Viva El Birdos: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Network Message: 50% Off: CBS/SB Nation Fantasy Baseball

shortstop

Jerry Crasnick at ESPN says:

Shortstop David Eckstein is a serious long shot to return, and Cardinals fans would love Kennedy to leave town right along with him. But the Cardinals owe Kennedy $7.5 million over the next two seasons, so it appears they're stuck with him.

The new hot rumor has the Cardinals pursuing Braves shortstop Edgar Renteria, a local favorite who left St. Louis as a free agent in 2004. Renteria, who's hitting .333, is dispensable with the emergence of young infielder Yunel Escobar in Atlanta. But the Cardinals won't trade Rasmus, who's in line to replace Edmonds as their center fielder in 2009, and they don't appear to have enough young pitching to match up with the Braves.

Renteria is the sentimental pick, and I know we're known for embracing our former players, but think back to '04 when Edgar defected to the Red Sox for supposedly a few million dollars over the course of a 4 year contract.  I realize the details of those negotiations can never be fully public, but I still believe he left for close to if not less than $1M/yr, and took a shot at the organization on his way out.  I can't find the exact quote, but something about how he felt more "loved" by the Red Sox.  That didn't sit well with me, and obviously I've held a grudge.  Maybe that makes me the exception amongst Cards fans.

In one year, Eckstein seems to have gone from fan-favorite scrappy World Series MVP to injury-prone wimpy old veteran.  Am I missing something?  Look at what Eckstein has done.  His health has been inconsistent this year, but he's hitting .307 where his previous career high is .294, and he's only 32 years old.  His FP and RF are down, but that is likely a result of his back problems.  You could make an argument that those very problems are enough to make him too risky, but I'll leave that up to the team doctors to decide.  I think if he's healthy, I'd love to see him back on a 2 year deal at around $3-3.5M/yr, maybe with a 3rd year option.

Poll
What should the Cardinals do at SS in '08?
Re-sign Eckstein
16 votes
Trade for Renteria
54 votes
Give the starting job to Brendan Ryan
64 votes

134 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 52 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Rent vs Eckstein
I love Eckstein and I loved Edgar so to me my like of the players is out of the equation.

Edgar is better with the bat and better with the glove.  The only thing I think Eckstein is better at is not striking out and maybe the running game (Eck is 9-1 SB-CS Edgar is 11-1 so since I can't quantify first to thirds I can't really say who really is better since I haven't seen Rent in years as for K% Eck strikes out 5% of the time but also only walks 5.2% while Rent is 15.6% K and 8.6%BB).  I just feel that Edgar gives us a better chance to win and Ryan isn't polished enough to be counted on as an everyday but I think he should be given a shot before Miles definitely.

by StLHugo on Sep 26, 2007 5:14 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Billy Hall
What about trying for Billy Hall?   It seems the Brewers are now in favor of playing Corey Hart in centerfield.   Now Billy is out of a position again.   Will they attempt to convert him to leftfield.   Maybe back to third and convert Braun to leftfield?  

Perhaps the Brewers would sell a little low on Billy's down year and we could put him back at SS.

by RedbirdRay on Sep 26, 2007 5:44 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

agreed
i think hall would be a great addition. wasn't he also the first player to hr in busch iii?

by erik on Sep 26, 2007 6:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hall...
He's absolutely brutal with the glove, and has really only ever had one good year.  He's always been closer to what we are seeing now than what he showed in '06.  Can't see any reason to even entertain acquiring him.

No thanks.

"I'm hungry. Not for food. Just for baseball" Amaury Cazana Marti

by bobbyballgame1 on Sep 26, 2007 11:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not so fast...
He isn't so hot in the outfield with his glove...and not really so hot at third either.

However, at SS isn't bad.   In 2006, when he had almost a full season at SS, UZR had him only one run under average.   Other metrics had him similar.   Nothing great, but average defensively.

While he certainly had a career year at the plate that year, he's not quite as bad as he is this year either.    An .800 OPS SS with average defense is definitely not the same thing we've been marching out there.

by RedbirdRay on Sep 27, 2007 8:37 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I never did get
the fact that some Cards' fans treated Renteria so miserably after he left -- traitor, all that silly stuff.  He got a better offer from the Sox and took it as many other free agents do and as we all would if given the chance.  The difference, as I recall, was $8M over 4 years but that's not really the point.  Players do this all the time.  Cards' fans don't look upon Rolen as a traitor for asking out of Philly and then signing a free agent contract with us.  It's a business.

Additionally, Renteria's comment was that he felt that the Sox wanted him more than the Cards did.  Guess what -- they offered him more money than the Cards did; they did want him more and put more $$ on the table to show it.  So I don't get why Cards' fans still get all wound up about that.  I'd take Renteria back -- he's a very good SS and would be a big improvement over what we have now.  The reasons for not taking him back have nothing to do w/ feeling betrayed over getting our feelings hurt when he left town.  They have everything to do w/ the $7 M (I think) the Braves owe him next year -- can we afford it considering all the help we need in the rotation (I think the Sox are picking up $3M or so) and what do the Braves want in return?

I'm not sure he's worth all that we'd have to give up but I'm sure not going to get all worked up b/c he left the Cardinals acting as any of us would do given the circumstances.

by chuckb on Sep 26, 2007 5:53 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Rolen
was traded here.  He signed an extension with us.  And Philly fans hate him.

by spants on Sep 26, 2007 6:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He forced their hands
and then signed w/ us as a free agent. We don't look at him as disloyal or as if he betrayed his organization by asking out. He did more to get away from the Phils than Renteria did to get away from the Cards but we don't look at him as disloyal or as a person who's not a team player.

by chuckb on Sep 27, 2007 11:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree
that he forced their hands.  To be traded, one must be under contract.  Early 2002, Rolen was awarded a one-year arbitration contract with the Phillies.  He rejected their following offer of a contract extension and was traded to St. Louis in July 2002.  He was playing under his Philadelphia contract, which was transferred to St. Louis.  In September 2002, he signed an extension.  He wasn't a free agent, though he would have been by the end of the season.  It never got that far.

I think it's pretty natural for a typical fan to "hate" the guy who left their team for more money somewhere else.  I don't agree with it, but it's not surprising that people are that petty.

by spants on Sep 28, 2007 2:39 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I can't figure
how anyone would sign Eck as a SS. His range is just gone. I would laugh at anyone who signs him as a SS. He should be moved to 2nd yesterday.
"Show me a guy who takes his time on the mound and I'll show you a damned loser." - Leo Durocher

by mattyfrommo on Sep 26, 2007 6:00 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

he's a great player
but he doesn't solve anything --- he's a 1-year rental. at the end of the season, the cards are right back in the same boat.

the cardinals' problem is that they are not bringing in (or developing) enough guys who can nail down a position for 3 to 5 years. that's exactly what they did after 2003 --- they acquired 3 years' worth of marquis and suppan, stabilizing the rotation; they bought pujols out of his arbitration years and guaranteed he'd be in st louis for another 8 years; and they developed molina (6-year starter), calero, taguchi, and haren (coulda been . . . . ). plus they added wainwright via trade (who will hopefully provide 6 years' worth of pitching). those moves weren't just one-year moves --- they took a far-sighted approach and set themselves up for many years of competitiveness.

their recent off-seasons haven't worked out as well. the 3-year free-agent solutions they bought after 2005 (encarnacion and looper) have just been so-so. their internal promotions have been hit-or-miss; duncan and wainwright are successes, the jury's out on everyone else. rolen and edmonds got old. carp and mulder got hurt.

so the overall talent base has steadily declined, and adding 1 year of edgar renteria does nothing to halt that slide. on the contrary, it probably would accelerate the trend, because we'd have to give up 4 to 6 years' worth of some young player(s) for our 1 year of edgar.

i like renteria a lot. it made sense when they acquired him in 1999 --- he solved the shortstop position for 6 years. that's the kind of move the cards need to be looking for --- bringing in players who will be around for a while and build up the talent base.

by lboros on Sep 26, 2007 6:07 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

thus this year there first draft pick was
a shortstop. i may be out a limb a bit here, but jose martinez maybe able to handle the job in a year or two. of course, that doesn't help in 2008, however. therefore, a year or renteria isn't a horrid idea, just not worth selling the farm over.

by erik on Sep 26, 2007 6:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

but i think they'd have to sell the farm
or at least, an important piece of it. if the braves just hang onto edgar and let him walk after 2008, he'll be a Type A free agent and return a couple of high draft picks as compensation. so it seems unlikely the braves would give him to st louis for 2d- or 3d-line prospects; they'll get a better return for him just by letting him walk.

if the cards can get him on the cheap in a salary dump, then yeah --- why not.

by lboros on Sep 26, 2007 10:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

the only thing he does
is buy the team a year, when the free agent market for SS is better -- Furcal, Cabrera, Renteria.  I agree that it doesn't solve the longer term problem and, b/c of the cost involved in $$ and prospects, probably isn't a great idea.  But he does provide a 1 year stopgap at the position until there are better options on the table.

That said, those SS's will require a 3-4 year free agent contract -- one they will finish in their mid-30's.  That's probably not a commitment worth making.  But the Renteria trade would also give Walt a year to trade for a younger SS if he's unable to find one this offseason.  It's, essentially, putting the SS on a credit card for a year.  Given the team's financial resources and prospect resources, it's probably not a great idea but it's better than re-signing Eckstein.

by chuckb on Sep 26, 2007 6:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm worried about giving up young talent too
for short term gains from a 32 year old.  I'd rather find someone we could have for 3-5 years.  Now if we could get more years out of Renteria, I might change my mind.  But with all the injuries we've been facing, 32 years is sounding old(er).

On the other hand, I love Renteria.  He was the shortsstop on the Marlins team when they won the WS in 1997 and he was my favorite player (I lived in FL at the time).  I've followed him ever since.  He always gives 100% of himself.  And we do need a big bat in the lineup.

by nycardfan on Sep 26, 2007 6:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

As great of a player as Eck is,
he is NO Edgar. Yeah, Eck is hitting .307, Edgar is hitting .333. Eckstein has 22? errors,Edgar has 11. David has missed 44 games, Renteria has missed 35. In almost every hitting category, Renteria is better than Eckstein. I would rather see Yadi playing shortstop than Eckstein this year. Eckstein has a poor arm, and makes way too many errors.
bring in livian hernandez!

by dunc4life on Sep 26, 2007 6:08 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Eck
might have a little more range than Yadi. I do like Eck, I just wish he was our 2nd baseman next year if  Hoff doesn't take it.
"Show me a guy who takes his time on the mound and I'll show you a damned loser." - Leo Durocher

by mattyfrommo on Sep 26, 2007 6:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yea, I'd rather have Eck than Kennedy
at second base.  I know Kennedy was performing well but he has not this year.  He didn't look sharp defensively as well as offensively.

But I think if Brendan Ryan is not at SS, I'd rather have Ryan at 2nd than the other two.  He has such fast hands for double plays.  And I really would like him in the lineup.  As I've said before, he adds zip to our team.  And we definitely need more zip.

by nycardfan on Sep 26, 2007 6:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yes
At this point, Ryan's speed is his most attractive quality.  I agree there completely - we need a lot more speed.

I had great hopes Ryan would mature more quickly, but he hasn't developed the plate discipline to be the leadoff guy and seems prone to boneheaded mistakes.  That being said, I personally wouldn't be disappointed if we stuck him in there anyway in hopes that he would develop into the regular SS/leadoff hitter/base thief we need.  But I don't see it happening if Tony comes back.

by hit and run on Sep 27, 2007 10:22 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

eckstein
is a miserable shortstop, does not have the arm strength or range to cover that very important position.

is also a miserable leadoff hitter, he has absolutely zero speed and only hits singles.

i dont know who said it earlier but i too will laugh at any team that signs him as their starting SS.

by Dankston on Sep 26, 2007 6:36 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

also.....
regarding renteria, i think hes really over-rated, especially to cards fans. everyone remembers his phenomenal '03 (i think it was '03) season, but he has been declining since then, theres really not much reason to trade any prospect for one year of him

by Dankston on Sep 26, 2007 6:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

actually
Renteria's two seasons in hotlanta have been really good. OPS was .797 last year and well over .860 this year. he has also only made 24 errors total during that time.

the only 'decline' year he's had was the disasterous 2005 campaign in boston.

I'd gladly take him back.

10-time World Champs!

by TheFranchise9 on Sep 26, 2007 6:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Renteria's OPS+
1996 104
1997  80  
1998  86
1999  85
2000  94
2001  78
2002 116
2003 131
2004  90
2005  91
2006 107
2007 126

Since 1999, his slugging percentage has dipped below .400 only twice, one of those years was in BOS.  Renteria is aging, as is ARod and every other ball player.  But that doesn't mean his production is slipping.  He's looking pretty good to me.  And he looks a hell of a lot better than any of our other options, especially since our pitching isn't likely to improve much.  We need a solid bat in the lineup, and Renteria provides that.  

As for one-year rentals, I'm okay with them.  We've got the flexibility to let him walk, or we could lock him into an extension.  Who knows?  Any other SS is going to require a multi-year deal.

by spants on Sep 26, 2007 6:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would rather
have Renteria than Jeter! You want to talk over rated! What is Jeter making 20m?

by nybirdfan on Sep 26, 2007 9:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I feel like a broken record
Please see my signature.
Re-acquire Edgar Renteria

by Mr Redbird on Sep 26, 2007 7:08 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Give me Ryan
He's cheap.

He's energetic.

He's outstanding at defense.

He's young.

I'd much rather spend the money from Eck on a pitcher, and would much rather keep whichever prospects we'd need to dish out to get Renteria. It's time for the Brendan Ryan era to begin.

On with the youth movement!

by aet15 on Sep 26, 2007 7:14 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Agree, we need to stop trading away prospects
Until the farm recovers.  Renteria has a outstanding year which was out of line from his normal production.  He is unlikely to match this level next year.  No need to buy high, sell low.

We have a surplus of outfielders and relief pitchers.  We need to convert that into a SP.

Realistically without Mulder or Carp next year we need to view it as building for 09.  

by DriverZn on Sep 26, 2007 7:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

that makes a lot of sense
especially given our enormous pitching needs .  I'd be very happy (and surprised) if Brendan Ryan were announced as our SS next year.

by nycardfan on Sep 26, 2007 7:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's not
near the hitter Edgar is...

Having Renteria would ease the pressure put on the MV3 & Dunc and Ankiel.  Remember when our lineup was a murderer's row of sorts?  We've got way too many holes, way too many slow, slappy hitters (Ryan is a fast, slappy hitter, but still...), way too many former Angels infielders.

by spants on Sep 26, 2007 7:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well I know Ryan was exceeding
his numbers at AAA but he was hitting between 330 and 350 most of his time in the majors, similar to Renteria (minus the homeruns which is a big minus).

Renteria did not have a big bat when he started as a rookie.  Perhaps Ryan has similar possibilities.

by nycardfan on Sep 26, 2007 7:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Did you know
that Brendan Ryan's middle name is WOOD?  

If he keeps up his current level of play, we're looking at Eck, Jr.  He's fallen off quite a bit.

Between AA & AAA, Renteria had 9 homeruns.  Between AA & AAA, Ryan had 2.  Renteria's slugging % was higher.  Still, Ryan had 4 HR pretty quickly after getting called up...  Who knows whether Ryan will have as much pop as Renteria, but it would be nice.  

I think we should trade for Renteria.  Ryan plays SS on Edgar's days off, and splits time with Kennedy at 2B.  If his offense falls off, don't play him as much.  Meanwhile, he can learn from el Capitan.

by spants on Sep 26, 2007 7:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just noticed
that Brendan Ryan is 25 years old.  Renteria was 20 years old his first year in MLB.  With that knowledge, I'm betting that Ryan won't have the pop that Renteria has.

God, he looks 12.

by spants on Sep 26, 2007 8:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Will he really?
He's a rental player coming off a year of injuries . . .

You know what would ease the pressure off the MV3, Dunc, and Ankiel even more? Solid pitching!

Ryan can hold his own in the batters box, and won't be a whole lot worse than Edgar. By not signing Eckstein, and not trading for Renteria, we'll have much more wiggle room to bring in a pitcher and not be diminishing our prospects either.

We're not convincingly great enough of a team to waste prospects on a rental player quite yet. We'd be much better off using Ryan at short, and signing a dependable pitcher.

On with the youth movement!

by aet15 on Sep 26, 2007 11:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pitchers
No pitcher is dependable with a bad defense behind him. In particular, Duncan's pitch to contact army. This year's group of pitchers wasn't as bad as they looked. When you have to get 31 or so outs per game, the task gets tougher.

Unless you think Duncan is going after a 250 strikeout guy.

How about handin' me another helpin' of those mashed taters...thank you very much!

by Elvis on Sep 27, 2007 9:28 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Are you kidding?
Yes, they were as bad as they looked.

Wellemeyer, Maroth, and Pineiro were all lost causes on other teams before coming here.

Thompson and Looper were middle relievers.

Wells was on the verge of retirement entering the year.

This was NOT a formidable starting rotation, no matter what defense was behind it.

On with the youth movement!

by aet15 on Sep 30, 2007 1:40 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

AAAAAmmmmeeeeennnnn!
I have been a big fan of ryan since he came up. I am ready to let the youngster have his chance, we needed more pitching. If ownership wants to keep payroll under 100 mil, you have to cut corners some where, why not here? Even if he does come down off his good numbers, him at 350k (or whatever) is better than 7 mil.
"Textbooks are Soviet propaganda" - Rev. Jerry Falwell

by elirock83 on Sep 27, 2007 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

renteria
bobby cox wants reyes. package reyes with a couple prospects. (not rasmus or anderson). and they can get him. the main reason is the braves want to go with their young shortstop.and save money. and i agree renteria would take alot of pressure off the lineup. he is the chosen one that will bring to the cardinals lineup
HURRY BACK CARP AND MULDER

by LaRussa4President on Sep 26, 2007 7:49 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

reallly
not sure how edgar helps our pitching woes. Ryan, Eck, it really isnt that big a difference. There isnt a young shortstop on a team thats looking to give him up that we can sign/ trade for in a reasonable deal. We might as well take the 2nd base approach to short for the time being until another renteria type falls into our lap. As long as the player is adequate (and both are) and we restore the MV3(pujols and anyone else who wants to step up) our hitting will be fine. Now only if we had some good young sp's

by jacksonian on Sep 26, 2007 7:51 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Defense
This is how Renteria, Jack Wilson, Orlando Cabrerra, Guzman...Ryan...heck any of these guys would help. I like Eckstein, but the Cards' defense up the middle of the infield was the worst in baseball. No range, lots of errors, and a ton of plays just not made. (that result in missed DPs and infield hits.) All of those things spark and keep rallies going. Great defense up the middle, and every pitcher on the Cardinals' staff becomes much better.
How about handin' me another helpin' of those mashed taters...thank you very much!

by Elvis on Sep 27, 2007 9:23 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'll take a Renteria '03 and tade...
I didn't like seeing him leave, but didn't think it was worth the price to keep him from the Sox either.  The worst of that was having him drag out the decision until after winter meetings.  We were lucky  the Angels decided they needed Cabrera, and Eck proved to be a good pickup.  First year he was clutch w/risp and turned the dp's with Grudz. 2nd year he gets WS MVP.  3rd year he's on the DL, has  20 E's.  He is done at SS, and we're already stuck at 2B.

I'd gladly have Rent back, but the acquisition effort had best be applied to SP.

Play Roy Hobbs Everyday!

by Birds on the Bat on Sep 26, 2007 9:31 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree
that starting pitching should be the organizations number one focus.  But if we're a 2-seam organization, we're gonna need to field a solid defense.  Renteria is an upgrade from Eck in several areas.

by spants on Sep 26, 2007 9:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

well that's certainly true
it's been a big problem for our pitchers this year.

by nycardfan on Sep 27, 2007 12:55 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Renteria, etc.
If, and only if, Reyes plus a marginal prospect would net you Edgar, then I would love to see El Capitan back in 08.  It was a huge blow when he left, (although Eck did a nice job in 05, a little less each succeeding year) and it would be really nice to see him wearing the Birds again.  However, if it would take any more than that, the Braves can just hold on to him.  The farm system is in the shape it is because of trades like this.  (Admittedly, the worst scouting department I've ever seen has something to do with it, but the point remains.)  Even if the Cards thought they could sign Edgar to a deal for a few years after they traded for him, giving up any kind of promising talent just pushes the (finally) developing farm system back again.  

In the end, just starting Brendan Ryan at short next season nets us a pretty sizable upgrade defensively.  His bat is still a little bit of a question mark, but I think he would be at least serviceable.  The best use of resources this offseason would probably be to focus on the starting rotation.  Ryan boosts your infield defense; that helps whatever pitcher(s) you bring in here.  See if Kennedy bounces back, or give Hoffpauir a shot at producing at 2b.  This team has got to find a way to bolster the rotation, at least a little.  

To review:  if the Braves just want to move him for salary relief and to unblock one of their kids, then bring Renteria back.  If the Braves want good value, talent wise, for him though, walk away.  Just walk away.  There are bigger needs on this team than another player in his 30s.  

Oh my god! Was that an iceberg? No, these chairs are just all out of whack.

by the red baron on Sep 27, 2007 7:25 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Figgins
I love renteria - he was fantastic for us, was a great clubhouse guy and I'd be pleased if the cardinals reacquired him (barring that we don't give up to much for the one year left on his contract, i think we can all agree he probably would test the market). But the player I'd really like the cardinals to go after is Chone Figgins, who was almost traded on two or three seperate occasions last offseason. The Angels have numerous stud third base and shortstop prospects waiting in the wings (Aybar, Wood), and they need what the cardinals have. I want the cardinals to trade Duncan and Reyes for Ervin Santana, Figgins and a good prospect. We need some speed at the top of our line up too, this would give us the kind of energy at lead off any team would covet.

by jnangle472 on Sep 27, 2007 10:20 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Either 2B or adios
I'd only sign Eck for 2B, with the plan of getting rid of Kennedy, which might be possible because he's cheap (but so is his production). Eck has killed the Cards defensively this year, with very negative impact on an already sub-par pitching staff. He has no range left, and, I believe, his 20 errors are the most he's committed since being here (and in fewer games).
    Also, I'd be against getting Renteria. Another 10+ million player who is on the downslope (has Walt learned anything from Edmonds and Rolen? Let Ryan play short and use the money on pitching. If they don't think Ryan is the answer then get a defensive shortstop elsewhere.

by vinniefromjersey on Sep 27, 2007 11:09 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Where is
this "downslope" of Renteria's?

by spants on Sep 27, 2007 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed
OPS+ for Edgar from 2002 to the present
116, 131, 90, 91, 107, 125

If anything he is in an upswing, now his last upswing was followed by a downswing but I don't know how you follow a .333/.391/.471 season with a downswing yet somehow he did that in 04 as well.  Edgar is an interesting animal but if he follows his last downswing after his great 03 to an ok but not great 04 then we could expect close to his 04 line of .287/.327/.401

by StLHugo on Sep 27, 2007 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly
And he adds pop to the lineup, in addition to his better-than-Eck defense.

by spants on Sep 27, 2007 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No Downslope to Rent's Numbers
but, we obviously didn't fare too well negotiating a new contract the last time.  We don't know what those discussions were really like then, but I'll bet there are some, perhaps Rent included, that don't want it to go like that again.

getting him back in the walk year of the contract that took him to the bosox just doesn't sound fruitful.  could they work a trade to include an extension directly?  Not likely.

like i said, I'd like to have the '03 model again.

Play Roy Hobbs Everyday!

by Birds on the Bat on Sep 28, 2007 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I've been a fan of his since his early days
with the Marlins.  He has said in interviews that the environment he works in makes a big difference to his performance.  He really did not like Boston and thought that influenced how he played.  

Perhaps that is one of the reasons that he'd like to return to St. Louis.  If he knows that he plays well in certain environments and with certain teams (St. Louis being one), that may be something we can use in bargaining with him for a possible extension.

by nycardfan on Sep 28, 2007 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: downslope
Three years ago when the Yankees showed some interest in Edmonds prior to their signing Damon I similarly advocated trading him for either Cano or Wang and an outfielder who could be a defensive centerfielder. I believe it was lboros who indicated at the time the Cards were asking for both Cano and Wang and the Yanks said no. I was shouted down in similar fashion then. Renteria's downslope is his age, his increasing stints on the dl, and his cost, which limits improvement in other areas. Don't get me wrong, if DeWitt turned into Steinbrenner I'd be all for it.

by vinniefromjersey on Sep 29, 2007 8:42 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Except
Renteria does NOT have the injury history that Edmonds has, nor does he play a position that finds him diving from full sprints headlong into walls.  But I see your point.

by spants on Sep 29, 2007 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.
Start posting about the Cardinals »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

Cbs_fantasy_baseball_promo

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Ozzie_small
VEB Needs a Tagline
Photo_29_small
Rich Hill still has two arms for some reason.
Cardinals_spring_baseball_small
2010: A Baseball Odyssey
Pcb_sunset_web_small
What does the BA Top 100 tell us?

Recent FanPosts

St
1985 Don Denkinger bad call photo
74591_missouri_state_small
(Another) Fantasy League
Images_small
Wednesday Morning Fun Fact
Cardinal70-48_small
2010 Cardinal Approval Ratings
Lkkn__2__small
 " Baseball fantasy or reality "
Lkkn__2__small
Es el Busch Stadium amigo de los Pitchers o lo es HOK SPORT ?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Jack_benny_small DanUpBaby

Editors

Images_small azruavatar

Trigun_001_small the red baron

Adam1_small chuckb