the merry merry month of may
may is in the books; the cardinals went 12-15, which is (ahem) their best month since last august, when they were 13-15. a few select statistical lines for the month, starting with you know who:
| AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | | | AVG | OBP | SLG | |||
| pujols | 97 | 14 | 33 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 14 | | | .340 | .421 | .495 |
this is pujols' second consecutive month of sub-.500 slugging; prior to this season he had only slugged below .500 for two months in his entire career, july 2001 (his rookie season) and may 2002. the latter month was also the only month in albert's career in which his isolated power was less than .200 --- until this month, when he recorded the lowest monthly ISO of his life. (i'm not counting june 2006, most of which he spent on the disabled list with a strained oblique.) it was still a good month for albert --- he hit the ball consistently hard, and if he keeps it up i think the power numbers will follow.
| AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | | | AVG | OBP | SLG | |||
| edmonds | 75 | 12 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 13 | 6 | | | .266 | .317 | .467 |
edmonds slugged over .450 for just the 3d time in his last 10 months of baseball. his 2007 rate stats to date (.245 / .313 / .388) aren't much different from where they stood as of june 1 last season ( .241 / .345 / .379). he's a month further removed from surgery and has regained his ability to drive the ball to right field. two weeks ago he appeared finished as a ballplayer, but over the last half of may he slugged .707. last year, edmonds went .268 / .355 / .537 from june 1 forward; the way he has looked the last two weeks, it's suddenly reasonable to hope that he might produce at a similar level the rest of this year.
| AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | | | AVG | OBP | SLG | |||
| eckstein | 71 | 7 | 24 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | | | .338 | .382 | .408 | ||
| may 06 | 111 | 17 | 38 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 | | | .342 | .405 | .387 | ||
| may 05 | 116 | 19 | 38 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 12 | | | .328 | .386 | .448 |
as you can see, may has been a good month for eckstein every year since he joined the cardinals. it was his best month since his concussion on june 15 of last season and the ensuing oblique injury in august; now he's battling a sore back, so it's fair to wonder whether may 2007 will be the start of an upswing or just a blip in a continuing downspiral.
| AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | | | AVG | OBP | SLG | |||
| duncan | 73 | 15 | 17 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 11 | 9 | | | .233 | .325 | .493 |
he actually had a very good month going through the pittsburgh sweep --- .919 ops, led the team in rbis --- but then went 0 for the washington series and has been laid up with a bad knee since then. that knee is a very serious concern --- he was sent to the hospital for tests, and the quotes from team personnel in this morning's post-dispatch are not encouraging. so just as they're getting edmonds back, they might lose duncan . . . . it figures.
| IP | H | BB | SO | W-L | ERA | WHIP | |||
| looper | 33.2 | 39 | 14 | 20 | 3-3 | 5.35 | 1.574 | ||
| april 2007 | 33 | 23 | 10 | 18 | 3-1 | 1.91 | 1.000 |
ulp. . . . . . which of these two months do you think will prove to be the more aberrant, when all is said and done? the best we can hope for is that they're both aberrant, and looper's era stabilizes in the low to mid 4s. but lookie here, this may split will make you feel better:
| IP | H | BB | SO | W-L | ERA | WHIP | |||
| suppan | 30.2 | 35 | 14 | 15 | 2-3 | 4.99 | 1.598 | ||
| april 2007 | 42.1 | 43 | 7 | 22 | 4-2 | 2.55 | 1.181 |
by the time supps' four years in milwaukee are up --- by the time this year is up --- which of those two months will appear to be the aberrant one? ok, back to the cards' own troubles:
| IP | H | BB | SO | W-L | ERA | WHIP | |||
| wainwright | 27 | 39 | 7 | 17 | 3-2 | 5.00 | 1.704 | ||
| april 2007 | 29.1 | 39 | 16 | 21 | 1-2 | 6.14 | 1.875 |
look at the vast improvement in the walk rate --- very encouraging. adam's batting average on balls in play remains freakishly high at .379, despite pretty ordinary batted-ball splits --- average line drive rate (18 percent), high groundball rate (48 percent). he's been keeping the ball in the park all season, so as long as he continues to do that and keeps his walks low, wainwright is going to be fine. he posted 3 quality starts in his 5 may outings.
| IP | H | BB | SO | W-L | ERA | WHIP | |||
| thompson | 31.2 | 38 | 7 | 11 | 3-1 | 4.26 | 1.547 |
man, but the cardinal pitchers give up lots of baserunners. thompson got sorta lucky last night, retiring 12 of the last 13 men he faced despite a number of well-hit balls. i will say that he looked impressive in working himself out of a 3d-inning jam last night, pitching very intelligently against the top of the rockies' order; once he got a big lead he stripped down the repertoire and just started chucking it in there, which is when the rockies began to hit the ball harder. in other words, the kid pitched to the situation; brainy.
| IP | H | BB | SO | W-L | ERA | WHIP | |||
| isringhausen | 10.2 | 4 | 3 | 9 | 0-0 | 0.00 | 0.656 |
opposing hitters batted .114 against izzy in may, and are at .147 for the year; he hasn't yielded a home run all season. the rockies were absolutely defenseless against him wednesday night. his only blown save came in a game the cardinals went on to win, and occurred on a wind-blown bloop double. where is the love?
128 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Thanks lboros
Very impressive turnaround.
by paCardsFan on Jun 1, 2007 9:00 AM EDT reply actions
I still say...
by itsalemmon1019 on Jun 1, 2007 10:30 AM EDT up reply actions
At this point who else would be the Cards' AS rep?
I don't know where he's at in the voting, but...
Pujols is ahead by >100,000
- Pujols, A. Cardinals 399,706
- Fielder, P. Brewers 291,911
- Lee, D. Cubs 224,165
- Garciaparra, N. Dodgers 222,107
- Delgado, C. Mets 218,647
Ya
by itsalemmon1019 on Jun 1, 2007 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Nice
Larry, last winter there was as you called it 'agent speak', that Mulder would be ready in June. Is there any word on his re-hab? How about Carp is he still on track for August?
Scott had mild improvement
However, since the Milwaukee series:
.289
1 HR
7 2B
12 RBI
15 BB
12 SO
.825 OPS
He needs to start hitting more over the wall, but he isn't the dead weight he used to be.
by Hardcore Legend on Jun 1, 2007 9:45 AM EDT up reply actions
Love to see those walks
I'm just going
by rockin redbird on Jun 1, 2007 9:21 AM EDT up reply actions
i'd like to see Rolen's numbers also...
by Ankiels Missing Curveball on Jun 1, 2007 9:14 AM EDT reply actions
Let go Cards!
the next 18 out of the next 21 games against sub .500 clubs. Oakland might or might not be. I think they can win every series. The Dodgers might be tough. It is nice that there are 6 games against KC.
Now that the bats seam to be waking up it is time to get hot and go 15-6 over the next 21! That will make the Cards 37-35 as they hit Shea.
by nybirdfan on Fri Jun 01, 2007 at 08:58:58 AM EDT
[ Reply to This ]
Got nothing but love for Izzy
by ryanisforever on Jun 1, 2007 9:38 AM EDT reply actions
Still holds true...
"""Here's to the rest of the summer...
Ok, so it's only a 2 game winning streak, but it got me looking ahead a bit. I think that the standings as of June 8 will be something to look at. Right now, the brewers are 10 games over at home and 1 under on the road. After Monday, they start a 10 game home stand that is followed up by 19 out of 28 on the road. Their road trip consist of the Twins and Tigers, whereas ours, beginning on the 12th, consists of the Royals and A's. I have been frustrated at times this yr but have not come close to folding it up. I kept a lot more faith than most last year and was rewarded w/ the first WS Championship of my memory (born in '80). I would love to be w/in 3-5 games when July 27th gets here and we then proceed to play the Brewers 8 times in a 21 game stretch. Granted that they may not even be the team to beat at that point, but we're close enough to every one else that we, in escence, control our own destiny w/ the rest of the division."""
We were 9 games back at the time and here we sit today only 5 back in the L column.
Let's just enjoy the ride and see how it goes.
A happy weekend to all.
Larry Bigbie is a Free Agent....
Larry Bigbie, who was hitting .349 for Triple-A Las Vegas, was dropped from the Las Vegas roster hours before a June 1 escape clause in his contract kicked in.
------
Given Dunc's injury, perhaps the Cardinals should try for him?
by Ankiels Missing Curveball on Jun 1, 2007 10:30 AM EDT reply actions
get him
why?
thanks for that insightful response.
Ludwick could be a 900 OPS guy but will probably end up in the mid-800's. He strikes out too much as well, but he hammers lefties and could potentially get things straightened out and be a factor in the lineup; early in his career he was thought to have 40 HR potential and while the injuries make that unlikely, he would have hit 30+ if he had stayed in memphis.
Both strike out way too much and don't walk enough. Both play average defense.
I don't see any reason whatsoever for us to go for Larry Bigbie. Maybe you can enlighten me?
Bigbie would be an excellent pickup
At AAA Las Vegas in 126 AB:
.349 BA (4th in the league)
.431 OBP
.532 SLG
.962 OPS
3 HR, 12 doubles, 1 triple
14 RBI
22 runs scored
24 strikeouts
In 56 AB in spring training:
.357 AVG
.400 OBP
.554 SLG
.954 OPS
2 HR, 3 doubles, 1 triple
14 RBI
only 9 strikeouts
Bigby is a former #1 draft pick, can play all three outfield positions well. He has various physical impediments last year, but he's evidently healthy now and playing up to his potential.
I'd be thrilled if the Cardinals would take a chance on this guy again, especially with Duncan ailing.
Bigbie chose to leave the Dodgers
"Bye-bye Bigbie: Veteran outfielder Larry Bigbie, who is hitting .349 at Las Vegas, has informed club officials that he will exercise the escape clause in his minor-league contract when it kicks in today, assistant general manager Kim Ng said.
"That will make Bigbie a free agent and officially end his ties with the Dodgers.
"Bigbie also tried to find a major-league job when his last "out" clause went into effect at the end of spring training."
Too bad we already have him on the team
In triple A he hit:
.340/.375/.642 = 1017 OPS w/ 8 homers and a 36 RBIs in 121 PA. I don't understand this bigbie love fest when we have better on the team already.
by Birds on the Matt on Jun 1, 2007 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions
Do it
A question on pitching intelligence
i will say that he looked impressive in working himself out of a 3d-inning jam last night, pitching very intelligently against the top of the rockies' order; once he got a big lead he stripped down the repertoire and just started chucking it in there, which is when the rockies began to hit the ball harder. in other words, the kid pitched to the situation; brainy.
So how much credit can we give pitchers for their pitch selection? The defense of Reyes seems to hinge on the perception that he never shook off Molina, that he was "pitching to the gameplan," and that therefore when he was getting rocked, it was the fault of the gameplan but not the pitcher.
Moreover, what is the difference between this assessment of Thompson as a brainy pitcher for pitching to the situation, and a comment like Bernie Miklasz's that Reyes is dumb as a rock when it comes to "pitching acumen?"
it's fair to say that reyes still has to improve
just re-read your post, taiko
we can credit thompson for good execution of an intelligent game plan, and fault reyes for poor execution thereof --- but to return to my point, reyes is not equipped to execute a pitch-to-contact game plan. if you ask a player to do something he's not good at, and he fails at it ---- how do you apportion the responsibility? it's partly the player's fault, because he's paid to perform --- but it's also the coaching staff's fault, because they're paid to get the most out of the talent on their roster. by forcing reyes to pitch to contact, they're not getting the most out of his talent.
There's still a fog for me
I get that a pitching coach's game plan essentially gives the pitcher a "toolbox and a blueprint", where the tools are the favored pitches in his repertoire, and the blueprint is the plan for attacking certain batters, or approaching certain situations.
I also get that a pitcher who is given a set of crappy tools, and whose best tools are taken away from him, is at a disadvantage.
But what I don't know is how much credit a pitcher should get for making a "smart" pitch in a certain situation, for calling his own number and getting it right, versus making a "good" pitch - executing what the catcher calls for, or what the pitching coach calls for, and just hitting a spot. We can obviously assess a pitcher's "stuff" and ability to make "good" pitches, with perhaps Pedro Martinez at the very tip of that scale. However, I also want to believe that pitchers should be given credit for their intelligence, and that Grag Maddux stands at the very tip of that scale. I would have a very hard time accepting that Maddux's success was a product of just having a good catcher or a good pitching coach telling him what to throw and when. We all know that even in his prime he never had overpowering stuff.
Regarding Maddux...
To my mind, Greg Maddux is the epitome of the "command and control" pitcher... he attacks batters by putting the ball where they can't hit it hard! When he has to, he can also go for the strikeout by putting the ball in whatever "holes" a batter has in his swing. (Almost every hitter has some "hole" in his swing... exceptions include guys named Musial, Williams, Gwynn, and Pujols; they're damned rare!)
Maddux knows what he can (and can't) do; he devises his own game plan based on that. Maddux doesn't need a Dave Duncan/Yadier Molina combo to be effective... but Maddux is a sure-fire Hall of Famer! Other pitchers can use that help, by concentrating on making whatever pitch is called for at the time. (Other pitchers seem to refuse that help, and are lesser pitchers for it.)
by The Ol Goaler on Jun 1, 2007 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions
Head scratcher to me
So why aren't we seeing Tony/Dave put Reyes in that "most likely to succeed" position? Especially as a young guy with a lot of upside? They are the pro's, but it just doesn't fit together. I understand trying to develop him into more of a complete pitcher, but shouldn't one do that by building on strengths (as you have noted before).
When you look at the way Reyes has been treated in 2006-2007 I don't see how he is a Cardinal long-term (or even short-term for that matter). I get this feeling that he'd love to be out of here and go somewhere else where they will just let him pitch.
An interesting read
Fun Stuff
all star game
eckstein in the top 5 at short
by stlcardinalsfang on Jun 1, 2007 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions
Not so fast
The vote counts you see now don't count for that much.
by redbird2006in on Jun 1, 2007 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions
Last years first numbers
by billyhoyel on Jun 1, 2007 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions
ankiel
by stlcardinalsfang on Jun 1, 2007 1:10 PM EDT reply actions
Ankiel vs. Bigbie
My reasons? While Rick has better power numbers (I guess, certainly more homers), Bigbie's avg and OBP are quite a bit higher, he (Bigbie) has major league experience, and (probably the biggest reason) once we call up Ankiel, we can't send him back down. It's still better, IMO, for the long run to leave him in Memphis where he can get 3-5 AB's per night instead of being the 4th or 5th OF in StL. Come August/September, given that he keeps performing at his current level, my preference would probably switch.
by ArkansasTravs on Jun 1, 2007 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions
Wow, this Bigbie
by MdRedbirdFreak on Jun 1, 2007 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions
as opposed to
by Birds on the Matt on Jun 1, 2007 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions
Agreed. And I watched Bigbie
by MdRedbirdFreak on Jun 1, 2007 4:53 PM EDT up reply actions
Sucking?
g ab r h hr rbi bb so sb cs obp slg ave
83 287 43 87 9 31 29 60 7 1 .365 .456 .303
2004 bal
g ab r h hr rbi bb so sb cs obp slg ave
139 478 76 134 15 68 45 113 8 3 .341 .427 .280
(sorry no matter what I do I can't get them to line up)
2005 he was hurt and last year was wiped out beacuse of injuries.
I dare say those 2004 numbers are very Edmonds like numbers. As a matter of fact lets see who in our current outfield has better numbers? JaunE? Taguchi? Speez? Ludwick? Wilson? Tell me who would you rather have? That you could add to team for a song?
I say sign the man, and Dl Duncan. Hell he plays all outfield spots. Once Duncan is cleared to play Ludwick gets optioned.
I was excited about Ludwick I was hoping he would provide a spark. Well, Larry was right. He can't hit ML pitching. Bigbie at least has, and his defense will be a plus.
Ankiel is not coming up...
Also....
by Irishman on Jun 1, 2007 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions
Our or field Roy Oswalt on the mound tonight..
Is my memory bad or is this who we are?
Any chance we try to take some pitches tonight?
by redbird2006in on Jun 1, 2007 1:53 PM EDT reply actions
I was under the impression
Elijah Dukes
Seems the D-Rays would like to trade Elijah Dukes for a solid reliever. A few teams might bow out because of Dukes' past, but in my experience most don't care. I could see a match with the Padres, as they will need a center fielder if Mike Cameron leaves.
He's been a problem child, but I can't believe all they would want is a solid reliever for him.
For the talent he's got
They guy's lucky he isn't in prison and might find himself there in the near future.
Plus, the composition of a human being who storms into an elementary school and threatens his own wife's life is more than enough reason to stay away.
by Big Red on Jun 1, 2007 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions
I realize
And let's sort him out while he's hitting for the Cardinals. Heh.
There's gotta be...
4 2/3 innings, 11 hits, 2 walks, 0 Ks, 5 runs allowed... and the Braves have stranded 6 and had a guy thrown out at home.
Well
They were treated to a chorus of Boos from the Wrigley faithful after a big inning by the Braves that pushed their lead to 7-1. That's with Zambrano on the hill btw
and we think
by jeff abs on Jun 1, 2007 4:05 PM EDT up reply actions
Dumbrano just attacked Barrett
sooo
No one really got 'jacked'
Both have been removed from the game.
by Hardcore Legend on Jun 1, 2007 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions
Somewhere...
Probability Game
My guess is only 15% that he is a Cub. I think he will be traded at the trade deadline. Possibilities - to the Mets for something like a Pelfrey/Milledge combo (although the Cubs have absolutely no need for Milledge, Jaque Jones could be packaged too) or to the Indians or Tigers (however I doubt Leyand would want to put up with Zambrano) or maybe even to the Angels. I could see the White Soxs making a run and that would make it even more interesting
perhaps...
I think the Cubs have more than enough
by Hardcore Legend on Jun 1, 2007 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions
well, yes and no
however, i'm not sure two months of zambrano buys milledge. especially if he keeps throwing more haymakers than no-run innings.
Fight continued in the clubhouse
Zambrano has apparently left the stadium in his car in a hurry.
It is his birthday, too. Happy Birthday, Carlos!
by Hardcore Legend on Jun 1, 2007 4:26 PM EDT up reply actions
Barret was on the bench, I believe
DAMMIT I hate when I miss this stuff. I'm 10m from home - I should start working from home on Fridays. Friday afternoongames always seem good for some Cubs self-destruction.
Wow...
Keep in mind, those two teams are in "win now" mode.
Bite your tongue
by Hardcore Legend on Jun 1, 2007 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Stupid Scott Boras quote of the day
http://www.ocweekly.com/features/features/the-boras-factor/27177/?page=1 (Top of second page. Hat tip to www.mlbtraderumors.com)
Somehow, I don't see Jeff Weaver's 14.32 ERA as the missing ingredient on this team.
I caught that too
lets see what he says...
My favorite is this one
Weaver eventually signed with the Seattle Mariners for $8.3 million. "You have to respect that teams have a right to make their own decisions," Boras says, before turning around and passing judgment on Cardinals general manager Walt Jocketty. "Here's a GM who never played the game saying, `We're going to go with our young guys,' and I go, `You can't.'"
"GM who never played the game" sounds like a real dig at Jocko. That phrase seems out of place there. As if he wanted to say: "Here's (this jagoff) saying, 'We're going to win with our young guys.'"
Juicy stuff.
agreed
oh yeah....
Nah. Barrett can actually hit.
by MdRedbirdFreak on Jun 1, 2007 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions
hours of entertainment
by jeff abs on Jun 1, 2007 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions
On Elijah Dukes....
california penal
And, before you start yelling at me,
this is NOT duke
- his wife showed reporters the photo of the gun he sent her.
- school officials called the cops when he showed up at her school and threatened her. not like there were no witnesses to what he did.
- his response to the allegations has not been, i didn't do it or i'm innocent, which is what the duke guys did from day 1. his response has been, i'm just going to play baseball.
His actual response to reporters
Nice.
by Big Red on Jun 1, 2007 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions
Apparently
Let's see... Give them Encarnacion for Jones. Trade for Barrett then ship him off to the AL. Give them Kip Wells for Zambrano. They can keep Big Red and Eyre.
Heh. And do what with Jones?
oh yeah, tlr and duncan
hahahahahahaha
Len Casper: "thank you for that"
here's a clip of some of it!
by jeff abs on Jun 1, 2007 4:54 PM EDT reply actions
I stabbed a guy
by jeff abs on Jun 1, 2007 5:03 PM EDT up reply actions
This is why I LOVE the Cubs!!!
Just when you think they've gotten as bad as they can, they go out and do this.
Classic.
by Big Red on Jun 1, 2007 4:56 PM EDT reply actions
And now some moron
by Big Red on Jun 1, 2007 4:57 PM EDT reply actions
Astros game tomorrow
I'm in Portland, OR, so I never got my hopes up, of course.
freakin' ridiculous
by stlcardinalsfang on Jun 1, 2007 5:13 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't think they make that judgement ...
by jeff abs on Jun 1, 2007 5:17 PM EDT up reply actions
a non-fan
by stlcardinalsfang on Jun 1, 2007 5:18 PM EDT up reply actions
espcially considering that the belmont stakes
by stlcardinalsfang on Jun 1, 2007 5:19 PM EDT up reply actions
Nice
I thought I had ESPN for Yankee games?
by Big Red on Jun 1, 2007 5:24 PM EDT up reply actions
YES
dang, I turned the flubs game off too early
no, it's freakin hilarious.
in other news, any one else think it's time us Cards fans lowered are expectations for the Cards this season? I really want to believe they will make the playoffs, but I just don't see it. not with the starting rotation they keep rolling out day after day. the last two games were nice wins, but tonight they go up against Roy, who always shuts them down. the game probably won't last two hours tonight because he'll mow right threw the line up like he always does, and fat elvis could hit a cheap homer run to the boxes in left for the only run of the game. it does not matter that Roy has been ruffed up, at least by his standards, in his last few starts. he owns the Cards. they are the reason why his owner bought him some huge caterpillar bulldozer.
I don't know. maybe I'm too much of a pesimist, but I don't have any faith at all that the Cards will win tonight.
Per Lou
When asked if anyone got hurt
hmmm
I made this YouTube of it
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_O64BqGsVwM
it would appear...
Yeah
At some point, Barrett went back to the clubhouse and all hell broke lose.
Btw, if you watch the video, you can see that after Barrett says something and then points (looks like he points to the scoreboard) he walks towards Z and starts to raise his hands.
Z then kinda jabs him with a left and cocks the right just as the batting coach and Rothschild get between 'em.
IMO, Barrett's lucky he wasn't knocked out.
by Big Red on Jun 1, 2007 6:00 PM EDT up reply actions
CLASSIC!!
Nah...
by rockin redbird on Jun 1, 2007 6:28 PM EDT up reply actions
saw lou's press conferance
all in all, he looked and sounded depressed. your typical flub manager attitude i guess.
Oh, dear....
well....
The kid was 0-8 and was in a funk needing a break from the discouraging results of some good as well as some less than good efforts. I also think that had the Cards scored a bunch of runs and got him a couple of wins along the way, things would/might be different. Hence, no need for discussion here, at all. So maybe he WAS a victim of numbers...the teams dreadful at bats?
In terms of numbers, the most important number in the eyes of management, the (0-8)W/L was indeed not good, ...and secondly....rampant conjecture about a disagreement was drawn from a statement by Ducan about "throwing a certain OUT-PITCH to get ground balls" the day after or the day he was sent down, which in my mind meant NOTHING!!...more LaDuncan fodder and propaganda for the media. I personally dont think Duncan knew WHAT to say! The kid was going down and he gave an excuse based on some discussion he'd probably had with Reyes at some point in the past (maybe he thought it was better than saying "the kid was bad and he cant pitch out of the pen, we had to send him down"???)
I believe it was probably damage control, get the guy a break, some wins and confidence...I dont think punishment was involved, he fit into the rotation at Memphis wherever he fit it, period.
I also dont think he's a bonified major league pitcher yet, not when he folds up with runners on base and starts walking batters. I think he has a ways to go to get consistent command of his pitches from game to game, or even inning ti inning.. (and so does Wellemeyer, for that fact!) He has very little trade value at the moment, maybe thats ANOTHER aspect of the damage control side of it?
Carlos Zambrawlo strikes again, what a picture show he is...whines and complains, then he gets more money (6 + million increase), then promises a Cy Young award AND a WS to Chicago..now he blames his performance on Barrett (the Cardinal killer)! Maybe if you go after the other guy on the team with a rep for punching back, you look more justified?



















