Shelley Duncan has a little fun...
Not sure if this has been discussed, but I found it to be rather humorous.

story
The whining, sappy response from the boston paper makes it even more entertaining. 'Oh, the poor kid! scarred for life.' welcome to the most unfriendly rivalry in sports, kid.
0 recs |
93
comments
Comments
discussion already in process
like i said over there: if any adult abused my kid's feelings this way, said adult would have to explain himself to me. and i would be skeptical.
i think picking on 10-year-olds is cowardly.
by lboros on Sep 17, 2007 11:31 AM EDT 0 recs
your opinion carries
by _pistol_ on
Sep 17, 2007 11:47 AM EDT
up
0 recs
I agree
by aet15 on
Sep 18, 2007 1:07 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Main thread
by StLHugo on Sep 17, 2007 11:32 AM EDT 0 recs
I think it`s funny
He`s not happy right now but later on down the road he`s gonna love having that autograph.
he`s gonna show it off to all his friend`s he`ll love having it.
I guarantee you if D-Lee signed Cards Suck to me I would LOVE IT that would be so awesome.
by Calhoun on Sep 17, 2007 11:58 AM EDT 0 recs
exactly
by _pistol_ on
Sep 17, 2007 12:10 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I also agree
by SethWestern on
Sep 17, 2007 12:20 PM EDT
up
0 recs
what's funny about being mean to a kid?
by lboros on
Sep 17, 2007 1:05 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Like i said before
My point is, if the kid's Mom had chuckled, remained upbeat and explained the joke to him - instead making a beeline for the pressbox - all would be well. Given and opportunity to react like an adult, a 10 will gladly do so. Kids take their queues from those around them.
by _pistol_ on
Sep 17, 2007 1:27 PM EDT
up
0 recs
pulling a prank on a niece or nephew
that doesn't make it ok for me to act like an ass with every kid i happen to meet.
by lboros on
Sep 17, 2007 1:45 PM EDT
up
0 recs
i think our perception of the
regardless, the mother's actions only enabled the child as a victim. Perhap Duncan was being mean. In that case, then shame on him. But the mother still should have taken the high road instead of going to the press and justifying the natural reaction to fell sorry for himself.
But I bet an ebay auction and a couple thousand dollars will make this a positive experience for the lad.
by _pistol_ on
Sep 17, 2007 1:58 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Perceptions
I imagined it like pistol did that he was trying to joke around and kid the kid and have fun with him and not to beat up on him. Shelley is 28 years old, most 20 somethings love to kid around but some are complete A-Holes I think that is where it could have been taking the wrong way.
by StLHugo on
Sep 17, 2007 2:34 PM EDT
up
0 recs
His parents have to be collasal douchebags
I thought it was funny, I think they are intentionally taking this the wrong way in order to start shit and get in the paper.
by JI on
Sep 17, 2007 2:47 PM EDT
up
0 recs
it wouldn't have been their decision
the photo pose wouldn't have been the parents' call either; that'd be the photographer's call.
by lboros on
Sep 17, 2007 11:02 PM EDT
up
0 recs
This will all be much funnier
by blove121 on Sep 17, 2007 1:40 PM EDT 0 recs
This is hilarious
Whatever. I say congratulations. Shelley Duncan has officially added fuel to an already volatile rivalry. Which, by the way, is most certainly GOOD for baseball. I can't wait to see the Yanks/Sox playoff matchup!!
by tpacardsfan on Sep 17, 2007 3:30 PM EDT 0 recs
Talk about over reacting
And why was a Red Sox fan asking a Yankee player for an autograph anyway? I'm surprised Duncan was nice enough to acknowledge the kid in the first place.
by JShell73 on Sep 17, 2007 3:31 PM EDT 0 recs
Players like to have fun too
by JShell73 on Sep 17, 2007 3:33 PM EDT 0 recs
I'm inclined to believe
by matty on Sep 17, 2007 4:11 PM EDT 0 recs
when you guys have kids of your own
by lboros on Sep 17, 2007 4:16 PM EDT 0 recs
Question.
by champion on
Sep 17, 2007 4:22 PM EDT
up
0 recs
then it's unfortunate
it happens to me, i'm chuckling. it happens to a 10 year old, it's a shitty thing to do.
as i tell my students, "i was just joking" is not an excuse for every crappy thing that you do, regardless of intent.
by sdesserman on
Sep 17, 2007 5:37 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Clarification
that you are unable to recognize the difference between writing this 'joke' to a 10 year old and an adult college graduate.
You must not have understood my statement. You should reread it.
as i tell my students, "i was just joking" is not an excuse for every crappy thing that you do, regardless of intent.
You're assuming what Duncan did was "crappy". I'm glad you're using such language in front of your students. You might be the next person in the paper if that mother has anything to say about it.
by champion on
Sep 17, 2007 5:45 PM EDT
up
0 recs
oh, i understood
it's not a matter of taste, it's a matter of treating kids with respect.
by sdesserman on
Sep 17, 2007 5:52 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Nope.
So the VAST majority of people who have posted on this website today who agree with me that it was a pretty funny gag by Duncan, given the context of the matter, show an "inability to understand that playing a prank on a 10 year old is not funny"?
it may have been intended as humor, but it comes off as a mean-spirited attempt to make a kid feel bad.
You're in the minority on this one and rightfully so. Again, read the wealth of comments on this site today and you'll see that.
Lighten up. You're overreacting.
by champion on
Sep 17, 2007 6:14 PM EDT
up
0 recs
The VAST majority agree with you...
I'm not a particularly sensitive soul, nor do I think my son is particularly "fragile" but if anyone did something like that to him, I'd be livid. There is a world of difference between pranking a 10 year old and a 28 year old.
Are his parents overreacting? Maybe. But that doesn't mean Duncan wasn't being an ass. I'm sure he thought it was funny...pro athletes are notorious for not living in the same world as the rest of us.
All that being said, you must find Bonds' mocking of Dan Peltier in front of his son hysterical.
http://deadspin.com/sports/baseball/jeff-pearlman-on-his-subject-barry-bonds-281739.php
by svengali on
Sep 17, 2007 7:10 PM EDT
up
0 recs
True, but...
...that doesn't mean he WAS being an ass, either.
by champion on
Sep 17, 2007 8:48 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Question.
by champion on
Sep 17, 2007 8:48 PM EDT
up
0 recs
my son
by erik on
Sep 17, 2007 5:43 PM EDT
up
0 recs
By the time my kid's 10,
by baw on
Sep 17, 2007 5:53 PM EDT
up
0 recs
they're all fragile at 10
by lboros on
Sep 17, 2007 5:59 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Agree.
partic around adults who they look up to.
You're right. His mother did the child a disservice by overreacting.
by champion on
Sep 17, 2007 6:15 PM EDT
up
0 recs
wait, so
by baw on
Sep 17, 2007 6:19 PM EDT
up
0 recs
The context of the event is everything
Even if it was meant poorly, the kid is going to be find, and the joke's on Duncan...but I doubt he was being mean. Why would he go through the trouble of signing the kid's paper, on the road in hostile territory where he likely signed many other autographs as well, if he simply wanted to be an asshole to this one kid?
Unlikely...although it speaks to how bad the Cardinals are if on September 17th we are talking about this instead of an upcoming series. When does the hot stove start???
by cardzfan24 on Sep 17, 2007 5:35 PM EDT 0 recs
good grief
good freakin grief. lighten up people.
why is this even a topic?
by gdm426 on Sep 17, 2007 6:51 PM EDT 0 recs
somebody has to explain something to me
same thing if zambrano mouths off at a cardinal batter; or if an espn commentator says a disparaging word about the cardinals; or if an announcer from san diego makes a crack about hillbillies in camaros; or if a commenter at Bleed Cubbie Blue says something bad about our team or our fans.
things of that nature make people around here very angry and offend their sensibilities. but nobody gets angry when a player, in a clumsy attempt to be funny, effectively disses a 10-year-old boy to his face? everybody thinks that's funny?
it just seems, you know, inconsistent with the reactions people have around here in other situations.
by lboros on Sep 17, 2007 10:08 PM EDT 0 recs
He wrote "Red Sox suck"
And I don't really get offended by any of that other stuff.
Basically all this is is the boy's parents being media whores and pimping themselves out a newspaper in order to have some facetime. What type of awful people does it take to get in the position where they are calling up a freakin' newspaper, and having their kid pose for frowny-face pictures.
As far as as I'm concerned, this is a non-incident, and the boy's parents are causing more harm to their child that Duncan could have possibly inflicted even if he wrote: "You are pathetic douchebag and I hate you, signed Shelly Duncan."
by JI on
Sep 17, 2007 10:52 PM EDT
up
0 recs
i understand what he wrote
that being the case, maybe a parent's not so out of line to get riled up when the comment "red sox suck" is hand-delivered to her red-sox-loving kid directly from a ballplayer.
by lboros on
Sep 17, 2007 11:01 PM EDT
up
0 recs
All I'm saying is
To quote Jeff at Lookout Landing:
"I don't understand this. The kid was at a Sox/Yankees game. He was basically going to have his virgin ears raped for four hours whether he got the hilarious autograph or not."
For his parent to make a story out of this and whore their child out is hypocritical at best. Dude's got way bigger problems.
by JI on
Sep 17, 2007 11:06 PM EDT
up
0 recs
i think jeff misses the point
duncan took a potshot at a kid and deserved to be called out for it. i wouldn't have run to the press, but i have no problem w/ the parents for having done so.
by lboros on
Sep 17, 2007 11:13 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I have sympathy for the kid
by JI on
Sep 17, 2007 11:26 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Wow
by spants on
Sep 18, 2007 12:19 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Not Once.
It just seems, you know, consistent with the reaction I've had around here in other situations.
by champion on
Sep 17, 2007 11:01 PM EDT
up
0 recs
got any more stories about
by lboros on
Sep 17, 2007 11:14 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I don't see
by cardzfan24 on
Sep 17, 2007 11:49 PM EDT
up
0 recs
i responded that way
by lboros on
Sep 17, 2007 11:59 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Wrong.
by champion on
Sep 18, 2007 12:03 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Nope.
It was a hypothetical question. You must be quite the parent.
by champion on
Sep 18, 2007 12:02 AM EDT
up
0 recs
i'm not insecure about my parenting
by lboros on
Sep 18, 2007 12:17 AM EDT
up
0 recs
and if you're merely posing a hypothetical
by lboros on
Sep 18, 2007 12:20 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Equal.
by champion on
Sep 18, 2007 12:26 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Response.
I made it clear earlier today that I do not have children of my own. You replied directly to the post where I stated that. Your reply in this thread within the past half hour was not acceptable according to your own guidelines. You attacked me personally and not my ideas. For that, you should be held accountable by the community.
by champion on
Sep 18, 2007 12:23 AM EDT
up
0 recs
so file a complaint
keep at it, champ.
by lboros on
Sep 18, 2007 12:25 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Rules.
I'm pointing out your rules which you have clearly disregarded tonight. Thanks for proving this to be true.
by champion on
Sep 18, 2007 12:28 AM EDT
up
0 recs
and if you run to the community board
i'm not going to get into a pointless argument about which rules you think i broke. the relevant point is that this is not a democracy. it's my website.
by lboros on
Sep 18, 2007 12:37 AM EDT
up
0 recs
*sigh*
...yet you did.
Have a great evening!
by champion on
Sep 18, 2007 12:48 AM EDT
up
0 recs
and really --- where's the attack?
by lboros on
Sep 18, 2007 12:29 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Taunts.
Ok, so you knew I wasn't a parent yet you still left a condescending message. Snark, attacks, taunts, baiting...
but we learn nothing --- and you make yourself look stupid --- when you simply taunt your adversary or call him names.
:)
by champion on
Sep 18, 2007 12:32 AM EDT
up
0 recs
where does it end, champ?
by lboros on
Sep 18, 2007 12:38 AM EDT
up
0 recs
By
by spants on
Sep 18, 2007 12:42 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Good Evening.
My hypothetical question was hardly baiting. It's a stretch to even consider it misleading.
You seem to enjoy stirring the pot on this website.
I do? That's news to me.
by champion on
Sep 18, 2007 12:50 AM EDT
up
0 recs
I think the fact
by spants on
Sep 18, 2007 1:04 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Good Advice
by champion on
Sep 18, 2007 12:09 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Wanted to stay out of this, but...
If Shelley had just scribbled that onto an unsuspecting kid's notebook, then yeah, it was a boorish, mean-spirited act that he ought to be ashamed about having committed.
In any case, like I said this morning, he ought to get in touch with the reporter to arrange for a delivery of an autographed bat with a personalized message and a thoughtful letter to the kid and an apologetic one to his parents. (He could have Papelbon arrange it.)
If things are as I assume them to be, then it's different from a player acting like ass during a game, disrespecting the other team and its fans.
by liam on
Sep 18, 2007 12:55 AM EDT
up
0 recs
WOW, this got out of hand fast
honestly i just dont see how this is an issues. but then again i'm not a parent of young kids. maybe i'd feel differently if i was, but i'm not. i thought it was funny. i get the joke shelley was trying to pull. and i dont think it was wrong for him to do it on a 10 yr old red sox fan. i'm really shocked this has gotten such a strong response from many here.
i guess thats why i dont look at it like big z taking shots at a Cards player, or bleed cubbie blue taking shots at us, or reyes dancing around like a spaz on the diamond taunting the other team. those are adults taking shots at other adults. where as i see this as an adult playing around with a kid. and there shouldn't be any problems with that. this was susposed to be a harmless prank. and i just dont understand how it's gotten blown up so much and pissed off so many here.
this was a joke people. a harmless, good natured joke.
by gdm426 on Sep 18, 2007 12:58 AM EDT 0 recs
i appreciate your
i guess that it comes down to your last line. many of us (with kids) don't see the joke as necessarily harmless o


