The League of GLRS: The Secret to the Cards' Success
For years, baseball historians, archaeologists, and anthropologists have belived that the Tony LaRussa era St. Louis Cardinals were successful because of an undocumented group of gritty role players who dwell in the bullpen and on the bench of the Stadiums Busch. Today, in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Cardinal athropoligst Tom Gordon has made startling revelations about this collection of individuals. The group? GUYS LIKE RUSS SPRINGER.
You, like me, are undoubtedly wondering who has membership in the exclusive League of GLRS ("Guys LIke Russ Springer")? Very little documentation exists. Up until today, no one even knew the name of this shadow group within the Cardinal Clubhouse, the lifeblood of a decade of winning. But, not only has Poster-Dispatcher Gordon exposed their collective name, but he has also provided the list of their membership, a list many thought lost to the sands of time. Here it is: So Taguchi, Scott Spiezio, Aaron Miles, Cal Eldred, Eduardo Perez, John Mabry, Craig Paquette, and Mike Matthews.
You, like me, are doubtlessly wondering how a list touting the secret to the success of the TLR era does not include Albert Pujols, or, as I like to call him, "The Greatest Baseball Player in the World."
Sure, Albert Pujols is the foundation that all this is built on. But reliable veterans -– mentally tough guys like Springer -– have given recent vintage Cards teams their heart and soul.
So Pujols is "the foundation," but "The success of the La Russa regime is built on guys like Springer." For those slightly confused, as I was, yes, a "foundation" is, in fact, "the natural or prepared ground or base on which some structure rests." Perhaps Pujols is the bedrock, under the soil, upon which the foundation of the League of GLRS stands stoutly foundationing the Cardinals to success...
While there is some confusion as to just what makes up the foundation of the St. Louis Cardinal Baseball Club--Pujols or the League of GLRS--there is but one entity that makes up the "heart and soul" of the ballclub and it is the "mentally tough" League of GLRS.
Heart and soul doesn't hit many home runs, get many RBIs, get on base very often, play many innings, throw many pitches, or retire many batters. This is why the League of GLRS have gone oft-unrecognized in the annals of Cardinal lore. However, Mr. Gordon continues to illuminate us as to this long-standing LaRussan League of GLRS. Aside from providing a heart and a soul to the collective club as a whole, they have done much more, as Mr. Gordon lays out...
Such players offer more than insurance, depth and fill-in capability. They help mold the team’s competitive personality and sustain the push through the 162-game marathon.
Insurance, kinda. Depth, yes. Fill-in capability, as in replacement player. That's what they are. Role players off of the bench.
These guys show up every day ready to give what they have whenever they are needed.
Isn't this the lowest possible bar one can set? Giving what they have whenever they are needed? This isn't the Justice League of America where what they have are super powers and when they are needed is an instance when the planet is in great peril. (As an aside, how does David Eckstein not get included in this League? Does a World Series MVP preclude you from being amongst the ranks of the League of GLRS? Or, does accounting for more than 10 win shares in a season (28 in '05, 12 in '06, 11 in '07) preclude inclusion in the League?)
They don’t require constant hand-holding from the staff or consistent usage to remain focused.
La Russa appreciates such players and makes them important. Such players are a huge part of the culture he has maintained through most of his time here.
How was that culture in 2007? 2008? When the Cards were floundering in fourth place. Don't get me wrong. As a Cardinal fan, I love the players listed above. But I don't allow myself to cry a river of nostalgia for gritty role players who are a dime a dozen. Without letting these guys go, we'd have never had their replacements. Paquette gave way to Mabry. Mabry gave way to Spezio. Role players by their very definition are not foundational in nature. They are complimentary parts, plugged into a nearly complete puzzle.
The key to success in the TLR era has been Mark McGwire, Matt Morris, Woody Williams, Chris Carpenter, Jason Isringhausen, Albert Pujols, Scott Rolen, Jim Edmonds, Edgar Renteria, and Yadi Molina. Every playoff team has a core of All-Stars that produce offensively and defensively. This article is just silly and I don't at all understand how you can point to the depth of righty relievers who will fill the '09 'pen in one paragraph, cite the other holes yet to be filled, and then argue that Springer is in any way integral to the success of the 2009 Cardinals. Especially after him being a member of the 2007 and 2008 non-playoff teams.
2 recs |
8 comments
Comments
Great Post...
You did a great job breaking down the absurdity of that article. But at times like this is when I really miss the Fire Joe Morgan guys. (I think they would have been a little meaner and vulgar than you)
When can the collective baseball public, and seemingly those who are paid to write about the sport get away from this unexplainable love for replacement level to average gritty guys?
The thought that I have is that the season is over. And that everybody in the game; a fan, a coach, a player, a manager, front office, scouts...surrender. They say, "that's enough," especially after a game like this. But then Christmas comes, New Years, contracts are signed, trades are made, free agents are signed; and then baseball, like the rose beneath the April snow will force it's way to the front again. And we'll have the fever once more.
- The immortal Jack Buck
by Jack618 on Dec 4, 2008 1:06 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
We Midwesterners
aren’t all that vulgar or mean. I find the piece silly and slightly offensive. Every good club’s bench players get celebrated illogically. Look at what happened in 2007 when the Cards took the luxury of overpaying to bring back the core groups of GLRS. Spezio, Miles, So…Worst season in about a decade. The whole irrationality to this column is that it somehow suggests that overpaying for gritty fill-ins is somehow good and that this marks the end of an era, or something. Russ Springer pitched on two non-playoff clubs. He had very good years, don’t get me wrong, but he’s 40 and teetering on a cliff. This was a good decision on every level.
"I'm gonna throw the nastiest curveball I have ever thrown...if he hits it, I'll tip my cap, but if not we're going to the Series."
--Adam Wainwright on the final pitch of the 2006 NLCS
by bgh on Dec 4, 2008 1:16 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agree, all around.
Just a poor understanding of how to build a winning team and a misunderstanding of how easy it is to replace GLRS on Gordon’s part.
And I was just messing around with the mean and vulgar thing.
The thought that I have is that the season is over. And that everybody in the game; a fan, a coach, a player, a manager, front office, scouts...surrender. They say, "that's enough," especially after a game like this. But then Christmas comes, New Years, contracts are signed, trades are made, free agents are signed; and then baseball, like the rose beneath the April snow will force it's way to the front again. And we'll have the fever once more.
- The immortal Jack Buck
by Jack618 on Dec 4, 2008 1:24 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
oquendo!?! Oquendo gets no love!?!
Jose Oquendo is the charter effing member of the GLRS club. They should rename it the GLJO.
Not to mention the sunk opportunity costs in allowing a grizzled thirty-two year old to fill a utility role while someone languishes at AAA who would make league minimum and maybe move up to a starting role with some exposure.
by tom s. on Dec 7, 2008 8:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I hope this begins the re-coinage
of grittiness to GLRS.
Space.
It's a problem we face.
So we never go anywhere.
We just stay in one place.
by hazel on Dec 4, 2008 7:10 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Jeff Gordon
Pays the PD to write for them, right?
hecanthithecanthithecanthithecanthit
by Alxfritz on Dec 4, 2008 7:17 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
a contrarian
I can only say these things:
There are many Taguchi’s in this world, but there was only one ‘SO’ Taguchi.
And who wasn’t in love with Bo Hart ? (at least for a few weeks)
by the Tewk on Dec 7, 2008 11:44 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
"Tom" Gordon?
If “Tom’s” writing is as moronic as Jeff Gordon’s, I’m surprised anyone actually reads that crap.
Perhaps Jeff realized that even his 7 regular readers were starting to grow weary of the moronic BS he calls “writing” and so he craftily changed his name to regain the benefit of the doubt.
“Bah! Not today, Jeff Gordon! I won’t read any more of your idiotic rambl…hello? What’s this? Why, this article is by some fellow named Tom Gordon! Well, in that case, let’s see what he has to say…”
There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
by Mr Clean on Dec 9, 2008 5:36 PM EST reply actions 0 recs



















