Viva El Birdos: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: World Soccer Digest for Soccer Fans!

Projection

If Fox and Major League Baseball can't turn this World Series into a hit they have only themselves to blame. My casual-fan friends—the type that likes baseball, but probably likes football more; that has a favorite team, but probably could not rattle off the 25-man—have talked more about this series than any I can remember, including the one in which our Sainted Red Sox shook off their mortal shackles and became at one with the universal World Series-conscience. It's been a lot of fun to watch a World Series that seems newsworthy, like that—with the baseball making news, instead of the would-be storylines. 

It helps that the games have been pretty good so far, although things might get a little more lopsided if the Phillies were to send somebody up to hit when they got a man on second, but it seems like no amount of great play or great stories is going to convince Major League Baseball and its TV partners to raise the national profile of teams like this, who have built themselves up for multi-year runs and are, at this rate, going to spend their pennant-chasing years completely anonymous. 

Anyway: I have a confession to make. Barry Bonds totally screwed up my RBI champ/MVP entry, previously scheduled for today. His sheer dominance—his utter obviousness, as an MVP, from 2001 to 2004—means I need to pick some new endpoints. So that post is in turnaround, as they say, for release on Monday. 

Luckily, SBN and ACTA have provided us with the 2009 edition of the Bill James Handbook's projections, which make for excellent weekend chatter and even better cover for a blown entry. So let's have a look at the hitters.

 

Hitter G AB H 2B 3B HR RBI BB K AVG OBP SLG OPS
Albert Pujols 155 575 194 45 1 41 125 102 59 .337 .443 .633 1076
Ryan Ludwick 152 540 152 38 1 31 100 54 135 .281 .351 .528 879
Troy Glaus 148 539 140 29 1 31 97 87 123 .260 .367 .490 856
Rick Ankiel 139 502 132 24 2 31 96 43 110 .263 .324 .504 828
Joe Mather 63 162 41 9 0 10 24 17 28 .253 .328 .494 822
Chris Duncan 103 290 77 15 0 13 46 41 71 .266 .358 .452 810
Brian Barton 60 115 33 5 1 2 14 12 28 .287 .359 .400 759
Colby Rasmus 135 472 116 27 1 18 54 60 99 .246 .331 .422 752
Skip Schumaker 128 405 119 20 2 6 33 34 45 .294 .350 .398 748
Felipe Lopez 112 344 92 18 2 7 36 35 66 .267 .340 .392 733
Aaron Miles 130 360 105 16 2 3 31 22 36 .292 .334 .372 706
Adam Kennedy 116 348 95 17 2 4 34 26 50 .273 .332 .368 700
Yadier Molina 126 473 129 22 0 8 60 37 40 .273 .329 .370 699
Jason LaRue 68 154 34 8 0 5 19 14 39 .221 .322 .370 692
Brendan Ryan 88 237 60 11 1 3 15 17 34 .253 .306 .346 652
Cesar Izturis 122 368 97 15 2 1 26 24 27 .264 .314 .323 637

 

Before we go on, I should mention that the Bill James Handbook has no concept of Chris Duncan's neck or the white-hot rays of hate that have, at times, been directed at Felipe Lopez; these are, to my knowledge, strictly statistical projections. (And in my experience, particularly optimistic statistical projections.) My hastily drawn impressions: 

 

  • Albert Pujols.
  • Unless you subscribe to theRasmus-for-Peavy newsletter it seems to me that Skip is the guy to trade, here, if anything of value can be had in return. There's plenty of depth in centerfield, he's blocking the Top Prospect, and if the Cardinals were to convert Schumaker into a Schumaker-class middle infielder they would be taking a significant step forward.
  • Speaking of that centerfield depth, does anybody know where Brian Barton is? The guy had a great year for a Rule 5'er and, for his troubles, has been wiped completely from St. Louis's collective memory. This is a guy the Cardinals, who may start two lefty outfielders next year, could get significant value from right now. He's only a year and a half younger than Skip, so stashing him in AAA now that they're legally able isn't going to help anybody but the Memphis Redbirds. 
  • Colby Rasmus is also projected to steal 22 bases, which should endear him with Busch Stadium's remaining Whiteyball contingent. That line would be a little disappointing over a full year, but I think he'll exceed it if he stays healthy long enough to adjust to the big leagues.
  • In 550 at-bats that version of Joe Mather would hit 34 homers, if you were curious.
  • Finally, I've been thinking about this and I've come to the conclusion that it is important enough to warrant a bullet point: if you were to combine Aaron Miles's batting average and scrappiness with Jason LaRue's secondary skills and propensity for the beanball you'd have Craig Biggio. For what that's worth.

 

So what are your thoughts? As I intimated earlier I've always been a little skeptical of these projections. It's not that they're bad so much as that the process has never been explained, and that from what I gather they are Bill James projections inasmuch as the Family Bucket at your local KFC contains chicken fried by Colonel Sanders. (The book, though, is great; you don't really know how much you've always wanted to know who had the league's best OPS on pitches outside of the strike zone until you've seen the leaderboard for it.)

As the first projections of the year they hold an undeniable Hot Stove allure, so let's discuss: would that line from Colby Rasmus be a disappointment? Is Yadier Molina going to hit .300 again? Would Cesar Izturis get 20 extra-base hits if he were allowed to use an aluminum bat? If I were pitching to him? Softballs?

 

0 recs  |  Comment 227 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Ankiel's hits

Might want to adjust those 1322 in 502 AB’s

That said, the Cubs do deserve my pity, but never my support.

by Solanus on Oct 24, 2008 9:27 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

woops

Thanks for reminding me. The table formatter in this software has this nasty habit of deleting half of the cells in a table when you delete a typo, so I was saving cutting Ankiel’s average down from 3.000 for the end. Obviously I saved it a little too long.

by DanUpBaby on Oct 24, 2008 10:39 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Rasmus line seems overly optimistic

I don’t see him hitting that many homers in his first year in the big leagues, unless someone gets hurt and he has to play 3 months of continuous time, you know, like Bobby Bonilla did in 2000 to make way for The Great Pujols. I do think he’ll get on base at a higher clip than .332 though. That line really makes Skippy obsolete because he’d be as good as Skip in the leadoff spot and is the future of the franchise in centerfield.

A couple other things struck me:

  1. If Mather develops the plate discipline he had a AAA, he becomes this guy, who some people have been talking about signing for multi-millions this offseason.
  2. Brian Barton needs to play more. Period.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Oct 24, 2008 9:36 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

mather, right on ankiels heels

ankiel a FA after 09 with a 3/24 mil contract on the horizon if he matches his 08 #’s and 09 projections.
mather, near minimum for at least 3 more years….not expecting mathers 08 sevice days to qualify him for super two status in 2010, even with full years in 09 and 2010.
if duncan has health issues in 09, barton will play more, but only because tlr hand is forced and skip needs a platoon partner.

by ball in play on Oct 24, 2008 10:00 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think Burrell is a fair..

comp for Mather’s upside. A bit of a free-swinger, but power and OBP to spare. Maybe I am mis-remembering, but weren’t we discussing Mather as a back up at third base last year? Has that been totally ruled out now that we think he could start in the OF?

by cardzfanbub on Oct 24, 2008 10:00 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

WTF

I don’t think he could handle the hot corner

by FlimtotheFlam on Oct 24, 2008 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Could he do it for a game or two, or six?

I really like both Mather and Barton and would love to see them both get more at-bats at the major league level to see if they can adjust and become consistent hitters.

Until the team makes a trade and clears up the OF picture for 2009…

Assume for a moment Chris Duncan is healthy, I think we all agree he will be given every opportunity to play LF and get his bat back. That would pretty much mean in April either Mather or Barton is in AAA, as well as Rasmus. 7 players for 5 roster spots.

Duncan, Ankiel, Schukmaker, Rasmus – LH bats
Ludwick, Mather, Barton – RH bats

That would be 3 LH bats and 2 RH bats on the major league roster, with 2 of the lefty’s needing to platoon (Duncan, Schumaker)

I still think that creates a need for a Scott Spezio/Placido Polanco type utility man who can back up 3B, 1B, LF, or RF.

Question is, could Mather fill that utility man roll? Can he back up 1B, 3B on days Pujols and Glaus get a rest? We know he can be the 3rd RH bat for the OF if TLR wants to play the matchup game, as well as a RH bat off the bench for late innings. If Glaus goes on the DL the team can always callup Freese to play 3B everyday, and still use Mather as the utility man. He can also play RF when Ludwick rests or goes on the DL.

That said – Duncan is a HUGE health question mark, and I expect to see one of the LH hitting OF’s to get traded, either Ainkel or Skip.

by Knighttime on Oct 24, 2008 6:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

he can certainly back up first

He is a much better 1B than Phelps or Duncan, at least.

the enemy's gate is down.

by SleepyCA on Oct 24, 2008 8:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Heck, I worry that just the AT BATS

are optimistic given TLR’s stubbornness.

by sdrone on Oct 24, 2008 10:27 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rasmus Needs More Time At AAA

He appeared to have turned things around last season in Memphis after an awful start before getting hurt. I think he will start the season in Memphis. I don’t see Rasmus hitting below .200 for the first six weeks of the 2009 season like he did during the beginning of the 2008 season. If he hits like he did last June and July at AAA, I could see Rasmus as a mid-season call-up.

"The big possum walks late." - Harry Caray

by memphiscub on Oct 24, 2008 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If for no other reason...

than the effect on the arb clock. I’m not sure how it all works, but I know that Tampa having Longoria start the season at AAA was suppose to be significant towards his playing time status.

by cardzfanbub on Oct 24, 2008 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Then Longoria

was inked to a long term deal a month into the season so it was a moot point to keep him down at the start of the season.

by Waxing Gibbous on Oct 24, 2008 11:22 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

no

That was a deliberate, calculated move by TB’s management. By doing what they did, it saved millions because they were able to negotiate with Longoria’s agent from a position of strength.

the enemy's gate is down.

by SleepyCA on Oct 24, 2008 8:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

On Rasmus

I’d say that if he is going to struggle whenever he gets to a new level, which history suggests is true, why not just start him in the bigs? I’d rather him have him playing like he should in July rather than getting called up in July, struggling, then getting benched because it’s too late in the season for him to learn how to play in the majors.

Is it fraud when Cubs ownership says "this year is our year?" Can somebody sue for that?

by thegodfather on Oct 24, 2008 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

Ryan Howard: one of the most Statistically Outstanding players of all time

by RunninRedbird on Oct 24, 2008 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1 , too

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Oct 24, 2008 7:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

fairly or unfairly

I think if he has a good spring training, ie, better than Mather, Barton or Skip (if all of them are still around), then he will come up, if not, he’ll stay down. And IMHO, that’s probably the right move.

by eglasier on Oct 24, 2008 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

so, only if he puts up good spring training numbers

then he should make the team? spring training stats are a joke. if he comes in healthy he should be the starting CF there is NO reason that we shouldn’t be seeing what we have with him at the major league level with the tools and production he has provided in the minors.

"Baseball is like church. Many attend, but few understand." -Wes Westrum

by nomar34 on Oct 24, 2008 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow

So play him even if he isn’t one of the 3 best OF’s at the start of the year?

I disagree. We’ll be in the hunt for a playoff spot, no reason to play a guy that may not be producing. We don’t HAVE to do that.

If he comes to ST and tears things up, I have no problems making him the opening day CF. We, as fans and the ballclub, better be willing to put up with the ups and downs though.

I wish he had been healthy at the end of the season, and had done more to deserve a callup. The last 2-3 weeks of the season would have been perfect for him to get some experience.

"Stats are for losers," Muschamp said after last week's victory. "I like winning games."

by SoonerfanTU on Oct 24, 2008 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree...

Sooner…If he isn’t producing better than Skip and/or Barton in Spring training, I have no problem with him starting the year in Memphis. I think it’s likely that one of Skip or Barton will be gone by Spring…but whoever isn’t should have just as good a shot at the starting roster as Rasmus (if not better since their options and arb clocks are already running).

Rasmus will be our starting CFer someday, and there will undoubtedly be growing pains, but right now we have the luxury of extreme depth in the outfield. There is no reason to get in a big hurry with the guy. His presence will push one of Mather, Skip or Barton off of the roster.

by cardzfanbub on Oct 24, 2008 11:59 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

here's what I want to see

Skip traded, starting Ludwick, Rasmus, and Ankiel in the outfield, with Barton and Mather on the bench (who knows what we do with CDunc)

go rays

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Oct 24, 2008 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

winter

I think this mess will become a lot clearer this winter and we won’t have to worry our pretty little heads about it come spring training.

by spencegrif on Oct 24, 2008 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

the thing is

he IS one of the 3 best outfielders to start the year…if he proves he cannot handle it then you might have to start platooning him or even send him down but he has proved he is something special in the minors now he should get the chance in the bigs.

what has he done to not deserve a call up? if everyone in baseball considers him one of the best prospects and he has proven at every level, yes even AAA as his numbers are a lot better than most people think, then if he is healthy he should be on the team and in the starting lineup.

"Baseball is like church. Many attend, but few understand." -Wes Westrum

by nomar34 on Oct 24, 2008 1:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

I just dont get whats with the big push to keep Rasmus in the minors. We are obviously at least 1 impact player from being a playoff contender. Skip is never going to be that guy. Barton – higher possibilty but theres still little chance. Rasmus could be that guy and his skills replace Skip’s best and more.

by rlgosnell on Oct 24, 2008 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If you want to go that route....
what has he done to not deserve a call up?

Really? That’s easy:

  1. He hasn’t put up better numbers in AAA than every other guy in the outfield mix
  2. He had a pretty short season last year with all the injuries and was mired in a nearly 2 month long slump before he broke out of it. If he’s the next great Cardinal, it’s probably not a good thing to just plug him in and watch him hit .200/.300/.330 for two months while he gets it figured out.
  3. Talent-wise he’s one of the three best, but that doesn’t mean you sit guys that are more prepared than he is because he’s the “next great thing”. When you’re the Reds, you can do that because you aren’t competing in 2008 and you know it. The Cardinals should be competitive next year and can’t afford to have a future stud stinking up your ballclub when you have 2 other warm bodies possibly stinking it up already.

He’d be better off getting regular AB’s in Memphis than being platooned by TLR in St. Louis.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Oct 24, 2008 5:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

You said it perfectly.

"Stats are for losers," Muschamp said after last week's victory. "I like winning games."

by SoonerfanTU on Oct 24, 2008 5:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

not that easy

1. he was starting to hit AAA pitching like crazy before he got hurt. and using that argument we’ll have to wait till mather, barton, stav, jon jay, and amaury marti don’t pan out before we can call up raz. they all hit better than he did at AAA and cody haerther was pretty close.

2. he always starts off slow so no matter what we’ll probably have to suffer threw a .200/.300/.330 line for two months.

3. so as long as we are competitive he stays down in memphis? again, he will struggle for a while so by your argument he will always hurt our team’s chances. i think there is room for struggle with a lineup of ank, lud, and raz. even raz, mather, and lud there is room for struggle.

if he’s brought up i hope there would be an understanding between mo and tlr that he starts everyday regardless. if not i guess we will have to wait till tlr is gone before we see raz.

"Sorry about him, he's dealing with being an inker. " - Chasing Amy

by FutureMan on Oct 24, 2008 6:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

good thing we didnt listen to you in 2001...
Talent-wise he’s one of the three best, but that doesn’t mean you sit guys that are more prepared than he is because he’s the "next great thing". When you’re the Reds, you can do that because you aren’t competing in 2008 and you know it. The Cardinals should be competitive next year and can’t afford to have a future stud stinking up your ballclub when you have 2 other warm bodies possibly stinking it up already.

hmmm, we let Pujols come up in 2001 and that turned out ok and we were a lot more competitive then than now…

"Baseball is like church. Many attend, but few understand." -Wes Westrum

by nomar34 on Oct 24, 2008 8:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

We needed Pujols to fill a spot and he hit so well that it was illogical to take that spot from him

it’s a completely different situation.

Also, Pujols wasn’t a highly prized prospect at the time, he was just another rookie that was potentially a future starter.

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Oct 24, 2008 10:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

By 2001

pujols most certainly was a highly prized prospect. No one thought he was going to become the best hitter in the game, but they knew he was something very special.

the enemy's gate is down.

by SleepyCA on Oct 24, 2008 10:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

still

he wasn’t supposed to stick with the team like he did. It was supposed to be a cup of coffee while Bonilla rehabbed.

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Oct 24, 2008 10:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

even though he was a 13th rounder and not necessarily on the radar of the public after his first full season of pro ball, it was pretty well known that the scouts absolutely loved him.

I remember watching him in an AFL game in 2000 and he just stood out like a man among boys. I called my brother from the game and told him Albert Pujols was going to the HOF.

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Oct 25, 2008 12:35 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i am certain that

we had atleast some other players to choose from Pujols was the logical choice because he was the best player out of those choices kind of like Rasmus is the best player out of our choices. and why does it matter that Pujols wasnt as good a prospect? So because Rasmus is a better prospect he shouldnt get to come up to the majors?

"Baseball is like church. Many attend, but few understand." -Wes Westrum

by nomar34 on Oct 25, 2008 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I just don't want a repeat of last season's farce

when both the GM and the Manager said he would be given every opportunity to play his way on to the roster, then he proceeded to put up the best numbers of any player not named Pujols and they sent him to Memphis anyway.

I am not a big fan of TLR’s spring training “competitions” as it seems like the winner is preordained.

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Oct 24, 2008 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Barton won last year in ST

but look where it got him: lots of bench

go rays

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Oct 24, 2008 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would have liked to see Barton more

but didn’t Ludwick’s surprising ability at the plate, and Schumaker’s continued progression both contribute to Barton losing pt?

That makes me believe that when Colby gets called up, and IF he hits well – he will play. TLR had no plans to play Ludwick 150+ games and 500+ ab’s, but Ludwick’s performance forced him to be put into the lineup. i.e. He earned it.

by Knighttime on Oct 24, 2008 6:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It would have been interesting to see what would have happened

if Chris Duncan hadn’t been abysmal. Luddy probably would never have been a regular.

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Oct 24, 2008 9:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not so sure he was the best of anyone not named Pujols...

if I recall correctly every one of our OFers had good springs. Barton had to make the team and Colby was the easiest to send down. I expect Colby to be at Memphis to start the year unless he is the BEST OFer not name Ludwick or Ankiel in spring training – and best by a good margin.

by cardzfanbub on Oct 24, 2008 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

or Duncan's not ready + Skip is traded

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Oct 24, 2008 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Even in that scenario...

Mather could tear it up and earn a starting spot (quite likely IMO). If Colby is in the STL he has to be starting.

I’m praying Duncan has a huge spring and we trade him before something else happes.

by cardzfanbub on Oct 24, 2008 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

ick

I’m not looking forward to seeing Duncan play the outfield ever again

go rays

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Oct 24, 2008 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

rasmus had the 2nd best OPS on the team during spring 08

duncan should have opened in the minors, if it’s a true competition. but it’s not. it’s tlr babble and bias.

by ball in play on Oct 24, 2008 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Duncan had a running arb clock

and Rasmus did not.

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Oct 24, 2008 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

arb is determined by service days and years, duncan was optionable, stopping his arb clock.

rasmus will never need an arb clock, he’ll get extended like wainwright did, before he’s arb eligible.

by ball in play on Oct 24, 2008 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

But when you have to do that is determined by when your arbitration comes up

and I’d just as soon start Rasmus’s expensive time for a time when the team is competittive and he is completely ready to play at the MLB level. Last year showed that he did still need time to develop.

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Oct 24, 2008 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

so we weren't competitive enough to have rasmus on the roster in 08?

if dunc is in the minors where he belonged are we even a more competitive team?

won’t disagree rasmus has since shown he looks to need a half season at AAA again, in hindsight, but we didn’t know that when 08 roster decisions were made at the end of ST. if rasmus makes the roster, he also doesn’t have reason to go down to AAA and pout like a 21 yr old. now i’m speculating, but what says he doesn’t continue his spring success during 08 ?

i will continue putting stl wins, ahead of when the gm has to offer any player an extension, earlier than possible. arb clock and options seldom come into play with top 5 prospects like colby. longoria’s arb clock and extension as example #1. longoria’s extension, applied to colby, has very little effect on team budget, for quite a few years. keep pullin the rug out from under colby’s feet and longoria’s extension may not be accepted by rasmus.

by ball in play on Oct 24, 2008 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

A couple fo things

1) If he’s unprofessional enough that he was actually pouting in AAA and that wasn’t just an adjustment period, then the dude should be traded for some team’s star player/prospect. That primadonna behavior will come back to bite the team eventually.

2) Before the 2008 season started, there was absolutely no reason to think that the team would be competing for the division title. None. The Cubs and Brewers looked completely stacked, and the Cardinals had just dumped two of it’s stars. Additionally, there was no assurance that Ludwick was going to keep on producing, or that Ankiel would have any sort of consistent success. The rotation was a giant question mark, also. That fantastic April was a surprise to everyone.

3)Of course the point about the extensions is a more valid one, but just the same, perhaps we’d be better off putting it off by a year nonetheless. And it was clearly good for Rasmus that he didn’t entirely skip AAA. Now, if he had gone down to AAA and murdered PCL pitching, I could understand the argument for bringing him up a lot more. As it was, I don’t think that the team did anything wrong, especially since he was as young as he was.

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Oct 24, 2008 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dude he is still a kid

I don’t know if he pouting or not. The kid was disappointed that he didn’t make the team after having a great spring training and the Tony said their would be open try outs.

I wasn’ that mature when I was 21/22 so I will give the kid some slack. Sounds likes his family is the bigger problem.

by FlimtotheFlam on Oct 24, 2008 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I have no idea if he was pouting either

and I want to give him the benefit of the doubt, and taking some time to adjust to AAA is completely reasonable. But if he was, it really is a bad mark on his behavior, and an indication that he probably, at the minimum, needed to be taken down a notch anyway.

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Oct 24, 2008 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You don't think?

Having AK and Aaron Miles play in the OF in Sept didn’t take him down a level?

by FlimtotheFlam on Oct 24, 2008 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Perhaps

But that isn’t an argument as to why he needed to be with the big league club.

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Oct 24, 2008 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think its concrete evidence that he should have been in STL

Rasmus couldnt have offerend more than AK and Miles in the OF? REally?

by rlgosnell on Oct 24, 2008 4:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

they were emergency fill ins after the season was over

When did AK and Miles play in the OF? It was effing September. This is a completely absurd comparison.

It is really clear that the OF rotation to start the season was Ank, Ludwick, Barton, Duncan and Skip. They were all servicable, and while Rasmus probably could have matched the production of some of them last year, his performance in Memphis last year certainly would indicate that his development was likely aided by that year at AAA.

Throwing AK and Miles guys in the outfield to eat up meaningless innings is a way, way, way different thing than rushing your best prospect to the majors. This is a completely disingenuous argument.

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Oct 24, 2008 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

that's off the topic

since it was at a completely different point in the season. having AK and Miles play in the outfield was retarded to be sure, but I’m sure they didn’t think Mather would get hurt; which doesn’t explain why Barton was still a bench dweller… that’s the weirdest thing of the season I think. bench miles or kennedy and play Barton, duh.

go rays

by Cards Fan in Chitown on Oct 24, 2008 3:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

To expand on the extension...

St. Louis has shown no tendency to extend players before they were eligible for arbitration. I don’t see them as likely to make an exception for Rasmus…meaning that if he had played last year he’d be making $5mil in 2011 instead of $500K…$10 mil in 2012 instead of $5mil and $12mil in 2013 instead of $10mil.

by cardzfanbub on Oct 24, 2008 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

wainwright, molina

to name two in the last offseason

by ball in play on Oct 24, 2008 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

To nitpick

weren’t they extended basically to avoid arbitration? As in, they would have been arb eligible after this year?

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Oct 24, 2008 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually...

Molina was arb eligible in 2007 and Wainwright in 2008…as in before those seasons.

by cardzfanbub on Oct 24, 2008 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

how was Wainwright eligigble in 08?

I am not an expert on the arbitration process, it may be my major flaw as a baseball fan, but don’t you have to have three years of service time, or at least be eligible under the Super 2 provision?

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Oct 24, 2008 7:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I could definitely see how Wainwright would be Super two

but the rule is kind of weirdly phrased:

A: A player with three or more years of service, but less than six years, may file for salary arbitration. In addition, a player can be classified as a “Super Two” and be eligible for arbitration with less than three years of service. A player with at least two but less than three years of Major League service shall be eligible for salary arbitration if he has accumulated at least 86 days of service during the immediately preceding season and he ranks in the top 17 percent in total service in the class of Players who have at least two but less than three years of Major League service, however accumulated, but with at least 86 days of service accumulated during the immediately preceding season.

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Oct 24, 2008 10:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

if they just count days, then Wainwright is definitely super 2

since he was on the opening day roster both of his first two years, and he played every game without a DL stint. That would definitely put him in the top 17% of all players who started baseball in 2006 in terms of time on the roster. If they try to use innings or something like that, then it’s more complicated, and him being a reliever in 2006 makes things confusing.

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Oct 24, 2008 10:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

wainwright was not arb eligible before 2008

he would have been arb eligible today, but was extended to avoid his arb years. which is why rasmus service clock doesn’t matter, unless you are writing the checks. elite players get extended before arb eligible, IF they will accept the contract offer.

wainwright had 2.027 service time accumulated before 08. which breaks down to 2 yrs / 27 days. ludwick had 2.109 service time accumulated and also MISSED super two status before 08, which is why he wasn’t arb eligible until this offseason.

the super eligibility is set by that particular years class, as to where the upper 17% falls. 2.128 through 2.140 is usually where super two falls, but it varies by year.

the key to understanding service years, is to realize 0.172 DAYS is equal to 1.00 service year. not 0.999 = one day short of a year.

the season is about 0.172 DAYS long. (0.173 = 1.001 service years)

ludwicks 2.109 before 2008 = 2 yrs and 109 days. when he reached 2.173, it convert to 3.001 yrs, and contiues accumulating.

molina was a bad example by me, i should have checked his contract record before replying, i didn’t. i did not realize he had avoided an arb year by being offered a contract and accepting. his lack of offensive numbers made his first arb yr affordable and the org just extended him one year rather than long term (he hadn’t put up the numbers expected of rasmus).

by ball in play on Oct 25, 2008 8:23 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The arb clock is still determining when you're extending them

for increased salary. You just aren’t going through the arbitration process.

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Oct 25, 2008 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You are correct regarding Wainwright...

he signed his extension on March 20 this year, months after the team had already reinked him for 2008. Still, he made only $.5 million this year in his third season. Regardless of when an extension is signed (pre-arb or post-arb) it will still reflect the progression that his seen by players who go year to year. Meaning in their first two years in the league a player will make about $1 million total…probably less than a million in year three. If Colby started 2008 in STL or played significant time there he would make $3-5 million more in 2011 and in 2012 than he will now. Teams must be careful not to rush guys that they plan on having around for 6+ years…

The Royals commonly make the mistake of bringing up players before they are ready and end up suffering through two years of struggling play and losing out on 2 cost-controlled years of peak performance.

by cardzfanbub on Oct 25, 2008 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I said...

before they were eligible for arbitration. I believe Molina may have even been on a one-year deal in 2007 to avoid arbitration. The Cards won’t extend Rasmus (IMO) until the offseason after 2011 – they would have done in it in the offseason of 2010 if he had been called up early in 2008.

by cardzfanbub on Oct 24, 2008 5:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

re: showing no tendency

if i remember correctly, the pujols extension was the contract that pretty much invented the current paradigm of extending promising youngsters long-term.

the enemy's gate is down.

by SleepyCA on Oct 24, 2008 8:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Question

Didn’t the Yankees do the same for Jeter?

by Knighttime on Oct 24, 2008 10:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jeter's contract is REALLY rich

that’s not avoiding arbitration, that’s signing him to a massive contract. But it did avoid arbitration: From Cot’s:

  1. $16M signing bonus (paid in 16 $1M installments 1/30 & 6/30, 2001-08)
  2. 01:$11M, 02:$13M, 03:$14M, 04:$17M, 05:$18M, 06:$19M, 07-09:$20M/year, 10:$21M
  • no-trade clause
  • They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

    by Valatan on Oct 24, 2008 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Valid about the HUGE contract

    But it’s in Yankee Dollars, so that’s like 32.76% more than the rest of baseball contracts.

    at risk of being “that guy” also from Cots:
    http://mlbcontracts.blogspot.com/2005/01/new-york-yankees_111398168678860040.html

    1 year/$10M (2000), avoided arbitration 2/00 ($10.5M-$9.5)
    replaced tentative deal for 7 years/$118.5M (2000-06)

    by Knighttime on Oct 24, 2008 11:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Albert vs Jeter

    Jeter got his in his 5th yr after winning a $5M contract in arbitration the previous yr. total was 7y/118.5M

    Albert got his in his 4th yr and made $7M in his 4th yr – $2M more than Jeter at the same stage, 4 years later (2000 vs 2004). total was 7y/$100M

    Not that big of a difference actually – if you I actually say $18.5M over 7 years is not a big deal. (i should have learned how to hit)

    by Knighttime on Oct 24, 2008 11:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    I really thought it was something that started...

    with the Florida teams, but you may be right. Pujols signed his deal before I really paid much attention to the business side of baseball. Nowadays I find myself as interested (if not more interested) in the business side than I do the games. This offseason has me on the edge of my seat!!!

    by cardzfanbub on Oct 25, 2008 4:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    It was still signed...

    in his first year of arbitration. I do remember them making Pujols the highest paid “pre-arb” player in history, but I’m pretty sure it was a one year deal. Cot’s confirms this.

    by cardzfanbub on Oct 25, 2008 5:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    not to argue

    i acknowledge your points are well thought through. another viewpoint to the 3 points you made……..
    1) prima donna behavior— that was probably the first time rasmus EVER had his bubble popped, within baseball in his lifetime. MAYBE (i speculate) he pouted, and if so, bad choice from what i consider a child.
    2) before the season started i predicted 85 wins in the NL central thread on stlcards.com. we won 86.
    3) would have prefered tlr kept his mouth shut about rasmus chances to make the parent club out of spring. the FO did nothing wrong, i agree.

    by ball in play on Oct 24, 2008 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Floppy vs Rasmus...

    A lot of pro Lopez people say he only played so poorly in Washington because he didn’t like playing for such a bad team.

    Why is that apparently excusable behavior in a vet, but not in a rookie (one who put up good enough ST numbers to make the team)?

    Felipe Lopez - next year's Joel Pineiro

    by DiscoJer on Oct 24, 2008 6:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    good point

    that playing for a bad team thing always bothered me. that doesn’t seem like the type of player i want on my team. no randy mosses please.

    "Sorry about him, he's dealing with being an inker. " - Chasing Amy

    by FutureMan on Oct 24, 2008 6:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    +1

    "No matter where you go, there you are" Buckeroo Bonzai Across the 8th Dimension

    by sportsman on Oct 24, 2008 6:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    yea, I'm the biggest

    Rasmus fan there is but he’s not playing winter ball, he had a tough year and yes,
    he still has to prove that he belongs at the big club. I think there’s not doubt that he’s the center fielder of the future but if he comes out and plays in spring training like he did the first part of the season in AAA, then sure, I’d leave him in AAA.

    by eglasier on Oct 24, 2008 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    how do you prove that you belong in the

    bigs? produce at the minor league level? check. have tools that scouts and sabermaticans drool over? check. absolutely pound major league pitching the only chance you have gotten? ST ’08 check. what more do you want from him?

    "Baseball is like church. Many attend, but few understand." -Wes Westrum

    by nomar34 on Oct 24, 2008 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    was he really that good in ST this year?

    I remember him being average or slightly above average

    go rays

    by Cards Fan in Chitown on Oct 24, 2008 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    I'm feeling the same thing...

    I remember him taking an ungodly number of walks, and hitting pretty well…I don’t recall him “absolutely pounding” everyone.

    by cardzfanbub on Oct 24, 2008 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    .302/.464/.605

    "Baseball is like church. Many attend, but few understand." -Wes Westrum

    by nomar34 on Oct 24, 2008 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    better than I thought

    but wouldn’t call it “absolutely pounding”

    go rays

    by Cards Fan in Chitown on Oct 24, 2008 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    what do you call a 1.069 OPS then?

    Pujols calls it just another year but most people it would be considered pounding the baseball…then again it is 43 AB’s which is why spring stats are pointless and he should be on the team regardless…

    "Baseball is like church. Many attend, but few understand." -Wes Westrum

    by nomar34 on Oct 24, 2008 3:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    If he had torn it up in AAA

    I could understand the statement “he should be on the team regardless”.

    But he didn’t. So I’m more inclined to believe his AAA numbers than his ST numbers, wouldn’t you agree? And wouldn’t you also agree that based on his AAA numbers, a little seasoning wouldn’t kill him?

    "Stats are for losers," Muschamp said after last week's victory. "I like winning games."

    by SoonerfanTU on Oct 24, 2008 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    his number are a lot

    better than people give him credit for given his age, league, and peripherals .

    "Baseball is like church. Many attend, but few understand." -Wes Westrum

    by nomar34 on Oct 24, 2008 4:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    No one is saying he is or was a crappy prospect

    they were saying he was not MLB ready. And given his age, performance and league last year, he would have likely been way overmatched in the majors last year.

    They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

    by Valatan on Oct 24, 2008 4:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    he probably wasnt last year

    although after his first 2 mos he was pretty darn good before the injury. i am saying that he is one of our three best outfielders and should be on the ML roster.

    "Baseball is like church. Many attend, but few understand." -Wes Westrum

    by nomar34 on Oct 24, 2008 8:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    You can pull these things too early, with guys who aren't ready

    Look at Felix Pie — he has a lot of same skills and tools as Colby and hasn’t come close to replicating his AAA numbers in the big leagues. If they Cubs were stinking up the joint they could have left him in there and let him learn on the fly, but they were competing for the division in both 2007 and 2008 and needed production out of that spot.

    Here’s my problem with your argument: You can’t make a case that any of the other 5 options in the current outfield mix haven’t earned their way onto the club, but you just want to plug the kid in and see how he does. You’re forgetting that LaRussa isn’t going to let him fall on his face and that he’ll yank him around when he has all kinds of other talent he could be putting out there instead — which is exactly what Piniella did to Pie in Chicago. I don’t want to see that happen to Colby. I’d rather see him go back to start the season at AAA, hit the cover off the sphere, get some confidence, and then be called up in May, similar to what the Rays did with Longoria this year.

    Why do you have such a problem with that? It’s not like we have an unproductive player like Willy Taveras or Juan Pierre in centerfield — we have Ankiel, Skip, or Barton to play that position, and all have shown that they can put up an OPS+ of 100 or better.

    "I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

    by fourstick on Oct 24, 2008 5:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    i dont buy the too early theory

    if he cant handle failure at the major league level than he isnt going to amount to much anyway. might as well find out sooner rather than later…this how you earn it: you get a chance to play and you perform…if Rasmus doesn’t perform at the major league level better than the other options then you have to take action but i find it very hard to believe that he is not in the top 3 outfielders we have.

    the only problem i have with that is that we should being playing the best players and if you can say with a straight face that Rasmus isnt one of the best outfielders we have than i will stop arguing my point with you because i will not be able to change your mind, but just because we have players that are league average doesnt mean we should play them over better players. what kind of logic is that?

    "Baseball is like church. Many attend, but few understand." -Wes Westrum

    by nomar34 on Oct 24, 2008 8:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    *straight face*

    Colby Rasmus is not one of our 3 best outfielders heading into next season.

    Happy?

    but just because we have players that are league average

    Did you look at the projections above? At all? Ankiel, Mather, and Ludwick all project to be much better than league average in 2009 if given 500+ AB’s each. According to the projections above, Rasmus should only start over Skip and Duncan (injured) at the start of next year — which puts Barton, Mather, Ludwick, and Ankiel ahead of him.

    Sounds to me like you’d rather watch the kid ride the pine in the big league than have him getting a good number of AB’s in AAA. You’d also rather burn an option and start his arbitration clock when he struggles to start the season and ends up back in AAA because the Cardinals currently have a lot of talent in the outfield and Tony isn’t going to let him stink up the joint when there are better options out there.

    If he goes to AAA and puts up a line like he did last June in the first two months there, then I have no problem calling him up and sticking him in centerfield when Ankiel gets hurt for the first time.

    Your problem is that your dealing with your own best case scenario here, and not looking at the reality of the situation in terms of outfield talent, manager, and organizational strategy.

    "I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

    by fourstick on Oct 26, 2008 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    I confess...

    I didn’t recall him SLG over .600. I knew he got on base like crazy and had a good AVG…but I had no idea he hit for that much power. What was Barton’s slash line? Skips? Mathers?

    by cardzfanbub on Oct 24, 2008 3:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    they were all very good

    although Colby had the best OPS

    "Baseball is like church. Many attend, but few understand." -Wes Westrum

    by nomar34 on Oct 24, 2008 4:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    i agree but

    We saw how he struggled at AAA last year. granted, given the opportunity, he did begin to excel later in the year. The question remains if he does make the team out of ST this year, will he struggle initially? This is where it’s wise to operate cautiously. The pressure in faltering at the big league level is much different than AAA.
     I’m a bit leery of handing him a starting position, as I’d hate to stunt his growth by rushing him up (Alex Gordon anyone?). Especially with the glut of big-league ready OF talent.

    I'd rather my sister be a prostitute than my brother a Cub fan.

    by _pistol_ on Oct 24, 2008 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Would you have wanted to start his arb clock last year?

    when every logical set of reasons dictated that it was probably a rebuilding year, where we had to find out what we had with Ankiel and Ludwick, and Barton had to stay on the 25 man all year long?

    Unless he just totally annhilated spring training pitching, and then dominated AAA over the first half, I didn’t see much point in calling him up last year. Keeping him in Memphis last year kept him with the team for another year. Or at least made him cheaper over the long haul.

    They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

    by Valatan on Oct 24, 2008 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    If that was the organization's feeling

    then they should have kept their damn mouths shut. I am far more pissed off about the way MO/TLR mishandled it than I am about whether Raz actually made the team or not. The correct way to have handled it, no matter what their private feelings were, was to say that we think the kid has a bright future, we want to take a good long look at him, but he needs to play at AAA. Then everyting works out beautifully and nobody has their nose out of joint.

    The way it was played you are left with two possible conclusions:

    1) 1.069 OPS isn’t good enough, so WTF do I have to do at AAA to get a callup – 1.200? Maybe he struggled at AAA out of the gate because he was trying to do too much, not because he was pouting.

    2) These guys are not being straight with me, what have I gotten myself into?

    Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

    by giveml on Oct 24, 2008 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    I always thought that approach and stuff like that was more important than performance

    in ST. If he had put up a 1.069 OPS in Memphis, I have little doubt he would have made the big club around the all-star break. Instead, he struggled. I’m sure the coaching staff would say it was because they found something about his approach they were unhappy with. Maybe he was too aggressive against quality breaking pitches or something, and got away with it in ST because the MLB pitchers hadn’t found their locations quite yet. I don’t know. And none of us do.

    Maybe it played out how you said, but all the same, it’s hard to deny that the year of seasoning probably did him good, and he’s young enough that it didn’t really stunt his career, either.

    They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

    by Valatan on Oct 24, 2008 4:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    I guess we'll never know

    whether AAA did more good than harm or not. I just don’t think you jerk around your top prospect the way they did and I don’t want to see it done again.

    Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

    by giveml on Oct 24, 2008 9:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Let me go on the record here.....

    You don’t jerk around your top prospect. You also make it a point to not jerk around ANYONE. You don’t want a player? Fine. Thank him for his service and set him free. Players move from one organization to another all of the time. While they may not say anything to the public, they most certainly talk to their friends and new teammates. All teams need to find and sign marginal talent—if you want the best from that group, you want to have the reputation of treating your players well.

    Wait-here’s the short version-you want the players that have a choice to choose you. Good player relations (not just with your stars) is good business.

    She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

    by jillsinmo on Oct 25, 2008 7:35 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Where did he mention "stats"???

    He didn’t, you did.

    Spring training is a good evaluation period — without the spring of 2008, K-Mac is still at AA, Mortenson is a complete unknown, and Skip is probably still the 5th outfielder. It’s not for nothing — it’s a chance for guys who have things to prove to make themselves look good.

    "I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

    by fourstick on Oct 24, 2008 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    if he proves he is healthy

    then his tools will play out better than everyone else so it will be a moot point…

    "Baseball is like church. Many attend, but few understand." -Wes Westrum

    by nomar34 on Oct 24, 2008 3:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Whoa!!!

    how many teams have four guys PROJECTED to hit over 30 HR’s. We all know the potential is there, but that’s a pretty big statement.

    Overall I think the projections are reasonable, and I’m hoping little conservative particularly in the OBP and AVG categories on Mather, Ankiel, Rasmus and Molina…apparently Bill James doesn’t think Yadier has turned the corner quite as much as I do.

    by cardzfanbub on Oct 24, 2008 9:37 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

    four projected to hit thirty

    many thought we would have a murderers row this year as well…but until they start hitting them on different days or when people are on base we will still have the same inconsistent offense imo.

    "Sorry about him, he's dealing with being an inker. " - Chasing Amy

    by FutureMan on Oct 24, 2008 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    and one over 40

    that makes me drool in anticipation. stupid winter blocking me from Cardinals baseball in ’09

    go rays

    by Cards Fan in Chitown on Oct 24, 2008 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    The Bill James projections

    are almost always higher than the ZIPS, Chone, or PECOTA projections and probably higher than where they’ll end up. By “higher”, I mean that offensive numbers are much better than the other systems. The value in the James projections, as I see it, will be in comparing one player to another (i.e.: Skip vs. Rasmus) rather than to previous seasons. Ludwick’s projections, for example, are very strong going forward. The value in that lies in comparing Ludwick to Ankiel or Rasmus or Matt Holliday or other similar OFs. Needless to say, if Ludwick’s our best OF again next year, and can put together 30 bombs and a .350 or so OBP, he’ll be a very good middle of the order hitter.

    The curious thing to me about these projections, and where I’m going to call “bullshit!” is w/ Adam Kennedy. If he’s just as good offensively as Aaron Miles, it makes no sense to bring back Miles since Kennedy was among the top 2nd sackers in the league, defensively, last year. But Kennedy hasn’t been able to see a .700 OPS w/ a telescope the last 2 years. It’s unreasonable to think that he’s just suddenly going to rebound at his age.

    Needless to say, Izturis is awful.

    by chuckb on Oct 24, 2008 10:00 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

    ack. that wasn't supposed to post yet

    anyway, it’s pretty clear that the bill james ones are the most optimistic of the group. is there a system that tends to be the most pessimistic? i feel like it’s probably PECOTA, but i can’t really remember if that’s consistent or just my selective memory.
    also, i wonderhow much Albert outperformed his projections in 2008, especially given his “down” year in ’07. must have been pretty high percentile.

    by mattybobo on Oct 24, 2008 10:19 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    PECOTA on the extremes seems pessimistic systemically

    But it’s also (arguably) the best on because it seems to me it isn’t nearly as influenced by a Derrek Lee ’05 season as others. Regardless “best” means 1% better over CHONE and ZiPS and others.

    Bill James’ seems like the league is projected to score more runs than it allows.

    Kosuke Fukudome: $48 million .257 .359 .379
    Skip Schumaker: $Free .302 .359 .406
    Skippy needs a new publicist, but I heart Ben Zobrist

    by joker24 on Oct 24, 2008 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    "projected to score more runs than it allows"

    huh. i wonder how that would work… heh.
    as for albert, i wonder what that would mean for he PECOTA this coming year. probably his second “worst” year followed by his arguably best year yet… if you’re right about PECOTA being less susceptible to outliers (though calling anything he does an outlier is kinda weird…) it should be interesting to see how the various projection systems rate him for 09. of course, “how’s albert look?” is almost certainly one of the first questions on any cards fan’s mind when these things are released no matter what…

    by mattybobo on Oct 24, 2008 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    At this point I think Albert has to be treated as a unique player

    Projecting him is a wee bit too easy, put the OPS in the 1.050 range and you’re fine. I don’t think his 2008 season was an outlier outlier, it’s on the top end of what he’s going to do given his current approach barring a big power surge——which I wouldn’t rule out, his swing mechanics at least last season weren’t built for maximizing power (as scary as that is), but I think the 1.050 range is the most realistic right now.

    I’m talkin outliers in terms of a legit career year “no one saw this one coming….and no one will see it again”. Without looking at what even happened this year whatsoever, I’d bet PECOTA handled a Carlos Pena better than others.

    Kosuke Fukudome: $48 million .257 .359 .379
    Skip Schumaker: $Free .302 .359 .406
    Skippy needs a new publicist, but I heart Ben Zobrist

    by joker24 on Oct 24, 2008 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    definitely

    I didn’t take a long look at the pitchers but they actually seemed a little more pessimistic than usual—maybe there’s been some tweaking toward a projection that is, at least, internally consistent.

    by DanUpBaby on Oct 24, 2008 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    I just seem to remember last year James was the "optimistic one" on several pitchers AND hitters

    Kosuke Fukudome: $48 million .257 .359 .379
    Skip Schumaker: $Free .302 .359 .406
    Skippy needs a new publicist, but I heart Ben Zobrist

    by joker24 on Oct 24, 2008 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    I thought azruavatar said............

    Izturis’s defense was so good that you could live with is so/so offense, based on him being under a similar contract in 2009?

    I don’t want to put words into azruavatar’s mouth tough, as he was kind of thinking out loud I believe…..

    by ICbirdfan on Oct 24, 2008 10:28 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    these projections bring ryans' third season in at a 74 OPS+ (roughly).

    back to his career avg or just slightly under, which is currently a 76 OPS+, with mlb avg ss in 2008 being a 92 OPS+.
     
    ryan needs a better year than that to keep his name in the hat. he needs at least a 90 OPS+ in 09. somewhere near the 95 he put up in 2007, or his 2007 becomes a fluke.
    ryan dropped the ball in 2008, and can’t afford to do it again.

    if he restablishes his worth we can quit renting defensive specialists for a 4 mil avg in the future.

    by ball in play on Oct 24, 2008 11:22 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    I don't think he needs to be a league avg SS...

    he just needs to be a little closer. If he could put up an OPS+ of 85 he probably justifies his playing time – since he’s basically free.

    by cardzfanbub on Oct 24, 2008 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    preachin to the choir brother :)

    he can’t drop the ball again or have the year these projections call for. it’s forcing the orgs hand to do something in the 4 mil range minimum, every year.
    if he could give us near avg production on both sides of the ball for near minimum $, we could look to upgrade 2B somewhat easier than ss. just the fact that hoffpauir is closer than kozma to mlb ready, makes ss a bigger concern.

    if ryan had gave us your 85 OPS+ in 08, izturis isn’t even mentioned this offseason, and 3.5 mil more available right now. we move kennedy for a left reliever as a salary wash and 4 mil more available. theres 7.5 mil towards an o. hudson TYPE, without getting into the 20 mil or so available now.

    ryan matches his 08, he won’t be in our offseason talks next year.

    by ball in play on Oct 24, 2008 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Question?

    Rasmus:azruavatar::Ankiel:DanUpBaby

    by azruavatar on Oct 24, 2008 10:02 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

    it depends

    do you get butterflies in your stomach every time Colby Rasmus is around? Do birds suddenly appear?

    by DanUpBaby on Oct 24, 2008 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    are you questioning the question?

    I like Ankiel too… I project he’ll have an even better year next season

    go rays

    by Cards Fan in Chitown on Oct 24, 2008 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Rasmus

    if Rasmus puts up this line and gets 135 games i will be very happy if he pushes to .350/.450 OB/SLG i will be doing back flips. if Barton doesnt get more playing time this year it will be a sad thing for the organization. he has great speed and on base skills that are pretty tough to come by. i dream of the day next season i see an outfield of Barton/Rasmus/Ludwick!!!

    "Baseball is like church. Many attend, but few understand." -Wes Westrum

    by nomar34 on Oct 24, 2008 10:08 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

    ankiel

    aren’t you giving up a lot of SLG leaving ank out of there? barton and ank makes more sense

    by spencegrif on Oct 24, 2008 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    there is plenty of power

    with Pujols, Ludwick, and Glaus especially if you throw in Rasmus. i would much rather have the on base abilities and speed of Rasmus than Ankiel who only brings power.

    "Baseball is like church. Many attend, but few understand." -Wes Westrum

    by nomar34 on Oct 24, 2008 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    good point

    Billy Beane has said that OBP is around three or four times more valuable than SLG, and I believe that. HR’s are sexier, but putting guys on base and avoiding outs gets the job done. I think we would have a great offense if we could just get league-average production out of our middle infield (i.e., avoid having so many black holes in the batting order).

    by apack on Oct 24, 2008 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    +1

    Did the early part of last nights WS game illustrate your point? (I had to go to bed so I taped the rest).
    The Rays did all the little things right: move the runner, groudout RBI’s with runner on 3rd and less than 2 outs, and safety squeeze. While Philly, couldn’t move the runner, couldn’t hit the sac fly or grounout RBI even though they had lot’s of folks on base or even on third. Phillies were dependant on that big HR/SLG number and it was feast or famine. Ok, maybe my example isn’t exactly supporting your OBP vs. SLG argument, but I guess I just wanted to share my thoughts on the first part of last night’s game.

    born Dodger blue, now dyed Cardinals red

    by totalloser on Oct 24, 2008 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    A point of OBP is 1.7-2 times more valuable than SLG

    Moneyball was referring to the dollar (mis)value at the time I believe. But slugging also has a much higher ceiling i.e. you can slug .650 vs on base of .450. But it’s much easier just to go with EQA——>RARP

    Kosuke Fukudome: $48 million .257 .359 .379
    Skip Schumaker: $Free .302 .359 .406
    Skippy needs a new publicist, but I heart Ben Zobrist

    by joker24 on Oct 24, 2008 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    that seems like an oft-misunderstood point about moneyball

    i.e., the money part. a GM always has to factor in dollar value in any of his evaluations.

    by mattybobo on Oct 24, 2008 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Well, that's the thing

    A good hitter will have a SLG that is 1.5-2x his OBP, just because of the scale of the things—Your max slugging is 4, but your max OBP is 1. But if you made the OPS formula OPS = 1.5*OBP + SLG, then it would cut down on your ability to look at a card and calculate OPSes.

    They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

    by Valatan on Oct 24, 2008 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Which is why OPS itself isn't exactly a perfect measure

    I know I even referenced OPS like 10 seconds ago, but in terms of really estimating value it’s not very good.

    Kosuke Fukudome: $48 million .257 .359 .379
    Skip Schumaker: $Free .302 .359 .406
    Skippy needs a new publicist, but I heart Ben Zobrist

    by joker24 on Oct 24, 2008 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    I think if you can't figure out...

    OBP X 1.5 + SLG = OPS you probably need not worry about calculating OPS, cause it’s not gonna make sense to you anyway.

    The hard part is learning what a good OPS would be in the new structure…800 is the desireable number now…would the new number be 1.000 – I’m thinking .975.

    by cardzfanbub on Oct 24, 2008 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Of course you can figure it out

    but it’s a matter of doing the math in your head. A one step mental math operation becomes a two step operation. It becomes a less useful heuristic, because you can’t do it as quickly.

    They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

    by Valatan on Oct 24, 2008 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    and yes

    it would be something like 1.000, right, because a good hitter has something like a .350 OPB, and therefore, you’d be adding about .175 points to the total.

    They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

    by Valatan on Oct 24, 2008 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    GPA uses something between 1.7 and 1.8 i think...

    and they divide everything by 4 so the scare more resembles batting average or EQA.

    by mattybobo on Oct 24, 2008 3:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    I'm waiting for the day...

    when Pujols SLG’s 2X his OBP. That .330/.450/.900 line looks AWESOME!!

    by cardzfanbub on Oct 24, 2008 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    I was envisioning a "good hitter"

    having something like a .300/.350/.670 line. Which, in retrospect, is a little unrealistic

    They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

    by Valatan on Oct 24, 2008 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    well, this isn't precise

    but according to baseball reference, his april slash lines were; .346/.509/.914, OPS of 1.423. wow. just wow.

    by mattybobo on Oct 24, 2008 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    beat me to it

    a truly absurd line.

    Edmonds in July 04 is my other favorite.

    by DanUpBaby on Oct 24, 2008 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Thanks!!!

    I do recall that ridiculous April.

    by cardzfanbub on Oct 24, 2008 5:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    no prob.

    he clearly wasn’t going to sustain that all year, and not even up until his injury, but man. it sucked so hard to see him injured.

    by mattybobo on Oct 24, 2008 5:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Holliday

    With the set of outfielders the Cards have it is crazy that they were even entertaining the idea of trading for Holliday. Actually, that might not be fair. Its crazy that Mad Scientist Tony was pushing for the deal.

    by njnick on Oct 24, 2008 10:13 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

    well said

    dear tony; we have outfielders. they’re pretty good. we don’t really need to go out and get more, especially expensive ones from colorado. now, middle infielders from florida, on the other hand…

    by mattybobo on Oct 24, 2008 10:14 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    the grass is ALWAYS

    greener…

    "Baseball is like church. Many attend, but few understand." -Wes Westrum

    by nomar34 on Oct 24, 2008 10:16 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Brian Barton better not

    spend the year in AAA. I vote play him or trade him. But then again, he may not have earned it…

    Is it fraud when Cubs ownership says "this year is our year?" Can somebody sue for that?

    by thegodfather on Oct 24, 2008 11:20 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

    why no convert Barton talk?

    Lot’s of folks clamored to turn Skip into 2B. How about Barton at 2B. Maybe he play SS in Pee-Wee League.
    In all seriousness… As much as I love so many things about Barton: the energy, the speed, the hair and the helmet falling off, and the brain; I have to remind myself of his arm, power, and sometimes looking lost at the plate (although was that mainly due to not getting enough regular playing time?). Anyway, I am not disagreeing with him playing more, but other OFs bring other trade offs.

    born Dodger blue, now dyed Cardinals red

    by totalloser on Oct 24, 2008 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    everyone looks lost at some point even Pujols...

    is there another outfielder competing for LF with better speed? on base skills? power? range? cool socks? outside of his arm strength Barton would have to rank highest on every category worthy of judging with the exception of Mather’s power. were we watching the same player?

    "Baseball is like church. Many attend, but few understand." -Wes Westrum

    by nomar34 on Oct 24, 2008 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Competing for LF?

    yes. If we use an outfield of Lud/Rasmus/Ankiel……….

    by sdrone on Oct 24, 2008 11:53 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    then

    obviously Barton should not get an everyday role if this was the outfield…although i think he could be just as valuable as Ank over 162 games

    "Baseball is like church. Many attend, but few understand." -Wes Westrum

    by nomar34 on Oct 24, 2008 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    The Skip thing was centered around the fact that Skip, very long ago, played MI

    I don’t think that Barton ever has, at any developmental level. It was more in analogy with So Taguchi, who had also played MI in Japan, and was used as a fill-in at 2B from time to time while he was with us.

    They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

    by Valatan on Oct 24, 2008 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    I know it's harder than we imagine

    But what’s to lose by having him workout all winter with coaches and training to be a MI? We spent 1.5 mil on Clement knowing that probably wouldn’t work out – this couldn’t hurt and to get his bat and speed into the line up everyday..wow

    by riotmute on Oct 24, 2008 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    I was just jokin'

    when I said that maybe BB had played short stop back in Pee-Wee league. I did check his H.S., Layola Marymount, and Miami info, and I did not see any experience in the infield at all. I think all I saw was RF. I am sure it’s really difficult to convert at this level if a players has never played MIF. I know it would probably be awesome if it could be done, but…

    born Dodger blue, now dyed Cardinals red

    by totalloser on Oct 24, 2008 4:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    barton has shown GOOD opposite field skills in his debut

    if he continues to be a platoon partner for skip vs lefties, or duncan, his opp field skills are a plus vs a lhp. the correct approach.

    by ball in play on Oct 24, 2008 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Why trade.....

    a talented kid that may or may not be good enough to be on your roster? That is ridiculous. Trade him b/c we don’t have the innings for him RIGHT NOW?

    Barton doesn’t have much experience. I know his age, but injuries have shortened his career to date. Getting a full season of AAA under his belt would be MUCH better than having him platoon against lefties.

    "Stats are for losers," Muschamp said after last week's victory. "I like winning games."

    by SoonerfanTU on Oct 24, 2008 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    I fully expect him...

    to start the year in AAA – and I think it’s the right place for him. He’ll get some time with the big club…especially if we can move Duncan and Ankiel at some point during the season.

    by cardzfanbub on Oct 24, 2008 12:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    I really doubt Ankiel moves

    during the season, unless we are out of contention. I don’t see why the organization would move an “impact” bat like Ankiel’s midseason when we expect to contend.

    Is it fraud when Cubs ownership says "this year is our year?" Can somebody sue for that?

    by thegodfather on Oct 24, 2008 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    I made this argument the other day...

    Ankiel could bring back a pretty good return if he has a solid and healthy first half. We have 3 guys that can produce at or close to the same level as Ank (Ludwick, Mather and Rasmus) most teams can’t replace a guy that easily. Considering Ank is a FA at year end, I think we would be remiss to not make an effort to move him for pitching or middle infield help at the trade deadline. These are the types of deals that smart ballclubs make IMO.

    by cardzfanbub on Oct 24, 2008 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    My point is

    that he IS good enough to be on a ML roster. What does he have to prove in AAA? He already spent a full season in the bigs where he played much less than he probably should have. So, unless he is on the roster and plays, which I would prefer, he is worth more to us now as trade bait than toiling in AAA. I don’t see the point of having such a talented player if he’s not going to have the chance to play where it counts.

    Is it fraud when Cubs ownership says "this year is our year?" Can somebody sue for that?

    by thegodfather on Oct 24, 2008 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Of course he is good enough.....

    to be on an ML roster. And he might be, depending on how things shake out this offseason. But AAA is littered with guys that are good enough to be on a ML roster, right? Doesn’t mean that all of those teams should just trade those guys.

    Barton isn’t going to be one of our 3 best OF’s next season. And he might not even be our 4th best. Why not send him to AAA where he can get everyday AB’s? You don’t think there is any room for improvement?

    "Stats are for losers," Muschamp said after last week's victory. "I like winning games."

    by SoonerfanTU on Oct 24, 2008 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    "he might not even be our 4th best."

    Skip, Luddy, Ank, Mather, Duncan, Rasmus, Barton.

    Let’s assume Skip gets dealt (he’s got the most likelihood to), Luddy and Ank start, Rasmus probably starts if he’s on the ML roster. We know Barton is better than Duncan defensively and Dunc’s health is still a question mark. That leaves a debate between Mather and Barton for our 4th OF. Both bring different tools to the table but I’d give Barton the edge on defense. Mather provides what we already have plenty of: power. Barton is a little more dynamic of a player with his speed and baserunning. All I’m saying is Barton is good enough right now to be our 4th OF. It just depends on what TLR will want to utilize more, the power or the speed.

    I fully expect it to be Joey that gets the spot, and I bet we see Barton in Memphis at the beginning of this season.

    Ryan Howard: one of the most Statistically Outstanding players of all time

    by RunninRedbird on Oct 24, 2008 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    power -- well, sort of

    Actually we only have power in the starting lineup. The bench is pretty much devoid of power. We could seriously use someone who can provide power when some of the main guys are resting, and can also provide good pinch-hitting. Right now that guys looks like Mather or maybe Lopez. Considering age, salary, and defense, I’d prefer Mather.

    by apack on Oct 24, 2008 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Exactly.

    Mather can play all three positions, though not center very well. Thus, he can platoon with either Rasmus or Ankiel. Barton only platoons with Ludwick, which isn’t the worst outcome, but definitely not ideal from a roster composition standpoint.

    by Red in Chicago on Oct 24, 2008 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    I'd prefer Mather as well...

    I was just pointing out that Barton is good enough right now to be our 4th OF.

    Ryan Howard: one of the most Statistically Outstanding players of all time

    by RunninRedbird on Oct 24, 2008 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    That's why Freese...

    should be on the bench. He may not be thought of as a power guy, but he poked out 27 for Memphis this year.

    by cardzfanbub on Oct 24, 2008 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    I'm not sure I'd give...

    Barton the edge on defense. He’s got more speed and covers more ground for sure – but Mather is supposed to be a capable center fielder. I’d call it a draw at best for Barton who takes strange routes and has a tendancy to look a little lost in the OF at times.

    by cardzfanbub on Oct 24, 2008 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    they are pretty darn

    close Mather +5 in RF and +2 in LF while Barton is +3 in LF and +1 in RF with pretty close to the same amount of chances surprisingly. so even though you think he “looks lost” he was just as good as Mather last year.

    "Baseball is like church. Many attend, but few understand." -Wes Westrum

    by nomar34 on Oct 24, 2008 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    I believe I said...

    a draw. Though Mather might be better.

    by cardzfanbub on Oct 24, 2008 3:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    and my point

    was even though you think he looks lost he really isnt.

    "Baseball is like church. Many attend, but few understand." -Wes Westrum

    by nomar34 on Oct 24, 2008 3:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    I said at times...

    he looks lost. I think he is a decent fielder he just has an unorthodox approach (bare in mind I watch very few games). He also seems to “flip” the ball to the cutoff rather than “snapping” it in. I think we agree with each other here.

    by cardzfanbub on Oct 24, 2008 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    youre right

     i just feel like arguing today, sorry.

    "Baseball is like church. Many attend, but few understand." -Wes Westrum

    by nomar34 on Oct 24, 2008 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    No prob...

    my wife was the same way last night for some reason.

    It happens.

    by cardzfanbub on Oct 24, 2008 5:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Hey, I know what to do with Barton.....

    Call Kevin Towers. San Diego had planned to get him in the rule 5 draft. Um, find out about Khahil Greene; maybe ask if we can have Mike Adams. I know he’s right hander, but I like him. Good stuff.

    I don’t think they should send him to AAA, and when they needed someone to play outfield, they chose Kennedy, Ryan, and Lopez over Barton. That’s what they think of Barton-they didn’t use him when there were no outfielders to use. It’s simple to me-they should do the right thing here, and work out a trade for him.

    She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

    by jillsinmo on Oct 24, 2008 6:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    thank you

    i’ve been thinking about this while monitoring the argument. it was just ridiculous that barton didn’t play more near the end of the year. then there were those rumors that he had “fallen out of favor” with the organization or something—is there still no indication of what that was all about? i would like to see barton given a chance to succeed in the majors for someone.

    by mattybobo on Oct 24, 2008 8:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    If he's not in the plans,

    he’s not in the plans. They could change directions of the organization right now by NOT keeping players around that they don’t really want. He’s shown enough to be of interest to someone.

    She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

    by jillsinmo on Oct 25, 2008 7:40 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    I'll be glad to see...

    Tony and Dave spread there wings and fly next winter. I am so tired of all of the mello-drama. Bring in somebody who will play the best players in their best positions and give the team the best chance to win. I swear sometimes Tony is trying to live vicariously (spelling?) through these AAAA players that he gets the “most” out of…rather than letting true major leaguers succeed or fail on their own account.

    by cardzfanbub on Oct 25, 2008 5:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Ah, but they will never leave. Never.

    It is what it is……

    She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

    by jillsinmo on Oct 26, 2008 9:37 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    lineup imbalance

    These projections are useful because they reinforce the notion that we have at least six useful major league outfielders. It would be great if we could trade any one (or more) of them for an equivalent middle infielder. Not sure who’s the middle-infield equivalent of Rasmus, but all the rest seem like they should have SS or 2B doppelgangers out there that we should be able to identify pretty readily. Really I could see trading any of our OF crew in the right deal. We don’t need to win such a deal, just make a fair trade. I expect Mo’s on the phones now trying to work out just such a deal.

    by apack on Oct 24, 2008 11:37 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

    absolutely

    Like I said, if we could get the second base or shortstop version of Skip—would he hit, what, .280/.335/.380? with above-average defense—I would be pretty pleased with this offseason. A Jason Bartlett type, I guess.

    Of course, if you believe these projections, or the end of last year, we have this guy and his name is Adam Kennedy. I don’t know if I’m quite ready to take that to the bank.

    by DanUpBaby on Oct 24, 2008 1:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    agree

    I think Skip or Ankiel are most likely to be traded for a MIF’er. Rasmus is probably least likely as he’s hardest to match up on.

    Kennedy seems really hard to predict — in fact hard to fathom at all. I’d be tempted to see how well he can play shortstop and if he can handle it then call him our primary reserve infielder. Should be able to do better there than Miles or Lopez at least, and it’s important to remember that his contract is almost a sunk cost at this point since we probably have to eat most of it to trade him.

    by apack on Oct 24, 2008 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Who are we talking about?

    I thought it was Kennedy. He slammed Big Z and the Cubs. Glaus slammed the BoSox.

    by cardsgirl95 on Oct 24, 2008 3:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    oh

    I thought it was a grand slam; either way, it won the game.

    go rays

    by Cards Fan in Chitown on Oct 24, 2008 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Oh, I hate to be this guy...

    but the Cards lost that game where AK had the double.

    by Hal Lanier's Pants on Oct 24, 2008 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Which

    tied up the game in the 9th (after VEB darling Chris Perez blew a 2-1 lead in the 8th). Youkilis then won it with a homer in the 13th.

    Cards took 2 out of 3 in Fenway, and could have swept. Meanwhile, they went 7-10 against the Pirates and 2-4 against the Royals!

    Actually, the most damaging record was 5-10 against Milwaukee. 7-8 and they tie for the WC. Think about that.

    by Hal Lanier's Pants on Oct 24, 2008 6:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Sorry

    9-6 and they would have tied for the WC. Bad math.

    by Hal Lanier's Pants on Oct 24, 2008 6:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    But trading for a MI of even value with Skip

    would be “winning such a deal”, wouldn’t it?

    There are plenty of outfielders who can put up a 100 OPS+, if you have a middle infielder that can do that, why would you trade him for an outfielder of the same type, unless you need have a plethora of middle infielders that can put up those type of numbers.

    Looking around the league, I don’t see many teams, if any at all, that go more than 3 deep in terms of middle infielders like that. Making a straight up trade for one of those guys with Skip would essentially be fleecing the other team.

    "I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

    by fourstick on Oct 24, 2008 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    I think by 'even value'

    Something like an even VORP was what was meant.

    They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

    by Valatan on Oct 24, 2008 4:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    exactly

    Not the same numbers in an absolute sense, but the same numbers relative to others at the position.

    by apack on Oct 24, 2008 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Chesty Larue

    I think the comparison of Aaron Miles-Chesty Larue hybrid = Craig Biggio is apt. I just want to make note that Jason Larue should be called Chesty Laure, here on out.

    For those of you unfamiliar – in the Simpsons episodes when Homer changes his name to Max Power, he changes Marge’s name to Chesty La Rue.

    by oldiz304 on Oct 24, 2008 11:44 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

    oh Chesty LaRue

    one of the reasons I like VEB so much is because you can find multiple references to Chesty LaRue.
    Really, how many others blogs on here will have 5 comments that link to Chesty (6 now?)?

    * sarcasm might be involved in this comment

    by mattyfrommo on Oct 24, 2008 8:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Two thoughts-

    1. I would take that Rasmus line in a heartbeat. That being said, I don’t think he’ll hit that many homers, and I think he’ll have a higher OBP and maybe a slightly higher AVG, but not much higher.

    2. I think Yadi will hit over .300 again this season. He’s finally stuck with a stance in the batter’s box and has become a legit hitter because of it. If he sticks with it, he’ll do fine.

    Ryan Howard: one of the most Statistically Outstanding players of all time

    by RunninRedbird on Oct 24, 2008 12:42 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

    "I'm as nauseous as I've ever been. I have a terrible headache. My head is pounding. I feel like throwing up and I'm having trouble swallowing. And the beauty of it is, you want to feel like this every day." - Tony LaRussa

    by adiueordie on Oct 24, 2008 2:18 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

    I was watching when this aired

    Love it.

    defy, cards, defy. hey logic --- you suck.

    by effin fisk on Oct 24, 2008 2:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    If he stays healthy...

    Hellz yeah!

    Ryan Howard: one of the most Statistically Outstanding players of all time

    by RunninRedbird on Oct 24, 2008 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    if he woulda stayed healthy

    he probably would have had 30 to 35.

    go rays

    by Cards Fan in Chitown on Oct 24, 2008 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    outfield

    ank could hit 40 this year. he could also hit 20, bat .220, or get hurt. ank is so hard to predict. i believe he and carp r our wildcards. if he and carp r healthy and productive we r a contender, even with izturis at short.

    i really wish we would talk to ank about an extension. he is the kind of guy that if/when he hits the market next year, somebody will offer him a fat contract. id like a 4/40 extension on top of next year. he would get more on the open market im sure. if he could just swing at strikes and not balls(sounds so easy), he would be one of the best in the game. he really is the natural.

    by joelcards on Oct 24, 2008 2:38 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

    the guy is very hard to predict

    since he doesn’t really have any comps in MLB history. he’s pretty new to the outfield and hitting thing, so how do we know when he will really hit his stride there?

    go rays

    by Cards Fan in Chitown on Oct 24, 2008 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Joelcards

    are you the same “Joelcards” who haunts MLB Trade Rumors? Some of the guys who comment over there are a little uninhibited in their enthusiasm for stupid trade ideas…and the Cubs. This site has 10 times the intelligence and 90 percent fewer Cub lovers.

    by Red in Chicago on Oct 24, 2008 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    No way

    would I talk to Ank about an extension until I saw that he was completely healed from his surgery. That is an injury that can rob a player of his power as we have seen with Duncan. Since Ankiel’s only real plus skill is power, it would be a huge mistake to sign him long term if he couldn’t generate the same power.

    I hope they work with him on changing his swing to rotate his back foot a la Pujols. Neither Ank nor Duncan pivot properly on the back foot and both end up tearing their abdominal wall. Are you listening, Hal?

    Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

    by giveml on Oct 24, 2008 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    honestly, maybe pujols should just become a player/batting coach

    his swing is based on sketches of leonardo davinci and the works of archimedes. or maybe deirdre (spelling?) pujols could do it. i seem to recall she has spotted problems of his more than once in the past.

    by mattybobo on Oct 24, 2008 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    That may be true,

    but I doubt that is the type of injury that just happened suddenly like that. Probably a result of repetitive stress over time that had weakened the area.

    Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

    by giveml on Oct 24, 2008 10:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    "squash the bug" with the back foot

    to help unload the hips (rotate) and extend through the ball. that’s soooooo basic, it’s sad.

    you know albert his had to be influential in molina’s success. lopez even credited albert with his improvment.

    by ball in play on Oct 24, 2008 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    squishing the bug is a myth and most hitting instructors dont teach it...

    most hitters in MLB dont pivot on their back foot in fact their back foot is barely on the ground and in Pujols’ case it isnt even that. Chris O’Leary has some great images of some very good hitters…

    "Baseball is like church. Many attend, but few understand." -Wes Westrum

    by nomar34 on Oct 24, 2008 9:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    ankiel

    hey red in chicago. yes this is me. i was booted off mlb traderumors for using a bad word. funny u sat that about all the cubs fans. it did get old. even tim has slight cubs bias, albeit not too bad.

    what do u think we should do with this outfield. i have many ideas. we could sign ankiel, trade ankiel, trade skip. i was thinking a skip+ for ben zobrist. zobrist played outfield in that world series game which u know tony would like but he looks like he could be a decent ss. also i want khalil greene. great buy low candidate with ++ defense.

    by joelcards on Oct 24, 2008 6:09 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

    Joel

    Check the right sidebar. There is a Hot Stove post over there. It’s updated weekly. Everything you have mentioned has been kicked around hard over there. I don’t know if Mo reads this site regularly, but he has been known to drop by from time to time.

    by Red in Chicago on Oct 24, 2008 6:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    red

    r u serious about mo? thats pretty cool. i would sweep floors for 5 years to get the chance to work for the cards. i have dreamed about what i would say to him if i met him on the street. i would probably offer advice over an attempt at personal gain. the cards must come first.

    i will check out the hot stove post. im still new here and dont know the best places to talk. thank you.

    by joelcards on Oct 24, 2008 7:33 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

    another friendly hint

    there is a reply button at the end of each post, try it out, you might like it

    by FunkeeC on Oct 24, 2008 7:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

    Someone else remembers?

    Earlier this year… I mean February-early? When Rasmus was being discussed in Matt Leech’s Mailbag on a weekly basis… The front office said that Rasmus was going to be tested in AAA and, if successful, called up to MLB to play CF on a regular basis. And if I am not wrong, this posture still remains. So, if Rasmus makes the team in 09, forget about being platooned by TLR. If he makes it, he will play as much as Glaus and Pujols.

    Or at least, thats what has been said…

    Yadi swings and hits a high fly ball... Endy Chavez goes back, to the track, to the wall... ITS A GUNNER!! Yadi gives St. Louis the lead in the top of the ninth!

    by Paulspike on Oct 25, 2008 12:14 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

    Comments For This Post Are Closed


    User Tools

    Welcome to the Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.
    Start posting about the Cardinals »

    Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

    FanPosts

    Community blog posts and discussion.

    Recommended FanPosts

    Avatar_small
    How to EASILY make tables for Fanposts
    1753738656_110919ebe9_o_small
    2010 Hot Stove Post #1: CHONE hitter projections

    Recent FanPosts

    Arch_small
    Number 15
    Small
    Some thoughts on Holliday (and potential replacements)
    Small
    Ok let me try this again...
    Knights-09_small
    Disenchanted Blue Jays Fan Looking For A New Team
    Painterlance_small
    The Holliday Dilemma (Rocks Fan Perpsective)
    375830-r1-025-11_011_small
    Anybody read Bob Gibson's new book yet?
    Flanders_small
    Yadi2first
    Small
    40 Man Question..

    + New FanPost All FanPosts >


    Managers

    Jack_benny_small DanUpBaby

    Editors

    Bender1_small azruavatar

    Adam1_small chuckb

    Kid-a-bear_small the red baron