Viva El Birdos: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Feature: Mobile Commenting and Retweeting now live!


Hot Stove Fanpost 10/20-10/27

Well, well well. Yet again do Cardinal fans hear the question they have heard so often this past year that their ears start to bleed any time they hear it: "Do we trade Rasmus?"

Said question has probably come up over 500 times over the past year on this site alone. But, will Mo have the cahones to pull the trigger on trading the system's golden boy, or will he soon become the answer to a trivia question?

Argue away, folks. Let's just hope there will be plenty to talk about this coming week!

Poll
Will Colby be traded, or does Mo not have the cahones?
Yes, the trade will work out for both/all teams
15 votes
Yes, but will be undersold
19 votes
Yes, and will get more than expected
5 votes
No, Mo decides against it, and the Cardinals start manufacturing Rasmus jerseys in January
367 votes

406 votes | Poll has closed

5 recs | Comment 182 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

this fits here i think

I just read on mlbtraderumors.com that jake peavy is available….what do you guys think it will take for the cardinals to get him?

;)

by VolsnCards5 on Oct 20, 2008 6:16 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

oh man, i have the best idea!

Chris Duncan! HE’D BE PERFECT! Who doesn’t want a slugging lefty first basemen? The padres can play him at first and put Gonzalez in left!(/sarcasm)

The NL Central Blog.com

by dunc4life on Oct 20, 2008 6:19 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

also,

Derrick Goold has reported that Mo sent a letter to Mulder’s agent saying that they are buying him out. I think this is a great time to celebrate! NO MORE MULDER IN CARDINAL RED!

I still hope he does great somewhere else, though, (of course not in the NL central).

The NL Central Blog.com

by dunc4life on Oct 20, 2008 6:20 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Buying out option only

Mulder could still sign back with the Cards. The $1.5M buyout is in lieu of paying Mulder $11M to maybe pitch in 2009. Maybe he’ll be a ST non roster invitee like JuanGone.

by ubeddie on Oct 21, 2008 10:12 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That wouldn't be a bad thing.....

"Stats are for losers," Muschamp said after last week's victory. "I like winning games."

by SoonerfanTU on Oct 21, 2008 12:12 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Forget this Peavy talk.

The Rays are going to have to do some housecleaning. They have too many close to MLB starters stuck at AAA. They have Sonnanstine and Jackson-they might prefer to move them and promote one or more of their AAA guys to fill the 4-5 spot. They like speed-maybe they’d rather have Brian Barton playing out there in right instead of Gabe Gross or Erik Hinske or Johnny Gomes. They love Rocco, but how many games is he good for? They want a real closer, or a swing closer, since they still have Troy Percival under contract for next year. They haven’t been afraid to use young players-um, Perez could be part of the deal, no?. Serve an apprenticeship with Percival?
I’d rather keep both of those guys, but not if they’re going to rot in AAA-trade ‘em if that’s their future. For one of the Rays good young extra arms.

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Oct 20, 2008 6:31 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Might be on to something here

The Rays have serious pitching depth in the minors. Here a few of the best ranked by scout.com

#1. David Price (MLB)

  1. Jeremy Hellickson (AA)
    #5 Jeff Niemann (AAA)
  2. Wade Davis (AAA)

They also have the highest SS prospect in baseball Reid Brignac at AAA. So they have 4 of the top 11 pitching prospects in baseball one in MLB now, 2 at AAA, and one at AA. So they will have to move somebody for them.

Now who should we target?

Zobrist obviously should be on the list but also some starting pitching. Edwin Jackson has to be the first to go. He is going to hit his first year of arb after this year. He really doesn’t do much for me but he is a cost controlled asset. He is #5 starter in my book but he has to go. They are just so stacked in starting pitching it is mind boggling.

 

by FlimtotheFlam on Oct 20, 2008 11:34 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Ha, and Edwin Jackson would be the poorest fit for this team.

Let’s just remove his name from the list. They have extras, though. Go for the one you like best.

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Oct 21, 2008 8:25 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Mulder out....Zito in

Now that we don’t have Mark to kick around anymore, should we go for Zito. Maybe they would take Piniero and a minor leaguer for him. Seems like you could get him incredibly cheaply and I don’t believe he’s done yet. Giants would eat at least 50% of his salary and we wouldn’t have to give up much. What’s a Cardinals team without a project?

by The Duke on Oct 21, 2008 6:46 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

no

just say no big 3 EVAR again

"Textbooks are Soviet propaganda" - Rev. Jerry Falwell

by elirock83 on Oct 21, 2008 9:45 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

On the bright side

Zito doesn’t throw hard enough to get hurt, so he’ll take the ball every fifth day…….

"Cross a lawyer with the Godfather, make you an offer you can't understand" - Don Henley

by TurdFerguson on Oct 21, 2008 10:15 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Fill in your own joke to the above comment

"Cross a lawyer with the Godfather, make you an offer you can't understand" - Don Henley

by TurdFerguson on Oct 21, 2008 10:16 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That's what she said?

Space.

It's a problem we face.

So we never go anywhere.

We just stay in one place.

by hazel on Oct 21, 2008 11:51 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I Have to Say....

…I’m curious to see if Dunc cud rescue Zito’s career. Personally, I think his career went downhill the minute he stopped traveling with stuffed animals…

;=8)

by The MooCow on Oct 21, 2008 1:20 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

even if the Giants did eat 50% of his contract

I still think he would be overpaid. I suppose there is a chance that the old Zito comes back, but do you really wanna chance 50M on that?

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Oct 21, 2008 5:59 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Does no Peavy mean.....

No Greene?

Not that it’d kill me not to get Greene, just though he might be a good option, and might come cheap, relatively speaking.

If I could ask Mo one question only, and he had to give me an honest answer, I think I’d want to know what his plans were for SS next year. I really think every other move me make is dependent on how SS plays out.

I like Furcal, but I’d like to see us go after Zobrist first, or try to find another young SS. Not sure who else would fit that description though.

"Stats are for losers," Muschamp said after last week's victory. "I like winning games."

by SoonerfanTU on Oct 21, 2008 12:14 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Don't fall over, Sooner

but I agree with you completely!

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Oct 21, 2008 12:16 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You sick today?

:)

"Stats are for losers," Muschamp said after last week's victory. "I like winning games."

by SoonerfanTU on Oct 21, 2008 12:52 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

No more

than usual.

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Oct 21, 2008 1:54 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

For the arm-chair experts

who have soured on Rasmus. Please go to futureredbirds.net and read erik’s inteview with Ben Badler. A sample of Ben’s comments is, “Every scout I talk to who saw him this year raves about him.”

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Oct 21, 2008 12:16 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

read it. loved it.

"Sorry about him, he's dealing with being an inker. " - Chasing Amy

by FutureMan on Oct 21, 2008 2:19 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

According to

this article in the Chicago Tribune, the Cubs could be “outbid” on Kerry Wood….

Should the Cards go after Wood? Or does the very thought of Wood with the Birds On the Bat make your head want to explode?

What say you?

"In this game, don't nobody know nuthin' about nuthin'." -- attributed to Lawrence Peter "Yogi" Berra

by The Ol Goaler on Oct 21, 2008 12:30 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I could totally see him on that Cardinals

In this capacity:

  1. Discuss rehabbing arm problems with injured Cardinal pitchers under the guise that they would do the exact opposite of everything he says.
  2. Send him out once every Cubs series to throw a 99 mph heater over the head of some Cubs player — that way they know how every other hitter has felt over the last 10+ years.
  3. Allow him to close out the 2009 World Series so every Cub fan cries in his beer and says “How did we let THAT guy go?”, resulting in the Cubs keeping every aging talented free agent until 2024.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Oct 21, 2008 12:49 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'd rather sit pat.....

And even sign Izzy to an incentive-laced deal. Wood just seems like a potential injury to me. Not a chance I want to take, for that kind of $, at that age.

"Stats are for losers," Muschamp said after last week's victory. "I like winning games."

by SoonerfanTU on Oct 21, 2008 12:53 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Wood

If you could get Wood for a 1yr deal and with Perez as his Plan B injury backup might not be a bad way to go. I have no idea how much money or the length of contract Wood will comand, or how much the Cubs are willing to pay. Any more than 1yr would be a deal breaker for me.

I see what you are saying about Izzy – but in my mind that is the last resort, only to be done in case all other options at getting a 1yr closer fail.

by Knighttime on Oct 21, 2008 1:09 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don't see any way.....

Wood signs a 1 year deal. With us, or anybody else.

"Stats are for losers," Muschamp said after last week's victory. "I like winning games."

by SoonerfanTU on Oct 21, 2008 1:13 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

that is probably correct

one would think some team out there would offer him more than 1yr.

by Knighttime on Oct 21, 2008 1:18 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I kinda like him

Anyone that smashes Sosa’s clubhouse stereo system with a baseball bat, like Wood supposedly did the day Sosa left the ballpark early, is OK in my book.

by Merry CRasmus on Oct 21, 2008 2:48 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I can't picture Kerry Wood in anything but a Cub's uniform.

He bleeds Cubbie Blue.

This Wood fellow, um, I do think he has an extensive injury history, no?

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Oct 21, 2008 8:27 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

wait..... if this happens.....

Kerry Wood in a Cards uniform pitching to Edmonds in a Cubs uniform??? Now I know I am going crazy…….

"It ain't braggin' if you can back it up."
-Dizzy Dean

by thegashousegang on Oct 22, 2008 9:34 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Mark Prior

How about a small contract to Mark Prior? Of course, he has an absolutely HORRIBLE history of arm trouble (and that’s an understatement), but I think it could pay off. Wood had a similar comeback to be a great closer for the Cubs, just wondering if Prior could work out that way. He’s still only 27.

by wizardofozzie on Oct 21, 2008 1:17 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Just to stick it to the Cubs...

I’d love to see the Cardinals sign Prior for a one year incentive laden contract and have him win the Come Back Player of the year…

…That being said I don’t honestly see him ever being big league effective again. There’s got to be better options for the cards to waste the money on.

by E-Dizzle on Oct 21, 2008 2:22 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Mark Prior?

If they really, seriously wanted to take a flier on Mark Prior, I wouldn’t be opposed. Ha, ha-you do know who one of his closest friends in baseball is? The Cardinals really should have been kinder and gentler in their treatment of Mr. Reyes……

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Oct 21, 2008 9:29 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Doubt that'll be a factor.

"Stats are for losers," Muschamp said after last week's victory. "I like winning games."

by SoonerfanTU on Oct 21, 2008 10:29 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

prior

i think it could be a great signing if cheap let duncan work on him a little bit and watch him give to the cubs

"Textbooks are Soviet propaganda" - Rev. Jerry Falwell

by elirock83 on Oct 22, 2008 9:11 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

cheap gamble on an injured pitcher

I’m not opposed to taking a flyer or somebody this year as I wasn’t opposed to the Clement experiment. My question on this topic would be: Prior, Hampton, or Pavano – assuming equal $$$’s in an experiment, which would you rather take a flyer on?

by Knighttime on Oct 22, 2008 12:39 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Ankiel to Yakees

I saw this on stltoday.com
I am not sure of the validity as they had no real source but i wanted to share it anyway to see if this would be plausible.


According to FSN, the Yankees have been talking to the Cards about a package that would send Ian Kennedy, Phil Hughes, and a third prospect for Ankiel and Bryan Anderson. Thoughts?

by bearcatcardfan on Oct 21, 2008 2:14 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

We'd be fools not to jump on that.....

Ankiel is immediately replaceable. We’d have some youngerish, talented SP’s. In a heart beat.

"Stats are for losers," Muschamp said after last week's victory. "I like winning games."

by SoonerfanTU on Oct 21, 2008 2:15 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

roger that

"Sorry about him, he's dealing with being an inker. " - Chasing Amy

by FutureMan on Oct 21, 2008 2:21 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Is it possible that

they are under the impression that because of LaRussa’s love-fest with Ank that it would take a deal like that to bring them? With Posada on the tail-end of his career Bryan Anderson fits their needs and mindset now (young talent instead of big names).

"All baseball fans can be divided into two groups: those who come to batting practice and the others. Only those in the first category have much chance of amounting to anything."--Thomas Boswell

by albrtfn on Oct 21, 2008 3:38 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

this has got to be bull

because if it isn’t…then we hit the jackpot

though i wonder why the yanks would have soured on kennedy and hughes that quickly…maybe they know more than they are letting on

i was thinking that the cards and yanks could do an ankiel for cano trade though

by VolsnCards5 on Oct 21, 2008 2:56 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I completely agree

Wish they would have named the source, that deal would work out amazing for us. We lose Ankiel, I love him to death but that’ll give Rasmus a chance to come up and shine, and we lose a guy who stuck in the system behind Yadi. We get a two good young pitchers and someone else. Any negatives on this trade??

by wizardofozzie on Oct 21, 2008 4:25 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Biggest negative

Is that we would rely totally on Rasmus’s as-yet unproven ability to play at the MLB level starting in six months. Next year could be a big year for the team. I would hate to have less than stellar production from our centerfielder. The second-biggest negative, from a club perspective, is that Ankiel is a big draw. He’s extremely popular and has filled Edmonds’s substantial shoes quite well.

by Red in Chicago on Oct 21, 2008 5:19 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

St Louis doesn't really need a draw does it?

I mean we have Albert F-in Pujols, and like a great following, tradition, etc.

As for Rasmus not being proven, Ank hasn’r proven he can stay healthy either, plus this has the potential to shore up our rotation for years, cheaply.

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Oct 21, 2008 6:05 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I can't see them giving up

both Kennedy and Hughes with emphasis on Hughes but maybe replace and another prospect and Hughes and throw in Cano or maybe a bullpen arm that they have extra of and we might get close.

by bearcatcardfan on Oct 21, 2008 6:23 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I can't say I agree with that...
Is that we would rely totally on Rasmus’s as-yet unproven ability to play at the MLB level starting in six months

Totally? Ank was hurt for the entire final two months of the season and the club was able to survive without Rasmus playing a role. Skip can play center, a healthy Barton can play center, even Mather could fill if if absolutely necessary. Considering the windfall of pitchers that deal would bring, how could the team NOT do that deal? Hughes and Kennedy would immediately compete for a spot in the rotation in St. Louis and both are cost controlled for another 4+ years.

Even if Rasmus doesn’t win the job in the spring, Skip/Barton could easily play CF with Luddy in RF and Mather/Stavinhoa could man LF.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Oct 21, 2008 10:21 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Okay, maybe it isn't a "total" reliance

but it is a very significant reliance. I just think 2009 could be a great year, and a patchwork outfield is not ideal. I still don’t like anyone but Skip in center if Ankiel and Rasmus are out.

Now, tell me we’re getting Robinson Cano in the deal or trading for Uggla or something like that, and my confidence goes up a notch in our run-scoring ability. Maybe to the point where the defensive loss is not such a big deal.

by Red in Chicago on Oct 22, 2008 1:47 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Of course it hurts the offense

Rasmus is almost undoubtedly going to need time to adjust to the majors…maybe all year. But he can play good defense and, quite frankly, the offense is going to be strong with or without Ankiel’s bat.

Now consider the impact on the rotation. Quite frankly, with the uncertainty surrounding Carp, the rotation seems to me to be more concerning than the offense. This would be not one but TWO cost-controlled young pitchers who would immediately jump into the mix for a spot in the rotation. You’re looking at, optimistically:

Carpenter
Waino
Wellemeyer
Lohse
Whoever wins the fifth spot — Pinata/Hughes/Kennedy/Thompson/Boggs

If Carp isn’t ready by the start of the year, then you just hand two slots over to those guys instead. Quite frankly, I think Hughes could pitch Pineiro out of a job pretty quickly.

by mojowo11 on Oct 22, 2008 4:56 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Still....

….you kind of get the feeling that the Yankees see these guys as damaged merchandise. I’d be up for Hughes; I don’t see Kennedy being that much different than Thompson or even Pinerio, although he does have more upside than either of them. If it were the MooCow, I’d try to work out a trade that gets us Hughes and Cano for Ankiel, Anderson, and maybe Motte. Heck, we might even be able to unload AK onto the Yanks as well. Thing is, with moost teams Ank would be a 1 year rental, buyt the yanks have so much buying power that they can easily trump anyone else’s offer if they like someone enough, and if Ank had a good year for then you can bet they’ll do what it takes to keep him. Overall, though, I can’t see Ankiel being traded to anyone – i think he stays put in St. Louis.

by The MooCow on Oct 24, 2008 8:52 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I agree on the Hughes-Yanks perception

Seems like when he wasn’t hitting 97 on the gun and tossing no-hitters the entire city turned on him. He has always been the pitcher that he was there, and he just needs a shot and some time to adjust.

Space.

It's a problem we face.

So we never go anywhere.

We just stay in one place.

by hazel on Oct 24, 2008 7:57 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Makes no sense

Ankiel only has a one-year deal.

by Red in Chicago on Oct 21, 2008 5:16 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Surely if this would happen

A contract extension would be in the deal. I’m sure Boras would be salivating to get Ankiel with the Yankees $$Cha-Ching$$

"All baseball fans can be divided into two groups: those who come to batting practice and the others. Only those in the first category have much chance of amounting to anything."--Thomas Boswell

by albrtfn on Oct 21, 2008 5:47 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

doesn't need to make sense

This is the Yankees. They didn’t make the playoffs this year and they seem to think that is their birthright. Think that they would really care about the logic of it all? It sure wouldn’t be the craziest thing they have done to try and win a title.

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Oct 21, 2008 6:06 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The Yankees are just as rational

as any other team. They just have more money to toss around.

I dunno. The whole thing sounds like a Cardinals fan fantasy, not a bonafide trade deal. Has anyone else even sniffed at Bryan Anderson? He certainly isn’t ready to start in the majors, and he does nothing to solve the Yankees’ catcher needs in 2009.

by Red in Chicago on Oct 21, 2008 6:14 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

They are?

They have a history of throwing big money and big prospects after players just to try to win this year. While it seems they have calmed down a bit the last couple of years, it hasn’t been that long since the Vazquez, Johnson, Weaver, Neagle days. I am sure I have missed a few, but that isn’t a bad list off the top of my head.

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Oct 21, 2008 6:55 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

how about

Carl Pavano and Jaret Wright? Both guys have one good year and then get signed to giant contracts by the Yankees — then both go to shit less than a season after or get hurt.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Oct 21, 2008 10:23 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That doesn't prove they aren't rational

How about tossing an extra $13 million at Mark Mulder? How about the world’s largest contract to Barry Zito a few months before he loses his mind? Zambrano for Kazmir? Brock for Broglio? Just because suboptimal decisions are routinely made does not mean a club isn’t rational.

One should always assume for-profit enterprises are run rationally. It used to be that sports franchises were nothing more than ego trips for their owners. I’m sure George Steinbrenner’s ego needs no boosting at this point. But I’m equally sure Cashman and his sons understand the Yankees are not just a baseball team but a business.

by Red in Chicago on Oct 22, 2008 1:50 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah

You can attempt to be rational and just do a poor job of it. Just to make sure everyone understands your reference, that was Victor Zambrano for Kazmir.

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Oct 22, 2008 2:39 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

WHEW!

Now THAT’S a cow pie of a deal…
:=8P

by The MooCow on Oct 24, 2008 8:54 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The Yankees have a Rasmus Type player coming up

and should be ready in 1 year so if the contract was any longer he would be blocking him

by bearcatcardfan on Oct 21, 2008 6:19 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

do you have a name for him?

Maybe I am forgetting a name I should now, but I can’t think of an everyday prospect in the Yankees system that is as highly regarded as Rasmus.

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Oct 21, 2008 6:58 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Austin Jackson

http://minors.baseball-reference.com/players.cgi?pid=7082

I realize he has no AAA experience but at this point last year rasmus was in the same boat and a lot of people wanted him to make the jump.

by bearcatcardfan on Oct 21, 2008 8:26 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

and after 1 incomplete year of AAA

Everyone has Rasmus in their Fantasy Lineups. So After a full year Jackson could be ready.

by bearcatcardfan on Oct 21, 2008 8:32 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Rasmus-type?

Not really. Rasmus is a 5 tool, elite, blue chip prospect. He hit more homers in 2007 than this Austin Jackson guy has hit in his entire four-year minor league career.

Rasmus mashed in his first full season at AA — .932 OPS. Jackson played at AA this year and OPS’d .773. That is what is called in the business “a huge goddamn difference” (this statement applies to any business). Rasmus was also a year younger.

I mean, really, this is a pretty insane comparison. They’re both quick and they both play center field, but that’s about the end of the similarities.

by mojowo11 on Oct 22, 2008 5:03 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

if you are talking about gardner

then he is nowhere close to rasmus in stature

they traded their best outfield prospect to the pirates for marte this season

by VolsnCards5 on Oct 21, 2008 8:15 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think New York wouldn't be very good for Rick

with all the media pressure. I would feel pretty sorry for him actually if this happend.

We’ve got a long way to go and a short time to get there.

by KYCards on Oct 21, 2008 4:22 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

If this were real it would be absolutely impossible to say no to.

Space.

It's a problem we face.

So we never go anywhere.

We just stay in one place.

by hazel on Oct 22, 2008 9:59 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

any ankiel deal to the yanks

should insist they include cano. I just can’t believe that hughes and kennedy have much trade value right now.

the enemy's gate is down.

by SleepyCA on Oct 22, 2008 11:58 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Go after Hughes and Cano

I’m not sure how he’s progressing or if he has any trade value at all, but we could throw in Duncan along with Ank and Anderson. They do need a 1B and that may sweeten the deal.

Wait a minute…I just realized LaDunc would be trading away both Ankiel and C. Duncan. I’m sure they would not give their blessing to Mo on this one…if that matters.

"Your mom likes Albert Pujols" - Happy Joe

by fatbellyjefferson on Oct 24, 2008 11:45 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

St

will show a lot from clement and duncan… especially in a crowded OF for Duncan. Who knows, maybe Clement is that back-of-the-rotation Mo is looking for in FA

Yadi swings and hits a high fly ball... Endy Chavez goes back, to the track, to the wall... ITS A GUNNER!! Yadi gives St. Louis the lead in the top of the ninth!

by Paulspike on Oct 22, 2008 1:30 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I sincerely hope that is sarcasm

Clement won’t be anywhere near ST unless his family is on vacation there we don’t need to give him anymore free money.
Duncan will be in ST but only to compete for a bench role

by bearcatcardfan on Oct 22, 2008 2:04 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I could see

Clement taking a minor league free agent deal after the Cardinals handed out some vouchers to him last year, as long as it is incentive laden on starts made in the majors or something.

by stlfan on Oct 22, 2008 7:44 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

We released Clement during the season...

…I highly doubt you will see him signing anything with the Cards…

by moser34 on Oct 22, 2008 3:23 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Well he is kind of the odd man out when you take defense and role into account

Ank has that kind of power and way more speed.
Schu is the only person who can lead off in all reality (unless we sign a FA or trade for one).
Rasmus has less power but plays a lot better on defense (understatement).

This is why we need to move someone in the outfield if not two someones.

by bearcatcardfan on Oct 23, 2008 1:09 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Do we really?

I guess if Duncan is healthy, we might need to move one guy.

But even if we start Ludwick/Rasmus/Ankiel…..and have Duncan and Skip on the bench…..it wouldn’t KILL Mather to have some more time in AAA, and it certainly wouldn’t hurt Barton. I guess I don’t know what other OF’s we have in AAA that they may take time away from is all.

"Stats are for losers," Muschamp said after last week's victory. "I like winning games."

by SoonerfanTU on Oct 23, 2008 10:39 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

ha. I just wrote that below.

I was in the middle of typing when you posted, though.

by stlfan on Oct 23, 2008 10:53 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Just noticed.....

That is a ****-load of lefty hitting bats on the ML roster. 4 of 5 OF’s.

Doesn’t see to be a way around that though. If healthy, Ludwick, Ankiel, Duncan, and Skip all have to be on the ML roster. Wish Duncan could go to AAA for awhile, and sort through some things. Wonder if he’d clear waivers?

"Stats are for losers," Muschamp said after last week's victory. "I like winning games."

by SoonerfanTU on Oct 23, 2008 11:26 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

duncan has one more option year

when he went to AAA this year, he spent less than 20 days there, which preserved his last option.

I'm as nauseous as I've ever been. I have a terrible headache. My head is pounding. I feel like throwing up and I'm having trouble swallowing. And the beauty of it is, you want to feel like this every day. - Tony LaRussa

by adiueordie on Oct 23, 2008 11:06 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I was talking out of the group of.....

Ludwick, Rasmus, Ankiel, Skip, and Duncan. Only Ludwick is righthanded.

"Stats are for losers," Muschamp said after last week's victory. "I like winning games."

by SoonerfanTU on Oct 24, 2008 11:08 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

mather and barton

both in AAA creates a logjam there though. haerther, jon jay, and robinson are already there. stav has to go someplace and jones is knocking on the door.

"Sorry about him, he's dealing with being an inker. " - Chasing Amy

by FutureMan on Oct 23, 2008 1:08 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Well.....

I think out of everybody that I listed, Haerther and Stavi have the least value. If that means letting one or both of them go, that is a better option, to me, then moving one of the better OF’s for nothing, or letting one of them go.

Mather can play some 1B, not sure about the others, as far as opening up spots in AAA to get more of them on the field.

"Stats are for losers," Muschamp said after last week's victory. "I like winning games."

by SoonerfanTU on Oct 23, 2008 1:13 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Duncan/others

I agree that one probably needs to be traded, but maybe not…there just might be a bit of shuffling between Memphis and St. Louis.

Preface – I have never seen Rasmus play.

Ankiel is our best CF because he gets good reads off the bat 80% of the time or more, has good range, and a rocket arm. Batting, he has a lot of pop, is developing an OK eye, and needs to make contact much more often. Rick is very injury prone, as proven throughout his career.

Schumaker is a good CF and a great corner outfielder defensively with a slightly above average arm. Batting, he has a pretty good eye, he can lead off because he’s the quickest out of them, but he’s probably the best #2 hitter on the team (in terms of typical #2, not the powerful kind TLR likes).

Rasmus, from what I hear, is going to be a great CF or a great corner outfielder. He has 5 tools, but will have to prove all of the offensive ones at the major league level. Rasmus may be getting that “injury prone” label that Ankiel already has.

Duncan is a poor defender in RF and a decent backup at 1B. He can mash as well, or better when healthy, than any of the other options in LF. (35 homers in 140 game stretch 2006-2007.) He also has a decent eye and can get on base at a good clip, but he (like Ankiel) needs to work on his K rate.

Ludwick is an anomaly. He seems to either be an All-Star or hurt. He has been hurt much more often than he has been an AS. Ludwick has good range in the OF, has a decent arm, and decent range. I don’t think he has a plus plus tool defensively, but they are all good. Hitting, we saw what he can do when healthy.

Barton is the fastest player to play in St. Louis since Kerry Robinson, I believe. He has some pop, some ability to hit for average, a lot of ability to get to the ball, but can only play LF because of 1) a not good throwing arm and 2) a horrible ability at reading the ball off of the bat. There is no logical reason to keep him in STL instead of Memphis, unless they start having a pinch runner role like the DH…where he can simply run for Yadi every time Yadi gets on.

Mather also have a ton of pop in his bat, but struggled getting on base at the major league level. I think he could use a little bit more time at AAA just working on his batting eye. As soon as he shows he can get on regularly, or if someone struggles offensively at the big league level for April or April/May, then he should be called up.

I just think that players like Barton and Mather have the abilities to play in the bigs at some point (whether as a starter or as a bench player), but I think that they will be benefited more by playing EVERY DAY in the minors than Skip or Duncan. If the Birds on the Bat go with Ludwick, Ankiel, Rasmus across the outfield (left to right) and have Skip and Duncan on the bench, that is the best way to go. Skip would be the speed/defense off of the bench and Duncan would be the power off of the bench. I know that is a lot of lefties in the outfield, but the infield and catcher are all RHB or switch hitters.

by stlfan on Oct 23, 2008 10:52 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

has Rasmus had an injury other than the knee this year?

He had the sinus infection last year , right? Getting a terrible sinus infection isn’t going to make someone more injury prone, is it?

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Oct 23, 2008 7:58 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Praise for Perez also

In the above link to Pat Dailey’s article, DDunc has a nice outlook for Perez – unlike the Reyes quotes from the past. Might not be as hopeless as some believe for YP’s future in STL.

Likewise, Duncan’s impressions of the 23-year-old Perez (3-3, 3.46 ERA, seven saves) were good.

"He’s a very talented kid," Duncan said. "I like him a lot. He’s willing to work and understands he doesn’t have it all figured out, yet. There are still things he needs to be able to do to move himself up, as far as the significance of the role he will play in the bullpen. I think right now you can say he can pitch in the big leagues. What role he will play will be determined by how he develops."

by ubeddie on Oct 21, 2008 9:10 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Uh yeah...

listening to Duncan is his problem. Like Reyes, Perez would be good when first called up, but the once he started listening to Duncan and throwing like he wanted, start sucking.

Felipe Lopez - next year's Joel Pineiro

by DiscoJer on Oct 21, 2008 10:49 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I know everyone is waiting patiently for my opinion so...

Every game I watch Longoria play I more and more want Rasmus starting in CF next year.

We really don’t need starting pitching(even though you can never have enough) as much as we need bullpen help.

I hate to say it but unless Peavy gets cheap I would pass on dealing Colby.

"Why does he keep saying that?"

by Red Blazer on Oct 22, 2008 10:44 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

i agree

it seems like the peavy to st. louis possibility is all but gone now, realistically. obviously hypothetical discussions still make sense, but the latest news seems to indicate that we’re not really in the running, and the package would have to be built around a young pitcher, which rasmus ain’t.

by mattybobo on Oct 22, 2008 10:57 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Stay with the youth...

There are some obvious places to deal from if you’re the cardinals, the OF, Catcher, 3B. But considering that the long term cost of a free agent starter will be comparable (more probably, but comparable) to what Peavy gets paid over the next 5 years I think the best moves of the offseason for the Cards will come via FA. I like the proposed Ankiel deal above because it gives us more flexibility but I’m not overly impressed with Hughes. I would prefer the suggestion of Cano and Kennedy for Anderson and Ankiel. Combined with moves to shore up the ’pen and address the hole at SS, talent retention and development is still the best offseason strategy (And I love the idea of a Mather, Rasmus, Ludwick outfield)

by BustaCard on Oct 22, 2008 2:42 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Jayson Nix released?

Pretty sure I saw this the other day. I know he was a bust in Col last year but at triple A put up a .302 .372 .591 line with 17 dingers in 264 ABs. Why not let the man compete for the job at second next spring?

by RayMonD! on Oct 24, 2008 1:57 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

mlbtraderumors

is saying that jayson nix is a free agent. not sure if he was releases or just reached his free agent level of service time.

"Sorry about him, he's dealing with being an inker. " - Chasing Amy

by FutureMan on Oct 24, 2008 12:30 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I just saw that, too...

I sure as hell hope JoMo is all over this! Granted he’s 26 and it was his third season at AAA, but a .964 OPS is HUGE for a MIF. He put up a .793 the year before. I’d like to think we do what it takes to get him, even if it requires a big league deal.

by cardzfanbub on Oct 24, 2008 1:01 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

nix got signed :(

the white sox just signed jayson nix. i would have loved the cards to pick him up.

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2008/10/white-sox-sign.html

....my quick smells like french toast...

by mstreeter06 on Oct 29, 2008 10:17 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

scratch that

now that im looking at it i think hes still a rock

by RayMonD! on Oct 24, 2008 2:06 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Oh joy!

“Several weeks after predicting an "aggressive” and “creative” offseason, Mozeliak says the club will remain in a “holding pattern” until better understanding ace Chris Carpenter’s recovery from a season-ending nerve condition that affects his right shoulder." —From Strauss

Good to see we didn’t learn anything from last season. (Putting all our eggs in the coming back from injury basket). I think this is code for: Mr. Dewitt won’t let me be as “aggressive” as I thought he would.

I hope I am wrong……….

We’ve got a long way to go and a short time to get there.

by KYCards on Oct 24, 2008 2:30 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think this is the pertinant thing to do.

They should know something about whether Carp will be ready for the start of the year by the time the winter meetings roll around in 6 weeks or so, so it only makes sense to kick the tires on everybody available but not commit to anything.

I don’t see the team making a blockbuster trade this offseason — and nobody here seems to think they should do that anyway, according to all the negative posts related to trading top prospects. If Carp is ready then they don’t need to pursue a starter, which allows them to spend more money or make a bigger trade to secure a good middle infielder for next year.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Oct 24, 2008 8:55 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

BINGO!

Knowledge is power (for a GM as well as a general) — I would be willing to wager that very little gets done by any team before the winter meetings. Possible exceptions might be CC and Manny — but both of those players (agents) will likely try to get a “bidding war” going.

By the winter meetings, the Cards should know more about their needs. I don’t see them winning a “bidding war” for CC, Lowe, Furcal, etc. I’m not knocking DeWallet — I just think somebody will offer these guys unreasonable money/years.

"In this game, don't nobody know nuthin' about nuthin'." -- attributed to Lawrence Peter "Yogi" Berra

by The Ol Goaler on Oct 24, 2008 10:57 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

negative posts

i don’t think most have a problem with “trading” the prospects. its getting equal value from the prospect that is the issue. from what i’ve read most posters would be willing to trade rasmus but not unless we’re getting back a young cost-controlled potential all-star at another position.

on the contrary, i think most of the posters “want” to trade from our OF, 3B, and RHP depth. in fact, in order to contain the drama next year we really “need” to trade from those areas.

"Sorry about him, he's dealing with being an inker. " - Chasing Amy

by FutureMan on Oct 24, 2008 12:41 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

MLBrumors says.....

That we’re holding pat on our rotation until we find out more about Carpenter. I don’t believe it mentions that we still won’t be going out and talking to folks about our lineup, and probably our pen.

"Stats are for losers," Muschamp said after last week's victory. "I like winning games."

by SoonerfanTU on Oct 24, 2008 11:13 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think the implication

is that they don’t want to do anything until they figure out whether they will have Carpenter or not. That’s what I got from MO’s comments. Makes sense unless you just get blown away by a great deal.

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Oct 24, 2008 1:36 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

it would be nice to turn Kennedy into a pumpkin...

because you don’t have to pay a pumpkin millions of dollars and they probably have the same VORP right now….

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Oct 24, 2008 5:29 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

trade ideas

if we dont want kennedy, why would another team?

how about skip, duncan and one of motte/perez for zobrist and either e jackson or sonnanstine. this would give us a legit 4 or 5 starter(something pinieros not) as well as a potential starting ss. sign lopez and either lopez or zobrist plays ss. we then could release keenedy and keep miles. as much as trading motte or perez would suck we can unload one and go sign/trade for a proven closer. one more lefty reliever and we could have a team.

by joelcards on Oct 24, 2008 7:57 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The (forever recurring) Duncan problem

Duncan is untradeable. He is attempting an unprecedented medical recovery. He has no value in a trade.

by mojowo11 on Oct 28, 2008 2:38 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Possibility of signing Orlando Hudson?

May be slightly cheaper than Furcal but it would suck to put Lopez/Miles at SS.

by wizardofozzie on Oct 25, 2008 1:43 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Hudson

isn’t worth either a long-term deal or a fat salary. He is on the wrong side of 30, he is coming off a pretty severe wrist injury, he hasn’t put up an RZR over .800 since 2005, and most of his offense is attributable to playing in Arizona.

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Oct 25, 2008 3:27 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Plus

it looks like Hudson is going to be a Type A.

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Oct 25, 2008 11:54 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

trade

rasmus and perez for joakim soria. look up sorias contract its awesome. perez can be a closer in a low pressure environment while soria gets saves that count. fuentes will cost at least 3 yrs 30 mil. soria is signed for 6 years 30 mil and 12 mil is 2 years of club options so if his arm falls of its cool.

by joelcards on Oct 25, 2008 2:46 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Rasmus for a closer??

Why in the world would we trade away one of the top prospects in all of baseball and a guy who could develop into a good reliever for a good closer?

by wizardofozzie on Oct 25, 2008 3:03 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

not a good closer a great closer.

soria is absolutely dominant. did u see the 6 games against the royals. sometimes a pitcher gets lucky when retiring batters. he was dominant. those games were over in the 8th. now think of last year. if our games were over in the 8th last year we might still be playing. perez might develop but tony doesnt want to give the job to someone so young(right or wrong this is the case). what does a team like the royals need a lights out closer for anyways? a team like the cards who play so may close games could really max his value. we would lose the cheap rasmus but we would gain the cheap soria. i think the contracts would equal themselves out and we would be trading need for need. i guess we could take dejesus and trade him for a mi. rasmus is a prospect, which means he hasnt done anything. soria is a safer bet, and a much greater need.

by joelcards on Oct 25, 2008 6:23 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don't think

that the Royals would do it anyway.

by stlfan on Oct 25, 2008 11:28 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Maybe Perez and someone like Freese or even Mather

But absolutely no way would we give up Rasmus—with or without another player for a closer. Even if it was Mariano Rivera you’re talking about, Mo wouldn’t do it.

I’ve read that Soria is pretty off-limits, too. Kansas City dreams every offseason about making some noise…

by Red in Chicago on Oct 26, 2008 2:54 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

soria

yeah i do think soria is somewhat off limits. thats why i suggested rasmus because i dont think they have even considered getting him. i also agree that the royals think they will be good. im not saying this is a good idea, its just an idea. i used to believe a closer wasnt that important but watching the last few years i completely have changed. i believe certain teams, like the cards, twins, and angels, need a good closer. our style of baseball makes us always play close games. i would bet money our team save chances are tops in the league the last few years, so this is why a closer is more important to us. my thinking is in order to get a closer(krod or fuentes) we will have to overpay. the amount we will overpay should be similar to the amount of money a prospect with talent like rasmus saves us. so why not trade rasmus if the money is a wash because we would be trading from a team strength for a need.

by joelcards on Oct 26, 2008 4:24 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

save chances the last few years:

2008: 73 save chances (1st in league), save% 58% (14th in league), record 86-76
2007: 45 save chances (last/16th in league), save% 76% (2nd in league), record 78-84
2006: 57 save chances (13th in league), save% 67% (13th in league), record 83-78

so in 2008 we did in fact lead the league in save chances, but previous to that we were near the bottom in chances while near the top in converting those chances.

however despite the 2008 teams horrid ability to convert saves this year, they still had the best record… the point being that the ability to close the game is just a small peice of the puzzle when it comes to building a winning team.

Sure, it was frustrating to see the team blow all those leads but adding more offense to the middle infield or improving the starting rotation could improve the numbers by creating larger leads, more three run saves, and less save chances.

The important thing is to get the most value out of your trades/money. Sacrificing offence to pick up a closer will not necessarily create more wins for the team.

also of interest…

2008 NL average: 61 save changes, 62% save%, 23 blown saves…

so despite the cardinals blowing 31 saves it was still only 8 more blown saves than the league average…

by E-Dizzle on Oct 27, 2008 11:20 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

oops...

I meant

2006: 57 save chances (13th in league), save% 67% (4TH IN LEAGUE), record 83-78

by E-Dizzle on Oct 27, 2008 1:02 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

funny

funny how people adjust stats to prove their point. i guess 04 and 05 dont count then right!!

by joelcards on Oct 29, 2008 8:16 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

EVERYBODY

can dream… whodathunk the Rays would win 97 games and make it to the Series? If ya stink long enough and draft well, you can get a bunch of talented young players; then have good baseball men teach them how to win.

Were I the Royals, I’d hang onto Soria, too!

"In this game, don't nobody know nuthin' about nuthin'." -- attributed to Lawrence Peter "Yogi" Berra

by The Ol Goaler on Oct 26, 2008 12:19 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

put...down...

the….crack….pipe

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Oct 25, 2008 3:28 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

+1

....my quick smells like french toast...

by mstreeter06 on Oct 25, 2008 4:57 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

No Way...

….that happens. It’s one thing to trade away a cowmodity like Rasmus for an ace starter; its an-udder to trade him for a relief pitcher with only 2 years experience, even with those saves. No dice.

by The MooCow on Oct 27, 2008 3:34 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Rasmus for ANY closer is a HORRIBLE idea.

I don’t care how great he is.

Rasmus is one of the top prospects in baseball.

The Dirty Canuck of the now.

by Blicks on Nov 2, 2008 10:28 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Tyler Greene

i mentioned this the other day, but it has become even more apparent to me since then…tyler greene is really tearing up the Arizona Fall League…his line is .323/.447/.645. most of that production coming while he was playing 2nd base…could it be that he tends to take playing a demanding and extremely important position like shortstop to the plate with him, and that causes his to not have the same focus as when he plays second? i’m not saying that second isn’t important or demanding, but it’s not quite as difficult as SS imho…maybe greene relaxes more when he is at the keystone

for those of you that think this comment looks familiar…i just posted the exact same thing on futureredbirds

by VolsnCards5 on Oct 26, 2008 6:45 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

more proof

just looked at the AFL statistics…he’s played 2 of his 8 games at 3rd, 1 at short, and the rest at 2nd…the only game he didn’t have a hit in was the game he played short(though he did take 2 walks in that game)

by VolsnCards5 on Oct 26, 2008 6:56 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

sample size much?

there isn’t any proof here. these numbers are over eight games.

How depressing is it being you? Is it closer to being a lifelong cubs fan or being born without lips? - Janitor

by themanthemyth on Oct 27, 2008 11:27 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

ummm

it is proof that greene has hit better as a 2b than SS in the AFL…which is the point i was trying to make

i realize the sample size is too small to draw any real conclusions…the point of the post was to see if people though playing a relatively easier defensive position could cause a player to be mor focused at the plate…anyone?

by VolsnCards5 on Oct 27, 2008 1:21 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What did he grow up playing?

If is was 2nd base, you might have a point. If it was SS, I’d say you probably don’t.

"Stats are for losers," Muschamp said after last week's victory. "I like winning games."

by SoonerfanTU on Oct 27, 2008 1:41 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Not buying it

I seriously doubt he’s mentally weak enough that where he fields his ground balls is somehow going alter his approach at the dish.

by mojowo11 on Oct 28, 2008 2:41 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   1 recs

I dunno

Some pitchers can only throw to certain catchers…is that a sign of mental weakness.

Our CF currently comes to mind…

by RDF922 on Oct 28, 2008 11:25 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Boston

needs a forth outfielder, and they want a young catcher to take over in ‘10 or ’11 they have some MI depth as long as it’s not lugo. OF’er & Anderson for Lowrie and prospect(s) I don’t think they would let pedroia go, or okijima.

by from First to Third on Oct 26, 2008 7:04 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

BOS OF

Drew, Bay, Ellsbury, and Crisp are all under contract through at least next year. Seems like they already have four outfielders.
No way they trade Lowrie for a bench player and catching prospect.

Okajima has a $1.75M club option for 2009 which will be picked up for sure. He’s great against lefties as well as righties, but he won’t be worth what we would have to give up for him.

"I'm as nauseous as I've ever been. I have a terrible headache. My head is pounding. I feel like throwing up and I'm having trouble swallowing. And the beauty of it is, you want to feel like this every day." - Tony LaRussa

by adiueordie on Oct 27, 2008 2:12 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I know all sorts of dreadful posts start out "I was on truth and rumors" . . .

but I was on truth and rumors and they alleged the Rays were on the K-Rod trail. Not sure I totally buy it, but I was looking at Jill’s post way up there, and thinking, maybe the bridge solution for us in the closer spot is a recent departure — would the Rays trade us Percival for some sort of reasonable package, in hopes of picking up a younger, more reliable closer on the FA market? Percival, for all his continuing health problems, might be a good fit. He could be a veteran presence who would likely not pitch the full season, giving motte and perez some exposure, without saddling either with a full season in a high-pressure role. He doesn’t cost ridiculous money ($4M). Given his health problems, we could get him at a discount. He seemed to do well in his time here.

I know nobody wants to add more ailing arms to our squad, but I’d rather have him than Izzy at this point. He seems to be able to pitch capably when healthy, as opposed to being either injured or ineffective. he would be the kind of vet that tony would trust.

by tom s. on Oct 27, 2008 5:05 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Why trade for Percival?

A healthy Izzy is probably going to be just as good as Percival next year, so why would we give up a player for him?

I’d rather target someone like Takashi Saito if we’re not going to hand the reins to Perez.

"I just wish that the late Harry Caray were still around so I could hear him mispronounce 'Kosuke Fukudome' every fukun' night" -- Dennis Miller

by fourstick on Oct 27, 2008 9:32 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

what's the basis for saying that a "healthy Izzy is probably going to be just as good as Percival next year"?

Wasn’t Izzy healthy but ineffective most of this year? I seem to recall his first trip to the DL was a contrived business about him hitting a TV. I don’t think any legit health issues surfaced until later in the season.

Moreover, if you actually believe that Izzy’s problems were health related, is his hip really gonna get BETTER this year?

I made this suggestion precisely because I disagree with that statement. Percival actually pitched very well when healthy, while Izzy pitched terribly all season, healthy or not. Point me to an extended period where Izzy pitched well in 2008.

by tom s. on Oct 28, 2008 4:06 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Wasn’t Izzy healthy but ineffective most of this year?

No. Hurt in ’06 and ineffective. Healthy in ’07, did great. Hurt in ’08 and ineffective.

IF it looks like he’s going to be healthy, Izzy might be the cheapest closer option that we can go with. I guess it depends what we do with the rest of the pen, and how much we spend at SS. Let’s give Perez another year to get ready, or give Motte another year to win the closer job away.

"Stats are for losers," Muschamp said after last week's victory. "I like winning games."

by SoonerfanTU on Oct 28, 2008 9:22 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

unsustainable peripherals '07

sustainable performance ’08

Space.

It's a problem we face.

So we never go anywhere.

We just stay in one place.

by hazel on Oct 28, 2008 6:28 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

'07 looked like most of his career

’06 and ’08 did not

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Oct 28, 2008 6:36 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

but Izzy is 36

and coming off two injury/surgery plagued years out of the last three. I just don’t see how anyone can look at all the factors and expect Izzy to be consistently good again. Hope? Yes. Expect? I just can’t see it.

* sarcasm might be involved in this comment

by mattyfrommo on Oct 28, 2008 6:47 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

the 2007 BABIP was a bit lucky

career average of .291 and his 2007 was .226, though he’s been .261 or lower since ‘04 and below his career average since 2001, until ’08’s horrific .338.

the enemy's gate is down.

by SleepyCA on Oct 28, 2008 7:12 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I have absolutely zero interest

in taking a guy that has TWICE demonstrated that he is willing to hide performance affecting injuries.

He just looked old, worn out and out of shape all last year. You can check the archives, I posted that after his first appearance of the season. We just need to move on.

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Oct 28, 2008 8:16 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

All of you guys have a point

I was merely responding to the claim that Izzy’s performance from 2007 was ‘unsustainable.’

There is no reason to think that he WILL revert back to his career levels. But there is at least a reason to think that he CAN be a good pitcher again.

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Oct 28, 2008 8:24 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Hey, I don't think that is totally unreasonable.

Percival hasn’t had a recurrence of his arm problems-it’s been his legs and his back. He is under contract for next year with the Rays. They very well may want someone more youthful, and more reliable. That is, if you consider most relief pitchers are consistently inconsistent from year to year.

I think Isringhausen is a good candidate for a change of scenery. I do think he may have something left, and it would be best for all if he just moved along.

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Oct 27, 2008 5:55 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I really want to get a SS in this offseason

So… Who are the notable FA SS?
Orlando Cabrera CWS .281 .334 .371 161 games
Alex Cora BOS .270 .371 .349 75 games
Craig Counsell MIL .226 .355 .322 110 games
Rafael Furcal LAD .357 .439 .573 only 36 games (injury)
Cesar Izturis STL .263 .319 .309 135 games
Edgar Renteria DET .279 .317 .382 138 games
Juan Uribe CWS .247 .296 .386 110 games

I think we need to keep comparable defensive talent at this position, AND upgrade our offensive ability in this position. I think there are a few players on this list that accomplish this goal for us. My first pick is Furcal, but I think it’s more possible (although not probable) that we get Renteria. Does this fulfill our needs at the SS position? IMO it does, but if anyone wants to further analyze this, be my guest. Assuming DET doesn’t pick up their option on him, I like him as our ‘09 SS. Cabrera is an obvious upgrade offensively, but I’ve heard that he’s not so good defensively.

If it were up to me, in this offseason, I would use our OF depth to go after cost-controlled young pitching i.e. anyone from the Rays or Matt Cain from the Giants (since Lincecum is untouchable), Phil Hughes/Ian Kennedy from the Yanks. Or go after some relief help from Boston in return for filling their OF hole (Coco Crisp). THEN SPEND SOME MONEY ON THE SS POSITION!! I’m not saying 90 mil. over 7 years, but can we get another all-star on our infield other than El Hombre? I know Glaus has been there, but I’m tired of replacement-level MIFs… hence the name.

by aaron_notmiles on Oct 27, 2008 7:32 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I hate the Renteria idea

His defensive numbers are toward the bottom for shortstops. He’s as bad at short as Izturis is good. Not to mention he’s coming off the worst offensive year of his career at the age of 33 or so. No thanks.

The reputation that Cabrera is a plus offensive player stems almost entirely from his 2003 season. He’s just okay. As for his defensive reputation, I had always thought that he was widely considered a plus defender. I dunno. Not in love with the idea.

I like Furcal, though I don’t really have a good reason why he’s better than Cabrera. I’m guessing he’ll resign with LA, though.

I have no idea what to do. Izturis may end up being the best option for the money.

by mojowo11 on Oct 28, 2008 2:48 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

for the 397th time...so i semi-apologize

we need to convince Edgar that he is now a 2nd baseman.

by stlfan on Oct 28, 2008 12:01 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

His 2008 line is bad even for a 2B

2008 #s
Renteria: .270/.317/.382, 84 OPS+
Kennedy: .280/.321/.372, 82 OPS+
Miles: .317/.355/.398, 99 OPS+
Izturis: .263/.319/.309, 67 OPS+

Now obviously Miles is probably going to come back to earth a bit and Renteria is likely to move closer to his stellar 2007. But a) I’m not sure Renteria is really any better at second than short and b) Busch is a pitcher’s park just like Comerica.

Renteria’s 2007 (125 OPS+!) looks more like an aberration than a breakthrough. I’ve got no confidence whatsoever in any aspect of his game showing up.

I dunno. Renteria strikes me as a pretty ho-hum hitter. His career OPS+ of 96, a fact which I think many of us seem to be blinded to thanks to his peak coming here in St. Louis in 2002-2003. On top of that, he seems to be completely erratic — but mostly he’s terrible in the AL (he’s been awful for both BOS and DET). Is there some actual connection? I have no idea. What a strange case.

by mojowo11 on Oct 28, 2008 12:16 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

FWIW

espn park factors says Comerica was the sixth best hitter’s park in MLB in 2008. All the more reason to cherish the Edgar memories and take a pass on him at this point.

Those Pilgrims ain't lookin' so proud now...

by giveml on Oct 28, 2008 2:48 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

huh. did craig counsell really hit .226 and get on base at a .355 clip?

that’s kind of impressive… i wonder…
oh, wait. he’s craig counsell. craig counsell is 37. nevermind…

by mattybobo on Oct 28, 2008 11:02 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

LH Swing man, anybody?

http://mlb.mlb.com/stats/individual_stats_player.jsp?c_id=mlb&playerID=435179

Scott Olsen is 24, had an okay season w/ the Marlins. Seems like a reasonable bottom of the rotation/LHRP in the mold that Mo is likely looking for. Easily picked up. Not likely to set the world on fire, though with a solid defense and a winter w/ Mr. Duncan, who knows?

by tom s. on Oct 28, 2008 4:16 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

what you need to know

about olsen

21.8% strike out rate 2006

16.1% 2007

13.2% 2008

and a two mile an hour drop in velocity. think he might be hiding an injury?

Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue.

by Dave Barry on Oct 28, 2008 9:21 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Olsen will not be traded as a "Swing Man"

If the Marlins deal Olsen they are going to be shopping him as a legit of middle rotation stater, and his stats from this season support that argument.

However, Olsen lost a few miles off his fastball this year, and if you look at his strikeout numbers they have declined each year. On top of that he is a headcase, and has had legal problems (drinking and driving) off the field.

If we could get him for Freese or Allen Craig I might do that straight up only because of our logjam at 3b, but the marlins will likely be wanting much more than that.

by salukihoops on Oct 28, 2008 9:25 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Giles

MLBTR claims marcus giles is NOT RETIRED. that’s usually a bad sign. He’d be a cheap short term 2b option though. He claims his immediate goal is to make the All-star team. If i were him my immediate goal would be to make, you know, a team.

by spencegrif on Oct 28, 2008 3:42 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

if we signed marcus

brian might accept a trade. That could be a fun outfield…

the enemy's gate is down.

by SleepyCA on Oct 28, 2008 5:58 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

3B allen craig for SS jason donald

why aren’t trades like this happening more frequently? both 23 and on the same carrer path at the same level.
very close as equal value in return, imo. both org have the need, per position, and the surplus depth to trade from.
what’s the holdup? too easy?

by ball in play on Oct 31, 2008 1:15 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

donald was a 2nd rounder

he is on a philly depth chart behind rollins, utley, bartlett. could be acquirable if PHI could address 3B w/ glaus and go for a repeat. i gotta think they’d try to upgrade feliz/dobbs platoon with glaus if the budget allowed it. glauss’ bat could replace the possible loss of burrell.

don’t now what fair value in return is, in a glaus / donald trade. would think 6 yrs of donald holds very good value, but “others or $ ", would balance it.
if stl could put a better "ss of the future” in the org at AA, it would be a reap the benefits after 09, plan. i can see donalds offensive upside, but know nothing of his D.
could look at it as losing glauss’ 124 ops+ for 09, or a way to replace izturis ops+ long term. with freese/wallace in the chain, and a donald addition at ss, it could possibly make the 2010 left side infield, more productive than the 08. and yrs to come……freese / mather at 3b in 09 shouldn’t replace glaus 08 production, but they might come close. especially if glaus falls off slightly…….random ramblings :)

by ball in play on Oct 31, 2008 3:19 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

for what its worth

most don’t think donald has the range to stick at short.

Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue.

by Dave Barry on Oct 31, 2008 3:28 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

puts a damper on "ss of the future"

hope for the best and prepare for the worst? move to 2b if necessary?
a near ready middle infielder could really help this org.
like his numbers alot. like craig and freeses’ alot too. hope mo finds a way to shift talent to middle infield.

by ball in play on Oct 31, 2008 3:59 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Jason LaRue

Resigned for one year and $950,000.

Why do teams refuse to go this route for backup catchers? I doubt that guy would cost much. This guy may hold out for a bit more, but can probably throw better.

Anywho, LaRue did a respectable job back there. I think that the eventual situation will have Anderson doing a one-year apprenticeship under Molina, then getting dealt.

"Your Holiness, I'm Joseph Medwick. I, too, used to be a Cardinal."-Joe Medwick, to Pope Pius XII.

by redbirdnation8206 on Oct 31, 2008 6:24 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

eh.

League minimum’s $450,000. The money’s really not much of a concern.

Though I guess this means that Bryan Anderson’s probably not gonna be on the MLB roster in 2008, FWIW.

They say that it's never too late, but you don't get any younger...

by Valatan on Oct 31, 2008 8:36 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.
Start posting about the Cardinals »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Photo_29_small
Wrist injuries (we've earned this)
Small
The pitches the Cardinals throw.
Stl_ia_card_45_-_dark_small
Bernie *loves* RBIs as a measuring stick for offensive talent
Photo_29_small
The hiatal hernia (Or why you should stop worrying)

Recent FanPosts

Small
More Halladay
Ozzie_s_jacked__small
Tickets to All-Star Sunday w/ Futures Game!
Images_small
Rasmus miscellany
Small
Cardinals and Injuries/Announcements
Cardsvscubs2_small
Cardinals express interest in Roy Halladay.
Leopold_butter_scotch_southpark_small
Brewers imploding?
Small
CARDINALS/DOMINICAN BASEBALL DOCUMENTARY
Small
Five players I'm watching in July

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managers

Jack_benny_small DanUpBaby

Editors

Bender_small azruavatar

Adam1_small chuckb

Ulquiorra2_small the red baron