azruavatar on Dec 4, 2008 2:40 PM EST up reply actions  

well,

everything leading up to that 1 line had indicated that it was 2 relievers, so I’m guessing that yes it is. As long as there isn’t a position prospect involved then there really isn’t any risk involved in making this deal.

I hate winter!!!!

by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Dec 4, 2008 2:47 PM EST up reply actions  

pedermo

is eligible for rule 5, so may not be available. that may be part of what is going on

"No matter where you go, there you are" Buckeroo Bonzai Across the 8th Dimension

by sportsman on Dec 8, 2008 10:34 AM EST up reply actions  

What is Walt Jocketty's deal with Mike Lincoln?

2 years and $4 million + incentives?

What has happened to Walt’s magic touch?

I hate winter!!!!

by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Dec 4, 2008 2:34 PM EST reply actions  

Mike must have dirty pictures of Walt or something

There’s no other explanation.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Dec 4, 2008 5:30 PM EST up reply actions  

i mean ...

i can understand it if it was “up to” 4 million after the incentives….but more money on top of the 4 million? Maybe its the old 25,000 bonus if he earns the non-existent divisional series mvp award?

I hate winter!!!!

by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Dec 4, 2008 5:38 PM EST up reply actions  

he's also said to be

resigning…Weathers…wow if i was a reds fan i dont see a whole lot of change in those moves..

in other news brantley and dibble are said to be returning to baseball…ok maybe not..

I can't believe i gave up a homerun to that punch and judy hitter-major league 2

by punchinjudy on Dec 4, 2008 11:57 PM EST up reply actions  

i have this strange feeling that Mo is going to get into the jon garland race

something about his screams dave duncan to me

hope i’m wrong, or if i’m right, we get him cheap

i think another starter is our most pressing need..i know kennedy at 2B isnt optimal and that he wants out, but i think he is worth the $3million we owe him

by VolsnCards5 on Dec 4, 2008 6:02 PM EST reply actions  

Non tenders???

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2008/12/non-tender-cand.html

Brandon Backe
Erik Bedard- I would at least inquire and see how his arm is..still think the guys overated
Matt Belisle
Angel Berroa
John Buck
Chris Burke-backup maybe?
Daniel Cabrera
Chris Capuano
Jason Davis
Randy Flores- pleas i hope so..
Jason Frasor
Chad Gaudin
Jimmy Gobble
Jonny Gomes
Aaron Miles
Brian Tallet
Willy Taveras- i would also see what he might cost. It’d be worth a gamble in my mind.

I can't believe i gave up a homerun to that punch and judy hitter-major league 2

by punchinjudy on Dec 4, 2008 6:20 PM EST reply actions  

Willy Taveras

Is not worth a gamble and has no place to play on the 2009 Cardinals.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Dec 4, 2008 6:31 PM EST up reply actions  

he had been mentioend before so I was like why not

if they move one of the OF for a MIF then if he comes cheap…if..unless your sold on skippy as leadoff..

Get backe to make Pujols mad before at bats…that could be worth a few mil..haha

I can't believe i gave up a homerun to that punch and judy hitter-major league 2

by punchinjudy on Dec 4, 2008 7:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Taveras -- leading off?

Taveras (2008): .251/.308/.296 (Career): .283/.331/.337 in 1973 AB’s

Schumaker (2008): .302/.359/.406 (Career): .299/.350/.404 in 795 AB’s

I’d rather have Skip any day of the week and twice on Sunday. Dude slugged .296 at Coors Field!!! I didn’t even think that was possible!

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Dec 5, 2008 10:27 AM EST up reply actions  

does anyone else like the first name on that list?

and of course you should take the third word in the subject line out

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Dec 4, 2008 6:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Daniel Cabrera is an interesting guy too...

He misses a ton of bats, has good stuff, and throws a lot of innings (albeit BAD innings), but he walks a ton of hitters and gives up too many hits. Could he be a Duncan reclamation project for 2009? I think he’s a candidate assuming we get him on the cheap (read: <$2M).

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Dec 4, 2008 6:59 PM EST up reply actions  

i agree with cabrera

he would be a low risk high reward type pickup

....my quick smells like french toast...

by mstreeter06 on Dec 4, 2008 7:02 PM EST up reply actions  

We should pick up Backe

He can give Pujols pep talks any time we lose two games in a row.

by Evilfrog on Dec 4, 2008 9:40 PM EST up reply actions  

i said basically the same thing above

but I suggested every at bat…

I can't believe i gave up a homerun to that punch and judy hitter-major league 2

by punchinjudy on Dec 4, 2008 10:22 PM EST up reply actions  

every at bat, every pitch, every everything

we should sign him just so he can yell at Albert all the time. he can sit in the stands right behind the dugout & do his thing.

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson AND THAT'S A WINNER!

by gdm426 on Dec 5, 2008 2:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Could you see it?

Teams all jumping around in the locker room, champagne spraying around as the camera pans around the room, everyone yelling and cheering and a soaked Backe comes up and is getting interviewed.

Reporter “So Backe, the Cardinals win yet another WS title, but you weren’t on the roster, how would you explain your role to the team for the fans back home”

Backe “Well, I would explain it like this. You remember that 3 run bomb that Albert put up in the seventh? That was me. As Albert’s bitch I’m the inspiration for all of the damage he’s done this year. Now if you’ll excuse me I need to go talk some more shit so he is ready for his interview”

Reporter “Well Chris, you heard it here first. Backe is Albert’s Bitch.”

One Century down, next on its way. Cardinals '09 : Preserving the Cubs tradition.

by AdjustedExpectations on Dec 5, 2008 3:28 PM EST up reply actions   5 recs

Heh

Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...

by RunninRedbird on Dec 5, 2008 4:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Rec'd

The Godfather himself has decided to grace us with his presence. This is his damn house. He sleeps 20 feet away.

by thegodfather on Dec 5, 2008 5:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Jimmy Gobble...

could be a sleeper LOOGY…he was terrible last year, but most of the damage came from the right side of the plate. He also had a pretty damn good ’07

I hate winter!!!!

by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Dec 5, 2008 5:18 PM EST up reply actions  

What do you guys think about trading Glaus?

I think if Mo could, he would

I think if he did, Tony would have ball-in-hand, and he ain’t playin 9-ball

by RayMonD! on Dec 5, 2008 1:36 AM EST reply actions  

well, what are the odds that Freese will be the seventh best 3d baseman in baseball next year?

Because that’s what Glaus was last year (which doesn’t mean he will be again, but still).

I guess if we get a hook on a talented 2B or starter who’s young and will stick here for years to come, and Glaus is demanded as part of that package. But I don’t see that happening. I doubt a one-year rental of Glaus gets you a top-notch MIF or starter.

I think, especially given the crashing economy, the 3B prospect pieces we have (Freese, Craig) would be much more in demand. Glaus would only be interesting to a contending team that needs a 3B NOW (say, ChiSox).

by tom s. on Dec 5, 2008 2:43 AM EST up reply actions  

Why?

I don’t see the need for it.

"Stats are for losers," Muschamp said after last week's victory. "I like winning games."

by SoonerfanTU on Dec 5, 2008 10:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Well, let's see

Glaus is due, if I am correct, $11.3M next year. We have 3 guys who are knocking on the door to get to the bigs in Freese, Craig, and Wallace. If you traded Glaus that would free up $11.3M in payroll with a minimal drop in production. You could then use that $11.3M to address other needs.

That said, I’m fine not trading him. And we’re not going to trade him becuase I doubt he wants to be traded (no trade clause). It’s just a hypothetical idea that would free up a lot of payroll without hurting the team at the 3B position very much if at all.

Two goldfish are in a tank. One of them turns to the other and says, "You man the guns, I'll drive!"

by thegodfather on Dec 5, 2008 11:41 AM EST up reply actions  

Fair enough.....

But I don’t think any of those guys are ready, this season, to give us what Glaus can. So if you make that trade, whatever you acquire with that free’d up cash (another issue), it better be able to cover the lost production at 3B as well.

I haven’t seen an updated matrix, but we should be able to complete our roster with the money we have left to spend, especially considering we are likely to trade for a 2B, rather than sign one.

Then we left Glaus walk after the year, and pick up a nice draft pick for him.

"Stats are for losers," Muschamp said after last week's victory. "I like winning games."

by SoonerfanTU on Dec 5, 2008 11:56 AM EST up reply actions  

I think we're seeing pretty much eye to eye

We don’t NEED to trade Glaus. We can’t completely make up his production this year and we still have some payroll flexibility without trading him. And that draft pick sounds very good right now.

I would, however, argue that Freese is ready to contribute in the majors, if not as a starter then at least as a bench player. He skipped AA and put up this line: .306/.361/550/.911 in 464 ABs in Memphis. He won’t be starter, but he could be one in the future easily. He’s only 25.

Two goldfish are in a tank. One of them turns to the other and says, "You man the guns, I'll drive!"

by thegodfather on Dec 5, 2008 1:48 PM EST up reply actions  

This particular convo seems to be within a few convos so I’m replying here – so don’t take all of my reply as aimed at your words directly, just didn’t want to add another convo start.

There’s an easy case that if Glaus was traded for a position of need that the WAR difference between Glaus and his replacement (say Freese since Wallace is still has work to shore up) and the addition in WAR of who came back in the trade, plus who we got in return with the extra salary room (minus said player we got back) would be better than what Glaus would give by himself. So I can see why a trade makes sense.

However, I’d rather not. Part of it is bias, I’ve followed him all 11 years he’s played.

But here’s how I look at it. His value could be higher in July than now. Most of the American League teams that are looking towards a 3b will probably lean on a prospect or a potential bust. Ironically as of now they look to be lead runners in contention (Angels, Twins, WSox?). Then you can add the Dodgers if you would like, who you’d have to consider a contender going into next year.

He’s much more likely to accept if we’re not contending and there’s a contender in play for a trade. He may even be open to playing for the Twins even though it’s turf if it’s a deadline deal.

He’ll most likely be a Type A unless next year is horrid and then then you’d have to think a Type B could be possible. That’s two draft picks to keep in mind if no trade happens at all.. We could have a strong draft class in ‘10 if Rick also stays around . That’s one thing to keep in mind.

This will also be Glaus’ contract year, which he’s generally done fairly well in. We could enjoy a bump that may come.

Ironically his stats on the field and with the bat could get better next year contract year aside. His splits vs LHP which has generally been a strong suit will regress up next year. He’s not nearly as streaky as last year indicates. His eyes were harsh on him early and as it resolved he compensated with his long swing. He was also too patient later in the year which allowed the Ump to dictate the zone instead of his bat and if you recall, when the Ump dictacted, he was generally screwed.

He’s also a year removed from turf which should help him out on the field side as well.

From a team point of view, he gives us a veteran bat that is patient and is willing to take a walk and career wise is solid against LHP, something our team really needs.

If it were me I’d put Freese in AAA and allow his numbers build value, I’d put Wallace in AA and allow him to work on his footwork and maintain his development track, when Wallace is ready to be promoted some time next year, allow him and Freese to platoon 1b/3b the rest of the year and deal with it next year. Doing that means that we need to, or should deal Craig. He can be a part of a package deal for something else, or maybe a swap for a LHP.

I guess in short, both sides have merit. I just like the idea of having a veteran constant in that position knowing full well we are getting younger there in ‘10, which is where our development track is headed. And all bias aside, if Glaus didn’t have a no trade clause it would probably sway me over to the trade side of the equation.

One Century down, next on its way. Cardinals '09 : Preserving the Cubs tradition.

by AdjustedExpectations on Dec 5, 2008 3:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Good analysis

Can’t say I disagree with much, if anything. If there wasn’t a no trade clause, Glaus would be absolutely perfect for a midseason trade. Oh well.

The Godfather himself has decided to grace us with his presence. This is his damn house. He sleeps 20 feet away.

by thegodfather on Dec 5, 2008 5:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Trading Glaus...

Could allow the Cardinals to be in contention to sign a big name FA pitcher (Burnett, Sheets).

Would the Cardinals offer Arbitration to Glaus next season? You can’t count on the draft picks until you know if Glaus will decline arb if it is offered to him.

by Jumsy on Dec 9, 2008 12:05 AM EST up reply actions  

I seriously doubt

That Glaus would accept salary arbitration. Barring a major injury this season, it is in his best interests to sign a long term deal. I’d say it would be very safe to offer him arbitration. Worst case scenario: he accepts and we trade him. Win-win situation. Kind of like Looper…

The Godfather himself has decided to grace us with his presence. This is his damn house. He sleeps 20 feet away.

by thegodfather on Dec 9, 2008 5:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Or say...

…the Angels, who also happen to be one of the few teams flush with middle infielders. I say again…Howie Kendrick.

by sabertooth5185 on Dec 5, 2008 9:39 AM EST reply actions  

The Angels are historically difficult trade partners

They like to hold on to their prospects. But you’re right, Kendrick would look good here.

"A genius is a guy like Norman Einstein." - Joe Theismann

by Futility Infielder on Dec 5, 2008 1:33 PM EST up reply actions  

That is an interesting move...

If your not going to keep Glaus after this year why not deal him for Kendrick and get Freese/ Wallace up and let them duke it out for the spot.

My only question is does Glaus want to go back to the Angels and do the Angels want Glaus back?

*Rasmus is to CF as Longoria is to 3B*

by Red Blazer on Dec 5, 2008 10:53 AM EST reply actions  

Are we talking straight up for Howie Kendrick?

I think that would be a colossal mistake.

Kendrick hasn’t ever played in 100 games in a single season. He’s been a starter for two seasons in Anaheim and has played in 88 and 92 games respectively. He’s never played more than half a season!

His rate stats look pretty good, but his OBP is strongly tied to his average because he rarely walks: 9 walks in 353 PA’s in 2007, and 12 walks in 361 PA’s in 2008. If he ever goes into a prolonged slump, he’s going to be a nearly worthless player.

Let’s compare him with what we currently have:

Kendrick (2008): .306/.333/.421 (Career): .306/.333/.430 in 997 PA’s
Kennedy (2008): .280/.321/.372 (Career): .276/.328/.389 in 4469 PA’s
A. Miles (2008): .317/.355/.398 (Career): .289/.329/.364 in 2253 PA’s

Miles and Kendrick are probably a push defensively, Miles may be a little better. Kennedy is much better defensively — so much so that he offsets the difference in offensive ability. We already have both of those players and they both played more games last year than Howie Kendrick.

Keep in mind that we’d be trading the 7th best third baseman in the big leagues last year by WAR, replacing him with one of two different players that haven’t played at the big league level yet, and all we’re getting in return is a guy who really isn’t that much better than the players that we already have, he’s just younger. Kendrick will be eligible for arbitration after the 2009 season and will be cost controlled for 3 more seasons after that, because I don’t think that he’s a Super 2 player, but I could be wrong on that.

Unless you think that Kendrick is going to improve next season, then I don’t think that he’s worth giving up Glaus in 2009.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Dec 5, 2008 11:27 AM EST up reply actions  

I doubt that

the Angels would trade him to Glaus straight up because the main advantage that Kendrick gives us is that he is young, cheap and under team control. That is worth quite a bit in the market. He also has room to improve. If we could trade Glaus straight up for Kendrick, I’d jump at that. That’s assuming they feel one of Freese/Wallace is ready.

by eglasier on Dec 5, 2008 11:49 AM EST up reply actions  

If they don't feel that Freese is ready

Then they should be shopping him for middle infield help right now, and keep Glaus through next year. He was the player of the year in the PCL, but I don’t think he’s going to put up numbers that are going to make us forget about how good Glaus was last year.

So you’re saying that the Angels — with a need for a right handed power hitter and third baseman, wouldn’t jump at the chance to move Kendrick, who they can easily replace with a younger, better player (Rodriguez), for the 7th best third baseman in the big leagues last year? I think they’d do it in a heartbeat, and I think that you’re really overvaluing Kendrick as a player as well.

Would you do Glaus straight up for Robbie Cano if that offer was on the table? I think that’s a much better deal for us and he’s a better hitter, better fit, and is only a year older than Kendrick. The Yankees don’t need a third baseman, obviously, I’m just comparing similar players.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Dec 5, 2008 12:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Agree

Freese has already proven himself in AAA. I’d like to see Freese as the spare corner infielder. If they want to get him playing time, then shuttle him between Memphis and STL thoughout the year. Freese could trade places with Barden every month.

by jjray on Dec 5, 2008 1:03 PM EST up reply actions  

What about Freese for Hendrick

Both cost controlled players, Angels easily replace 2B and doesn’t cost them 11.3M.

by ubeddie on Dec 5, 2008 1:17 PM EST up reply actions  

I would do that deal

If I’m dealing Glaus I’d want Rodriguez back in return, because he could play second base next year and then be a longer term solution at the SS position. It would take more than Glaus to get him, but I think that’s a much better deal for the Cardinals.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Dec 5, 2008 2:56 PM EST up reply actions  

What about to the Dodgers for...

James McDonald or Scott Elbert?

If we were going to do it I think young pitching would have to be the focus.

by RayMonD! on Dec 5, 2008 12:06 PM EST reply actions  

I could see that move

He’d be going to a contender, so he’s probably be more inclined to want that trade….

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Dec 5, 2008 12:53 PM EST up reply actions  

No

But I think the asking price is going to be a corner outfielder like Ludwick, and that’s too much, imo.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Dec 5, 2008 4:05 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't even think we should be out of the Escobar equation.

We’re probably not going to be in it now that we have Greene, but that’s exactly why I think we should be in it.

It can’t hurt to try and drive a deal because Greene will be a fall back, clearly there’s a need out there for SS since the market really has been lively on them so we could unload him to another team, or we could send him to the Braves as a stop gap in a multiplayer deal (both sides, not just our side).

It can’t hurt, we can’t be used to drive up the market price as we would be in a position of want, not need.

But akin to fourstick, if Johnson is who we talk about, Luddy has to be off the table.

One Century down, next on its way. Cardinals '09 : Preserving the Cubs tradition.

by AdjustedExpectations on Dec 5, 2008 4:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Carp will start throwing in January

…so reports Goold

But Mo’s still possiblity after another starting pitcher and more bullpen help. The Greene trade apparently has made a second baseman a lower priority.

by Forsch31 on Dec 5, 2008 5:48 PM EST reply actions  

get another starter...

period

I can't believe i gave up a homerun to that punch and judy hitter-major league 2

by punchinjudy on Dec 5, 2008 6:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Can never have too much pitching..... ever!

People ask me what I do in winter when there's no baseball. I'll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring.-Rogers Hornsby

by thegashousegang on Dec 5, 2008 7:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Clint Barmes?

It’s been a while since we’ve heard his name come up in discussion. But he has always seemed to be a guy the cards have had their eye on. I initially wondered if a straight up deal for Skip Schumaker would make sense for both team, but after reviewing the Rox roster…it seems there are looking to eliminate an OF (Tavares) to make room for Dexter Fowler and Carlos Gonzalez. According to this article, http://colorado.rockies.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20081203&content_id=3700910&vkey=news_col&fext=.jsp&c_id=col, the rox would be looking to unload Barmes’ contract so maybe he could be had in a Khalil-type deal?

I hate winter!!!!

by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Dec 5, 2008 5:55 PM EST reply actions  

Please, no Rockies hitters

with career and 2008 road OPSes below .650. Pretty please.

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Dec 5, 2008 10:30 PM EST up reply actions  

lets try that again....

that wasn’t a suggestion it was more of a theory….i’m not a fan of barmes , but I think the cards front office is

I hate winter!!!!

by The Ghost of Todd Burns on Dec 5, 2008 10:35 PM EST up reply actions  

I actually think that they are too

And they also look to be avoiding arbitration with their outfielders if possible, so trading an outfielder isn’t out of the question. I also wonder if they wouldn’t be interested in Freese or Allen Craig….

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Dec 6, 2008 11:29 AM EST up reply actions  

If you look at our organization, we have a lot of long-term flexibility with some good prospects.

We are locked up for C & 1B through 2011. We have three plausible 3B candidates. We have ridiculous OF depth. We have three signed starting pitchers through 2011 (though Carp’s capacity to throw is unknown). We have decent bullpen depth in controlled players, including at the expensive closer position. We have a big long-term gap in the middle infield. We have limited prospects there, including several not likely to be ready soon.

But looking forward, we have about $48M locked up in starting pitching, 1B and C for 2010, and about $54M in the same folks in 2011. With that money we need to accommodate continuing arbitration (Ludwick), possibly re-sign Ankiel, bolster the bullpen with one or two arms a year, and get one or two starters (depending on how internal options like KMac, Boggs, Garcia, and Todd show up). We also need to keep the middle infield staffed.

It seems like the money is there ($45-50M/year) to do all those things, especially if internal starting options work out, or if Carpenter comes back healthy. I think in looking at 2b (and at SS beyond 2009) Mo needs to look for a long term option. I really think Mo needs to take a chance now, spend some prospects and some $ and see what we need to do to get Brian Roberts (or an equivalent figure) to come to St. Louis and extend for three years. The money is there to pay him. I am reluctant to shell out for a temporary fix at 2b. I don’t see many free agents likely to be much better than Barden/Miles/Ryan manning second, and they will doubtless cost far more.

The second baseman for 2008 should be a start of a long-term plan or he should be a real cheap solution while we try to set up our long-term plan.

by tom s. on Dec 5, 2008 11:12 PM EST reply actions  

How does Brian Roberts extending his contract

at age 32 solve our 2B problems “long term”? We’d have him for his age 33,34,and 35 seasons, and middle infielders who’s game are built around speed and defense don’t generally age well. I think the real answer is trying to pry a good prospect that’s ready to play and is blocked from another team by filling a need for them from some of our depth. The Angels have a lot of good middle infielders in their system, and so do the Rockies. We could trade from our depth of prospects to get a cost-controlled middle infielder from one of those clubs.

If we’re talking about a long term solution, I don’t think that the money is actually there to sign a veteran middle infielder long term.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Dec 6, 2008 11:33 AM EST up reply actions  

well, because he shows no sign of slowing down right now, even though he is past thirty.

And his game isn’t based around just speed and defense. He slugged .514, .410, .432., and .450 the last four years. He’s not somebody whose value is based on him stealing 30 bases every year. He’s taken more than 600 at bats in both 2007 and 2008 which speaks to his durability. Yes, I agree, generally mid-30’s middle infielders are not great options, but he looks like a solid bet.

and there is a difference in terms of the range required to play 2b v. that require to play SS. His position is a little more forgiving.

And finally, I just pointed out that we had $45-$50M available in 2010 and 2011 with relatively few expensive positions unfilled. How is the money not there? I meticulously pointed out that we were set at 3b, in the outfield, at most bullpen positions, at 1st, and with three starters spots already covered. Instead of just saying “i don’t think the money is there,” when someone’s labored to make a point, then actually make it. Say where you think that $45M to $50m will go in 2010 or 2011.

by tom s. on Dec 6, 2008 3:03 PM EST up reply actions  

if you'll look above, i posted his slugging stats since 2003, when he used.

If HGH keeps you bulked up for 5 years, then it’s more of a wonder drug than I thought.

by tom s. on Dec 6, 2008 5:20 PM EST up reply actions  

That's just when he's been caught

And HGH does more than make you stronger, it gives you more endurance and keeps a long season from wearing down on you.

by TheBirds on Dec 6, 2008 7:09 PM EST up reply actions  

HGH doesn't do any of those things.

Are you confusing HGH and amphetamines?

god, i love baseball. -roy hobbs

by SleepyCA on Dec 6, 2008 10:11 PM EST up reply actions  

HGH

does help with fatigue by aiding in recovery.

by spants on Dec 6, 2008 10:36 PM EST up reply actions  

no it doesn't.

It can, anecdotally, help reduce recovery time from major surgery, although scientific studies show that this is BS. Sugar pills with HGH stenciled on them would work just as well, according to every study i have seen.

No one has ever even claimed that HGH does anything for fatigue, as far as I know. Feel free to link to a study that shows otherwise, if you can.

god, i love baseball. -roy hobbs

by SleepyCA on Dec 6, 2008 11:45 PM EST up reply actions  

HGH does not do either of those things.

a. Steroids probably do, but HGH is not a steroid. none of the players mentioned here are considered sterois use candidates by even the most paranoid individuals.
b. Amphetamines definitely help fight the effects of fatigue. Notable amphetamines users over the years include willy mays and hank aaron
c. HGH might, possibly (though it has never been shown in a scientific study) help players recover from a major surgery, but it has never been shown to increase muscle size or help with fatigue.

If you can’t tell a from b from c, here, then God help you.

god, i love baseball. -roy hobbs

by SleepyCA on Dec 7, 2008 2:05 AM EST up reply actions  

So hgh is only there to help us recover from serious injury....

Seems like an awful waste of our body’s energy to secrete it throughout our life then.

by TheBirds on Dec 7, 2008 2:13 AM EST up reply actions  

nothing.

Well, there are anecdotal reports that it causes short-term weight loss, and there is anecdotal evidence that it helps people recover from major surgery, but there is no scientific evidence that it actually does either of these things, or that it does anything to increase athletic performance.

Welcome to 2006. This was all discussed in detail then.

god, i love baseball. -roy hobbs

by SleepyCA on Dec 7, 2008 2:57 AM EST up reply actions  

Growth hormone builds muscle in athletes, but may not help sports performance

That is the title of the systematic review of the literature conducted by Hau Liu and others at Stanford U that came to the conclusion that individuals treated with HGH significantly improved lean muscle mass, while not improving strength or exercise capacity.

Subjects who were given HGH in place of a placebo reported higher rates of fatigue.

The researchers did caution against our friend, the small sample size.

Here is the reference if any of you have the ability to search for scholarly articles: “Systematic review: The
effects of growth hormone on athletic performance,” by Dr. Liu, Dena M. Bravata, M.D., M.S., Ingram Olkin, Ph.D., and others in the May 20, 2008 Annals of Internal Medicine 148(10), pp. 747-758

"Baseball is like Church, many attend, few understand" - Wes Westrum

by scoot on Dec 7, 2008 2:14 PM EST up reply actions  

actually, it was steroids, not HGH, so if you're going to cheap shot guys, get your facts straight.

Fine. You want to relive the steroids era, go ahead. Chuck Ankiel and everybody else off the cards. Our hands are not clean. Then you and your “pristine” team can ride off into the sunset, unless you want to worry about whether there might still be somebody on your team who hasn’t been caught.

Please. Enough with the naivete.

by tom s. on Dec 6, 2008 11:07 PM EST up reply actions  

ankiel was possibly an HGH user, but was never accused of using steroids

.
(I know you didn’t mean to imply this, just want to head off any confusion)

god, i love baseball. -roy hobbs

by SleepyCA on Dec 6, 2008 11:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Sorry if I call into question the durability of aging PED users.

How did you get kick everyone who has been busted for PEDs off the team. You sure know how to misinterpret things!

Please. Enough with the naivete.

by TheBirds on Dec 7, 2008 1:01 AM EST up reply actions  

if you don't know how "PED's" work

it’s pretty massively egoistical to attack other forum members for not joining in your witchhunt.

god, i love baseball. -roy hobbs

by SleepyCA on Dec 7, 2008 1:15 AM EST up reply actions  

where do you get witchhunt

I have no desire to look into whether or not certain players are actually clean.

Fact is he is old and presumably is not as “enhanced” as he once was, making a longterm contract liability. If anything you should fault me for presuming innocence.

How do I argue with you if all you want to do is misinterpret the things I’m saying and call me out on totally unrelated crap you’ve made up in your own mind.

by TheBirds on Dec 7, 2008 1:28 AM EST up reply actions  

HGH does nothing like what you claim, above

It just doesn’t. Period. The human body doesn’t work that way, as far as the body of medical science has been able to determine.

While I am not a big fan of acquiring Roberts, it isn’t fair to him to attack his performance because of his alleged HGH use. There is absolutely no scientific reason to believe that, if he did use HGH, it helped him to perform better in major league baseball.

god, i love baseball. -roy hobbs

by SleepyCA on Dec 7, 2008 1:44 AM EST up reply actions  

Then why ban it?

Why risk your career and image taking it?

Are athletes and personal trainers all so easily fed misinformation?

by TheBirds on Dec 7, 2008 1:47 AM EST up reply actions  

it's stupid to ban it.

no argument. But that’s how it is.

The fact that it is banned for reasons which have no basis in reality is no excuse to attack people who support players who might possibly have used it.

god, i love baseball. -roy hobbs

by SleepyCA on Dec 7, 2008 1:53 AM EST up reply actions  

So basically we are never going to agree.

Just don’t confuse what I’m saying, don’t suggest I’m calling a witch hunt, don’t attack me when I defend myself against people who suggest I’m for releasing all those who have tested positive. All you ever had to say was HGH does nothing beneficial for athletes and I would have known where you stood and then said “to hell with it, this is not something that can be settled with words”.

by TheBirds on Dec 7, 2008 2:05 AM EST up reply actions  

you aren't defending yourself

you area ttacking players who did something that wasn’t illegal when they did it. There is no excuse for that.

god, i love baseball. -roy hobbs

by SleepyCA on Dec 7, 2008 2:07 AM EST up reply actions  

you said

“He may slow down now that he’s been caught for HGH. There is no fountain of youth.”

Duh. Given that modern science is pretty much in agreement that HGH does not do the things that you have claimed, that’s a pretty clear attack.

It’s folks like you (and others who don’t have the guts or knowledge to call it how it is) that cause kids (and others) to go out and try to buy HGH, because they think it’ll turn them into rick ankiel or brian roberts, or the hot girl that roger clemens is banging, or whatever. Sadly, HGH almost certainly does nothing, period, other than cause short term weight loss.

And that’s doubly sad, because people spend a lot of money in the expectation that it DOES do something, because “people say it does”. And because it is now illegal, the only people who can possibly sell it to you or your kids won’t tell you or them otherwise. It’s actually the perfect drug; they can sell you a big thingy of sugar water for the price of legit HGH and you’ll never know the difference, because it doesn’t do anything. If you got bigger while using it, it’s because you worked harder- you might have thought that HGH gave you that strength to work harder, but it didn’t. Either way, you’ll keep buying it whether it works or not, because it costs so much; it’s a classic placebo effect. But if it “works”, you’ll pay double next time, and tell all your friends, and they’ll pay the same to the jerk who sold it to you.

Anyway, I don’t care if it is banned or if it is for sale for a thousand dollars a pill at the GNC, the scientific studies say it does nothing, and until there are scientific studies that say it does do something, when some jerk comes on and says it does something, I’m going to call him out. I like to think I’m pretty well informed on this subject, but I’d love to be proved wrong.

god, i love baseball. -roy hobbs

by SleepyCA on Dec 7, 2008 2:52 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Brad penney

he’s our guy if you ask me…i think we can get him on a relatively cheap deal…an pitching is more pressing than a 2B to me

by VolsnCards5 on Dec 6, 2008 12:08 PM EST reply actions  

Solving 2b and starting pitching, and closer

Trade Ludwick, Schumaker,Kennedy, and Craig to Braves for Johnson, Jurjens, and Mike Gonzalez.

by eburn40oz on Dec 6, 2008 12:55 PM EST reply actions  

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL….

by TheBirds on Dec 6, 2008 3:41 PM EST up reply actions  

No thanks

But if I’m the Braves, I’m saying “Hellz Yeah!”

Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...

by RunninRedbird on Dec 6, 2008 7:06 PM EST up reply actions  

WHAT?!?!?

Jurjens is a cost controled ace…He alone is better than the ENTIRE package of guys we are sending them.
Johnson is a cost controlled above average second baseman.
Gonzalez is a quirky but solid RP.

MO would have to go to prison for this robbery.

by TheBirds on Dec 6, 2008 7:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Well

The Braves would like this deal because Luddy is cost controlled AND is one of the top 10 offensive bats in the league, Schu is a cost controlled leadoff hitter w/ solid defense and good offense. Kennedy was one of the best defensive second basemen in baseball last year and his offense can be good when he gets playing time. And Craig is a solid third base prospect who always gets lost on us because of Wallace and Freese. I’ve watched Craig play all season in Springfield and he’s legit.

I would probably do a deal of Luddy for Jurrjens. I am just not a fan of the proposed package above. I’m actually not much of a fan of trading Luddy period, however for Jurrjens I would consider it.

Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...

by RunninRedbird on Dec 6, 2008 8:51 PM EST up reply actions  

on top of this, jurrjens is basically all the ATL has to throw on the mound, along with

some unstable arms behind. That’s why they were so keen to get in on Peavy.

So if they did this trade, they’d have to try to find ANOTHER starter. Don’t see it happening.

by tom s. on Dec 7, 2008 5:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Impact Bat

Doing this frees up money for us to go get an impact bat at a corner outfield postion then because we solved all our needs without adding salary

by eburn40oz on Dec 6, 2008 12:59 PM EST reply actions  

When your possible middle lineup includes

Ankiel, Albert, Ludwick, Glaus, Rasmus, and Greene, there isn’t really a need for a power bat anymore.

Granted, that is not their order of course.

For some reason, I don't enjoy watching Big Mac hit #62, but I fondly remember Ray Lankford blasting the ball out of the park in the same game. He had one sweet swing!!

by miniboscorino on Dec 7, 2008 12:49 AM EST up reply actions  

What they need now...

is someone to get on in front of those people. Albert, at least.

Felipe Lopez - next year's Joel Pineiro

by DiscoJer on Dec 7, 2008 2:49 AM EST up reply actions  

If Cano is availible...

do you think he is on Mo’s radar?

by CaliBirdos on Dec 7, 2008 1:09 AM EST reply actions  

Impact bat as 2B

In thinking of a second baseman who can also provide pop, what about JORGE CANTU of the marlins. I feel like with his lack of continuity in regards to hitting he could be had for a decent price. I know he is available and the marlins will probably need young pitching. nobody is gonna want adam kennedy so I say we just cut his slack ass.

by Yadi on Dec 7, 2008 1:30 PM EST reply actions  

Cantu is a butcher on defense

I don’t think that the Marlins are going to be dealing him anyway, because he’s likely to start at one of the corners for them next year.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Dec 8, 2008 1:24 AM EST up reply actions  

Kei Igawa and Rule 5

Is there any reason why the Cards aren’t/didn’t pick up this guy in the Rule 5 draft? He seems to dominate at AAA, but has a bit of trouble putting it together in the Bigs. I know that sounds reminiscent of another former Card (Mr. Flat bill/high socks), but I really don’t think they’re the same pitcher. I’d think Duncan could work some magic with him, and help him be successful. And he’d only cost $4 Mil for a potential 5th starter. I know Rule 5 would state that he’d have to be on the ML roster for the whole year, but if we’re looking for relatively cheap pitching anyway, with ML experience….

Or is he really just that bad that the Yanks and no one else want him?

by A1R3Z on Dec 7, 2008 1:38 PM EST reply actions  

It is as they say, all about the benjamins.

The difference between FlatBill & Igawa is $4M. That’s a pretty expensive flyer on a pitcher w/ no history of performing on this side of the pacific.

by tom s. on Dec 7, 2008 5:38 PM EST up reply actions  

It doesn't cost you...

$4M unless he remains on the big league roster for the entire season. I say take a flyer on the guy and if it doesn’t pan out, send him back for $25,000 (I think that’s the cost). This could even be a strange scenario where the Yanks would be willing to take a low level prospect to not take him back and even eat a little salary if he didn’t pan out. Then you could send him to AAA if need be and use him in Emergency situations.

by Jumsy on Dec 9, 2008 1:13 AM EST up reply actions  

Rule 5

hasn’t happened yet. I think it’s Thursday.

by Toddius on Dec 7, 2008 10:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Any possibility of picking up Wood and Penny...

or is the budget not there? I’m guessing Wood would need at least $9 million per and at least two years. Not sure what the market for Penny is. Anyone have an educated guess? If we could sign these two then Mo could shop some of our outfield depth for prospects to strengthen our minor league system further. Thoughts?

by BustaCard on Dec 7, 2008 8:49 PM EST reply actions  

I would rather get Hoffman then Wood

He would only want a one year deal, he wouldn’t cost as much as Wood and he would be a great influence on Perez and Motte. He also obviously has a better track and would definitely give us a more consistent season than Wood, who is injury prone and only has one year as a closer under his belt.

I like the idea of getting Penny, but only if we could get him for a deal like Lohse’s last year. 1 year at 5-6 mil. He certainly has the track record and DD could certainly turn him around.

by vivaelpujols on Dec 7, 2008 9:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Hoffman would be great as well...

and with the savings compared to Wood we would be more likely to be able to swing someone like Penny. I think I would like that even more.

by BustaCard on Dec 7, 2008 9:45 PM EST up reply actions  

i like hoffman and he signed my ball in STL years ago

but he seems to be on the decline, where as wood you may or may not get a few more decent years out of him depending on health…I’d say wood for a yr with a option for 2

I can't believe i gave up a homerun to that punch and judy hitter-major league 2

by punchinjudy on Dec 8, 2008 12:31 AM EST up reply actions  

I would rather have Saito than Hoffman

He’d probably be cheaper, he’s younger, and he was more effective before and after his injury last season.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Dec 8, 2008 1:26 AM EST up reply actions  

IS Saito even available?

or is this a trade senario?

www.GriffinandtheGargoyles.com or www.myspace.com/GriffinandtheGargoyles
Dont take me seriously :-D

by jealousblues on Dec 8, 2008 1:37 AM EST reply actions  

I'm not sure of the rules on this one actually

I know that he signed two different 1 year deals the last two years with the Dodgers, but I don’t know how the rules work with Japanese League free agents in terms of service time (i.e. is he a free agent at the end of each season and unprotected by the existing controlled players rules?)

Maybe someone can answer that question for me, but I swear I’ve seen him on a number of free agent lists on various websites….

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Dec 8, 2008 10:08 AM EST up reply actions  

he's under club control

just like So Taguchi was. But there is a pretty good chance that the dodgers non-tender him instead of offering arbitration, so he might become available.

Unfortunately, his arm fell off last season.

god, i love baseball. -roy hobbs

by SleepyCA on Dec 9, 2008 2:25 PM EST up reply actions  

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2008/12/grudzielanek-de.html

Grudz declined the Royals offer because he “wants to play for a contender.” Can we pleeeasssseee bring him in? We could trade Kennedy to the Royals for a few balls and call it even.

On with the (good) youth movement!

by aet15 on Dec 8, 2008 2:55 AM EST reply actions  

as soon as Grudz says he "wants to play for a contender and for free" we'll see that happen.

I realize he’s not going to break the bank like other 2b options might. But I don’t see the cards picking up any free agent 2b’s unless they manage to trade Kennedy and his whole salary.

by tom s. on Dec 8, 2008 3:07 AM EST up reply actions  

If he's the same price as Aaron Miles

I’d definitely bring him in and let Miles walk. Grudz can play SS much better than Miles can and would probably be a good utility guy for Tony because he’s good against lefties and can play both positions.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Dec 8, 2008 10:09 AM EST up reply actions  

On the closer/starter front, does it make more sense to try to get a starter and a swingman?

There are several open questions on the pitching front, many of which will not be answered till spring.

- How will perez or motte do closing?
- Will carp come back healthy?
- Will any of our prospects grab a rotation spot (KMac, Boggs, Todd)?
- Who else will be injured/ineffective?

We knocked around an idea last year that Wellemeyer could come out of the rotation and close. This had a fair amount of support. It seems that if we get a short-contract starter (say, Johnson) and a swingman (say, Heilman), we would have substantial wiggle room in our rotation. That way, if everything is going great for Perez as closer, we can use our spare parts to keep the rotation going. If Carp comes back and Perez is doing well, piniero can be a (very expensive) mop-up guy. If neither Perez nor Motte look up to the closing task, Wellemeyer could be pulled from the rotation and used as closer.

I just think that rotations, like battle plans, rarely survive the first contact with the enemy. The more built-in flexibility we have, the better. And moving Heilman into the rotation or Wellemeyer into the closer spot is a lot easier than hunting for a rotation arm or closer in May.

by tom s. on Dec 8, 2008 3:17 AM EST reply actions  

I think that Oliver Perez would be perfect for us

He could definitely fill the roles of swingman, 5th starter and even as a LOOGY. He is so versatile because he strikes guys out and he has both starting and relieving experience. We could use a modified 6 man rotation until Perez proves that he can constantly go deep into games. He is only 27 so I wouldn’t mind giving him a 3 or 4 year deal.

by vivaelpujols on Dec 8, 2008 12:06 PM EST up reply actions  

If you're signing Perez

for starter money, then Piniero becomes the swing man/long man when a fifth starter isn’t needed, and Perez becomes the third starter until Carp comes back — then he’s the fourth, Welley’s the fifth, and Piniero is the long man in the pen.

I don’t think that you sign a guy to that kind of cash to be you’re swing man…

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Dec 8, 2008 1:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Burnett!

i don’t know if the idea that we could have a 123 of Wainer, Carp, burnett would make me sleep easy or stay up all night dreaming of the possibilities. I know Burnett is 32 soon and is demanding a 5 year deal of which the last two have great potential to simply be dead salary, but Burnett’s willingness to play in st louis and the dominance that he could provide in the post season can not be undervalued. btw this is from k rosenthal over at fox sports. We definitely need a proven starter and we don’t need innings eaters to earn starts in the playoffs, we need dominate pitchers who can win us games in the post-season. IM ALL FOR IT

Cantu and Penny for '09!

by Yadi on Dec 8, 2008 12:46 PM EST reply actions  

ya, i would be too

but for different reasons. I say you get a burnett or Lowe because I highly doubt Carp can be counted on. You need insurance.

I can't believe i gave up a homerun to that punch and judy hitter-major league 2

by punchinjudy on Dec 8, 2008 3:01 PM EST up reply actions  

a randy johnson alternative

Randy makes a lot of sense, but how about Jamie Moyer?

Great season last year, wants more than the Phillies are going to give him.

And he’s left-handed.

He’s said he wants a two-year, but I think that’s puffing. I see him on a one-year deal ultimately, for less than Johnson. So far he’s missed out on the FA buzz and could be a serious sleeper. Philly may be happy with their pitching prospects (kendrick & happ) and might not pay the bill for him.

by tom s. on Dec 8, 2008 5:05 PM EST reply actions  

He's holding out for 2 years and $10+ million per year

And in any case, if he’s going to settle for anything, it sounds like it’s going to be in Philly.

by mojowo11 on Dec 8, 2008 11:05 PM EST up reply actions  

but he's not going to get 2 years.

he just turned 46. and he is looking at other teams.

I’d offer him one year at $8m, with second year option that vests if he hits 180 innings at another $8m.

probably any offer we make would just pump up his price to philly, but it could hardly hurt to make him an offer. Like I said, philly has hamels, myers, several talented young pitchers and they’re stuck with eaton. hamels doesn’t make a lot of sense for them.

by tom s. on Dec 9, 2008 3:24 AM EST up reply actions  

"moyer" doesn't make a lot of sense for them. dang.

also, if we get moyer and call up anderson in september we can have a pitcher tossing to a catcher who wasn’t born when the pitcher entered the majors.

by tom s. on Dec 9, 2008 3:29 AM EST up reply actions  

cards "serious" about burnett

just in case anyone hadn’t seen it. after all of our usual back and forth about how much is worth it, i’d love to see him with the bob.

http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/8911104/Sources:-Cardinals-serious-about-Burnett

by sdesserman on Dec 8, 2008 6:02 PM EST reply actions  

Who makes more sense Jake or AJ

If Mo is serious about Burnett, then why not Peavy? Both will be in the 60+M for 4years, both maybe injury risks, Peavy’s 5years younger. AJ costs us a first round draft choice. As long as Jake does not cost Raz what makes more sense?

by rajah424 on Dec 8, 2008 6:22 PM EST reply actions  

I want AJ

Peavy needs his TJ, don’t know about Burnett

For some reason, I don't enjoy watching Big Mac hit #62, but I fondly remember Ray Lankford blasting the ball out of the park in the same game. He had one sweet swing!!

by miniboscorino on Dec 8, 2008 7:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Over on MLBTraderumors...

there are two reports that the Braves are interested in Ankiel. One says for Kelly Johnson or Yunel Escobar and maybe more. Another report talks of how the Braves are maybe looking at JJ Hardy at SS.
If we traded for Johnson it would not only provide us with the most powerful infield in baseball, but would also increase the amount of $ Mo has to pursue pitchers and open a spot for Rasmus in CF (and more PT for Mather as well, which I may value more than others).

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2008/12/braves-interest.html

by BustaCard on Dec 8, 2008 8:29 PM EST reply actions  

I love this possibility

I total agree with your comment on opening up playing time for Rasmus, Mather, Barton, etc. and think now is the best time to deal Ankiel.

That said, I don’t think we can do Ankiel for Johnson straight up. Ankiel has a few years on him age-wise, but plays a more premium position, has more pop, and plays better defense. Both are signed through 2008. I love Escobar for Ankiel, but only if we move Greene to second and get rid of Kennedy.

by Fred Head on Dec 8, 2008 10:19 PM EST up reply actions  

An update is the Cards would rather have pitching in return for Ankiel

Which is all well and good, but I think the # of teams w/ interest in Ankiel is very limited. They have to be competing teams w/ the need for an outfielder more than cheap young pitching. Then again, what the braves got for Renteria last year proves their are some gms who don’t mind trading top notch MLB ready pitching prospects for temporary impact bats.

by TheBirds on Dec 8, 2008 10:25 PM EST up reply actions  

The dream is dead before it even started....

So any possibility of a trade with the Braves happening? Thoughts from the masses?

Jurrjens for Ankiel is a pipe dream. How about Rafael Soriano for Ankiel? Or Mike Gonzalez + a prospect (forget I said that, unless said prospect is a Top 10 guy like Jeff Locke or Cole Rohrbaugh).

OK, I tried. I got nothing else, and the above options don’t really fit the Cards needs anyways…

by Fred Head on Dec 8, 2008 10:39 PM EST up reply actions  

blech on the relievers

A JoJo Reyes + prospect for Ankiel would seem reasonable. I don’t know enough about Reyes moving forward to say that with any authority though.

by azruavatar on Dec 8, 2008 10:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Is Reyes better than someone like Boggs?

He’s still young but he hasn’t panned out in the majors yet and we don’t really have and AAA numbers to go by. The only benefit I could see is that he is a lefty.

I’m not saying it would be a terrible trade, I just think a better trade could be made in it’s place.

by TheBirds on Dec 8, 2008 10:52 PM EST up reply actions  

I looked around a bit

and I’d say not really. Reyes is left-handed, FWIW, but he’s a back of the rotation kind of guy. The question is whether the loss of Ankiel for 1 year is offset by the returns on Reyes for 4 years. It’s probably a slight downgrade in the short term but I have little faith in our ability to develop starting pitching thus far.

by azruavatar on Dec 8, 2008 11:25 PM EST up reply actions  

I think it's a pretty unrealistic dream

It’s such a bad fit for the Braves, who are terrible against RHP. Factor in contracts and and injury issues and we’d have to kick in one hell of a prospect.

by TheBirds on Dec 8, 2008 10:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Edit LHP

Ankiel would do wonders for them then.

Also, I’m just gonna say it… Ankiel isn’t a very good defensive center fielder. Perhaps moving to right where he arm is more of a factor and route taking is less of one would change that. That certainly doesn’t add to his trade value though.

by TheBirds on Dec 8, 2008 10:46 PM EST up reply actions  

No go

I don’t think I would do it for anyone other than Johnson of Escobar. The pitchers that they have that would be available (anyone not named Hanson or Jurrjens) don’t really make my head spin, and none have shown anything on the ML level. Love to get one of those MIs though.

by BustaCard on Dec 9, 2008 1:26 AM EST up reply actions  

@ the above post

For some reason it won’t let me reply……..

If you could get Johnson for Ankiel + prospect that would be a great trade in my eyes. Ankiel is just going to be on his way out next year and I think a Mather/Skip platoon will at least equal his production for this year. Johnson would give us more than a quick fix at MIF for a change. I didn’t like the idea of trading Ludwick, but this would make me very happy.

I think Escobar is unrealistic. To be honest I’d say there really isn’t a chance of us landing Johnson either, but it’s plausable.

Against RHP

Skip
Rasmus
Pujols
Ludwick
Glaus
Johnson
Greene
Molina
Pitcher

That would be a SICK lineup.

by TheBirds on Dec 8, 2008 10:16 PM EST reply actions  

I know Skip is too,

but Kelly Johnson has hit lead off quite a bit before he struggled with the bat last year.

by Toddius on Dec 9, 2008 10:07 AM EST up reply actions  

C'mon Mo

Make that trade and grab either Kelly or Yunel for Anks. That way we’d have a MI beyond one year as always. Ankiel will prove too costly for us with Boras as his agent. Do it, Mo!

Miles in '08

by Zoop on Dec 8, 2008 10:54 PM EST reply actions  

Loretta

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2008/12/dodgers-sign-ma.html

whatever happened to Mark Loretta? Seems like a steal to me. I always wondered how he get slipping through the cracks.

On with the (good) youth movement!

by aet15 on Dec 9, 2008 1:41 AM EST reply actions  

well, yeah

that’s the link I sent. They got him for a really cheap deal is my point.

On with the (good) youth movement!

by aet15 on Dec 9, 2008 2:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Forget the Braves...

The Cards should try to work out a deal with the White Sox. The White Sox are big on developing young pitching and are in need of an OF. They have an older pitcher in Buerle ($14M/yr for ’09, ’10, ’11 Age 30 at start of ’09 and has 8 consecutive seasons of 200+ ip, era+ of 121 last season) who has previously stated he would like to pitch in St. Louis. The White Sox also have Dotel under contract for ’09 at $6M (2008: 67 ip, 3.76 era, 92:29 k:bb, 1.21 whip 122 era+ and has closing experience) and will walk after that (could receive draft picks if offered arb-35 y/o now, could be looking for final 2-3 year deal to end career and be willing to decline arb).

What would it take to get these two players? The salaries put the Cardinals a little out of their payroll target, but I believe being $5M over would be well worth it to have another innings eater in the rotation and a closer with some experience who isn’t locked into a multi-year deal.

Send Ankiel (opens spot for Rasmus), and 1 or 2 minor league pitchers (Boggs/Hawksworth/Todd/Mortenson/Walters/Ottavino)? Not sure what it would take but I think Mo should give Ken Williams a call and make something work, on the condition the White Sox don’t send Kelvin Jimenez back.

Any thoughts?

by Jumsy on Dec 9, 2008 1:48 AM EST reply actions  

buehrle's contract is too long. for my taste or for mo's based on recent comments.

That would bump our payroll for 2010 and 2011 into the $70M range — a lot of money on 4 starters (one whose status is questionable), a first baseman, and a catcher for a team with no shortstop or secondbaseman for either season.

I thought Jenks was the closer the chisox were shopping.

I also doubt that one of our outfielders brings any kind of reputable starter except in a salary dump.

by tom s. on Dec 9, 2008 2:53 AM EST up reply actions  

anybody think this guy is worth a look on the Rule 5 draft?

he’s a 2b. He’s playing well in AZ. he got a little AAA time this year but had a .829 OPS at AA where he spent most of his time.

Sounds like he might stick as a backup MIF. Could turn into something better.

And he’s a cub. So, if we took him, we’d be screwing the cubbies.

by tom s. on Dec 9, 2008 3:58 AM EST reply actions  

Sounds like it is only a matter of a day or two

before the Cubs get Peavy. When this happens they will have the best starting rotation in the NL and maybe in all of baseball. Of course there are health concerns with some of their guys like Harden, but if they are all healthy they could run away with the Central…at least on paper but the games still have to be played.

I think we might have a chance to compete with them if Carp returns to form and Lohse and Wainer have great seasons. It’s a lot of “what if’s” and “hope for this” but it’s all we have right now. We can’t afford to compete with the Cubs money wise…but I bet our guys can suprise some folks like last year.

We’ve got a long way to go and a short time to get there.

by KYCards on Dec 9, 2008 4:44 AM EST reply actions  

the cubs are burning the furniture to stay warm right now. If they take on Peavy, their contractual

salary obligations will get ridiculous. A lot of their high ticket players are on the wane (D. Lee) or have never shown their skill (Fukudome). There are some good arms in their rotation but a lot of dicey talent, too. They’ll have a great 2009, but in a year or so, they’ll be seriously handcuffed by their salary issues.

by tom s. on Dec 9, 2008 5:13 AM EST up reply actions  

Maybe, maybe not

If they get a new owner that wants to win and will spend money and eat bad contracts then I don’t see them going away anytime soon. It really depends on that. To be honest if they get an owner that wants to win and is willing to spend what it takes, then this division is their’s for the taking for as long as they want. No other team in the Central can compete with them in terms of money. So if they decide that they want to have the higest payroll in the NL then they can dominate this divsion for a decade much like the Yankees/Red Sox have done in the AL East. The Cardinals sure won’t outspend them, neither can the Brewers, Reds, Astros,or Pirates. When it comes to money to spend on players the Cubs have no rival in the Central division.

To me the Cubs finally figured out that they CAN outspend the teams in their division and can dominate this way. It took them a while to figure it out but they are laying it on now. All we can do is just watch and see what happens, and hope for more choke jobs.

We’ve got a long way to go and a short time to get there.

by KYCards on Dec 9, 2008 5:34 AM EST up reply actions  

Downs

I was cruising around on mltraderumors and reading on the possibility of the Rays and the Cards have opened up talks. Apparently, thier interested in Ank and scu, Ive seen alot of Sonnastine support, but Edwin Jacksons name is one i find very interesting,and with the Rays starting potcing depth it possibility. Hes only 25 years onld, just told 25 in September. He threw 183 innings last year, and 161 the year before that. Last year he walked 77, not great but doable, and he struck out 108 not bad. His E.R.A last year was right around 4.40(same for his career, roughly) but hes still young and the N.L central isnt the A.L east. Hes not elidgible for free agency until 2012 hes arb elgible after next year tough…On a not so high note his WHIP is1.6 for is career…kinda of decieving if you look at everything hes not that bad.

On another note, I saw a Jays fan say they had NO catching dept whatsoever. Nor do they have 3rd base depth, sounds like a match to me. Anderson package for someonle like Downs or Marcum?…..thoughts?

by pujols_5 on Dec 9, 2008 5:45 PM EST reply actions  

I am unfamiliar with

the players you mentioned

this line is dedicated to '09

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Dec 9, 2008 8:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Im not sure

how to put the link up here…Im relativley new, if its any help at all i got my stats on them from sports.ca ontario

Strikeouts are boring - besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls. More democratic.-Bull Durham

by pujols_5 on Dec 10, 2008 2:29 AM EST up reply actions  

Sorry about the grammar

Strikeouts are boring - besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls. More democratic.-Bull Durham

by pujols_5 on Dec 9, 2008 5:58 PM EST reply actions  

steve phillips just said

on sportscenter that the cardinals and angels are the main suitors for bryan fuentes. the rumored deal is something less than the 3 yrs/ $37 million k-rod got from the mets. that’s a relief. 3 yrs $36 million?

by rannpb on Dec 9, 2008 6:07 PM EST reply actions  

Haha

That would not be good. I still think a starter should be the main priority and spending $10M+ a season on a closer doesn’t solve our starting issues. You can’t close games you aren’t winning in the first place.

The Godfather himself has decided to grace us with his presence. This is his damn house. He sleeps 20 feet away.

by thegodfather on Dec 9, 2008 6:12 PM EST up reply actions  

I wonder how much whispering in the ear from LaDunc

Mozeliak can take

“c’mon John, you know you want to sign a major league proven closer” in sith-like voices

“but, but, we don’t need a closer, we have two already”

“money talks, John. why start the game when you can’t close it”

“the game doesn’t exactly work that way… why is my throat feeling weird, can’t breathe…. ok ok, we need a closer!”

/attempt at humor

this line is dedicated to '09

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Dec 9, 2008 9:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Well I LOL'd

So I’d say you attempt was successful

Patiently awaiting the day Colby Rasmus does this: .275/.381/.551/.932, 29HR, in St. Louis...

by RunninRedbird on Dec 9, 2008 9:44 PM EST up reply actions  

phillips?

no worries then, right? Has Phillips ever been right about anything?

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Dec 9, 2008 6:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Ha

I don’t believe he has

Acquire Boof Bonser. I am serious, and don't call me Shirley.

by Dave Barry on Dec 9, 2008 6:18 PM EST up reply actions  

here's another phillips gem

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2008/12/jj-putz-rumors.html who on earth told him this…i think it woul dbe a steal for the Ms Putz struggled alot last yr and even though I’d want him I’d have to be worried about his arm.

I can't believe i gave up a homerun to that punch and judy hitter-major league 2

by punchinjudy on Dec 9, 2008 7:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm afraid he has....

He said the Cardinals would fade towards the end of 08’. = {(. < I present the mustache frown face.

For some reason, I don't enjoy watching Big Mac hit #62, but I fondly remember Ray Lankford blasting the ball out of the park in the same game. He had one sweet swing!!

by miniboscorino on Dec 9, 2008 8:54 PM EST up reply actions  

however he didnt predict

the cards would even make the playoffs in 06 and I think they won it all that year…He is the def. of a blind squirrell

I can't believe i gave up a homerun to that punch and judy hitter-major league 2

by punchinjudy on Dec 9, 2008 9:34 PM EST up reply actions  

What would it take to get Zach Grienke?

He is really good and is still cost controlled for a couple more years. I know that the Royals asking price is steep, but we have a lot of chips to deal from.

by vivaelpujols on Dec 9, 2008 8:00 PM EST reply actions  

I don't think we match up with enough pieces to get grienke.

for instance, their outfield is full to overflowing, so they’d have little interest in our typical chips – ankiel, say. They’re already looking to dispose of either teahen or guillen.

They could demand a good price for grienke. and they’re still in need of good pitching themselves. They don’t compare to tampa with an excess of starting pitching.

by tom s. on Dec 9, 2008 8:10 PM EST up reply actions  

How about John Smoltz?

Too much of a risk? His agents are pushing as if he’s a possibility for another team. He’ll likely be a Brave, but let’s play to the fact that his agents are pushing him for contenders: good signing or no?

I vote yeah, simply because I love the guy. He’s still got it, and he’s as clutch as they get. If his agents are throwing his medical analysis at every contender out there, it seems he’s healthy enough.

Miles in '08

by Zoop on Dec 9, 2008 8:13 PM EST reply actions  

isn't Smoltz hurt?

I thought he was out for at least the first couple months of the season

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Dec 9, 2008 8:27 PM EST up reply actions  

maybe if they could be quick enough

to crunch the numbers on deals for Wood(who seems headed to Clevland), Hoff,and Smoltz, Funetes wood be the priciest, but if you are looking at one yr bandages I’d put Hoff first, Smoltz, and if no other options..cough izzy??

I can't believe i gave up a homerun to that punch and judy hitter-major league 2

by punchinjudy on Dec 9, 2008 8:29 PM EST up reply actions  

I think I'd rather get Johnson than Smoltz...

but I don’t really want to get either one of them

this line is dedicated to '09

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Dec 9, 2008 9:05 PM EST up reply actions  

good stuff from perrotto at BP

subscription required, I think, but he’s pretty much liveblogging from the lobby. Some stuff there I hadn’t seen anywhere else, IE cards still in on beimel and wolf, cubs might trade big Z, etc.

god, i love baseball. -roy hobbs

by SleepyCA on Dec 9, 2008 8:37 PM EST reply actions  

More reports of Francouer for Grienke in that blog

That might be the worst deal since Brock for Broglio. Couldn’t we trade Ank for Grienke if the Royals would be considering that.

by vivaelpujols on Dec 9, 2008 8:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Grienke's asking price is beyond his worth

which says something, as the guy’s talented.

Miles in '08

by Zoop on Dec 9, 2008 10:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Thinking about all of the rehabbers (such a word) that are portrayed as certainties by management . .

(read: Carp, AP, Ank, Greene, Lil’Dunc Kinney) one is mindful of this quote,
“It’s difficult to believe someone is telling the truth when you know you’d lie if you were in the same position.”

An optimist is a man who upon discovering that a rose smells better than a cabbage concludes it will make better soup.

HL Mencken

by akaitori on Dec 9, 2008 10:40 PM EST reply actions  

I have said all along that

they need to get someone as Carp insurance, and to be honest I had forgotten about Dunc….i think it is unwise to be so confident and not get backup plans

I can't believe i gave up a homerun to that punch and judy hitter-major league 2

by punchinjudy on Dec 9, 2008 11:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Fuentes and Putz may be in Cards plan.....

well… according to this article over at Mlb.com….

Go To:

http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20081209&content_id=3708563&vkey=news_stl&fext=.jsp&c_id=stl

People ask me what I do in winter when there's no baseball. I'll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring.-Rogers Hornsby

by thegashousegang on Dec 10, 2008 8:00 AM EST reply actions  

Rosenthal has Ankiel +1 on the table for JJ Putz

http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/8922020/Wednesday-MLB-winter-meetings-blog

I hope he’s wrong, or I hope Seattle says no. Of course, Rosenthal has been way off a few times this week.

"The Mollusk" makes me want to rail LSD crystals off my friends' sternum. Rage."

by ICEYhawtSTUNNAZ on Dec 10, 2008 3:25 PM EST up reply actions  

and the Ms said no?

man for a team who sucks they sure are demandish..they are so far away from being anything even in a ho hum west..course the angels rake..

I can't believe i gave up a homerun to that punch and judy hitter-major league 2

by punchinjudy on Dec 10, 2008 4:52 PM EST up reply actions  

What would Ankiel do for them?

They need someone who can they have under contract for a few years. They don’t need a one year rental guy.

On with the (good) youth movement!

by aet15 on Dec 10, 2008 8:28 PM EST up reply actions  

wow..that would be terrible trade

we could get a young starter for Ankiel instead of a injury problem closer!

Milt Thompson FTW!

by gossard56 on Dec 10, 2008 4:58 PM EST up reply actions  

IZ2 signed for 6mil

that makes the Greene trade look even better now

by bearcatcardfan on Dec 10, 2008 2:16 PM EST reply actions  

BTW

that’s 6 mil for 2 years… although I’d still much rather have greene

by E-Dizzle on Dec 10, 2008 10:47 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah I completely read over that part

and on mlbtraderumors it said 6 mil

11:46am: Peter Schmuck of the Baltimore Sun says the Orioles “have all but finalized” a deal with Izturis that is “believed to be worth about $6MM.” The O’s may not announce the deal until after the Meetings, because Izturis will have to take a physical first.

by bearcatcardfan on Dec 11, 2008 4:15 AM EST up reply actions  

Ankiel + prospect for Putz??

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2008/12/jj-putz-rumor-1.html

it says the cards offered this. i’d rather not see ankiel go for a reliever.

Smell the Glove

by emrfg8 on Dec 10, 2008 3:24 PM EST reply actions  

Holy smokes!

mlbtraderumors says nationals are willing to offer teixera 10 years at over 20 mil per.

by soccerfreak on Dec 10, 2008 3:49 PM EST reply actions  

Here's another absurd figure..

5/$70 mil for Oliver Perez. My prediction is either he’ll get about half that or he’ll be a proud member of the fiscally prudent Seattle Mariners/Texas Rangers next year. Question for Cardinals fans: would you give 3/$45 to Oliver Perez?

"The Mollusk" makes me want to rail LSD crystals off my friends' sternum. Rage."

by ICEYhawtSTUNNAZ on Dec 10, 2008 4:51 PM EST up reply actions  

nope.....

People ask me what I do in winter when there's no baseball. I'll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring.-Rogers Hornsby

by thegashousegang on Dec 10, 2008 5:41 PM EST up reply actions  

3 yrs, $45 M for Perez

That hypothetical contract makes me feel pretty durn good about 4/$41M for Lohse. I know a lot of people here complained about that contract, and yes 4 years is a little long, but perhaps after all the free agent starter dust settles this season, we will look back on that contract as solid.

by Fred Head on Dec 10, 2008 6:46 PM EST up reply actions  

perhaps...

… some reports have Burnett getting Zambrano money: 5/$90. some have the starting price of Lowe at 4/$60.

of course, those contracts haven’t been signed yet, and those aren’t really Lohse’s comparables. but i think most of us would put Lohse somewhere in between Burnett/Lowe and Garland/Wolf. we won’t know how good of a deal we’re getting with Lohse until after those guys sign.

by kindred on Dec 10, 2008 7:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Perez could not cut it for the Pirates or the Mets - a perfect fit for the Cards. . .

An optimist is a man who upon discovering that a rose smells better than a cabbage concludes it will make better soup.

HL Mencken

by akaitori on Dec 10, 2008 6:05 PM EST reply actions  

I propose

Ankiel and Motte for Matt Capps, EASILY my favorite guy of everybody mentioned. Thoughts?

Miles in '08

by Zoop on Dec 10, 2008 7:05 PM EST reply actions  

there's a pretty good chance

that Motte outperforms Capps next year. So, no.

god, i love baseball. -roy hobbs

by SleepyCA on Dec 10, 2008 7:09 PM EST up reply actions  

You really think so, Sleepy?

I certainly hope so, but my expectations are nowhere near that. If that’s the case, why even bother trading anybody for a reliever? I’m all for depth, but sign some scrubs to fill the spots rather that breaking out the champagne bottle with a big signing or deal, ’cause Capps is pretty damn good.

Then again, I’d rather see 2B addressed over closer anyway. I’m all for Perez in that role. Too bad Affeldt signed so quickly.

Miles in '08

by Zoop on Dec 10, 2008 7:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Ankiel + lower level prospect for Capps

Is more my speed. Having Capps instead of Motte wouldn’t really do that much good.

I just don’t see Ankiel as a good fit for the Pirates, he’ll just be gone after a year.

by TheBirds on Dec 10, 2008 7:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Same could be said

for Seattle. That team clearly cannot contend as is, yet that offer is on the table.

Miles in '08

by Zoop on Dec 10, 2008 7:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Welll...

Mariners actually spend money, so they could resign Ankiel. Putz is also closer to FA and more expensive than Capps.

Not really the same now is it?

by TheBirds on Dec 10, 2008 8:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Bad move

If the cardinals are the team that signs Fuentes for 3/$33 I think that would be an awful move.

by thoran85 on Dec 10, 2008 8:32 PM EST reply actions  

cross your fingers

Fuentes has always seemed like a trap.

by TheBirds on Dec 10, 2008 8:36 PM EST up reply actions  

I mean...

I think he’s an excellent pitcher and a top-notch closer, but I don’t think that would be a good use of money. I just think paying top dollar for a closer is categorically a bad idea, especially this season, when it seems like there are much more pressing needs, ie young pitcher, long term MIF, and LOOGY. I wouldn’t be upset with Brian Fuentes…he has a cool name, he doesn’t give up many home runs (and for a guy whose pitched at Coors field for several seasons, that’s quite an achievement), and he’s pretty nasty. It’s just a lot of money and a long time to lock up a closer.

"The Mollusk" makes me want to rail LSD crystals off my friends' sternum. Rage."

by ICEYhawtSTUNNAZ on Dec 10, 2008 9:28 PM EST up reply actions  

I wouldn't mind a Fuentes signing

if we also trade for a young starter. For example Ankiel for Sonnastine

by vivaelpujols on Dec 10, 2008 10:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Tigers getting Edwin Jackson

rumor has it that Tampa got the left handed hitting corner outfielder it was looking for instead of Ankiel and traded away from their surplus SP.

by ubeddie on Dec 10, 2008 10:24 PM EST reply actions  

Joyce > Mather...

… and much better than Schu. his first year above AA last year as a 23-year old and he OPSed .900 in AAA (200 ABs) and .830 in the bigs (240 ABs).

i’m not entirely sold on Jackson, either. he’s still young of course and he’s got tools, but pretty limited success and already in his arb years. good deal for the Rays: get OF help and keep Sonnanstine.

by kindred on Dec 10, 2008 10:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Fuentes

I would love to see them sign Fuentes for 3 years. Can you imagine the 1-2-3 punch of Motte, Perez, and Fuentes. You dont have to necessarily make Fuentes the closer, switch him and Perez out between the 8th and 9th depending on the matchup, AND DO NOT FORGET about Josh Kinney, I think he could be great this year. We just need another starter and you can go ahead and buy postseason tickets now

by eburn40oz on Dec 10, 2008 10:34 PM EST reply actions  

that's the point...

… if you sign Fuentes for 3/$33 you can’t get another starter.

by kindred on Dec 10, 2008 10:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes you can.....

It just will have to come through trade, or be a a guy like Penny/Wolff.

"Stats are for losers," Muschamp said after last week's victory. "I like winning games."

by SoonerfanTU on Dec 11, 2008 10:55 AM EST up reply actions  

Trade for a Starter

I would rather trade Rasmus than Ankiel but Im in the minority on that Im sure

by eburn40oz on Dec 10, 2008 10:41 PM EST reply actions  

Care to explain why?

Trading for a starter is all well and good but, um…

"The Mollusk" makes me want to rail LSD crystals off my friends' sternum. Rage."

by ICEYhawtSTUNNAZ on Dec 10, 2008 10:42 PM EST up reply actions  

maybe because

Rasmus wasn’t all that great last year?

this line is dedicated to '09

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Dec 10, 2008 11:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Other people think this is absurd too, right?

I’m not the only one that thinks this a completely asinine argument?

"The Mollusk" makes me want to rail LSD crystals off my friends' sternum. Rage."

by ICEYhawtSTUNNAZ on Dec 10, 2008 11:42 PM EST up reply actions  

absurd?

I’m sure there are others that think it is absurd, but that doesn’t make it so.

by abothecardinal on Dec 11, 2008 12:34 AM EST up reply actions  

i don't want to take away from what ank did last year.

but he ultimately was not all that spectacular. He hit for good power. His fielding ultimately ended up being only okay, despite his spectacular arm. But he went through long slumps. He got injured. And he is 30, and approaching a very expensive free agency.

He may do better next year, or he may not. This would be a very different argument if we were arguing about trading, say, ryan ludwick to make room for rasmus. but if you’re going to say, i don’t think rasmus is so great, then you need to explain why ankiel will do much better next year than this.

Remember, ankiel had a net worth of 19 runs last year, one run behind skip schumaker. he was not a top 5, or even a top 15 center fielder.

again, i’m not saying that ankiel did badly or that i think he’s not a good player or that i don’t think he’ll do better next year.

by tom s. on Dec 11, 2008 4:06 AM EST up reply actions  

A huge man crush

and I just think if we trade Ankiel we wont get a pitcher worth having, if we cant get Putz for Ankiel and a prospect then who are we going to get for Ankiel, Adam Eaton or Mike Hampton

by eburn40oz on Dec 10, 2008 10:54 PM EST reply actions  

Putz just went to New York....

Putz, Sean Green, and Jeremy Reed for Endy Chavez, Aaron Heilman, Joe Carp. Cleveland throws in Franklin Guiteriz (?spelling) and gets Joe Smith from the Mets and a 2nd base prospect Valbuena from the M’s. The second base guy looks like the most interesting player in the deal.

Chavez can now rob Rolen of another home run……

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Dec 10, 2008 11:31 PM EST up reply actions  

That's fair

I respect that, although I disagree. Based on nothing but conjecture, it seems to me that we could have gotten Andy Sonnanstine for Ankiel, definitely could have gotten Edwin Jackson, maybe could get Mike Gonzalez +1, or with a lot of haggling and a prospect, Ian Kennedy…someone like that. Either a young 3rd/4th starter from a team who really wants an outfielder, or a fantastic bullpen arm to allow KMac to try to start.

"The Mollusk" makes me want to rail LSD crystals off my friends' sternum. Rage."

by ICEYhawtSTUNNAZ on Dec 10, 2008 11:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

649494__1__small
Hall of WAR: Part 2

Recent FanPosts

N1046613005_8392_small
Our 2010-2011 strays
Dsc01844_small
Cardinals take the Governor's Joplin Challenge, will help build 35 homes for torando victims
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals of All-Time - Relief Pitching Edition
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals of All-Time - Starting Pitching Edition
Small
Two Trades That Set the Cards Back in the 70s
Nyc_small
Cardinals Offense vs. Reds Offense - 2012
Nyc_small
Cardinals Rotation vs. Reds Rotation - 2012
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals by Position - Center Fielders
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals by Position - Corner Outfielders

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Jack_benny__1__small DanUpBaby

Editors

Bendermad_small azruavatar

Trigun_001_small the red baron

Images_small tom s.

Authors

1989_bgh_cropped_small bgh

Valverde_medium_small vivaelpujols