Viva El Birdos: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Spencer Hall's College Football Week 12 Alphabetical

the tournament gets underway

let's get this thing underway. typically i won't feature tournament results in the main morning post; i'll post most of them as afternoon add-ons. but it's a holiday, and there isn't much else to write about; the post-dispatch has an interesting article on mulder's arm (of which, more to say at some point) and another one about troy cate's heart; i also recommend derrick goold's blog entry about the competition for the rotation. also, the kip wells community projection is still pending; post your figures if you haven't already.

but it has taken more than two weeks to get this tournament organized and set up, and now that there finally are results to report it seems only fitting to give them some prominent play. i'll only post a few results at a time; gotta draw things out, have a little suspense. today we feature a couple of series with very familiar, mostly popular players. let the games begin.

lankford (7) v ozzie (10)
here's an interesting pairing. lankford came up in 1990, the swan song of the whiteyball cardinals; it was the last of 6 seasons in which ozzie, pendleton, mcgee, and vince coleman played together as a group. ozzie was past 30 by the time lankford arrived and in decline as a fielder, but his hitting was better than ever; half the players on this team of ozzies were ray lankford's teammate. they played together through a lean half-decade, finally collaborating on a playoff team in 1996, ozzie's last season. a quick word about the lineups: rather than be accused of mismanaging, i decided to delegate lineup construction for the whole tournament to a computer application: david pinto's lineup toy. i used whatever sequence the toy designated as optimum. the lineups for this series are:

ozzie '87 lankford '99
ozzie '91 lankford '97
ozzie '92 lankford '96
ozzie '96 lankford '00
ozzie '85 lankford '98
ozzie '89 lankford '95
ozzie '93 lankford '01
ozzie '88 lankford '94
ozzie '86 lankford '92

GAME 1
ozzie strikes first, bunching two doubles, a single, and a steal in the top of the 3d to plate a couple. he makes at 3-0 in the next frame with a two-out walk, stolen base, and rbi single. lankford reclaims a pair in the 5th inning (double, double, error, single) but whiffs with the tying run at 3d base and only one out; he still trails after five. ozzie extends the lead to 4-2 with another manufactured run in the 6th: walk, steal, two-out hit. the lankfords answer with muscle in the bottom of the frame: a solo homer leading off from lankford '00; a two-run double by lankford '94 to give the team its first lead at 5-4; and a three-run shot off the bat of lankford '99 to blow the game open. it's a six-run inning and an 8-4 lead for the lankfords. they lead 10-4 by the time the ozzies come to bat in the 9th; with two out and nobody on, they rally for 3 runs and bring the tying run to the plate. ozzie '89 uncoils an uppercut, going for the tie; the ensuing fly ball travels 275 feet, and game 1 goes to the lankfords 10-7.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 R H E
ozzie 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 3 7 12 1
lankford 0 0 0 0 2 6 0 2 x 10 13 1
2B: ozzie 4, lankford 4     3B: lankford 1     HR: lankford 2
BB: ozzie 4, lankford 5     SO: ozzie 2, lankford 9
SB: ozzie 7     CS: ozzie 2, lankford 1

GAME 2
ozzie jumps out to the lead again with a run in the first; an unsuccessful steal keeps the rally from being more damaging. in the 3d ozzies '86 and '87 lead off with walks, then execute a perfect double steal; alas, ozzies '91 and '92 fail to get the ball out of the infield, and the runners remain stalled with two out. another walk loads the bases, bringing ozzie '85 to the plate; he blasts a double into the corner and clears the bases. that makes it 4-0, and the lankfords are still hitless; they loft a couple of homers (by '98 and '97) to close to within 5-3 after five, but the last 10 lankfords go in order. it's a win for the ozzies; series knotted at 1-1.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 R H E
ozzie 1 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 6 9 2
lankford 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 4 2
2B: ozzie 2     HR: lankford 2
BB: ozzie 6, lankford 4     SO: lankford 8
SB: ozzie 8, lankford 2     CS: ozzie 3

GAME 3
lankford plays small-ball in the 1st: three walks, a stolen base, and a three-run double vault him to a 4-0 advantage. the ozzies rally with three in the 3d (walk, error, hit, two-out, two-run double), but they run themselves right out of an inning in the 4th, when ozzies '93 and '86 are both caught stealing. the lankfords come up in the 6th inning, hitless since the opening frame; '00 doubles, and '95 follows one out later with a majestic home run to extend the lead to 6-3. the ozzies refuse to go quietly; they load the bases with two out in the 8th (a groundout ends the threat) and put the first two men on leading off the 9th. ozzie '96 comes up with men at first and third and one out, representing the tying run; he taps into a double play, and the lankfords take a 2-1 series lead.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 R H E
lankford 4 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 6 5 1
ozzie 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 0
2B: ozzie 2, lankford 3     HR: lankford 1
BB: ozzie 6, lankford 8     SO: ozzie 4, lankford 11
SB: ozzie 5, lankford 2     CS: ozzie 2

hitting stars so far in the series: ozzie '87 has a .600 obp (5 for 11 with four walks) with 4 runs scored and 4 sbs; ozzie '85 is hitting .364 (4 for 11) with 6 rbis. the lankfords don't really have any stars; true to form, they have more strikeouts in the series (28) than hits (22), yet are scoring runs aplenty. their composite line is .227 / .342 / .474. ozzie's team line so far is .292 / .393 / .375. ozzie has 20 steals to lankford's 4; the rays have 5 homers vs the ozzies' nil.

remainder of the series later this week. click the "read more" link for the opening games of the brock-torre series.

Star-divide

torre/cepeda (8) v brock (9)
speed v power; El Birdo v El Birdo. brock won 2 pennants with cepeda while playing on a grass field, then anchored some explosive offenses with torre while playing in the same stadium on astroturf. all three guys will eventually end up in the hall of fame (torre as a manager). brock was my very favorite player growing up, in no small part because he threw left-handed; i'm a lefty, and he was the only left-throwing starter on the team in 1969, the year i got hooked on baseball. plus, i went to camp with his kid (lou jr) at a very early age, and got introduced to him one day after school at his flower shop on clayton road. so i'm rooting for brock to win the whole tournament; never happen, but that's where my heart lies. the torres' lineup features mvp players in the first two spots in the order; not a bad team:

brock '71 torre '71
brock '64 cepeda '67
brock '73 torre '74
brock '67 cepeda '66
brock '70 torre '70
brock '65 torre '69
brock '69 torre '72
brock '75 cepeda '68
brock '74 torre '73

GAME 1
the power-speed dichotomy couldn't be more stark than it is in this game. brock scores without a hit in the 2d (walk, steal, error, groundout) and manufactures another run in textbook fashion in the 7th (single, stolen base, single). the torres, meanwhile, are playing leadfooted station-to-station baseball. in the 6th, with the score tied 1-1, torre '74 can't score from second on a single by cepeda '66; two subsequent flyouts leave him stranded at 3d. same thing happens in the 7th, with the brocks now leading 2-1: torre '73 has to hit the brakes at 3d on a single by cepeda '67 and ends up stranded there. the brocks go for the throat in the top of the 9th but only end up bloodying themselves: '65 is caught stealing after a one-out walk, and'69 ends the inning by getting tossed out at the plate trying to score from 2d on a single by brock '75. two men lost on the basepaths; speed kills, alright. in the bottom of the 9th the torres finally score a runner from 2d base; '73 lumbers around on a two-out, do-or-die single by cha-cha '67 to tie it up at 2s and send the game into extras. annoyed, brock '74 takes matters into his own hands; he steals 2d and 3d after reaching on an error and trots home on a single by brock '64. that's the ballgame --- a sloppy start, but the brocks hold a 1-0 series lead.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 R H E
brock 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 3 7 0
torre 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 10 3
2B: torre 2     3B: torre 1     HR: none
BB: brock 2, torre 2     SO: brock 3, torre 9
SB: brock 9     CS: brock 2

GAME 2
through five innings, the brocks have only one baserunner --- and he's caught stealing. the torres lurch to two runs apiece in the 4th and 5th innings; three of them score on two-out singles. in the 8th inning they finally hit their first homer of the series, in their 82d plate appearance --- cepeda '66 does the honors. by then it's 8-1, and the brocks still haven't got untracked; they muster three hits and another run in the 9th inning, but the seats are largely empty by then. the series is even at 1s.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 R H E
brock 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 8 2
torre 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 3 x 8 12 0
2B: brock 2, torre 1     3B: torre 1     HR: torre 1
BB: torre 7     SO: brock 7, torre 5
SB: brock 3     CS: brock 2

GAME 3
the brocks go crazy in the first three innings of this game: eight hits, eight steals, a triple, and five runs. but the torres keep it close with a three-run rally in the 2d inning. it's still 5-3 after 7 innings; in the 8th the rump of the torre order forges a tie, bunching three singles and a double. brock '65 singles with one out in the bottom of the frame and steals both 2d and 3d; but brock '69 strikes out and brock '75 can't pick the runner up. a costly lapse in execution: torre '74 leads off the top of the 9th with a single and moves to 3d on torre '70's one-out double; they both score on a hit by torre '69. down to their final three outs, the brocks get one-out hits from '71 and '64; the latter promptly steals 2d base to get the tying run into scoring position. but brock '73 strikes out, and '67 flies out to the track to end the ballgame. the brocks seem to have dominated the game --- they've stolen 12 bags, whacked two triples and a double. but the torres slowpoke their way to 15 hits by the end of the game (including seven in the last two frames). they lead the series, 2-1.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 R H E
torre 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 7 15 0
brock 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 10 2
2B: torre 4, brock 1     3B: brock 2     HR: none
BB: torre 2, brock 2     SO: torre 6, brock 3
SB: brock 12     CS: brock 1

the brocks have 24 steals in the series, but the more telling number is 5 --- the number of guys caught. those failed steals have erased more than 15 percent of their baserunners (the team has had only 29 men on base so far). the torres have piled up at least 10 hits in all three games and ought to be leading the set 3-0. composite lines: torres .311 / .369 / .420, brocks .229 / .257 / .294.

tune in later this week for the series conclusion.

0 recs  |  Comment 25 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Reading that
was kind of surreal.

Go 1999 Ray Lankford!

Cheers

by Alxfritz on Feb 19, 2007 10:35 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

what's really surreal
is watching 10 lankfords up, 10 lankfords down (end of game 2).

you can only imagine how the hometown fans took that one.

by lboros on Feb 19, 2007 10:41 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I know this was probably addressed
but were any offensive numbers tweaked/weighted to reflect the defensive prowess of the wizard?  I know Ray was a capable up the middle defender, but if anyone shoudl garner leverage through his defensive, its Ozzie.  Were the rules stated that no defense would be considered in any form?  The guy did back flips!  C'mon!

by Jonathan23 on Feb 19, 2007 10:55 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

no defense, nor pitching
this is a lazy man's tournament --- thrown together in haste, and merely to pass the slowest part of the off-season. it's basically just a hitting contest --- hopefully that's enough to hold people's interest.

with a little more prep time, perhaps a more sophisticated sim can be put together. it has been suggested that the cards' 17 world series teams should be thrown into brackets, along with some good near-miss teams like 2005 and '02 and '49 and '63; you could run a 24-team tournament like that, and it'd be a lot of fun. in that case, defense and pitching obviously will have to play big roles.

by lboros on Feb 19, 2007 11:10 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

that'll teach me
to not hit refresh before posting a comment . . .

by brentonjay on Feb 19, 2007 11:17 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Love the tournament
For a slow February, this is terrific - I particularly liked the description of Torre as lumbering.  I see him churning bravely not merely for himself, but for every lead-footed catcher who ever played the game.

by madridbend on Feb 19, 2007 2:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I can't wait to see
What Tip O'Neill-1887 (211ops+) and Bob Caruthers-1886 (200ops+) do...

by Zubin on Feb 19, 2007 11:07 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Wow.
Thanks for nudging me to check these guys out at Baseball Reference. They are awesome, and should go deep into the tournament.  

by madridbend on Feb 19, 2007 5:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

RE: Rotation competition
I know it's probably just "motivation" and posturing, but everytime I read Reyes must compete for the starting job it makes me cranky. When I think he might actually lose his spot in the rotation it makes me almost ill.

by RedbirdRay on Feb 19, 2007 12:45 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

reyes
and know TLR is talking of putting him in the bullpen . . . come on--there is no way that Brad Thompson/Braden Looper/?? is better than Reyes.  TLR gets a bit too wrapped up in mind games . . .

by SprfldCards on Feb 19, 2007 1:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I take the middle ground on this...
I don't think Reyes has quite earned that rotation spot yet.  He has got to be the favorite for the #3 or #4 spot (behind Carp, Wells and/or Wagonmaker), but he hasn't nailed it down yet.  I don't think there is anything wrong with some competition for the rotation, but I wish TLR would be more honest about what is likely to project.

by Zubin on Feb 19, 2007 3:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, but
if you read between the lines on some of Duncan's comments, he basically said that one of the jobs is Reyes' to lose.  He said something to the effect of "a lot of pitchers develop better by starting in the bullpen" (ala Wainwright) but that Reyes wasn't really suited to bullpen duty.  What I took from that was that it would've been great if he had started in the pen but he's not going there now so, unless he implodes this spring, he'll be in the rotation.  You don't want him taking anything for granted w/ Suppan, Weaver, Marquis, and Mulder gone!

by chuckb on Feb 19, 2007 5:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments by McCann
Buster Olney had an interview with Braves catcher Brian McCann who had this to say about Yadi:

McCann thought for a moment, and decided to change his answer on arm strength. "Yadier Molina," he said. "That guy is unbelievable. He might be the best at everything we've talked about. What he does is ridiculous."

I have to say, I am not the biggest Yadi fan, but this is pretty high praise from one of his peers.

by OCCardsFan on Feb 19, 2007 5:36 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I love the tournament
and am kicking myself for forgetting to turn in a bracket.  I love Lankford and expect him to be Ozzie but that quote, Lankfor "whiffs with the tying run at 3rd base and only one out" brought back horrible flashbacks!

On another note, I really expect that there will be a discernible difference between "small ball" vs. power in the tournament.  I loved the Cards of the 80's -- what excitement to see people running all around the bases all the time.  But power is where the game is won b/c you have a greater margin for error.  So many things have to go right to get a run or have a big inning w/ small ball.  Though I find it more exciting than homers, the homers will win in the end, I believe.  Advantage Torre/Cepeda and Lankford.

by chuckb on Feb 19, 2007 5:45 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

If I were Cardinal mgmt
and I read this in the Mulder article:

"Mulder, targeted for an early July return to the rotation, said that by 2005 the same condition that altered his throwing mechanics caused enough discomfort that he couldn't use his left arm to lift a gallon of milk or pull a club from his golf bag."

I might think seriously about having lawyers talk to Mulder, the A's, or both.

by sdrone on Feb 19, 2007 5:48 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Reyes
Just saw some pics of Reyes throwing in spring training on Yahoo, and well, the brim is not flat!  Maybe he forgot his iron......
That's a winner!

by saveferris on Feb 19, 2007 6:08 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Reyes' hat
Maybe he thinks that if he goes with a regular hat instead of that flat-brimmed abomination, LaRussa will be slightly less annoyed with him and he'll have that much more of a chance to land that starting job...
There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary, and those who don't.

by Mr Clean on Feb 20, 2007 1:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Reyes's Hat
Fashion is meaningless.

by Yadier on Feb 20, 2007 8:35 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I find it ironic
to see that statement coming from someone whow took their screen name from the player who can always be counted on to have the most jewelry.  I can live with his below average offense, but the lone thing that drives me crazy about Yadier (the player, not you) is how expressive his face is.  It sometimes betrays him and makes him look like a punk.  I understand he's emotional, and I don't want the antithesis (Encarnacion).  It just seems like he is trying to put on a show.  That just rubs me the wrong way.

I have never heard anyone else say anything about it.  Am I imagining it or have others noticed this to?

by Stanfan6 on Feb 20, 2007 1:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

i have the opposite reaction
i love yadier's expressiveness. he's playing a game, having fun, and letting it show. he's never a hot-dog, just a kid having a good time.

i don't get your "punk" remark at all.

by lboros on Feb 20, 2007 2:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe punk
was a poor choice of words.  He is very young and sometimes it shows.  I just think that he has a lot of maturing to do.  Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to run him down.  At least he cares.

by Stanfan6 on Feb 20, 2007 2:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Hmm.
I'm with lboros on this one.  Yadi's face is like a little kid.

A good friend has a huge picture of Yadi's face about 0.8 seconds after he hits the game winning homer for NLCS Game 7, just as he starts to realize it's going to go out.  He's made that picture of Yadi's expression his desktop wallpaper.

Personally, I think it's awesome.

There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary, and those who don't.

by Mr Clean on Feb 20, 2007 2:46 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.
Start posting about the Cardinals »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Avatar_small
How to EASILY make tables for Fanposts
1753738656_110919ebe9_o_small
2010 Hot Stove Post #1: CHONE hitter projections

Recent FanPosts

Arch_small
Number 15
Small
Some thoughts on Holliday (and potential replacements)
Small
Ok let me try this again...
Knights-09_small
Disenchanted Blue Jays Fan Looking For A New Team
Painterlance_small
The Holliday Dilemma (Rocks Fan Perpsective)
375830-r1-025-11_011_small
Anybody read Bob Gibson's new book yet?
Flanders_small
Yadi2first
Small
40 Man Question..

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Jack_benny_small DanUpBaby

Editors

Bender1_small azruavatar

Adam1_small chuckb

Kid-a-bear_small the red baron