Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Nevin Shapiro Vows To Bring Down Miami

Yadi's Gold Glove

On a couple of occasions, I’ve made comments about Yadi’s being undeserving of a Gold Glove this year. I must admit that neither time did I actually defend those comments. Truthfully, they were glib remarks that were based more on Yadi’s defense this year relative to his defense in previous years rather than his defense in comparison to the other catchers in the NL. I stand by my comments in the first post that this was likely Yadi’s worst season defensively. However, all of you who pointed out that that didn’t necessarily mean that he was not the best defensive catcher in the NL are also correct. Honestly, I’ve never really looked at it…until now.

As we all know by now, Yadi won his first Gold Glove yesterday. I’m happy for him, of course. I do believe that he is the best defensive catcher in the NL, and probably the game. Nevertheless, his defense this year was lacking in comparison w/ his defense in previous years.

As the table in the first link points out, Yadi committed more errors this year than ever before. His CS% was the lowest of his career and his WP + PB per game was the highest of his career. All this does not mean, however, that he was worse than any other catcher in the league. Perhaps it’s true that he’s set such a high standard that he can have his worst defensive season and still be the best in the league. I hope that’s the case.

Compared to his peers, Yadi’s CS% was 3rd in the NL – his brother, Bengie, finished 2nd. Jason freaking Kendall finished first. Can anyone believe that? It’s true. WP + PB/G? 4th in the NL behind Russell Martin, Brian McCann, and Kendall. Only Martin made more errors than Yadi; McCann had 9 as well. There’s enough evidence to tell me that catchers do not have a material impact on ERA. Nevertheless, Yadi’s ERA was 4.22 – 6th in the NL. Like I said, I attribute that to our pitching staff and not to Yadi but if you’re looking for a compelling reason why Yadi is the best defensive catcher in the NL, that ain’t it.

Sky Kalkman over at beyond the boxscore evaluated the best catchers in baseball a few days ago. Now, Sky’s evaluations included offensive numbers as well but, by using the table toward the end of the thread, you can pretty easily determine Yadi’s defensive ratings versus his peers. He’s basing his evaluations on the aforementioned PB/WP rates and SB/CS ratio as calculated by Justin Inaz’s total value spreadsheet. Compared to other catchers in the NL, Yadi ranks 5th defensively – behind…guess who… Kendall, Chris Snyder, Bengie, and Soto. So far I’ve seen nothing to indicate that Yadi was the best defensive C in the NL.

So let’s go to bill james online to look at John Dewan’s fielding bible awards. When comparing the rankings of the so-called "experts" – Yadi finished first going away. 5 of the 9 experts chose Yadi as the best catcher, not just in the NL, but in baseball. Yadi finished first in Tom Tango’s fan poll. Two experts had him 2nd in baseball. John Dewan, founder of the Fielding Bible Awards, had Yadi 8th. All of those plaudits gave Yadi his 2nd straight Fielding Bible Award.

The Fielding Bible Awards do a pretty damned good job of selecting the best fielders in the league. Look at that list – some really good fielders on that list, including a first baseman who deserved a Gold Glove, BTW. (It wouldn’t be an offseason, I guess, w/o a Card being snubbed for a major award.)

Now I don’t see a clear cut, most deserving catcher from this list. Molina’s got a great reputation and it’s well-earned for his defensive work so far in his career, but I see nothing that tells me that he was the most deserving candidate this year. Was this a "make-up call" for last year’s snub? Was it more of a lifetime achievement award based on his reputation? Maybe to both. Maybe voters fell back on Yadi simply b/c no one else stood out. The thing that stands out to me, however, is that Albert was the more deserving gold-glover. I’m glad for Yadi. It’s about time he got one and I can’t point to anyone who was obviously snubbed by his selection but he wasn’t clearly deserving either.

On another note, Toronto claimed Kelvin Jimenez on waivers. I find this troubling. Who’s Tony going to turn to when we’re down 6 runs in the 5th inning? Who’s going to continue to throw batting practice while Aaron Miles warms up down in the pen? Can we expect such futility from Brad Thompson or even Mark Worrell? I think not. Mo – you’re on notice for this one.

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported that there’s been some discussion between the Cards and Braves about Kelly Johnson but that the Cards interested in giving up Ryan Ludwick in order to get him. I’m glad to hear that. Johnson’s a nice player but I really think that Ludwick’s worth considerably more than Kelly Johnson. If Johnson were a SS – now we’re getting somewhere.

And, oh yeah, Carp had surgery on his elbow yesterday. The good news is that it’s not related to his shoulder problems. Boy, that’s a relief!

Comment 231 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Man

Even in the link you posted about the ludwick-johnson deal, they guy says it was a deal that made sense for both teams.

Am I completely missing something? I mean come on, Ludwick is more valuable that Johnson by a pretty good margin….It just never made any sense to me.

I think chuckb may be right about this being a make-up call for Yadi. But like the man said….take it however you can get it

by VolsnCards5 on Nov 6, 2008 7:12 AM EST reply actions  

Another player

There was talk among the commenters at MLBTraderumors of adding a pitching prospect. If it was Johnson plus decent pitching prospect for Ludwick, I would definitely consider it.

by JBagKY on Nov 6, 2008 8:35 AM EST up reply actions  

+1

"Cross a lawyer with the Godfather, make you an offer you can't understand" - Don Henley

by Futility Infielder on Nov 6, 2008 9:39 AM EST up reply actions  

agreed

the last decent pitching prospect they gave us wasn’t too bad

by Glowsticks on Nov 6, 2008 12:06 PM EST up reply actions  

heh

this line is dedicated to '09

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Nov 6, 2008 1:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Just went over to Talking Chop

and propsed the whole idea of adding a pitching prospect, and they seemed to think that if its Johnson for Ludwick, they would have to kick in a decent pitching prospect as well. Then they suggest Lillibridge and Johnson for Ludwick and Kennedy, no money. I might be interested in that deal.

by JBagKY on Nov 6, 2008 1:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Escobar

I also read that the Cards are interested in Escobar or Johnson and that the Braves might need one of them to trade for Peavy and won’t be trading both. I would think that if they miss out on Peavy we could possibly get Escobar for Ludwick, that deal I would do if they threw in more on their side he is almost the same player as Johnson, slightly higher OBP due to a higher BA but roughly the same OPS in the end anyway. The main difference being position. I am also of the belief that Ludwick is still unproven. He has had all of one healthy season, is this his best season, will he get injured again, will he stay healthy and get better? We just don’t know, then again both of these guys are younger and unproven too. If the interest in Ankiel is real though I would do an Ankiel for Escobar deal straight up.

by StLHugo on Nov 6, 2008 8:10 AM EST reply actions  

Ankiel for Escobar would be a steal given their contract status and value.

They may want a minor leaguer as well but the Cardinals should jump at that. I’d have to think long and hard about swapping Ludwick for Escobar as well.

by azruavatar on Nov 6, 2008 8:33 AM EST up reply actions  

Escobar

might be the more attractive target. If it was Ludwick for Escobar, i think that I would still want to have them give something else back.

by JBagKY on Nov 6, 2008 8:40 AM EST up reply actions  

Say the Braves went for this

could Kozma or Barden move to 2B and fill that hole in a year or two?

"Cross a lawyer with the Godfather, make you an offer you can't understand" - Don Henley

by Futility Infielder on Nov 6, 2008 10:42 AM EST up reply actions  

i might have to agree with you on both counts (jump at ankiel, consider ludwick)

escobar is surprisingly close to johnson as a hitter—better on base, worse slugging. i don’t know much about johnson’s defense, but i’ve read at VEB that it’s enough of a drag to make his total value comparable to adam kennedy. i do know that escobar compares favorably to izturis in OOZ and RZR. i’m quite a novice with defensive stats though.

by mattybobo on Nov 6, 2008 11:18 AM EST up reply actions  

It depends on what you mean

by “compares favorably”. Similar, yes, but not quite as good.

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Nov 6, 2008 4:52 PM EST up reply actions  

true. the question in my opinion is whether it's close enough.

much has been made about the fact that kelly johnson is only marginally better than adam kennedy, because of how good kennedy’s defense is and how mediocre johnson’s is. escobar is almost as good a hitter as johnson. he might be almost as good a fielder as izturis. this makes him much more valuable, doesn’t it? he’s also younger.

by mattybobo on Nov 6, 2008 5:31 PM EST up reply actions  

yes.

As far as “value to the team” goes, we also don’t have an SS for 2009, so he’d be bigger improvement to our team than KJ.

the enemy's gate is down.

by SleepyCA on Nov 6, 2008 5:47 PM EST up reply actions  

and given his team control and cost effectiveness

he also has “organizational value” as well, from a development and a drafting prospective. Maybe we can start to see the words high upside at that position.

"The Post-Dispatch Cardinals website continues down a path where you'll notice it's really a few McCarvers leading a pack of Dusty Bakers. I'm so glad they don't represent Cardinal Nation. No wonder newspapers are going down in shambles"

by AdjustedExpectations on Nov 6, 2008 6:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Johnson shot down by StL

By David O’Brien

November 4, 2008 9:15 PM | Link to this

You in the KJ camp apparently needn’t worry about him going to St. Louis for Ludwick. The Kelly part of that equation was shot down by someone on the St. Louis side.

However, the Braves are interested in Ludwick. Ankiel, I’m not as sure about, but I think they’ve discuss him with the Cards, too.

By N8

by StLHugo on Nov 6, 2008 8:50 AM EST up reply actions  

Bet they are still talking

So Atlanta asked for Ludwick and it sounds like we countered with Ankiel. Atlanta declined. Gotta think it’s not over. Middle infield is a big need for us and we have lots of other trading chips not named Ryan Ludwick.

by jjray on Nov 6, 2008 9:20 AM EST up reply actions  

johnson for ludwick has the same chance as johnson for brendan ryan.
david o’brien, check your answering machine, comedy central has been calling.

by ball in play on Nov 6, 2008 9:34 AM EST up reply actions  

Ludwick for either one of the Braves MIFs

is not close to an even exchange. The Braves don’t appear to have any particularly appealing pitching prospects that are MLB ready, so I don’t know what they can get done. People need to understand that Ludwick was one of the top 5-6 OFs in all of MLB in 2008.

Most of the people who think Ludwick is a fluke, probably thought Pujols regress after his rookie year, too. I think it is a pretty safe bet that most guys who OPS .966 in their first full season manage to be pretty decent for a number of years.

It should take quite a haul to get the Ludder given his cost-controlled status.

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Nov 6, 2008 4:58 PM EST up reply actions  

I’ll agree that straight across it’s not even, but Esco was 2nd in the fielding bible this year in +/- . Add in his bat and position it’s a strong starting point. They also have some left handed arms that while might not be ready for next year, will give us nice depth going forward. A right hander to keep an eye on is Pruneda 100 mph with a ground ball rate that would make our defense sing.

"The Post-Dispatch Cardinals website continues down a path where you'll notice it's really a few McCarvers leading a pack of Dusty Bakers. I'm so glad they don't represent Cardinal Nation. No wonder newspapers are going down in shambles"

by AdjustedExpectations on Nov 6, 2008 5:07 PM EST up reply actions  

4437 professional plate appearances by ludwick

……………..PA……………………………………RC/G
minors…..3116…..270 / .345 / .501 / .846 ……5.93
mlb………1321…..273 / .345 / .512 / .857…….6.40

i like the consistency. the continued development. 4437 PA is a large sample size.
he had a spike year, good for him.
his arb1-arb3 yrs won’t be cheap, but .900 ops players never are. (er-uh allstar, too) :)

by ball in play on Nov 6, 2008 8:32 PM EST up reply actions  

more from that same blog...

st. louis didn’t say they didn’t want johnson…

They quashed it because they haven’t had KJ-for-Ludwick discussions. Braves have expressed interest in Ludwick, I just don’t know if they’ve gotten to point of giving St. Louis names of guys they might trade for him.

"I'm as nauseous as I've ever been. I have a terrible headache. My head is pounding. I feel like throwing up and I'm having trouble swallowing. And the beauty of it is, you want to feel like this every day." - Tony LaRussa

by adiueordie on Nov 6, 2008 3:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Agree

that this was a make-up call for last year when Yadi clearly deserved the Gold Glove. (He’s a little too young for a lifetime achievement award just yet.) So, in my eyes, he IS deserving of the award because he should already have two anyway.

by cardsgirl95 on Nov 6, 2008 8:41 AM EST reply actions  

When does Pujols get a makeup call?

The guy gets jobed on either the GG or MVP almost annually.

by jjray on Nov 6, 2008 9:21 AM EST up reply actions  

But at least

the Mang has one GG……. and one MVP. But he should have multiples of each. So, you’re right, he got jobbed.

by cardsgirl95 on Nov 6, 2008 9:25 AM EST up reply actions  

I am not sure on how you could figure this out but...

i wonder how many runners could not go 1st-3rd on a single or 1st-Home on a double because they didnt get a good enough secondary lead for being afraid of Yadi picking them off first if they wondered too far? it may have never happened, though i doubt that, but there is definitely some value in preventing runners from taking that extra base. Using my eyes only, Yadi would have to be one of the (if not the) best at that.

"I don't want to play golf. When I hit a ball, I want someone else to go chase it." -Rogers Hornsby

by nomar34 on Nov 6, 2008 9:22 AM EST reply actions  

I'm not sure how accurate it would be and I'm surely not going to try and do this

1). Assign every player speed scores
2). Calculate the average % (successes per opportunities) of 1st to 3rd or 1st to homes for each speed score against all catchers in the league
3). Calculate the average % versus Molina

I think the speed scores would be interesting and important in determining the quality of the baserunners that are facing the catcher.

by azruavatar on Nov 6, 2008 9:28 AM EST up reply actions  

yeah...

i think i will stick to just assuming Yadi is the best…you are never disappointed that way…

"I don't want to play golf. When I hit a ball, I want someone else to go chase it." -Rogers Hornsby

by nomar34 on Nov 6, 2008 9:37 AM EST up reply actions  

I'll donate 50 hypothetical internet dollars to anyone with the retrosheet Skillz to pull that one off

Kosuke Fukudome: $48 million .257 .359 .379
Skip Schumaker: $Free .302 .359 .406
Skippy needs a new publicist, but I heart Ben Zobrist

by joker24 on Nov 6, 2008 10:32 AM EST up reply actions  

ill throw in 3 HID's too

the economy isn’t what it used to be…

"I don't want to play golf. When I hit a ball, I want someone else to go chase it." -Rogers Hornsby

by nomar34 on Nov 6, 2008 10:41 AM EST up reply actions  

Sean Smith or MGL or Tango

probably already has some of those things built. I know MGL uses speed scores and I think smith does as well.

by azruavatar on Nov 6, 2008 11:36 AM EST up reply actions  

I know the speed score thing

But having that score and then doing a sort of runner advancement +/- system gets complicated IMO very quickly.

Kosuke Fukudome: $48 million .257 .359 .379
Skip Schumaker: $Free .302 .359 .406
Skippy needs a new publicist, but I heart Ben Zobrist

by joker24 on Nov 6, 2008 12:13 PM EST up reply actions  

I think they do something like that for outfielder arm ratings

My understanding was the arm ratings in SFR for example were based on a system like that. I’ll have to check though.

by azruavatar on Nov 6, 2008 12:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Not to say it isn't crazy complicated

just that the framework may already be existing.

by azruavatar on Nov 6, 2008 12:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah you're right about that with the arm ratings

But there’s gonna be a trillion confounding factors for a catcher e.g. outfielder’s arms, park effects, etc.

Kosuke Fukudome: $48 million .257 .359 .379
Skip Schumaker: $Free .302 .359 .406
Skippy needs a new publicist, but I heart Ben Zobrist

by joker24 on Nov 6, 2008 4:05 PM EST up reply actions  

That's my basic point

regarding all attempts to “objectively” rate catchers defensively. Like no other position in baseball, most of what a catcher does defensively is very dependant on confounding variables.

Even the attempts to debunk the long held belief that catchers affect pitching performance simply cannot rule out countless confounding variables and/or small sample size biases. I know many are convinced by those attempts, but the ones I’ve seen really don’t amount to much if you spend some time thinking of all the other things that could muddle the results. (personally I think a catcher can greatly affect pitching performance, mostly through a pitcher’s comfort with a catcher, which doesn’t necessarily reflect his skill – also a catcher’s ability or inability in framing pitches can be important)

by fltfire on Nov 6, 2008 5:06 PM EST up reply actions  

there aren't many plays in baseball

that don’t involve multiple players. For instance having Pujols or Derrek Lee playing first makes a big difference in the defensive metrics of the other infielders. Aramis Ramirez plus Prince Fielder wouldn’t be pretty – with Derrek Lee he does pretty well. Heck, Rickie Weeks plus Albert might be pretty good – well, better.

by ol Pete on Nov 6, 2008 5:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Yadi's down year

I’m going to try and resist a lengthy post regarding all of the unquantifiable thing a catcher does defensively.

Generally, I’ll agree that this was Yadi’s worst defensive year. I do think he was still the best defensive catcher in the league and probably in baseball this year. Here we have 1) a make up for him being snubbed last year (and the year before) and 2) no clear other candidate that really is in Yadi’s league defensively.

As far as defensive stats for catchers – they (for the most part) are uniquely dependant on other players, mostly the pitchers. A wp + pb rate will obviously go up if you have pitchers that thrown tons of wild pitches (not saying that happened to Yadi) – while a good catcher can stop some balls that might have been a wp, there is only so much he can do.

Regarding sb%, that can be a very misleading stat. First, most sbs are stolen off the pitcher. Second, if you have a defensive reputation like Yadi’s, teams and players will only try to steal if they are very confident they can get the bag off the pitcher. Conversely a catcher with a poor reputation may get a deceptively high percentage (Jason Kendell, I’m looking at you) because teams will run wild on them until they prove they can actually stop ANYONE from running.

In short, I greatly respect the improvements Jason Kendell showed behind the plate this year. He had a carreer year defensively. But I would be shocked if very many people who know much about catching would call Jason Kendell one of the best defensive catchers in the game as some of these stats and metrics indicate. His presence at the top of those lists alone shows that they aren’t very accurate in gauging a catcher’s overall effectiveness defensively.

by fltfire on Nov 6, 2008 9:50 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

Catcher's value in controlling the running game

I agree with Chuck’s post that Yadi may not have been as outstanding as usual defensively this year, but good enough for the GG. However, it got me thinking whether there may be a better way of evaluating a catcher’s value re: controlling the running game.

I find it hard to believe that Jason Kendall has more value than Yadi in this respect despite his superior CS%. One statistic that shows this is the fewer attempts that were made on Yadi, but this still doesn’t show the whole picture. A slightly different way of evaluating a catcher’s performance may be totaling his WPAs for CS and SB. I went over to Fangraphs, but couldn’t work out if it is possible to get a run down of these stats for each individual catcher.

Examples of how WPA may be a better way of looking at the running game:

17th May 2008 Cards vs Rays

Yadi catches 3 runners trying to steal for total +0.188, and picked off Longoria for +0.038. He also allowed B.J. Upton to steal in the first for -0.009, giving him a total of +0.217 for the game. What this shows is that a stolen base in the first is unimportant when compared to three CS and a PO in the same game.

An example of Yadi’s value in catching runners late in a close game (when SBs are more important):

27th May 2006 Cards vs Padres

Yadi caught Dave Roberts stealing in the seventh inning of a one run game for + 0.126, and picked off Brian Giles to end it in the ninth for a +0.160.

Now, Kendall’s CS may have been just as valuable as Yadi’s this year, but his greater number of SB may mitigate this, especially if he was being run on in crucial spots (an example of the possible value of a stolen base is Dave Roberts’ famous one in the 2004 WS which was worth +0.106).

Anyway I hope this makes sense, and if anyone could tell me whether it is actually possible or not to search for these stats on Fangraphs it would be much appreciated. Oh, and Pujols getting jobbed again is quite ridiculous.

by UKcardsfan on Nov 6, 2008 9:53 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

great questions

I’d love to see that done, but I don’t know of any way to do it. Also, it might not tell us what we want to hear due to the bizarre propensity of the 2008 team to allow advances on defensive indifference in the 9th inning and due to the fact that so few people ran on yadi in critical situations…

the enemy's gate is down.

by SleepyCA on Nov 6, 2008 4:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Anyone else think......

the way they choose Gold Glove winners is stupid? The majority of the time it goes to the best offensive player………..Molina has his best offensive year and he wins………its not a coincidence……

"Even when the rain falls, Even when the flood starts rising, Even when the storm comes, I am washed by the water!" -NeedToBreathe

by Calhoun on Nov 6, 2008 10:00 AM EST reply actions  

welcome top the party...

there are chips and guacamole on the table and beer in the fridge…

"I don't want to play golf. When I hit a ball, I want someone else to go chase it." -Rogers Hornsby

by nomar34 on Nov 6, 2008 10:51 AM EST up reply actions  

D'oh!

Welcome to the party…see what happens when you try to be too smart…

"I don't want to play golf. When I hit a ball, I want someone else to go chase it." -Rogers Hornsby

by nomar34 on Nov 6, 2008 10:52 AM EST up reply actions  

sad but true

i remember thinking earlier in the season “yadi finally figured out that if he hits better he’ll win a GG.” apparently the GG, like the MVP, is often reserved for a “break out” offensive season. hence, adrian gonzalez beats albert pujols. nuts to that!

by mattybobo on Nov 6, 2008 11:12 AM EST up reply actions  

forget the beer, where's the tequila & whiskey?

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson AND THAT'S A WINNER!

by gdm426 on Nov 6, 2008 1:56 PM EST up reply actions  

yep

this line is dedicated to '09

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Nov 6, 2008 1:39 PM EST up reply actions  

It's all about popularity and reputation

GG, MVP, Cy Young. It has little to do with actual on-the-field performance. Honestly you’d think the sportswriters never went to an actual game but only watched the ESPN highlights.

Proud sponsor of the Official 2008 StL Cardinal theme song: "Beautiful Day" by U2

by gocards62 on Nov 6, 2008 4:56 PM EST up reply actions  

There's obviously no method that make people happy

Have the managers and coaches do it? No way.
How about the players? They know less than the managers.
What about the sports writers? They’re stuck in the 1920s and can’t grasp statistics.
Okay then, I guess it’s up to the fans….. Uh……..

Catherine whispered into my ear, her breath rich with faraway spices, that she desire to make love. She wanted to try shinshi shinshi. Now, I'd been begging her to try shinshi shinshi for months. She'd refused on the grounds that it was unclean. Finally, she was willing to accept her lover's body in places no one had ever trespassed. Specifically, the ear canal.

by Tackle Box on Nov 6, 2008 5:33 PM EST up reply actions  

just a thought

how about the commish assembles a pannel of the top baseball analyses websites like dewan, bill james, etc

by Walking Underwear on Nov 6, 2008 8:15 PM EST up reply actions  

standing out from the stats

This thread with SleepyCA and fltfire (sp?) sums up my thoughts.

I’m increasingly convinced that this year Yadi was hampered by most of the bullpen and many of the MIs. Don’t his defensive stats depend on who’s handling the ball before and after him? I still can’t get over watching he and Iz2 practicing a textbook pick-off move at least ten times, only to have Iz2 flub the exact same move in the next inning. I have no solid proof behind it, but that’s like saying Albert won’t get an MVP because he couldn’t pitch us into the playoffs. If you have fewer runners going because of Yadi’s rep, or pitchers who take ages to get rid of the ball, don’t those on-field quirks distort the stats? I agree that his stats were down, but the guy just changed his conditioning and center-of-gravity— I expected adjustments, and by the time he was hitting his stride, he was out in the last month.

Granted, the GGs are subjective and partly a yearbook popularity contest. (This best be the last time Albert’s robbed this year. I swear he’s going to stoop to food bribes before anyone notices his flawless play.)

If that’s so, then I know when Yadi won his, and it’s the epitome of small sample size. June 15, 2008.

"But listen, and understand: more Molinas are out there. They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear." - THT

by Yadi2Second on Nov 6, 2008 10:37 AM EST reply actions  

Albert's so good at defense

he makes it look easy, so no one notices

this line is dedicated to '09

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Nov 6, 2008 1:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Gold Glove

Don’t forget the award is an offensive award awarded do the best defender! lol

by llabyellov on Nov 6, 2008 10:37 AM EST reply actions  

yeah

they really should change the name, heh

this line is dedicated to '09

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Nov 6, 2008 1:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Pujols is Spanish for "One who gets Jobbed".

Regarding trading an OF…

I really was looking foward to an OF of Ank, Raz, & Luds.

*Rasmus is to CF as Longoria is to 3B*

by Red Blazer on Nov 6, 2008 10:40 AM EST reply actions  

Ludwick might be overrated here.

Maybe, maybe not.

But he’s 30, had a career year last year, and has had frequent injury problems. His numbers were nearly elite last year, but I don’t think he’s an elite player. He’s okay defensively.

They should get as much as they can for Ludwick, but I’d accept Johnson and a good pitching prospect or two. Same goes for Escobar, who I’d prefer.

We can replace what Ludwick is likely to regress to. It will be much harder to upgrade the middle infield significantly.

by ChrisK on Nov 6, 2008 11:03 AM EST reply actions  

I agree there is risk

but it is cost controlled risk. Three more years for Ludwick vs. 1 for Ankiel before we have to start paying him. I think they should get as much as they can for Ankiel and ride Ludwick as far as possible. Even if he regresses a bit, he’s still really good. And his numbers last year weren’t nearly elite. They were elite.

by Ray Lankford on Nov 6, 2008 11:16 AM EST up reply actions  

That's right

Even if he’s injured and only plays two-thirds of the time he’s still a tremendous bargain. And his injuries are kind of all over the place. It’s hard to say there’s something wrong with him physically. Perhaps it’s just random occurrences. I don’t know, but if we trade the second-best slugger in baseball for a modest upgrade at second base we ought to have our freaking heads examined.

by Red in Chicago on Nov 6, 2008 12:17 PM EST up reply actions  

that's what I was thinking

if he was nearly elite, then there’s only like 5 elite players in the majors

this line is dedicated to '09

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Nov 6, 2008 1:53 PM EST up reply actions  

I like Luddy.....

More than Ankiel. I just think his swing has less holes in it.

Luddy’s numbers may drop, but I don’t think they’ll drop significantly. Maybe lose 5-7 HR’s…..and his average might fall to .280 or so. That is still pretty darn solid for what we are paying him.

Would love to move Ankiel for either a MI, or some young, cheap pitching.

Go with an OF of Luddy, Skip/Barton, and Raz next year.

"Stats are for losers," Muschamp said after last week's victory. "I like winning games."

by SoonerfanTU on Nov 6, 2008 12:22 PM EST up reply actions  

I know this is ridiculous

but I keep expecting Ludwick to have an even better year next year and hit over 40 hrs

this line is dedicated to '09

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Nov 6, 2008 1:54 PM EST up reply actions  

It's not at all ridiculous

His rate stats may not improve, but despite being healthy all year he only started 132 games. He could easily get another 50 ABs or so in 2009. I can’t imagine TLR will try to platoon him again.

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Nov 6, 2008 5:07 PM EST up reply actions  

well

part of my even better is hitting like .315 with less of a line drive rate, but yeah, it’s not that much of a leap

this line is dedicated to '09

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Nov 6, 2008 5:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Are we really looking at Milton bradley?

as per mlbtraderumors.

"There are 108 beads in a Catholic rosary. And there are 108 stitches in a baseball. When I learned that, I gave Jesus a chance."

by Bahamaredbird on Nov 6, 2008 11:08 AM EST reply actions  

Probably not

http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/8762816/Payroll-flexibility-gives-A%27s-option-to-look-at-Furcal

The Rangers are interested in retaining Bradley, and the Blue Jays also would be a logical suitor. While Bradley fits best as a DH, he also could make sense for NL contenders such as the Mets, Cardinals and Phillies, depending upon how the offseason plays out.

Lots of qualifiers in the statements. Nothing has come from the Cards just Ken’s opinion.

by StLHugo on Nov 6, 2008 11:10 AM EST up reply actions  

He can hit but seems like an ass.

"There are 108 beads in a Catholic rosary. And there are 108 stitches in a baseball. When I learned that, I gave Jesus a chance."

by Bahamaredbird on Nov 6, 2008 11:12 AM EST up reply actions  

it only really makes sense

if the cards were to trade away either Ank or Lud.

I'd rather my sister be a prostitute than my brother a Cub fan.

by _pistol_ on Nov 6, 2008 11:15 AM EST up reply actions  

I think that is what he meant

He said “depending upon how the offseason plays out” I think he means we might have interest if we trade both of them.

by StLHugo on Nov 6, 2008 11:21 AM EST up reply actions  

oops. i thought that was implied.

i was trying to say that, should we trade an outfielder or two, he is guessing we might be interested in bringing in bradley instead of filling in from within the org. i think we could stand to lose one outfielder and not have to bring in a replacement, perhaps even two… but that’s my rosy-colored glasses talking.

by mattybobo on Nov 6, 2008 11:28 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't know why we

would be interested now, since we could have had him for free last off-season. He only played 20 games in the OF last year – does anyone know if that was injury or incompetence?

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Nov 6, 2008 5:11 PM EST up reply actions  

even if they trade away Ludwick or Ankiel

it still doesn’t make sense. what’s wrong with an outfield of lud/ank, rasmus, and barton/mather?

this line is dedicated to '09

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Nov 6, 2008 1:56 PM EST up reply actions  

escobar makes sense

surprisingly, in 2008 yunel escobar’s defensive metrics were comparable to iz2’s. here’s the RZR rankings for nl shortstops from THT
(RZR, OOZ)
c. izturis .869, 58
y. escobar .843, 61

if we could get him straight-up trade for ank, i say go for it mo. 4 years of escobar vs 1 year of ankiel? i just don’t think the braves would agree to that.

I'd rather my sister be a prostitute than my brother a Cub fan.

by _pistol_ on Nov 6, 2008 11:54 AM EST reply actions  

Dial puts Escobar 3 runs above average Offense Plus Defense

Inaz’s total value has him 30 runs above replacement so their pretty much in agreement. For reference, Izturis was a 20 run player last year over replacement according to Inaz, Izturis -2.9 in OPD.

Either way we’re looking at only 5-10 runs switching from Izturis to Escobar all things staying equal.

Kosuke Fukudome: $48 million .257 .359 .379
Skip Schumaker: $Free .302 .359 .406
Skippy needs a new publicist, but I heart Ben Zobrist

by joker24 on Nov 6, 2008 12:12 PM EST up reply actions  

wow, great minds think alike...

i did this exact exercise earlier (and mentioned it above actually). interestingly enough, escobar also compares favorably to kelly johnson in GPA, PrOPS, and VORP. so he’s be a shortstop who was a similar fielder to izturis and a similar hitter to kelly johnson. my verdict; ankiel for escobar straight up would be totally sweet.

by mattybobo on Nov 6, 2008 12:15 PM EST up reply actions  

and probably not doable

I know I said I would like it but I said that knowing full well the Braves probably wouldn’t do it. But if you take those 2 and start working the deal from there it might be possible

by StLHugo on Nov 6, 2008 12:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Depends on the prospect

But I am thinking more along the lines of both teams giving up a prospect or two and those names just being the headliners.

by StLHugo on Nov 6, 2008 2:12 PM EST up reply actions  

how about

ank for escobar and a prospect?

by Knighttime on Nov 6, 2008 4:57 PM EST up reply actions  

that seems like wishful thinking to me

but they will have him awfully cheap for one year I guess

this line is dedicated to '09

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Nov 6, 2008 5:36 PM EST up reply actions  

it is wishful thinking

controllable years, reasonable concerns about coming off the injuries he’s had and the like.

"The Post-Dispatch Cardinals website continues down a path where you'll notice it's really a few McCarvers leading a pack of Dusty Bakers. I'm so glad they don't represent Cardinal Nation. No wonder newspapers are going down in shambles"

by AdjustedExpectations on Nov 6, 2008 5:48 PM EST up reply actions  

oops.

i see your post now.

I'd rather my sister be a prostitute than my brother a Cub fan.

by _pistol_ on Nov 6, 2008 12:22 PM EST up reply actions  

you actually provided numbers though

i just stated something with no proof. i just thought it was cool that somebody on the board had the exact same thought as me—ie, “i wonder how escobar compares to izturis defensively”—and checked at least one reputable source. i wasn’t trying to accuse you of being redundant or something, and i apologize if i unintentionally sounded like i was.

by mattybobo on Nov 6, 2008 12:36 PM EST up reply actions  

nah :)

you prefaced it with ‘great minds think alike’. How could i take offense to that?

I'd rather my sister be a prostitute than my brother a Cub fan.

by _pistol_ on Nov 6, 2008 2:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Kelly Johnson? No. Escobar? Yes.

How about Ludwick + minor leaguer for Escobar + Ohman?

I’d rather keep Lud than Ank, but I’m not sure Ank gets a significant deal done.

defy, cards, defy. hey logic --- you suck.

by effin fisk on Nov 6, 2008 8:19 PM EST up reply actions  

isn't ohman a free agent?

"I'm as nauseous as I've ever been. I have a terrible headache. My head is pounding. I feel like throwing up and I'm having trouble swallowing. And the beauty of it is, you want to feel like this every day." - Tony LaRussa

by adiueordie on Nov 6, 2008 9:56 PM EST up reply actions  

yes

"Baseball is like Church, many attend, few understand" - Wes Westrum

by scoot on Nov 6, 2008 10:55 PM EST up reply actions  

I just like putting random names into sentences

while we’re at it, we could trade Molina for Will Clark and Barry Bonds…

defy, cards, defy. hey logic --- you suck.

by effin fisk on Nov 7, 2008 1:08 PM EST up reply actions  

What the HECK is in Jason Kendall's cornflakes?

Am I remembering something wrong? He was never outstanding defensively, and I swear I used to watch runners go crazy on him when he came to the Cubs (I live in a Chicago burb and watch most of the games).

by sdrone on Nov 6, 2008 12:12 PM EST reply actions  

Answer

GRIT!

Miles eats it, too. Gives them a little crunch.

by Red in Chicago on Nov 6, 2008 12:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Now as brittle as Jason's knees!

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Nov 7, 2008 12:20 AM EST up reply actions  

you'd think

but the guy gets in a really low crouch and comes out of the box like a kid. I kind of wonder about that ankle.

by ol Pete on Nov 7, 2008 9:33 AM EST up reply actions  

Ludwick's 08 Line Drive Percentages

I am trying to figure out if Ludwick’s 08 was a fluke or not. The biggest stat I see that seems really outside the norm is his Line Drive % of 28.1. Which is just ridiculous since league average is 18.9% and he posted up a 18.8% in 2007. Line Drive percentage makes a huge difference in batting average numbers since line drives fall for hits over 70% of the time.

The problem is I can’t seem to find any league wide data on Line Drive percentages to analyze. Statcorner allows you to pull it up by player. I am looking to pull up every player’s line drive percentages from at least 07 and 08 to compare the too. To see how players who posted huge LD in 07 did in 08. It would be a great insight to see if Ludwick’s numbers were a fluke or not.

by FlimtotheFlam on Nov 6, 2008 12:56 PM EST reply actions  

One thing that might be helpful

Is to pull up some scatter diagrams. There should be at least three years of them available by now. You can compare and see. Keep in mind, Ludwick changed his stance in response to Hal MacRae’s suggestion. It opened up his power considerably, and is one of the reasons I don’t think he’s a flash in the pan.

by Red in Chicago on Nov 6, 2008 1:01 PM EST up reply actions  

I doubt he's a flash in the pan

but I also doubt whether he maintains last year’s performance.

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Nov 6, 2008 1:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Also note that Albert's percentage over his career

has fluctuated between 18% and 22. It it reasonable to expect Ludwick to be hitting line drives 25 more often than Albert does?

That’s a nice find, there.

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Nov 6, 2008 1:05 PM EST up reply actions  

this high line drive %

at least explains his low clutch rating imo

this line is dedicated to '09

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Nov 6, 2008 2:06 PM EST up reply actions  

how?

the enemy's gate is down.

by SleepyCA on Nov 6, 2008 4:46 PM EST up reply actions  

well

if he hits into more line drive outs, then he would have less hits in those circumstances; but I guess I’d have to prove that by saying he hits into line drive outs in high pressure situations, which is probably not that true. so I see you point.

this line is dedicated to '09

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Nov 6, 2008 5:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Typically,

line drives have a much better chance of being a hit as opposed to pop flies and grounders.

Catherine whispered into my ear, her breath rich with faraway spices, that she desire to make love. She wanted to try shinshi shinshi. Now, I'd been begging her to try shinshi shinshi for months. She'd refused on the grounds that it was unclean. Finally, she was willing to accept her lover's body in places no one had ever trespassed. Specifically, the ear canal.

by Tackle Box on Nov 6, 2008 5:39 PM EST up reply actions  

that's what I'm saying

but you’d have to prove that Ludwick hits a lot of line drive outs in high pressue situations, which would basically mean he was very unlucky this year. could this be proven with BABIP?

this line is dedicated to '09

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Nov 6, 2008 6:16 PM EST up reply actions  

2nd on the team in WPA.
if “clutch” means helping his team win, offensivly and defensivly.
charted by individual outcome of every play he was involved in, for the season.

by ball in play on Nov 6, 2008 9:30 PM EST up reply actions  

clutch means

according to the fangraphs stat, hitting in high leverage situations, which he didn’t do very well according to their stat, which I’m not sure how much stock I put into

this line is dedicated to '09

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Nov 7, 2008 1:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Clutch is an idea

into which I am not sure how much stock I will put.

by mattybobo on Nov 7, 2008 4:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Huuuh??

You’re saying his propensity for line drives (which have a high chance of being a hit) means he should be less successful in the clutch? Not following.

Kosuke Fukudome: $48 million .257 .359 .379
Skip Schumaker: $Free .302 .359 .406
Skippy needs a new publicist, but I heart Ben Zobrist

by joker24 on Nov 6, 2008 8:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Where did you get 28.1%?

THT says 26.2%.

If they are smart enough to bat him in front of Pujols for an entire season it might even go higher. His slash lines in front of Albert are outrageous!

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Nov 6, 2008 5:17 PM EST up reply actions  

You people are too narrow focused.

What was the original rumor we heard?

Cardinals interested in Jake Peavy and Khalil Greene.
Braves front runner for Jake Peavy and Khalil Greene.

Now we seem to hear those two teams talking about swapping OF’ers and MIF’ers.

So, amongst yourselves, create the 3 team deal and who gets what.

by Hardcore Legend on Nov 6, 2008 2:16 PM EST reply actions  

I'll bite

Cardinals get:
Jake Peavy
Kahlil Greene
Brent Lillibridge

Braves get:
Rick Ankiel
Pete Kozma

Padres get:
Yunel Escobar
Jeff Francouer
Mitchell Boggs

I guess. I hate doing these things. Whose stupid idea was this?

by Hardcore Legend on Nov 6, 2008 2:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Every time we do this

the Cardinals get the long end of the stick. How can this be in a three-way trade? Are there sticks with three ends on them?

by Red in Chicago on Nov 6, 2008 3:01 PM EST up reply actions  

for what the cardinals give up in this trade...

they probably couldn’t even get Peavy, let alone the other two. or maybe i’m underestimating the value of boggs.

I'd rather my sister be a prostitute than my brother a Cub fan.

by _pistol_ on Nov 6, 2008 3:04 PM EST up reply actions  

your value on Boggs is probably pretty spot on as he stands now. However, he has one key thing to work on, a change up. His fastball is + to ++ depending on how you view the movement, but it’s very solid. His slurve is acceptable to +. But his changeup is mediocre.

until that changeup matures into at least league average, left handed hitters will continue to protect against the fastball and pound his slurve. his splits are off the charts, give him that change and we may have quietly built a #3 starter.

If it doesn’t, the slurve and fastball should live well in the pen or against RH heavy lineups

"The Post-Dispatch Cardinals website continues down a path where you'll notice it's really a few McCarvers leading a pack of Dusty Bakers. I'm so glad they don't represent Cardinal Nation. No wonder newspapers are going down in shambles"

by AdjustedExpectations on Nov 6, 2008 5:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Another possibility

Cardinals get:
Yunel Escobar/Kelly Johnson or Kelly Johnson/Khalil Greene
Brent Lillibridge

Braves get:
Jake Peavy
Khalil Greene or Adam Kennedy/Kozma

Padres get:
Rick Ankiel
1 Cardinals’ Pitching Prospect
1 Braves Pitching Prospect
1 Braves MI Prospect
1 Braves OF Prospect

by stlfan on Nov 6, 2008 4:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Ankiel doesn't seem like the type of guy the Padres would be interested in.

30 years old and only under control for 1 year.

But, then again, packaged with that haul of prospects, they might be inclined.

Catherine whispered into my ear, her breath rich with faraway spices, that she desire to make love. She wanted to try shinshi shinshi. Now, I'd been begging her to try shinshi shinshi for months. She'd refused on the grounds that it was unclean. Finally, she was willing to accept her lover's body in places no one had ever trespassed. Specifically, the ear canal.

by Tackle Box on Nov 6, 2008 5:37 PM EST up reply actions  

I shudder to think

just how bad Jeff Francoeur could be at Petco.

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Nov 6, 2008 5:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Smells like pumping value to me

Quite a few teams are looking for MI, Arizona in particular. Letting it out that KJ is avail and Escobar may be for the right price as well. With Ludwick being the “targeted” one it sends a signal that even though the Braves have a OF surplus, that they’re not locking that surplus into next year.

Were signaling that Luddy is on the table for the right price, or creating interest for the org that may have someone settle for another of our OF.

Just seems like the Jason Bay scenario of last year. I still feel that when we were rumored to be after him, we pumped his value and visibility quite a bit. If so, the Pirates owe us for that one.

"The Post-Dispatch Cardinals website continues down a path where you'll notice it's really a few McCarvers leading a pack of Dusty Bakers. I'm so glad they don't represent Cardinal Nation. No wonder newspapers are going down in shambles"

by AdjustedExpectations on Nov 6, 2008 2:30 PM EST reply actions  

Of whom does Atlanta's OF surplus consist?

Honest question. I don’t know prospects for any teams besides the Cards very well at all. I’m confused, because I thought they still were gonna have Francoeur and Jones clogging things up. KC is apparently in love with Francoeur, and who wouldn’t want to get rid of Jones right now.

by mattybobo on Nov 6, 2008 3:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Schafer, Hernandez are also in the mix.

"The Post-Dispatch Cardinals website continues down a path where you'll notice it's really a few McCarvers leading a pack of Dusty Bakers. I'm so glad they don't represent Cardinal Nation. No wonder newspapers are going down in shambles"

by AdjustedExpectations on Nov 6, 2008 3:34 PM EST up reply actions  

my question is

realistically, when do you think this trading will go down?

this line is dedicated to '09

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Nov 6, 2008 3:25 PM EST up reply actions  

i don't know

i do believe there’s too much momentum for Peavy to be gone at some point.

I just think that Atlanta is just going to be a loud rumor mill this year. Very loud it seems.

"The Post-Dispatch Cardinals website continues down a path where you'll notice it's really a few McCarvers leading a pack of Dusty Bakers. I'm so glad they don't represent Cardinal Nation. No wonder newspapers are going down in shambles"

by AdjustedExpectations on Nov 6, 2008 3:36 PM EST up reply actions  

the suspense is killing me

but with this team, it could very well be killing me for months

this line is dedicated to '09

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Nov 6, 2008 3:38 PM EST up reply actions  

i agree

it seems like posturing. although trying to say that kj is worth ludwick would probably push teams away rather than intrigue them.

i do think that after all the non-happenings at this year’s trade deadline lots of things will happen this offseason. sounds like gm’s were asking way to much for their goodies and i think they will lower those prices to get things done this time around.

"Sorry about him, he's dealing with being an inker. " - Chasing Amy

by FutureMan on Nov 6, 2008 3:31 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah

I think things will be a lot more realistic on the trade front than at the trade deadline

this line is dedicated to '09

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Nov 6, 2008 3:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Well it opens up a few things. This is the true first time Ludwick has been considered on a trade block, even if it’s not true there’s now public mention. So hopefully it’ll bring a mass amount of interest. Even backhandedly it may put a notice that Ludwick isn’t going to bring in “names”, but “needs”. I love Luddy, but if he can command a cost controlled/team controlled MI and possibly more? With our surplus you have to consider that. We should save a little on arb as well.

If Tyler Wilson (an awesome – in my opinion- LHP. very nice stuff, solid k rate, 22yo, some control issues) is in the mix, I’d be more excited. He’s not the biggest name in the Braves farm system, but considering they have pitching woes themselves, he’s most likely the easiest to try and get. Pruneda would be another name that I’d love to get my hands on, 100mph type guy with a high ground ball rate – not common. He’s down the list in closer types within a system that has a ton of closer types.

But KJ + _ certainly isn’t low balling us if the rest of the league expects a 20-25% regression, so it’s not an insult. When you’re dealing with a team that has Francoeur (currently) vs the idea of Ludwick – 25%, you’d have to think that they may be willing to come up to Escobar.

But yeah, I still think it’s trying to overprice KJ for someone like Az who really wants a 2b and hopefully we can get Esco’ instead.

"The Post-Dispatch Cardinals website continues down a path where you'll notice it's really a few McCarvers leading a pack of Dusty Bakers. I'm so glad they don't represent Cardinal Nation. No wonder newspapers are going down in shambles"

by AdjustedExpectations on Nov 6, 2008 4:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Congrats to Yadi...

It’s about time. I do think this was a make-up award, but I won’t complain. I know everyone thinks Albert got robbed (as do I). But I’m surprised I haven’t seen as much outcry for Santa…I thought he had a great chance at it. I mean he hit 27 homers this year.

"I've never felt better to be hit by a big guy like that in my life." - Brad Lidge on Ryan Howard

by RunninRedbird on Nov 6, 2008 4:13 PM EST reply actions  

lol

at least he lost to David, anyone else I’d be more pissed. if only he could have belted another 3 hr. a 30hr GG sounds so much better

"The Post-Dispatch Cardinals website continues down a path where you'll notice it's really a few McCarvers leading a pack of Dusty Bakers. I'm so glad they don't represent Cardinal Nation. No wonder newspapers are going down in shambles"

by AdjustedExpectations on Nov 6, 2008 4:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Damn allergies...that's what cost him

"I've never felt better to be hit by a big guy like that in my life." - Brad Lidge on Ryan Howard

by RunninRedbird on Nov 6, 2008 6:43 PM EST up reply actions  

gold glove

i am happy for yadi, but i also think albert and glaus should have won as well

as far as albert goes, he was the biggest snub according to skip bayless (shocking support for a cardinal from the wwl), bayless actually called albert a very good third baseman who played first

Pujols is the greatest Cardinal in my lifetime.

by bigcardsfan5 on Nov 6, 2008 4:44 PM EST reply actions  

sad thing is

if we woulda been in first place, all 3 of them probably woulda won gold gloves

this line is dedicated to '09

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Nov 6, 2008 5:57 PM EST up reply actions  

That's probably true.

Catherine whispered into my ear, her breath rich with faraway spices, that she desire to make love. She wanted to try shinshi shinshi. Now, I'd been begging her to try shinshi shinshi for months. She'd refused on the grounds that it was unclean. Finally, she was willing to accept her lover's body in places no one had ever trespassed. Specifically, the ear canal.

by Tackle Box on Nov 6, 2008 6:05 PM EST up reply actions  

just a guess

but I have to say that I would assume while Albert prides his defense and works on it hard, the Clemente award carried more significance than the GG ever could. I’d even say that the Clemente award may carry more significance than a possible MVP award does.

Not saying he didn’t get snubbed, but framing it in the context of the character of the man. Albert is one of a kind.

"The Post-Dispatch Cardinals website continues down a path where you'll notice it's really a few McCarvers leading a pack of Dusty Bakers. I'm so glad they don't represent Cardinal Nation. No wonder newspapers are going down in shambles"

by AdjustedExpectations on Nov 6, 2008 6:14 PM EST up reply actions  

The side effect...

That I haven’t read is the fact if we were to lose Luddy, we’re really, really, isolating Albert in the lineup. While I agree that you’re not going to protect him in the Manny/Ortiz sense without costing us some serious, serious coin and only possible with a few players, at least Ryan when he was on made them rethink the idea of adding another runner just to bypass Albert. Compounding the fact that we’ll be relying to have better discipline and come back (power wise) from his injury that isn’t going to be the easiest to do.

It’s a rough thought having two long swinging batters behind Albert without Ryan around in there somewhere.

"The Post-Dispatch Cardinals website continues down a path where you'll notice it's really a few McCarvers leading a pack of Dusty Bakers. I'm so glad they don't represent Cardinal Nation. No wonder newspapers are going down in shambles"

by AdjustedExpectations on Nov 6, 2008 5:28 PM EST reply actions  

Obviously a straight up trade would be ridiculous

but it says “multi-player” trade. Wonder what the other parts might be?

Catherine whispered into my ear, her breath rich with faraway spices, that she desire to make love. She wanted to try shinshi shinshi. Now, I'd been begging her to try shinshi shinshi for months. She'd refused on the grounds that it was unclean. Finally, she was willing to accept her lover's body in places no one had ever trespassed. Specifically, the ear canal.

by Tackle Box on Nov 6, 2008 6:18 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah

the other parts to the trade make things much more interesting, especially if there’s mifs involved

this line is dedicated to '09

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Nov 6, 2008 6:20 PM EST up reply actions  

I can think of one mif on the Rockies that interests me....

Catherine whispered into my ear, her breath rich with faraway spices, that she desire to make love. She wanted to try shinshi shinshi. Now, I'd been begging her to try shinshi shinshi for months. She'd refused on the grounds that it was unclean. Finally, she was willing to accept her lover's body in places no one had ever trespassed. Specifically, the ear canal.

by Tackle Box on Nov 6, 2008 6:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Troy interests me

But both of them involved in one deal would be a mammoth one.

"The Post-Dispatch Cardinals website continues down a path where you'll notice it's really a few McCarvers leading a pack of Dusty Bakers. I'm so glad they don't represent Cardinal Nation. No wonder newspapers are going down in shambles"

by AdjustedExpectations on Nov 6, 2008 6:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh, I know,

but out of curiosity I just snooped around the Rockies organEYEzation for middle infielders, and they’re about as bare as we are. Hector Gomez looks intriguing but he’s 20 years old and really hasn’t made it past low A ball. I have a feeling the Cards brass isn’t interested in him.

Honestly, I’m not sure what (outside of Holliday) would interest the Cards from that team.

Catherine whispered into my ear, her breath rich with faraway spices, that she desire to make love. She wanted to try shinshi shinshi. Now, I'd been begging her to try shinshi shinshi for months. She'd refused on the grounds that it was unclean. Finally, she was willing to accept her lover's body in places no one had ever trespassed. Specifically, the ear canal.

by Tackle Box on Nov 6, 2008 6:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Here's more names and more specifics

from Tracy Rigolsby of the Rocky Mountain News.

The Rockies explored trade possibilities for Holliday, third baseman Garrett Atkins and center fielder Willy Taveras during the general manager meetings, which ended Thursday. In dealing Holliday and Atkins, the Rockies want to acquire a starting pitcher ready to step into the rotation, bullpen help with an emphasis on a left-hander, and a right-handed hitting outfielder to combine with left-handed-hitting Seth Smith in filling the left field void.

Of course, it doesn’t specifically say the Cardinals are interested in those other players (obviously Tavares is not interesting), but it shows what they’re looking for. But once again, there ain’t a whole lot on that team that is needed on the Cardinals.

Catherine whispered into my ear, her breath rich with faraway spices, that she desire to make love. She wanted to try shinshi shinshi. Now, I'd been begging her to try shinshi shinshi for months. She'd refused on the grounds that it was unclean. Finally, she was willing to accept her lover's body in places no one had ever trespassed. Specifically, the ear canal.

by Tackle Box on Nov 6, 2008 6:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Once you leave MI out of the picture (with Tulo being the real only asset), you have to look at LHP which is something we’re steady on needing depth and this year.

Luis Gonzalez seems to be intriguing, but nothing else stands out.

And yeah, we have no inclination for the CF or 3b, that’s for sure.

"The Post-Dispatch Cardinals website continues down a path where you'll notice it's really a few McCarvers leading a pack of Dusty Bakers. I'm so glad they don't represent Cardinal Nation. No wonder newspapers are going down in shambles"

by AdjustedExpectations on Nov 6, 2008 6:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Can Ian Stewart make it as a full time second baseman?

Catherine whispered into my ear, her breath rich with faraway spices, that she desire to make love. She wanted to try shinshi shinshi. Now, I'd been begging her to try shinshi shinshi for months. She'd refused on the grounds that it was unclean. Finally, she was willing to accept her lover's body in places no one had ever trespassed. Specifically, the ear canal.

by Tackle Box on Nov 6, 2008 6:45 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't know

but they have Eric Young in the wings, and while he’s not fully developed, he’s doing a solid job in Winter league – hitting something like .430ish with 5k, 5bb and 2hr

"The Post-Dispatch Cardinals website continues down a path where you'll notice it's really a few McCarvers leading a pack of Dusty Bakers. I'm so glad they don't represent Cardinal Nation. No wonder newspapers are going down in shambles"

by AdjustedExpectations on Nov 6, 2008 6:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Not bad.

Wonder why he only played 105 games this year? And would he be ready to start in ’09? And would LaRussa let him play? (sorry to open that can of worms)

Catherine whispered into my ear, her breath rich with faraway spices, that she desire to make love. She wanted to try shinshi shinshi. Now, I'd been begging her to try shinshi shinshi for months. She'd refused on the grounds that it was unclean. Finally, she was willing to accept her lover's body in places no one had ever trespassed. Specifically, the ear canal.

by Tackle Box on Nov 6, 2008 6:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Ha, Ha. Tackle Box opening a can of worms.....

That made me laugh.

Let’s all go fishing.

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Nov 6, 2008 7:02 PM EST up reply actions  

I guess I could say I did that on purpose........

Catherine whispered into my ear, her breath rich with faraway spices, that she desire to make love. She wanted to try shinshi shinshi. Now, I'd been begging her to try shinshi shinshi for months. She'd refused on the grounds that it was unclean. Finally, she was willing to accept her lover's body in places no one had ever trespassed. Specifically, the ear canal.

by Tackle Box on Nov 6, 2008 7:16 PM EST up reply actions  

If we had young

he’d be in Memphis with an ST invite I’d say. But I don’t know anything of value about him besides his numbers and they don’t scream out greatness, but potential. 23yo, 700+ OPS all three seasons so far. ISO over .100 but isn’t much to write home about, much better than someone they shipped up to Denver this year (Herrera)

Actually looking at Hoff’s stats, he’s probably no better than what we have within our own system on the offensive side.

"The Post-Dispatch Cardinals website continues down a path where you'll notice it's really a few McCarvers leading a pack of Dusty Bakers. I'm so glad they don't represent Cardinal Nation. No wonder newspapers are going down in shambles"

by AdjustedExpectations on Nov 6, 2008 7:07 PM EST up reply actions  

as far as Tony playing him

depends on who else is on the roster.

"The Post-Dispatch Cardinals website continues down a path where you'll notice it's really a few McCarvers leading a pack of Dusty Bakers. I'm so glad they don't represent Cardinal Nation. No wonder newspapers are going down in shambles"

by AdjustedExpectations on Nov 6, 2008 7:08 PM EST up reply actions  

One MAJOR difference between Young and Hoff

Speed. 46 SB vs. 2

Also, Young has stolen 245 bases in 449 career minor league games. Kid’s got wheels.

Catherine whispered into my ear, her breath rich with faraway spices, that she desire to make love. She wanted to try shinshi shinshi. Now, I'd been begging her to try shinshi shinshi for months. She'd refused on the grounds that it was unclean. Finally, she was willing to accept her lover's body in places no one had ever trespassed. Specifically, the ear canal.

by Tackle Box on Nov 6, 2008 7:20 PM EST up reply actions  

indeed

i usually don’t look at SB since we don’t have a manager that employs sb all that much. Which is interesting about the genuine interest in Holliday, he has wheels too, especially for a potential clean up hitter.

"The Post-Dispatch Cardinals website continues down a path where you'll notice it's really a few McCarvers leading a pack of Dusty Bakers. I'm so glad they don't represent Cardinal Nation. No wonder newspapers are going down in shambles"

by AdjustedExpectations on Nov 6, 2008 7:37 PM EST up reply actions  

and to note

I don’t think Luis and Holliday are both enough for Ludwick. Not saying he’s worth three or four players, but when you consider the team and cost control vs the risk, it has to be multiplayer on both sides. Or Holliday would have to sign a considerable club friendly contract – which isn’t likely considering he’ll be 29 on FA year.

"The Post-Dispatch Cardinals website continues down a path where you'll notice it's really a few McCarvers leading a pack of Dusty Bakers. I'm so glad they don't represent Cardinal Nation. No wonder newspapers are going down in shambles"

by AdjustedExpectations on Nov 6, 2008 6:48 PM EST up reply actions  

How does Holliday help in the long run?

Next year his salary goes up dramatically, we should assume. Ludwick is cost-controlled for three more years. We’ve got Carpenter on the shelf and the need for another 1/2-type pitcher potentially. That’s an awful lot of flexibility to give up for a little higher average and—maybe—a bit more slugging.

Plus, we don’t have any pitchers to give, right? If we traded Ludwick & Wellemeyer for Holliday & Tulowitizki, that would be alright with me, so long as the club can find a replacement for the Colonel with their cramped budget.

by Red in Chicago on Nov 6, 2008 7:46 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t think pitchers are really on the table. They may be, Motte I believe was part of what Colorado was looking for when we were looking at their closer. But from everything I’ve read it doesn’t appear pitching is the sole demand (since they have a 3b and a CF they may try to leverage pitching there).

But from an front office point of view, trading and extending Holliday is a marketing dream. You’re essentially looking at an Edmonds like marketing approach.

His contract could actually not cost anything in the scheme of things I’d hazard to guess. But if there’s an artificial cap on the salary we’re going to spend, his contract will kill us long term.

Having Tulo would nullify some of that cost because he’s cheap and fills a need, but Tulo hasn’t been mentioned and I doubt we could garner enough to get both.

"The Post-Dispatch Cardinals website continues down a path where you'll notice it's really a few McCarvers leading a pack of Dusty Bakers. I'm so glad they don't represent Cardinal Nation. No wonder newspapers are going down in shambles"

by AdjustedExpectations on Nov 6, 2008 8:03 PM EST up reply actions  

here ya go

Cards get:
Holliday
Tulo

Rocks get:
Ludwick
Motte
Boggs
Kozma

"Sorry about him, he's dealing with being an inker. " - Chasing Amy

by FutureMan on Nov 6, 2008 8:16 PM EST up reply actions  

in. a. heartbeat.

No question. Well, ok, I’d try and throw Barden in and see if we could get a LHP from them. Oddly enough if that were to happen, we’d fill 3/4ths of our needs in one trade

"The Post-Dispatch Cardinals website continues down a path where you'll notice it's really a few McCarvers leading a pack of Dusty Bakers. I'm so glad they don't represent Cardinal Nation. No wonder newspapers are going down in shambles"

by AdjustedExpectations on Nov 6, 2008 10:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Can't throw in Barden

According to MLB’s official website, he is a minor league free agent. Strange, haven’t seen or heard anything about that around here.

"Baseball is like Church, many attend, few understand" - Wes Westrum

by scoot on Nov 6, 2008 10:55 PM EST up reply actions  

shouldn't be

unless we removed him from the 40-man, since he was a sept callup. We should control him for 5 or 6 more years.

That may have happened, but i didn’t see any announcement about it. He’s still listed on the mlb page.

http://stlouis.cardinals.mlb.com/team/roster_active.jsp?c_id=stl

the enemy's gate is down.

by SleepyCA on Nov 6, 2008 11:01 PM EST up reply actions  

MLB needs to get its stuff straight

Cuz they have him listed here as a minor league FA.

I’ll defer to you on this one, probably just a mistake since there has been no mention of this anywhere.

"Baseball is like Church, many attend, few understand" - Wes Westrum

by scoot on Nov 6, 2008 11:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Wow

I almost thought you wrote MILFs. Now that would be more interesting.:-)

by Red in Chicago on Nov 6, 2008 7:41 PM EST up reply actions  

heh

I was kinda hoping someone would pick up on that

this line is dedicated to '09

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Nov 7, 2008 1:22 PM EST up reply actions  

huh

I wouldn’t mind getting Holliday, but isn’t it like getting almost the same player, but costing us tons, I mean tons, more?

this line is dedicated to '09

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Nov 6, 2008 6:19 PM EST up reply actions  

and under control for one year

not 3.

I’d LOVE to get holliday while keeping Luddy, though.

the enemy's gate is down.

by SleepyCA on Nov 6, 2008 6:28 PM EST up reply actions  

I'd trade Ankiel for him yesterday.

Catherine whispered into my ear, her breath rich with faraway spices, that she desire to make love. She wanted to try shinshi shinshi. Now, I'd been begging her to try shinshi shinshi for months. She'd refused on the grounds that it was unclean. Finally, she was willing to accept her lover's body in places no one had ever trespassed. Specifically, the ear canal.

by Tackle Box on Nov 6, 2008 6:34 PM EST up reply actions  

You'd of thought he would have made an impression

considering how badly he kicked their ass in Denver. But his injury status and one year really kills him going anywhere for a trade like this.

"The Post-Dispatch Cardinals website continues down a path where you'll notice it's really a few McCarvers leading a pack of Dusty Bakers. I'm so glad they don't represent Cardinal Nation. No wonder newspapers are going down in shambles"

by AdjustedExpectations on Nov 6, 2008 7:20 PM EST up reply actions  

5 things

Talks about an extension – would it be a trade and extend, if so… for how much?

Players involved, we need more and they can’t use a 2b so dumping Kennedy won’t happen.

That Peavy deal looks to be screwing us either way we go since Peavy looks to stop us from MI help.

The chat before the talks seemed to send a broad signal to all other clubs, Rasmus is in our ‘09 plans, so adjust accordingly, he hasn’t been brought up in any talks since – good thing.

If Luddy has trade value for two completely different teams, maybe we can gain something extra if we play our cards right.

"The Post-Dispatch Cardinals website continues down a path where you'll notice it's really a few McCarvers leading a pack of Dusty Bakers. I'm so glad they don't represent Cardinal Nation. No wonder newspapers are going down in shambles"

by AdjustedExpectations on Nov 6, 2008 6:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Meaning

maybe with Holliday coming to the table with the Rockies, maybe the Braves will stay at the table with a little more vigor. Depends how Peavy shakes out.

"The Post-Dispatch Cardinals website continues down a path where you'll notice it's really a few McCarvers leading a pack of Dusty Bakers. I'm so glad they don't represent Cardinal Nation. No wonder newspapers are going down in shambles"

by AdjustedExpectations on Nov 6, 2008 6:45 PM EST up reply actions  

While heavily cynical

and not sure on how accurate, Holliday could be a FO move to try and encourage some more season ticket sales. Since his name does have value and is involved in a dual market between both teams. meaning, for a rockies player he has high visibility here.

But when you break down both player’s numbers that’s hedging a lot on Luddy as a career year. It’s kind of amazing actually considering how anti injury history most of the Cardinals fans are. Yeah, Luddy may be a position player and not a pitcher, but his body has had a lot of work.

"The Post-Dispatch Cardinals website continues down a path where you'll notice it's really a few McCarvers leading a pack of Dusty Bakers. I'm so glad they don't represent Cardinal Nation. No wonder newspapers are going down in shambles"

by AdjustedExpectations on Nov 6, 2008 6:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Purple Row

The rockies blog seems to think they can net several players. If that happens and we’re that team and it’s only one year/ or extended for extreme money for Holliday, I’m going to be pissed.

The last place we need to dump prospects for is RF and the OF is the last place we need to spend money.

"The Post-Dispatch Cardinals website continues down a path where you'll notice it's really a few McCarvers leading a pack of Dusty Bakers. I'm so glad they don't represent Cardinal Nation. No wonder newspapers are going down in shambles"

by AdjustedExpectations on Nov 6, 2008 7:19 PM EST up reply actions  

right

the mlbtraderumors site said that ludwick would be “part of the package.”

"Sorry about him, he's dealing with being an inker. " - Chasing Amy

by FutureMan on Nov 6, 2008 7:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Purple Row seems dead set on getting a pitcher

if that’s the case, then this will never happen.

But, I also get the impression they feel they would only be giving up Holliday and would get multiple players in return. Well, that might happen somewhere, but not with the Cardinals and Ryan Ludwick.

Catherine whispered into my ear, her breath rich with faraway spices, that she desire to make love. She wanted to try shinshi shinshi. Now, I'd been begging her to try shinshi shinshi for months. She'd refused on the grounds that it was unclean. Finally, she was willing to accept her lover's body in places no one had ever trespassed. Specifically, the ear canal.

by Tackle Box on Nov 6, 2008 7:25 PM EST up reply actions  

agreed..

Mo is not stupid…. I don’t know why people get all jumpy. Mo told teams to shove it when they wanted Motte this year, I think he values Ludwick more than Motte and fully understands Luddy’s value.. If he doesn’t I am sure someone in the FO is running the numbers.

by ICbirdfan on Nov 6, 2008 7:30 PM EST up reply actions  

If it weren't for jumping to conclusions

many on this board would never get any exercise.

Catherine whispered into my ear, her breath rich with faraway spices, that she desire to make love. She wanted to try shinshi shinshi. Now, I'd been begging her to try shinshi shinshi for months. She'd refused on the grounds that it was unclean. Finally, she was willing to accept her lover's body in places no one had ever trespassed. Specifically, the ear canal.

by Tackle Box on Nov 6, 2008 7:40 PM EST up reply actions  

amen brotha!

"The Post-Dispatch Cardinals website continues down a path where you'll notice it's really a few McCarvers leading a pack of Dusty Bakers. I'm so glad they don't represent Cardinal Nation. No wonder newspapers are going down in shambles"

by AdjustedExpectations on Nov 6, 2008 7:48 PM EST up reply actions  

and most would probably agree with you when you consider risks

but there’s a difference in using him to garner cost controlled and talented MI which is what this whole day started on, rather than lud with questionable splits.

if it happens, it better be multiplayer on both sides. feels too much to me like a salary dump/prospect grab and that isn’t a good idea

"The Post-Dispatch Cardinals website continues down a path where you'll notice it's really a few McCarvers leading a pack of Dusty Bakers. I'm so glad they don't represent Cardinal Nation. No wonder newspapers are going down in shambles"

by AdjustedExpectations on Nov 6, 2008 8:42 PM EST up reply actions  

approves

I'd rather my sister be a prostitute than my brother a Cub fan.

by _pistol_ on Nov 7, 2008 8:53 AM EST up reply actions  

Wellemeyer

is a potential name. Say Wellemeyer and Todd. Maybe even throw in Franklin. But then that opens a hole in our rotation that we would be filling with (probably) Looper. We would then have one No. 2, three No. 4s and one No. 5. Gag.

Unless DeWitt just found a steamer trunk full of money and wants to go after Burnett or something. We really don’t have what they need, even if we do have lust for Holliday.

by Red in Chicago on Nov 6, 2008 7:50 PM EST up reply actions  

I think Luds for Holliday would be an even deal.

Luds has more years left on a club friendly contract with less proven success while Holliday has more proven succes on a less club friendly contract.

I think they balance out.

Now I don’t know how you get Tulo in that deal. I don’t think it is possible but I guess we will see.

*Rasmus is to CF as Longoria is to 3B*

by Red Blazer on Nov 6, 2008 6:32 PM EST reply actions  

I dunno...

I don’t see how Holiday for Ludwick would solve any of the Cardinals problems. Indeed, it makes the problems harder to move.

Because you are getting rid of a pretty good trading chip (Ludwick) and using up a good deal of money (At least $8 million) which could have gone towards getting a closer or a 2b/SS.

Felipe Lopez - next year's Joel Pineiro

by DiscoJer on Nov 6, 2008 6:42 PM EST reply actions  

+1

Ludwick’s bat this year was just as productive as Holliday’s, so I can’t see this being Tony’s impact player in the lineup if you have to give up a guy who is just as good to get him. It would completely defeat the purpose of the “impact bat”

"I've never felt better to be hit by a big guy like that in my life." - Brad Lidge on Ryan Howard

by RunninRedbird on Nov 6, 2008 6:47 PM EST up reply actions  

knowing Tony logic

he probably would be the “impact” bat because he is more “respected” than ludwick. tony is all about intimidation behind pujols.

"Sorry about him, he's dealing with being an inker. " - Chasing Amy

by FutureMan on Nov 6, 2008 7:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Luddy should legally change his name

to Thudwick…that would strike fear in the hearts of opposing pitchers. Now Tony’s happy :)

"I've never felt better to be hit by a big guy like that in my life." - Brad Lidge on Ryan Howard

by RunninRedbird on Nov 6, 2008 7:28 PM EST up reply actions  

haha

that is awesome…

the enemy's gate is down.

by SleepyCA on Nov 6, 2008 9:17 PM EST up reply actions  

if we trade for an outfielder

before we trade for a MI i’m pretty sure i’m gonna throw up. especially if that outfielder is one we will have to pay pujols money to.

the last i heard 4/60 wasn’t gonna do it. he a boras client so its probably going to be more like 6/100. Unless dewitt plans on raising the payroll 15 mil i don’t see how this works.

"Sorry about him, he's dealing with being an inker. " - Chasing Amy

by FutureMan on Nov 6, 2008 7:10 PM EST up reply actions  

couldn't agree more

trading 3 yrs of cheap luddwick for 1 year of expensive holliday makes absolutly no sense to me.

by Walking Underwear on Nov 6, 2008 8:47 PM EST up reply actions  

anybody got Mo's cell number?

somebody has to call that guy and talk some sense into him. heh.

"Sorry about him, he's dealing with being an inker. " - Chasing Amy

by FutureMan on Nov 6, 2008 7:30 PM EST reply actions  

Yeah, this Holliday idea

has been stuck in their heads for an eternity. Ludwick is an awfully valuable asset to trade for one-year rental Boras client who wants major jack to sign long-term. Also, wouldn’t a Holliday contract rush the Pujols extension? How can possibly justify paying Holliday more than Pujols—even if it’s just for a couple of years?

by Red in Chicago on Nov 6, 2008 7:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Bye

"Stats are for losers," Muschamp said after last week's victory. "I like winning games."

by SoonerfanTU on Nov 6, 2008 11:15 PM EST up reply actions  

exactly

it’s just stupid to trade a great outfielder for a more expensive great outfielder, this is hopefully just a rumor!

this line is dedicated to '09

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Nov 7, 2008 1:27 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't get the obsession with Holliday

So we want to trade a right-handed power hitter who is under team control for three years for a more expensive left-handed one who will be a free agent at the end of 2009? And the guy we want to acquire has Scott Boras as his agent. And we already have another lefty power hitting outfielder who has Boras as his agent and will be a free agent at the end of the year. This just seems moronic to me. Escobar makes sense—Holliday doesn’t.

Now if you we are talking Halliday…that is another story altogether.

by nmstar on Nov 6, 2008 8:52 PM EST reply actions  

The obsession is one man

Tony LaRussa and his temper-tantrum power plays.

Mozeliak will placate him just so maybe he will shut up about the ‘impact bat’ BS.

Give Tony his big, lumbering slugger (see: McGwire, Mark: Duncan, Chris) and then force him to take Rasmus on Opening Day.

by Hardcore Legend on Nov 6, 2008 11:34 PM EST up reply actions  

uggla isn't all that

and we’re not getting hanley

"The Post-Dispatch Cardinals website continues down a path where you'll notice it's really a few McCarvers leading a pack of Dusty Bakers. I'm so glad they don't represent Cardinal Nation. No wonder newspapers are going down in shambles"

by AdjustedExpectations on Nov 7, 2008 1:08 AM EST up reply actions  

considering the prospects we'll lose

getting him vs what kennedy bat AND glove can offer.

We’ll lose in all ways, short and long term.

"The Post-Dispatch Cardinals website continues down a path where you'll notice it's really a few McCarvers leading a pack of Dusty Bakers. I'm so glad they don't represent Cardinal Nation. No wonder newspapers are going down in shambles"

by AdjustedExpectations on Nov 7, 2008 1:11 AM EST up reply actions  

I'd clean out the farm for Hanley Ramirez

Rasmus, Perez, Kozma, Anderson, Todd — hold nothing back.

He’s a 6 win upgrade at shortstop.

by azruavatar on Nov 7, 2008 7:16 AM EST up reply actions  

+1

this line is dedicated to '09

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Nov 7, 2008 1:28 PM EST up reply actions  

that was the impression I got

from the strauss(?) article on the P-d.

mo probably has to walk a thin line, to balance between all the personalities in the organization. Hope he walks it well.

the enemy's gate is down.

by SleepyCA on Nov 7, 2008 12:28 AM EST up reply actions  

Which is why Walter was fired

to bring harmony in the organization. Problem is, they left one troublemaker in the corner office.

by Hardcore Legend on Nov 7, 2008 12:47 AM EST up reply actions  

troublemaker?

how could this guy cause any trouble?

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson AND THAT'S A WINNER!

by gdm426 on Nov 7, 2008 1:53 AM EST up reply actions  

i love the lineup in pic#1

he totally predicted 2006, with that shirt… in, like, 1986.

And his daughters (and wife- one of them is his wife, right?) in pic #5 are beyond reproach. When I am 64, I pray my daughters look that good.

[Well, it’ll make it harder to intimidate their 40yo BF’s, but I’ll manage.]

And if you f—- with my puppies, when i am 50, I will pay someone to make you disappear. That is all.

don sleepy

the enemy's gate is down.

by SleepyCA on Nov 7, 2008 3:14 AM EST up reply actions  

or my towel.

the enemy's gate is down.

by SleepyCA on Nov 7, 2008 3:15 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't see him needing to be forced to take Colby

Out of ST he was quoted on how impressed he was with Ras, the Org shifted him to AAA. And if that’s premised on being quoted saying Colby didn’t earn call up, well.. he didn’t.

Can’t say I blame him on the impact bat part. Which gets bantered around here as if it’s a negative all of the time. To me it’s pretty clear, he was in support of getting Bonds (which at one point or another, most here were) and used the trade deadline to term it impact bat. When every night you’re in high stress mode with little run difference on the scoreboard, I’d be pretty pissed my Front Office was in the “don’t sign Bonds” to help the pissing contest with other FOs around the league.

Ya know, impact bat could mean "give me someone else to put in the 4 spot so i can shift Ryan to the #2. Something that is very aligned with what Tony has done in the past.

"The Post-Dispatch Cardinals website continues down a path where you'll notice it's really a few McCarvers leading a pack of Dusty Bakers. I'm so glad they don't represent Cardinal Nation. No wonder newspapers are going down in shambles"

by AdjustedExpectations on Nov 7, 2008 1:20 AM EST up reply actions  

I guess that is it, thanks

How Holliday is an ‘impact bat’ and Ludwick is not I just don’t get.

by nmstar on Nov 7, 2008 8:04 AM EST up reply actions  

especially when you consider

Ludwick was 2nd only to Pujols in Slugging % in the NL

this line is dedicated to '09

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Nov 7, 2008 1:30 PM EST up reply actions  

They are close to the same player aswell

Luddy
.299 .375 .591
Holliday
.321 .409 .538

Luddy has lower BA and OBP and speed but higher SLG and OPS

Luddy is only a year and a half older than Holliday

Luddy will make about the same as Holliday over his 3 years as holliday’s contract alone for 2009

by bearcatcardfan on Nov 6, 2008 11:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Something to think about.....

But if Holliday puts up the same line next year, and Ludwick falls off, that “difference” starts becomind pretty big.

"Stats are for losers," Muschamp said after last week's victory. "I like winning games."

by SoonerfanTU on Nov 7, 2008 10:00 AM EST up reply actions  

but you forget the Coors effect

we know Holliday will fall off, and we don’t know if Ludwick will get hurt or not (which to me is the only thing stopping him from batting well again). I’ll go with Ludwick here.

this line is dedicated to '09

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Nov 7, 2008 1:31 PM EST up reply actions  

There is absolutely no evidence that proves Holliday will fall off in his production.

Catherine whispered into my ear, her breath rich with faraway spices, that she desire to make love. She wanted to try shinshi shinshi. Now, I'd been begging her to try shinshi shinshi for months. She'd refused on the grounds that it was unclean. Finally, she was willing to accept her lover's body in places no one had ever trespassed. Specifically, the ear canal.

by Tackle Box on Nov 7, 2008 6:30 PM EST up reply actions  

I WANT DAN UGGLA

forget holliday. trade ludwick, anderson, and motte for dan uggla. i will pimp this trade on every place i can until mo sees it and calls the marlins. that kind of production at 2b would be incredible.

and before people say he cant play d please keep in mind one all star game doesnt make him terrible. hes not good but neither is miles or lopez. actually lopez might be terrible. ill take below average d at 2b anyways with that bat. we could sign cesar at ss.

by joelcards on Nov 7, 2008 9:49 AM EST reply actions  

if we get uggla

we might as well re-sign izturis

this line is dedicated to '09

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Nov 7, 2008 1:32 PM EST up reply actions  

yes

i think that would almost be a requirement. cesar made glaus look good. he would only help uggla.

by joelcards on Nov 7, 2008 5:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Hahaha_small
These were a few of my favorite things (fink reminisces about the 2011 regular season)
N1046613005_8392_small
Our 2010-2011 strays
649494__1__small
Hall of WAR: Part 2

Recent FanPosts

Dsc01844_small
Cardinals take the Governor's Joplin Challenge, will help build 35 homes for torando victims
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals of All-Time - Relief Pitching Edition
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals of All-Time - Starting Pitching Edition
Small
Two Trades That Set the Cards Back in the 70s
Nyc_small
Cardinals Offense vs. Reds Offense - 2012
Nyc_small
Cardinals Rotation vs. Reds Rotation - 2012
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals by Position - Center Fielders

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Jack_benny__1__small DanUpBaby

Editors

Bendermad_small azruavatar

Trigun_001_small the red baron

Images_small tom s.

Authors

1989_bgh_cropped_small bgh

Valverde_medium_small vivaelpujols