Intradivisional musings
There's been a lot of talk over the last couple of days about Bernie's comments from the other day about the Cards being in the market for an SP. Initially I thought Millwood or Padilla from the Rangers were the most likely but it was revealed later that was the Brewers' Chris Capuano was the likely target.
As these rumors about Capuano started to fly, there was talk of Reyes being involved and perhaps that the trade would expand to involve Rolen and that the Cards might receive Bill Hall or Kevin Mench and Tony Gwynn, Jr.
I have no idea whether or not these rumors are true, but I thought we should evaluate the plausibility of these rumors and whether or not this trade might be one worth making. Doug Melvin's denied speaking to the Cards of late but that doesn't mean that other prime movers in the Brewers' organization haven't had discussions w/ Mozeliak or someone else in the Cards' organization.
First, is it conceivable that the Brewers could trade Capuano within the division? We know that this doesn't happen that often, mostly b/c teams are afraid the players they trade will come back to haunt them. You don't want to risk making your opponents better as well. But I'm of the opinion that, if the Brewers think trading Capuano for Reyes makes them better, then they believe that this trade will likely make the Cards worse so why wouldn't they do it?
What about Capuano as a Cardinal? He stunk last year, which sort of fits the criteria for what the Cards are looking for - someone we can trade for relatively cheaply and fit into the rotation. He only pitched 150 innings last year - finishing w/ a 5.10 era. His WARP1 was 3.3 and THT credited him w/ exactly 1 WSAB.
He is, however, coming off 2 solid seasons. In '05 and '06 combined he threw 440 innings, had ERA's of 3.99 and 4.03, and had 350 K's. However, one interesting thing about his successful years as opposed to last year is that his FIP in '05 was 4.54 while last year it was 4.44. Perhaps his unsuccessful season last year resulted, at least partly, from the Brewers' atrocious defense. So maybe there is reason to believe that last year was an aberration if put in the right situation.
Is he worth giving up Reyes for? That's entirely another question but we should be clear that Reyes will be traded this offseason. Should he be? Perhaps; perhaps not. But it's going to happen - he has no options left and there's every reason to believe that Tony and Duncan are sick of him. So he'll be traded - probably in a trade for a vet like Capuano.
The major problem w/ trading Reyes for Capuano is that Reyes has accumulated less than 2 years of service time, meaning that he has 5 years `til free agency. If you don't think Reyes will ever amount to anything - who cares? But if you're like me, and think that there's a decent chance that he'll turn into an average MLB starter - giving up 5 years of relatively cheap SP is a lot to give up. Capuano is 2 years from free agency. Would Capuano have to be 2 ½ times better than Reyes to justify the trade? Capuano does have at least 2 years (depending on how you see his '07) of solid pitching and Reyes just doesn't so we have more reason to be confident in Capuano's ability to be average or better than in Reyes'. However, I ask again - is it likely that he'll be 2 ½ times better than Reyes?
What about opening up the trade to include Rolen? Would the Brewers be interested? They'd be fools not to be interested and Doug Melvin is no fool. As I mentioned, their defense was atrocious last year - it probably cost them the division title and Ryan Braun was a primary culprit. His bat has to be in the lineup of course but he's beyond abysmal defensively and probably belongs in LF or at 1B. Unfortunately (for them) they already have a horrendous defensive player whose bat they must keep in the lineup at 1B so LF is Braun's best option. Putting Rolen at 3B and Braun in LF improves their team immediately. Using FRAA as a baseline, just last year Rolen was +16 FRAA and Braun was -25 FRAA - that's a 41 run difference, 4 wins, on defense alone. Even if you assume that Rolen would only be as good offensively as the man he'd replace in their lineup (Geoff Jenkins), Rolen adds 4 wins to the Brew Crew. Some don't like BP's defensive metrics. Even so, he's gotta be worth at least 2-3 wins on defense alone.
Would Rolen waive his no-trade to go to Milwaukee? Let's see - Midwestern team, contender, chance to stick it to Tony 15 times a year - yeah, I think he'd waive it. It seems as though Mozeliak is really working hard to try and trade Rolen so this part is conceivable.
What about Bill Hall? I'm not convinced Hall is worth Rolen. Hall has tremendous power, is relatively young, and has speed. He's also versatile - having played SS, 3B, and CF over the last few years. However, he also strikes out a ton - 393 times the last 3 years, and seldom walks - 142 during the same time period. His career OBP is .320 (yuck!) and his career high is just .345. Defensively, he's average at best though. He's hard to peg - BP and THT have him about league average defensively at 3rd. David Pinto measured him for CF last year and SS in '06, his primary positions and had him as the 2nd worst CF in baseball last year and the best SS in baseball in '06 . So it's possible he could be OK at 3rd.
Hall's OPS over the last 3 years has been .837, .898, and .740. His respective VORP's were 36.3, 44.3 and 6.7. Maybe moving back to the infield can get his VORP back into the 35-40 range. That would put him at around Garett Atkins' level. That, and average defense at 3B makes this trade look a little better than I originally thought. He'll be 28 when next season starts and has 2 years until free agency. Bill James has him pegged for 22 homers and an .800 OPS and ZIPS has him projected at 20 HR and an .811 OPS for next season. As I said, that's all better than I originally thought - Rolen and Reyes for Capuano and Hall. Interesting. I may have just talked myself into it.
So what about Mench and Gwynn? First of all, neither are everyday players and neither would solve the hole at 3B created by trading Rolen. Mench does mash left-handers. You could platoon him w/ Ludwick or Gwynn in LF and trade Duncan for a 3B or pitching or something. Gwynn can play all 3 OF positions but has a career OPS+ of 61. Isn't Schumaker as good or better? Why would we want him? Mench does have some value as part of a platoon. He's got a career OPS of .924 vs. lefties in 775 PA's but I'd rather have a AA half-prospect than Tony Gwynn, Jr.
So what about that -- Capuano, Mench and a decent but not great prospect for Rolen and Reyes? Mench platoons w/ Duncan and the other 3 OF spots belong to Edmonds, Ludwick and Ankiel. Mench is a free agent at the end of '08 so he really doesn't do much for the club. He mashes lefties and challenges the clubhouse uniform personnel to find a helmet big enough to fit his Heed - "It's like an orange on a toothpick. THAT'S A VIRTUAL PLANETOID!" . Aside from that, and the relentless jokes, he does nothing for me. Pass.
But Rolen and Reyes for Capuano and Hall is an idea worth exploring. We'd save a little money, but not really enough to justify send some coin to Milwaukee. Both Hall and Capuano are arbitration eligible this year and will earn, together, about $9 million. Rolen's $12 M + Reyes, say $1 M means the Cards would save about $4 million. I don't see a need to send the Beermakers any cash. We'd get 2 guys under control for 2 years and there's no reason to think that Capuano and Hall couldn't be at least league average over the next couple of years. We're going to trade Reyes anyway - maybe Capuano is the best we can do.
Millwood is under contract for the next 3 years and is owed $46.5 M - OUCH! When I first looked at that a couple of days ago, I didn't notice that his signing bonus hadn't been paid yet - talk about a virtual planetoid! Wow! Padilla is under contract for 2 more years at $23 M and is certifiable. His best ERA+ over the last 4 years was 102 in '06 - that was the year he hit 17 batters. Capuano's ERA+s over the last 3 years have been 107, 113, and 88 and there's every reason to believe that last year's would've been right around 100 w/ a better defense.
Something may still happen re: Rolen w/ the loser of the Miguel Cabrera sweepstakes - probably either the Dodgers or Angels. That might open up the possibility of Ervin Santana or, dare I say, Chad Billingsley? Doubt it but maybe there's something better out there but the idea of Reyes and Rolen for Capuano and Hall has more merit now than when I originally considered it. The problem is still trading 5 years of Reyes for 2 years of Capuano - it's possible that Reyes will be more valuable over 5 years than Capuano over 2, and that Rolen will be better than Hall - if so, we'd be screwed. You'd have to think this trade will still be there later - the Brew Crew's not trading for Cabrera so let's wait a while and explore this if something can't be worked out w/ the 2 LA/Anaheim/Santa Monica/Fullerton/Santa Ana/Chino/Yorba Linda teams.
74 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
i hope MO's smart enough
i do not like the deal with the brew crew. watching capuano pitch last year, it wasn't just the D that was his problem. it was his head. every time he took the mound you could see on his face he was going to lose. and damned if he didnt. the Cards dont need another head case.
besides, i dont want to see scotty sticking it to us 15-19 times a year.
be smart MO. wait till the winter meetings start & then go get some good players.
Waiting it out
I have
And I have to wonder if it is possible to turn Capuano around. Sure, the potential is there, but we were saying that last offseason about Kip Wells and that didn't pan out so well.
My thoughts
- Scotty's value is pretty low right now. Personally, I think he will increase his value a bit this season. He may be unlikely to recover to his old 875 OPS form, but an 800-825 OBP-heavy OPS with Gold Glove defense is pretty attainable, I think. Additionally, if his performance bounces back, then he'll have a higher expectation of performance plus only $24M guaranteed on his contract, making him more palatable to the gaining team.
- houstoncardinal, I question your math when you ask Reyes is likely to be twice as valuable as Capuano. I understand how you arrived at the figure, but I posit this: Capuano will probably earn $12-13 million over the next two years ($5.5M, $7.5M); Reyes will probably earn $16M before hitting free agency in five years ($400K, $600K, $2M, $5M, $8M) if he performs reasonably well. Basically, it's not merely a "we'll have Capuano for half as long as we'd have Reyes" equation. The monetary factor is huuuuge. Yes, we can say "in two years, Edmonds will be gone and Rasmus will be at the league minimum." However, in two years, Wainwright/Duncan will be getting expensive, and we'll need to start collecting pennies for Albert's pending free agency.
by gretchen on Dec 2, 2007 8:10 AM EST reply actions
Missing a big piece.
You're right
Why does that mean the Cards would have to pay some of Rolen's contract. Hall just became MORE expensive to us, not less. If anything, it makes it less likely that we pay anything toward Rolen.
Also, we can't trade Flores for a blind grandmother to be named later. It was Reyes I suggested trading, not Flores.
Cardinals shouldn't have to pick up some of
If it goes Crapuano and Hall for Rolen and Reyes:
Rolen and Reyes shouldn't cost more than $13-$15 M over the next 3 years.
Capuano doesn't become a FA until 2010. Bill Hall is due $4.8 M in 2008, $6.8 M in 2009, and $8.4 M in 2010.
So, they'd be trading:
Year: Cards for Brewers
- $12.6 M for $8.8 M
- $13 M for $10.8 M
- $15 M for $8.4 M
Of course, who really knows that those are anyways. They are going to pay Jeff Suppan $12.5 M in 2009 and 2010.
by Hardcore Legend on Dec 2, 2007 11:15 AM EST up reply actions
Endaround
It is an interesting trade match considering both teams would be selling low on thier players.
Capuano and Hall surely have more potential than exhibited last season. As do Rolen and Reyes.
I really probably wouldn't pull the trigger if I were us. Likewise, I wouldn't pull the trigger if I were you guys.
I think both teams would benefit from allow thier players to rebound before trading.
If we move Rolen now, it appears like we have to move him due to his relationship with TLR. If we start the season with him, it changes the stigma and allows him to prove he's healthy (or at least healthier than his horrid 2007).
Rolen should start the season here
by cm1000 on Dec 2, 2007 9:37 AM EST reply actions
wait it out
Here's a better deal.......
Having said that, I'll never undertstand why LaRussa and Duncan have always been so down on Reyes. He hasn't pitched well, but he's always kept his mouth shut and I have never gotten vibes that he wasn't trying, didn't care, or didn't want to be here. He's had the equivalent of one year of starting spread over 2 seasons-really not enough to know with certainty that he's never going to be any good. And because every one of the other GM's know the Cards don't want him, we will get nothing of value for him. Not even someone like Capuano. It will have to be a package, and they're going to have to give up someone they'd rather keep.
Reyes' value
Still, Reyes could still have decent value in the current market, but only because so few young starting pitchers are being made available these days. It seems likely to me that several teams will want to take a chance on him. Of course they will also all start out with low-ball offers, but, given the lack of decent starters available elsewhere (via free agency or trade), it seems like someone should pony up something useful. Probably the best idea would be to try to trade him for another young player who is currently out-of-favor with his current team, but who might fit in better here. A shortstop would be good. Hmm, I wonder what we could get by packaging Reyes with Izturis ... just kidding!
They can't put that genie back
And now they look at him as a key trade chip-do they expect anything for him? If they do, they are delusional.
Per Joe Strauss
Sure looks like they are just going to blow this thing up and start all over. All the veterans want out.
by Hardcore Legend on Dec 2, 2007 11:15 AM EST reply actions
trading the veterans
However, I doubt we can get enough for Edmonds or Rolen to make it worthwhile to trade them. So probably it is best to keep them and hope they rebound next year. I don't think that's likely, but we can still be hopeful. However, if we do get a decent offer this winter, or, say, if Rasmus wins the CF job in the spring, then...
That's how it's looking
Seriously why did they bring back LaRussa if they had no intentions on being a contender? If we are just going to get rid of our veterans and sign or trade for below average players like Izturis or getting the likes of a Kevin Mench to replace them then this team is totally lost with not much of a plan in place in my opinion.
then
selling low on rolen and edmonds, would still make us a bad team (lose rolen's defense to get a pitcher dependent on defense-yikes) now, if rolen, jimmy and mulder come back healthy, we're better than a bad team and we're better than the team we'd have traded for, too. they may not, and believing all three are coming back healthy requires potent kool-aid. however, i think this team's best shot to win is holding those guys and hoping they return to form.
unless we can get good (fair value) young talent to build around colby, wainwright, pujols and maybe carpenter in 2009.
by birdsonthebat on Dec 2, 2007 11:47 AM EST up reply actions
What's the deal with La Russa?
BTW, I am not convinced that La Russa can't develop young players. IMHO being tough on them and trying to instill strong discipline and professional integrity is good for their long-term development. However, he certainly does prefer to give playing time to established veterans over developing youngsters, even when the veterans aren't really that good. This problem can be solved by not including too many mediocre veterans on the roster. It's up to Mo to provide leadership here.
tony and kids
tony has played veterans over youngsters. but our farm system is abysmal and has been almost his whole tenure. what prospects should he have played? reyes might be the biggest example of a failed prospect, ankiel fell apart despite tony's protection. and walt traded away the haren's and barton's for veterans. tony didn't have a choice but to play vets. maybe it's a chicken or the egg question, but i don't see that tony has had a choice but to rely on veterans.
sidenote: i don't and didn't have a problem with tony yanking ryan for ignoring a sign. everyone said narron was right to pull edwin encarnacion for not hustling down the line, but then got all upset about tony 'calling out' ryan for not picking up/ignoring signs? ignoring a sign is vitally important, particularly for a hands-on tactician like la russa.
by birdsonthebat on Dec 2, 2007 12:44 PM EST up reply actions
I had no problem with him
you're right
by birdsonthebat on Dec 2, 2007 1:11 PM EST up reply actions
anecdote
i was on first and got the steal sign from our coach at 3rd. i froze. i just didn't go. he yelled at me from across the diamond. "did you not see the steal sign!?! ok, you're stealing on this pitch. this is your steal sign!" i stole the base and didn't missed a sign again.
that doesn't mean tony was right. but sometimes that stuff works. i had a good relationship/communication with my coach already and talked about the incident later. therefore, i knew his motivation wasn't anger or bullying, which i'm not sure tony can claim (but i have no idea what goes on in the clubhouse). i think the nature of the public display shows more anger than teaching, which, as you say, should not happen.
by birdsonthebat on Dec 2, 2007 1:36 PM EST up reply actions
How about I put it in simple terms:
i would be furious, too
i'm not ok with employer showing up the employee just because they're the boss. that's rude, arrogant, indicative of poor leadership and just plain wrong. the nature of the correction is crucial. your situation is the personification of bad correction. if you messed up, the boss should tell you. but not like that. ryan messed up, and i'm glad tony benched him for it. but not yelling and screaming.
i'm willing to bet that you hated tony's letter to rolen, too. i did, too. he's a veteran, a leader. there should be open communication between both of them, and no need for a letter. maybe both are at fault for that, but ultimately, tony should be held responsible for it, just like walt was.
by birdsonthebat on Dec 2, 2007 2:26 PM EST up reply actions
I have stated that I have no problem
I don't know about the letter. I don't know what the letter said. I probably would have made a phone call to set up a personal meeting and sat down over lunch or coffee and tried to smooth things over. But that would involve both of them admitting there was a problem, and that there was a chance to solve it. I think we have a case of two giant egos crowding each other out. Maybe Mr. DeWitt should invite Rolen and LaRussa over for coffee and a chat.....in private, out of any media glare and see what comes of it.
agreed
but you're probably right, the egos are large and most likely unwavering. and tony somehow believes that an angry rolen will play better. not sure about that logic, but i'd love to be wrong.
by birdsonthebat on Dec 2, 2007 2:43 PM EST up reply actions
And I am a middle child, too.
Dislike
- TLR & Brendan Ryan
- TLR/Duncan and Reyes
- TLR and his thought/rules on playing rookies
Amen to that.
by MdRedbirdFreak on Dec 2, 2007 9:58 PM EST up reply actions
Out of LaRussa's
Sure there is speculation;
I said
I just don't like to speculate about what is really going on since I have zero idea, so I try to keep my comments about it simple. You have done a good job of just saying you don't like how Tony yelled at Ryan in front of the camera. Alot of people try to wind that into some other crazy statement about TLR and whatnot that they have zero insight on.
the veterans
As mentioned above, I would keep Rolen and Edmonds unless we receive good return for them. I would definitely not dump them now.
Money and no one else wanted him...
While I doubt he has a hugely extravagent lifestyle, he's also not the simple living sort of guy, either.
And once he retires as manager, I doubt he'll have much income. I can't see him plausibly doing most endorsements that Whitey Herzog has done.
There were rumors about SD being interested
agreed, plus...
strongly agree
by Yield on Dec 2, 2007 7:37 PM EST up reply actions
Maybe I'm missing something
by Cardsfaninia on Dec 2, 2007 12:15 PM EST reply actions
They probably don't want
Vargas is terrible
IMHO, that trade does not make sense
Even if that trade (Reyes + Rolen for Cap + Hall) turns out to be a "fair" one, I doesn't think it makes much sense. We have already seen that Mo' wants to build for 2009 or 2010. With two years to go before FA for each guy, I am not sure if that really helps us in the years we need it.
Because
It's 3 for Bill Hall
Don't get me wrong, if Reyes and Rolen are to be traded, I'd much prefer they get players further from FA than Hall and Capuano are. But I have visions of trading Reyes for Padilla -- worse. If we can get younger players than these, we absolutely should.
The more I look at it, my gut tells me Reyes for 5 years is better than Capuano for 2. Over the next 3 years would I rather have Rolen or Hall? Rolen. The more I think about it, they win with this trade and that was really the purpose of the post -- to explore it in greater detail and, if nothing else, help me come to a conclusion about it. It's definitely not a slam dunk either way.
Reyes, though, is such a wild card. He might never make it or he might be a league-average starter. Accordingly, it's tough to estimate his true value. If it comes down to trading him for Millwood, Padilla, or Capuano, I choose Capuano even w/ Reyes in the same division. But, yes, I'd rather have younger players -- how about Reyes and Rolen for Chad Billingsley? The only advantage Hall offers is a 3B for the next 3 years -- obviously Billingsley doesn't offer that.
All Team Needs & Available Players
Just posted:
http://www.colby-rasmus.com/Available_Players.html
by rrumfelt on Dec 2, 2007 1:25 PM EST reply actions
If Mench reads this,
by 26thMan on Dec 2, 2007 2:44 PM EST reply actions
back to the Braun issue
Is he 'hopeless' ? So bad that he will never get better in the infield ?
And if moved to LF, would he be another Chris Duncan out there? At least until he learns it?
My premise is that getting Reyes and Rolen for Capuano and Hall would be a good deal for Milwaukee. BUT, the question(s) about Braun, above, are in the decision picture, too. If there is reason to believe his defense will improve, then maybe the trade is not so good a move for them.
Braun
However, this just shows me that Yost doesn't really know what the hell he's doing. If a guy has bad technique, you move his ass b/c that is something you should have learned a very very long time ago. And not knowing how to set your feet to throw? Good lord, you learn that shit in HS!!!
As much flak as TLR takes (and rightfully so sometimes) he could outmanage Yost with a blindfold on and his tongue temporarily paralyzed.
by redbirdnation8206 on Dec 2, 2007 4:04 PM EST up reply actions
Braun is a converted SS
by NTNgod on Dec 2, 2007 8:53 PM EST up reply actions
True
by redbirdnation8206 on Dec 2, 2007 9:20 PM EST up reply actions
Postion switching...
The move to third, with learning to adjust to its shorter reaction times, combined with prior bad habits, would be a potentially horrible combination.
Despite the gaudy slugging PCT, he is extremely fast (he's likely to have a few 30/30 seasons in his future) and not particularly big, and could probably make a hell of a CFer, if he could run decent routes.
by NTNgod on Dec 2, 2007 9:38 PM EST up reply actions
I've always thought
by redbirdnation8206 on Dec 2, 2007 10:00 PM EST up reply actions
True
Good infielders will always have good feet and good hands. If you have those traits you can be pretty good. If Bruan played SS you think he should be able to make the jump to 3B as SS if going to be your best athlete/fielder in the IF. The hard thing to adjust to from SS to 3B is the reaction time is a lot less, and you have to really just react oppsed to getting more of a chance to set up a hop for yourself. I guess Braun may still be in the learning process of seeing balls come off a wood bat and adjusting to balls coming at him fater than he has see a ball hit. I have not seen enough of Braun to really tell you how bad he really was. I saw him play a few times this year and I thought he looked to have good hands and a very solid arm so I don't know why he struggled so much. If I watched a full season of Braun I could probably get a better idea of if he could stick at 3B or if he needs to move. Stats don't really tell the whole story as there are a lot of things that could have just been a bit off that resulted in error. It is easy to look at stats and what not and say the guy is "awful" but I will hold any comment as I did not see Mr. Braun play enough to really comment in a inteligent manner.
Chris Duncan in LF
Trade
Hall can play a couple of infield positions and fill in in the outfield, and has more power potential than Rolen at this point. The drawback is that he's not much of an OBP guy...But, his 06 season saw a higher walk total than any other year, and coincidentally that was his best year. In this classic correlational argument, I would say that it is possible that if Hall were to do a decent job working the count he could have another successful year.
Capuano was the victim of the worst infield ever assembled last year. As bad as the BOB was last year defensively, they looked like a squad of Gold Glovers. In terms of ZR, they had the 3rd worst 1Bman, the worst 2Bman, the worst 3Bman (probably the worst fielder at any position last year), and the 3rd worst SS. Capuano's FIP was somewhere around 4.40 and he still had a pretty good K raten (7.92K/9). Even in front of an average defense, his numbers would likely improve. I mean other than walking more guys, he performed the same way in 07 as he did in 06/05, but the results were worse. At worst he'd be the new #2 starter, and at best he'd be the new ace.
I'm also of the opinion that Rolen and Reyes may never have good years again. Rolen's shoulder is a huge question mark, and if he has another year like 07, or worse, 05 he's a huge drag offensively. As for Reyes, I think there are two factors at play here. I don't think his arm is sound, and I don't think he and Duncan see eye to eye as far as approach goes. I think there's a possibility that Reyes can still be a good pitcher, but chances are slim to none that it will be as a Cardinal. With that said, what is the point of keeping him around thinking he may be better at some point and never proving it? Then you're just wasting a roster spot.
by redbirdnation8206 on Dec 2, 2007 4:22 PM EST reply actions
Dumb question
Yeah, we'd have to trade Izturis away somehow, but I'm sure we'd all feel terrible about that.
Hell
I think w/ or w/ out Rolen they are going to have an offensive hole on the infield. They could put Hall at SS or 3rd and have crapitude at the other spot, or they could keep Rolen and get nothing out of the SS spot.
by redbirdnation8206 on Dec 2, 2007 5:20 PM EST up reply actions
my 2 cents
The club could also look and see what it would take to pluck Chad Tracy away from the D-Backs -- he should be available since the skinny seems to be that Reynolds is the guy for them at 3B. Tracy would probably be better than Lamb, but I'm not sure the Cards would have enough trade bait left to be able to offer them a decent deal. They could offer Duncan, who would probably platoon at 1B for them like Tony Clark did last year. Not sure the D-Backs would go for that however
exchange rates
right now:
rolen's value is negative
kennedy's value is negative
edmunds value is negative
reyes is at best neutral, but he is just a hope to get better, not better (so too ankiel)
the best miracle to hope for is that one or more of these guys plays well for the first couple of months, so they can be moved for value. taking this risk seems better than giving up anything for capuano or hall or ??? if you're going to gamble on someone who can actually help the pitching, you are better off going for colon or others that don't cost as much as our undervalued assets. sell low, buy high is not the way to get rich.
And anyone who was thinking Jake Peavy
Yep
Kris Bensen BAL
A.J. Burnett TOR (may opt out)
Paul Byrd CLE
Jon Garland CWS
Tom Glavine NYM
Mike Hampton * ATL
Rich Harden * OAK
Orlando Hernandez NYM
Jason Jennings HOU
Randy Johnson ARZ
John Lackey * LAA
Esteban Loaiza OAK
Braden Looper STL
Derek Lowe LAD
Pedro Martinez NYM
Matt Morris * PIT
Mike Mussina NYY
Jamie Moyer PHI
Mark Mulder * STL
Carl Pavano NYY
Jake Peavy * SD
Brad Penny * LAD
Odalis Perez KC
Oliver Perez NYM
Andy Pettitte NYY
Mark Prior CHC
Horatio Ramirez SEA
C.C. Sabathia CLE
Johan Santana MIN
Ben Sheets MIL
John Smoltz * ATL
Julian Tavarez BOS
Steve Trachsel BAL
Brett Tomko LAD
Claudio Vargas MIL
Woody Williams HOU
Randy Wolf LAD
Tim Melville goes to Holt High
ATL
I don't know anything about the kid you speak of but I have been saying STL needs to start targeting HS kids that pitch. It is in your best interest to get an 18 yr old in the minors so he has time to develope. It beats trying to develope 22 year olds like STL does with the drafting college pitchers.
Any one who looks at that FA pitcher list I posted has to be really worried. People talk about saving $$ to get FA next year and all I can say is what FA do you want? They all have flaws and I think anyone can figure out what guys STL has no chance at.
Melville
by the red baron on Dec 3, 2007 1:45 AM EST up reply actions
THIS BLOWS!!!
We should be in the hunt for Miguel Cabrera! Give them Rolen, Reyes and 2 minor leaguers. Just not Rasmus!
was that an attempt at humor?
It wasn't humor....
but rather, desperation.

by 

















