Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jeremy Lin And How The Pac-12 Missed Him

Intradivisional musings

There's been a lot of talk over the last couple of days about Bernie's comments from the other day about the Cards being in the market for an SP. Initially I thought Millwood or Padilla from the Rangers were the most likely but it was revealed later that was the Brewers' Chris Capuano was the likely target.

As these rumors about Capuano started to fly, there was talk of Reyes being involved and perhaps that the trade would expand to involve Rolen and that the Cards might receive Bill Hall or Kevin Mench and Tony Gwynn, Jr.

I have no idea whether or not these rumors are true, but I thought we should evaluate the plausibility of these rumors and whether or not this trade might be one worth making. Doug Melvin's denied speaking to the Cards of late but that doesn't mean that other prime movers in the Brewers' organization haven't had discussions w/ Mozeliak or someone else in the Cards' organization.

First, is it conceivable that the Brewers could trade Capuano within the division? We know that this doesn't happen that often, mostly b/c teams are afraid the players they trade will come back to haunt them. You don't want to risk making your opponents better as well. But I'm of the opinion that, if the Brewers think trading Capuano for Reyes makes them better, then they believe that this trade will likely make the Cards worse so why wouldn't they do it?

What about Capuano as a Cardinal? He stunk last year, which sort of fits the criteria for what the Cards are looking for - someone we can trade for relatively cheaply and fit into the rotation. He only pitched 150 innings last year - finishing w/ a 5.10 era. His WARP1 was 3.3 and THT credited him w/ exactly 1 WSAB.

He is, however, coming off 2 solid seasons. In '05 and '06 combined he threw 440 innings, had ERA's of 3.99 and 4.03, and had 350 K's. However, one interesting thing about his successful years as opposed to last year is that his FIP in '05 was 4.54 while last year it was 4.44. Perhaps his unsuccessful season last year resulted, at least partly, from the Brewers' atrocious defense. So maybe there is reason to believe that last year was an aberration if put in the right situation.

Is he worth giving up Reyes for? That's entirely another question but we should be clear that Reyes will be traded this offseason. Should he be? Perhaps; perhaps not. But it's going to happen - he has no options left and there's every reason to believe that Tony and Duncan are sick of him. So he'll be traded - probably in a trade for a vet like Capuano.

The major problem w/ trading Reyes for Capuano is that Reyes has accumulated less than 2 years of service time, meaning that he has 5 years `til free agency. If you don't think Reyes will ever amount to anything - who cares? But if you're like me, and think that there's a decent chance that he'll turn into an average MLB starter - giving up 5 years of relatively cheap SP is a lot to give up. Capuano is 2 years from free agency. Would Capuano have to be 2 ½ times better than Reyes to justify the trade? Capuano does have at least 2 years (depending on how you see his '07) of solid pitching and Reyes just doesn't so we have more reason to be confident in Capuano's ability to be average or better than in Reyes'. However, I ask again - is it likely that he'll be 2 ½ times better than Reyes?

What about opening up the trade to include Rolen? Would the Brewers be interested? They'd be fools not to be interested and Doug Melvin is no fool. As I mentioned, their defense was atrocious last year - it probably cost them the division title and Ryan Braun was a primary culprit. His bat has to be in the lineup of course but he's beyond abysmal defensively and probably belongs in LF or at 1B. Unfortunately (for them) they already have a horrendous defensive player whose bat they must keep in the lineup at 1B so LF is Braun's best option. Putting Rolen at 3B and Braun in LF improves their team immediately. Using FRAA as a baseline, just last year Rolen was +16 FRAA and Braun was -25 FRAA - that's a 41 run difference, 4 wins, on defense alone. Even if you assume that Rolen would only be as good offensively as the man he'd replace in their lineup (Geoff Jenkins), Rolen adds 4 wins to the Brew Crew. Some don't like BP's defensive metrics. Even so, he's gotta be worth at least 2-3 wins on defense alone.

Would Rolen waive his no-trade to go to Milwaukee? Let's see - Midwestern team, contender, chance to stick it to Tony 15 times a year - yeah, I think he'd waive it. It seems as though Mozeliak is really working hard to try and trade Rolen so this part is conceivable.

What about Bill Hall? I'm not convinced Hall is worth Rolen. Hall has tremendous power, is relatively young, and has speed. He's also versatile - having played SS, 3B, and CF over the last few years. However, he also strikes out a ton - 393 times the last 3 years, and seldom walks - 142 during the same time period. His career OBP is .320 (yuck!) and his career high is just .345. Defensively, he's average at best though. He's hard to peg - BP and THT have him about league average defensively at 3rd. David Pinto measured him for CF last year and SS in '06, his primary positions and had him as the 2nd worst CF in baseball last year and the best SS in baseball in '06 . So it's possible he could be OK at 3rd.

Hall's OPS over the last 3 years has been .837, .898, and .740. His respective VORP's were 36.3, 44.3 and 6.7. Maybe moving back to the infield can get his VORP back into the 35-40 range. That would put him at around Garett Atkins' level. That, and average defense at 3B makes this trade look a little better than I originally thought. He'll be 28 when next season starts and has 2 years until free agency. Bill James has him pegged for 22 homers and an .800 OPS and ZIPS has him projected at 20 HR and an .811 OPS for next season. As I said, that's all better than I originally thought - Rolen and Reyes for Capuano and Hall. Interesting. I may have just talked myself into it.

So what about Mench and Gwynn? First of all, neither are everyday players and neither would solve the hole at 3B created by trading Rolen. Mench does mash left-handers. You could platoon him w/ Ludwick or Gwynn in LF and trade Duncan for a 3B or pitching or something. Gwynn can play all 3 OF positions but has a career OPS+ of 61. Isn't Schumaker as good or better? Why would we want him? Mench does have some value as part of a platoon. He's got a career OPS of .924 vs. lefties in 775 PA's but I'd rather have a AA half-prospect than Tony Gwynn, Jr.

So what about that -- Capuano, Mench and a decent but not great prospect for Rolen and Reyes? Mench platoons w/ Duncan and the other 3 OF spots belong to Edmonds, Ludwick and Ankiel. Mench is a free agent at the end of '08 so he really doesn't do much for the club. He mashes lefties and challenges the clubhouse uniform personnel to find a helmet big enough to fit his Heed - "It's like an orange on a toothpick. THAT'S A VIRTUAL PLANETOID!" . Aside from that, and the relentless jokes, he does nothing for me. Pass.

But Rolen and Reyes for Capuano and Hall is an idea worth exploring. We'd save a little money, but not really enough to justify send some coin to Milwaukee. Both Hall and Capuano are arbitration eligible this year and will earn, together, about $9 million. Rolen's $12 M + Reyes, say $1 M means the Cards would save about $4 million. I don't see a need to send the Beermakers any cash. We'd get 2 guys under control for 2 years and there's no reason to think that Capuano and Hall couldn't be at least league average over the next couple of years. We're going to trade Reyes anyway - maybe Capuano is the best we can do.

Millwood is under contract for the next 3 years and is owed $46.5 M - OUCH! When I first looked at that a couple of days ago, I didn't notice that his signing bonus hadn't been paid yet - talk about a virtual planetoid! Wow! Padilla is under contract for 2 more years at $23 M and is certifiable. His best ERA+ over the last 4 years was 102 in '06 - that was the year he hit 17 batters. Capuano's ERA+s over the last 3 years have been 107, 113, and 88 and there's every reason to believe that last year's would've been right around 100 w/ a better defense.

Something may still happen re: Rolen w/ the loser of the Miguel Cabrera sweepstakes - probably either the Dodgers or Angels. That might open up the possibility of Ervin Santana or, dare I say, Chad Billingsley? Doubt it but maybe there's something better out there but the idea of Reyes and Rolen for Capuano and Hall has more merit now than when I originally considered it. The problem is still trading 5 years of Reyes for 2 years of Capuano - it's possible that Reyes will be more valuable over 5 years than Capuano over 2, and that Rolen will be better than Hall - if so, we'd be screwed. You'd have to think this trade will still be there later - the Brew Crew's not trading for Cabrera so let's wait a while and explore this if something can't be worked out w/ the 2 LA/Anaheim/Santa Monica/Fullerton/Santa Ana/Chino/Yorba Linda teams.

Comment 74 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

i hope MO's smart enough
to wait this thing out. see who loses out on miggie, and dont foget tejada. then pounce on who ever lost out & get some real good players for scotty, not just some questionable to average ones.

i do not like the deal with the brew crew. watching capuano pitch last year, it wasn't just the D that was his problem. it was his head. every time he took the mound you could see on his face he was going to lose. and damned if he didnt. the Cards dont need another head case.

besides, i dont want to see scotty sticking it to us 15-19 times a year.

be smart MO. wait till the winter meetings start & then go get some good players.

I'm going to go try to find a puppy and kick it. - Brad Thompson And That's A Winner!

by gdm426 on Dec 2, 2007 7:00 AM EST reply actions  

Waiting it out
Well, he couldn't wait to sign one of the worst players in baseball. Couldn't imagine a December without Cesar Izturis. So I don't know about that.

by plh903 on Dec 2, 2007 2:18 PM EST up reply actions  

I have
to agree.  Wait and see who loses out on Miggy.  I DO NOT want to see Scotty Ro just given away.  I think we will miss his defense sorely.  Any slight gain (?) in D made by signing Izturis would be lost if Mr. Rolen takes his glove and leaves.  If he is going, I would rather see him go out west where we would only see him twice a year (or rarely).  

And I have to wonder if it is possible to turn Capuano around.  Sure, the potential is there, but we were saying that last offseason about Kip Wells and that didn't pan out so well.  

by cardsgirl95 on Dec 2, 2007 7:33 AM EST reply actions  

My thoughts
  1. Scotty's value is pretty low right now.  Personally, I think he will increase his value a bit this season.  He may be unlikely to recover to his old 875 OPS form, but an 800-825 OBP-heavy OPS with Gold Glove defense is pretty attainable, I think.  Additionally, if his performance bounces back, then he'll have a higher expectation of performance plus only $24M guaranteed on his contract, making him more palatable to the gaining team.
  2. houstoncardinal, I question your math when you ask Reyes is likely to be twice as valuable as Capuano.  I understand how you arrived at the figure, but I posit this:  Capuano will probably earn $12-13 million over the next two years ($5.5M, $7.5M); Reyes will probably earn $16M before hitting free agency in five years ($400K, $600K, $2M, $5M, $8M) if he performs reasonably well. Basically, it's not merely a "we'll have Capuano for half as long as we'd have Reyes" equation. The monetary factor is huuuuge.  Yes, we can say "in two years, Edmonds will be gone and Rasmus will be at the league minimum." However, in two years, Wainwright/Duncan will be getting expensive, and we'll need to start collecting pennies for Albert's pending free agency.
This assumes, of course, that this is a Capuano-for-Reyes deal rather than a Capuano for Rolen deal.  If MIL wants some coin in a Cappy-for-Scotty trade, screw 'em.

by gretchen on Dec 2, 2007 8:10 AM EST reply actions  

Missing a big piece.
Hall signed a new contract before last season.  He's under contract for $4.8m in 2008, $6.8m in 2009, and $8.4 m in 2010.  In addition he has a team option for 2011 at $9.25m.  Unless the Cards pay a huge portion of Rolen's salary, now way will Hall be involved for Rolen and Flores.

by endaround on Dec 2, 2007 8:53 AM EST reply actions  

You're right
how'd I miss that? Well, it was 1:30 am; I guess that's how. That changes things. He's owed $20 M over three years. It's still $16 M less than Rolen but...

Why does that mean the Cards would have to pay some of Rolen's contract. Hall just became MORE expensive to us, not less. If anything, it makes it less likely that we pay anything toward Rolen.

Also, we can't trade Flores for a blind grandmother to be named later. It was Reyes I suggested trading, not Flores.

by chuckb on Dec 2, 2007 9:07 AM EST up reply actions  

Cardinals shouldn't have to pick up some of
the contract.

If it goes Crapuano and Hall for Rolen and Reyes:

Rolen and Reyes shouldn't cost more than $13-$15 M over the next 3 years.

Capuano doesn't become a FA until 2010. Bill Hall is due $4.8 M in 2008, $6.8 M in 2009, and $8.4 M in 2010.

So, they'd be trading:
Year: Cards for Brewers

  1. $12.6 M for $8.8 M
  2. $13 M for $10.8 M
  3. $15 M for $8.4 M
Obviously, the Brewers are taking on considerable more payroll here (about $12.6 M) but it would work within their contract restraints.

Of course, who really knows that those are anyways. They are going to pay Jeff Suppan $12.5 M in 2009 and 2010.

"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Dec 2, 2007 11:15 AM EST up reply actions  

Endaround
Welcome!  Always enjoy your posts.

It is an interesting trade match considering both teams would be selling low on thier players.

Capuano and Hall surely have more potential than exhibited last season.   As do Rolen and Reyes.

I really probably wouldn't pull the trigger if I were us.  Likewise, I wouldn't pull the trigger if I were you guys.

I think both teams would benefit from allow thier players to rebound before trading.

If we move Rolen now, it appears like we have to move him due to his relationship with TLR.   If we start the season with him, it changes the stigma and allows him to prove he's healthy (or at least healthier than his horrid 2007).

by RedbirdRay on Dec 2, 2007 11:22 AM EST up reply actions  

Rolen should start the season here
at least spring training if hes shows hes healthy then trade to whoever loses out on miggy.But see if hes healthy first there are other options to get a pitcher I would keep reyes in the 5 hole dont move him around and let him pitch before i would trade for a hurt pitcher we can just pick up Lieber and Jennings in free agency and go from there..

by cm1000 on Dec 2, 2007 9:37 AM EST reply actions  

wait it out
i agree the brew trade is not a good idea right now.  if rolen wants out, he knows the best way is to play his way out.  so, much like a player in his walk year, i don't see his relationship causing a problem with desire to play his best.  his desire to leave will require max effort from him and i think that's the way mo should go.  wait it out.

by sportsman on Dec 2, 2007 10:40 AM EST up reply actions  

Here's a better deal.......
I know you'll be surprised to hear this, but Mike Hampton was hurt again.  Call the Braves....offer them some sort of deal for Reyes +  for Lillibridge +.   The Braves already have a lefty (Chuck James, throws a 4 seamer and change up with varying degree of quality on his other pitches from game to game) who is a carbon copy of Reyes, and they have had better results devising a plan that works for him.  If they don't want Reyes, they should.  He'd be good in Atlanta.

Having said that, I'll never undertstand why LaRussa and Duncan have always been so down on Reyes.  He hasn't pitched well, but he's always kept his mouth shut and I have never gotten vibes that he wasn't trying, didn't care, or didn't want to be here.  He's had the equivalent of one year of starting spread over 2 seasons-really not enough to know with certainty that he's never going to be any good. And because every one of the other GM's know the Cards don't want him, we will get nothing of value for him.  Not even someone like Capuano.  It will have to be a package, and they're going to have to give up someone they'd rather keep.

   

by jillsinmo on Dec 2, 2007 10:20 AM EST reply actions  

Reyes' value
I absolutely hate it when we devalue our players before trying to trade them (Mike Keenan anyone?) That's terrible strategy.  If they don't fit your philosophy, trade them when their value is high -- before you make it clear to the world that you don't want them.

Still, Reyes could still have decent value in the current market, but only because so few young starting pitchers are being made available these days.  It seems likely to me that several teams will want to take a chance on him.  Of course they will also all start out with low-ball offers, but, given the lack of decent starters available elsewhere (via free agency or trade), it seems like someone should pony up something useful.  Probably the best idea would be to try to trade him for another young player who is currently out-of-favor with his current team, but who might fit in better here. A shortstop would be good.  Hmm, I wonder what we could get by packaging Reyes with Izturis ... just kidding!

by apack on Dec 2, 2007 11:09 AM EST up reply actions  

They can't put that genie back
in the bottle.  To be sure, Reyes didn't pitch well--but Duncan, LaRussa, and Jocketty were the ones saying things like he's not a major leaguer, we have no one in the minors, pulled him from the rotation, complained about every pitch he threw, showed absolutely no confidence in him, never gave him any credit for trying hard to get it right.  At this point, they could even just non-tender him.  Maybe put him on waivers for one of those PTBN.  And I think most of the fans would be okay with that.  It's an unhealthy situation, and they shouldn't even try to put Reyes through that again.  They made it clear they don't want him.  So be done with it.

And now they look at him as a key trade chip-do they expect anything for him?  If they do, they are delusional.

by jillsinmo on Dec 2, 2007 12:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Per Joe Strauss
Edmonds would waive his no trade clause for a southern California team.

Sure looks like they are just going to blow this thing up and start all over.  All the veterans want out.

"Well, you wait for a strike. Then you knock the shit out of it. - Musial to Flood on how to hit a curveball

by Hardcore Legend on Dec 2, 2007 11:15 AM EST reply actions  

trading the veterans
It's already blown up.  Now we just need to clear out the wreckage.

However, I doubt we can get enough for Edmonds or Rolen to make it worthwhile to trade them.  So probably it is best to keep them and hope they rebound next year.  I don't think that's likely, but we can still be hopeful.  However, if we do get a decent offer this winter, or, say, if Rasmus wins the CF job in the spring, then...

by apack on Dec 2, 2007 11:26 AM EST up reply actions  

That's how it's looking
I know it's unthinkable now but it wouldn't suprise me to see Pujols either request to get traded in the next year or so or DeWitt won't give him the money he deserves and he walks when his contract is up.

Seriously why did they bring back LaRussa if they had no intentions on being a contender? If we are just going to get rid of our veterans and sign or trade for below average players like Izturis or getting the likes of a Kevin Mench to replace them then this team is totally lost with not much of a plan in place in my opinion.

by KYCards on Dec 2, 2007 11:30 AM EST up reply actions  

then
why would tony come back? i just can't believe tony would come back if he thought mo was just going to blow the thing up.  

selling low on rolen and edmonds, would still make us a bad team (lose rolen's defense to get a pitcher dependent on defense-yikes)  now, if rolen, jimmy and mulder come back healthy, we're better than a bad team and we're better than the team we'd have traded for, too.  they may not, and believing all three are coming back healthy requires potent kool-aid.  however, i think this team's best shot to win is holding those guys and hoping they return to form.  

unless we can get good (fair value) young talent to build around colby, wainwright, pujols and maybe carpenter in 2009.

by birdsonthebat on Dec 2, 2007 11:47 AM EST up reply actions  

What's the deal with La Russa?
It seems they're temporizing. Probably the outcome of the discussions between La Russa and DeWitt was that they wouldn't completely tear down the team in order to rebuild, but instead would try to field a competitive team while waiting for the kids to arrive. This is tricky to achieve though.

BTW, I am not convinced that La Russa can't develop young players.  IMHO being tough on them and trying to instill strong discipline and professional integrity is good for their long-term development.  However, he certainly does prefer to give playing time to established veterans over developing youngsters, even when the veterans aren't really that good.  This problem can be solved by not including too many mediocre veterans on the roster. It's up to Mo to provide leadership here.  

by apack on Dec 2, 2007 12:19 PM EST up reply actions  

tony and kids
by avoiding veterans, do you mean dumping them or not signing them?  i'm all for avoiding them.  but i'd rather not dump the ones we have, unless for young good talent.

tony has played veterans over youngsters.  but our farm system is abysmal and has been almost his whole tenure.  what prospects should he have played?  reyes might be the biggest example of a failed prospect,  ankiel fell apart despite tony's protection.  and walt traded away the haren's and barton's for veterans.  tony didn't have a choice but to play vets.  maybe it's a chicken or the egg question, but i don't see that tony has had a choice but to rely on veterans.

sidenote: i don't and didn't have a problem with tony yanking ryan for ignoring a sign.  everyone said narron was right to pull edwin encarnacion for not hustling down the line, but then got all upset about tony 'calling out' ryan for not picking up/ignoring signs? ignoring a sign is vitally important, particularly for a hands-on tactician like la russa.

 

by birdsonthebat on Dec 2, 2007 12:44 PM EST up reply actions  

I had no problem with him
yanking Ryan---I do however, have a problem with him screaming at him in full view of the TV cameras and his teammates.  You will never convince me that was the right way to handle the problem.  That's how bullies behave, and Mr. LaRussa should be better than that.

by jillsinmo on Dec 2, 2007 12:53 PM EST up reply actions  

you're right
i should have qualified that statement.  i'm fine with rebuking the youngster, but not blasting him or embarrassing him.  i like that tony is teaching them, but he needs to do it somewhere in between humiliation and a letter.  both are bad means (and can be ineffective) to a good end.

by birdsonthebat on Dec 2, 2007 1:11 PM EST up reply actions  

anecdote
while i disagree with the public lambasting, one of my most vivid (and favorite) baseball memories come from a similar situation.

i was on first and got the steal sign from our coach at 3rd.  i froze.  i just didn't go.  he yelled at me from across the diamond.  "did you not see the steal sign!?!  ok, you're stealing on this pitch.  this is your steal sign!"  i stole the base and didn't missed a sign again.

that doesn't mean tony was right.  but sometimes that stuff works.  i had a good relationship/communication with my coach already and talked about the incident later.  therefore, i knew his motivation wasn't anger or bullying, which i'm not sure tony can claim (but i have no idea what goes on in the clubhouse).  i think the nature of the public display shows more anger than teaching, which, as you say, should not happen.

   

by birdsonthebat on Dec 2, 2007 1:36 PM EST up reply actions  

How about I put it in simple terms:
LaRussa is the Employer; Ryan, the employee.  Now, if you make a mistake at work, would you be okay with being dressed down in full view of your co-workers AND folks who do business with you?  Because that's what was done to Ryan.  It happened to me once and I can't tell you how humiliated I felt.  But it also made my co-workers HATE the boss.  Guess who's still there?  Yep, my boss is the one who's gone.  I hope Mr. LaRussa thinks twice about how to handle young players who need guidance.  I don't think he will, because he has been given a free hand to do whatever he wants.  But if he wants to coax a better performance out of players, he really should think twice about how he does it.  I'd be really disappointed to see him do this again to another player...

by jillsinmo on Dec 2, 2007 1:49 PM EST up reply actions  

i would be furious, too
i agree that tony should not bully ryan.  you're oversimplifying my position.  i hope we agree that tony and employers have the right and the duty to correct employees.  otherwise, it'd be a rudderless ship.  and i'm ok with it happening in front of co-workers, it can be a learning experience for everyone.  dave duncan or tony will go out to the pitcher's mound to correct, rebuke or bench the guy (in front of everyone).   that needs to happen.  but there is a line.

i'm not ok with employer showing up the employee just because they're the boss.  that's rude, arrogant, indicative of poor leadership and just plain wrong.   the nature of the correction is crucial.   your situation is the personification of bad correction.  if you messed up, the boss should tell you.  but not like that.  ryan messed up, and i'm glad tony benched him for it.  but not yelling and screaming.  

i'm willing to bet that you hated tony's letter to rolen, too.  i did, too.  he's a veteran, a leader.  there should be open communication between both of them, and no need for a letter.  maybe both are at fault for that, but ultimately, tony should be held responsible for it, just like walt was.  

by birdsonthebat on Dec 2, 2007 2:26 PM EST up reply actions  

I have stated that I have no problem
with correcting a player/employee for making a mistake. In fact, you must make sure they know they made a mistake, and you know they made the mistake.  No complaints about that.   I just hated to see it so public.  

I don't know about the letter.  I don't know what the letter said.  I probably would have made a phone call to set up a personal meeting and sat down over lunch or coffee and tried to smooth things over.  But that would involve both of them admitting there was a problem, and that there was a chance to solve it.  I think we have a case of two giant egos crowding each other out.  Maybe Mr. DeWitt should invite Rolen and LaRussa over for coffee and a chat.....in private, out of any media glare and see what comes of it.

by jillsinmo on Dec 2, 2007 2:38 PM EST up reply actions  

agreed
i would love to see that.  i think it's a great idea and given the emphasis on communication through all branches with luhnow/jocketty rift, i think it should happen to show that dewitt is serious about it.  i'd like dewitt to have mo arrange it.  that would also securely establish that mo is tony's boss, which he is.

  but you're probably right, the egos are large and most likely unwavering.  and tony somehow believes that an angry rolen will play better.  not sure about that logic, but i'd love to be wrong.

by birdsonthebat on Dec 2, 2007 2:43 PM EST up reply actions  

And I am a middle child, too.
We are the fiercely loyal peacekeepers in the family.  So that kind of clouds my judgement, for better or worse.

by jillsinmo on Dec 2, 2007 2:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Dislike
I dislike these type of situations because I have no idea what goes on behind the scene.  You saw TLR yell at Ryan on camera (which I think he should avoid, as there is a tunnel for that), but that is about 1% of the whole picture.  I have no idea what goes on 99% of the time as I am not privy to conversations and whatnot.  It is all speculation on this board when people discuss the 3 most common speculation things.
  1. TLR & Brendan Ryan
  2. TLR/Duncan and Reyes
  3. TLR and his thought/rules on playing rookies
It is just hard and I think too much speculation comes into the discussion which I don't like discussing.  Obviously we speculate on a lot of things but I don't like to make too many comments on things we have zero idea about.

by ICbirdfan on Dec 2, 2007 9:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Amen to that.
Some of it is true speculation, which is fine, and is the currency of the offseason.  What I object to are the wild-ass guesses designed to prop up whatever pre-existing grudge, conspiracy theory or prejudice any commenter is hanging onto.

by MdRedbirdFreak on Dec 2, 2007 9:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Out of LaRussa's
own mouth he disdains confident young players.  That's why he hated Prior so much.  He feels young players needs to be humble and "soak it all in" with their mouths shut.  It's a safe bet to see something that reflects those sentiments as face value.  
"How depressing is it being you? Would you equate it to being a lifelong Cubs fan?"

by rocKStark5 on Dec 2, 2007 10:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Sure there is speculation;
but Tony DID yell at Ryan in front of his teammates and in view of the television cameras.  I saw it myself-I watched the game.  I happen to think that was wrong.  I don't care if Ryan is the biggest goofball on the planet.  That doesn't mean it's okay to humilate him.  Because it's not.  That's not specualtion-that's my opinion.

by jillsinmo on Dec 2, 2007 10:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Doh
Not humilate--"humiliate"

by jillsinmo on Dec 2, 2007 10:27 PM EST up reply actions  

I said
I said I did agree with the fact that TLR did not need to yell at him out in the open, but I would not worry about the team seeing it.  TLR should have pulled him into the tunnel and yelled at him.  All the team would still know it was going on but the TV viewers would not have seen it take place.  Managers and players get into it all the time in the tunnel in MLB.  It happens a lot and it is not a big deal, but it is a problem when the manager does it in front of a camera and all the fans can see it.  Heck players get into fights in the tunnel quite often.

I just don't like to speculate about what is really going on since I have zero idea, so I try to keep my comments about it simple.  You have done a good job of just saying you don't like how Tony yelled at Ryan in front of the camera.  Alot of people try to wind that into some other crazy statement about TLR and whatnot that they have zero insight on.

by ICbirdfan on Dec 2, 2007 10:32 PM EST up reply actions  

the veterans
I really mean that we shouldn't resign Miles or Taguchi, and we shouldn't sign other veteran scrubs for those spots either.  Let our kids have a shot, or get Rule-5 players or some other young players from outside the organization.

As mentioned above, I would keep Rolen and Edmonds unless we receive good return for them.  I would definitely not dump them now.

by apack on Dec 2, 2007 1:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Money and no one else wanted him...
That's why Tony is back. I still he think secretly wanted the Yankees job, and was hurt when it wasn't offered to him on a silver platter.

While I doubt he has a hugely extravagent lifestyle, he's also not the simple living sort of guy, either.
And once he retires as manager, I doubt he'll have much income.  I can't see him plausibly doing most endorsements that Whitey Herzog has done.

by DiscoJer on Dec 2, 2007 4:12 PM EST up reply actions  

There were rumors about SD being interested
but they wouldn't give us anything back. It would just be a salary dump. I just don't see it happening. He's on a 1 year deal, not 3. The only way I see it happening is if Rasmus plays his way into the lineup this spring.

by chuckb on Dec 2, 2007 12:49 PM EST up reply actions  

agreed, plus...
trading edmonds for nothing would be a bad PR statement to the fans and players.  If they dealt him at the deadline, and actually got a prospect for him, it would make some sense.

by rrvwmr on Dec 2, 2007 1:44 PM EST up reply actions  

strongly agree
Edmonds salary this year looks pretty good comparded to the $$'s being thrown at CF's the past 2 years.  He doesn't have to return to his glory days, but a slight uptick and a possible mentor to Rasmus at the end of the year might be worth the price tag.

by Yield on Dec 2, 2007 7:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Maybe I'm missing something
But I don't think the Brewers would really have much interest in Reyes.  They have Sheets, Suppan, Gallardo, David Bush, Claudio Vargas, Carlos Villanueva and I thought they had another pitcher at AAA that they though was close to ready (I don't follow the Brewers much so I'm probably wrong on that) Manny Para can be included as well.  Unless they're planning on some trades and I know there was some small talk that they might move Bush to the pen, there is pretty much no room for Reyes unless they think he can be a reliever which probably won't happen.  So I could be wrong but I seriously doubt the Brewers have any real interest in Reyes

by Cardsfaninia on Dec 2, 2007 12:15 PM EST reply actions  

They probably don't want
Reyes.  They have plenty of starting pitching.  In fact, they have a first rate farm system that's loaded from bottom to top.  It might be more of insurance for when Ben Sheets goes down (and he will-that's what he does every year) and to unload Capuano's more expensive contract.  Perhaps they'd just be willing to take him off of our hands, and the Card's desperately want him taken off of their hands.    

by jillsinmo on Dec 2, 2007 12:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Vargas is terrible
they were talking about dfa'ing Dave Bush, Sheets has a history of being injured and is a free agent at the end of the season. Besides which, they'd be trading a starting pitcher. If nothing else, they may see this as getting the most possible from a trade of Capuano, who they're looking to unload. I don't see their interest as being implausible.

by chuckb on Dec 2, 2007 12:52 PM EST up reply actions  

IMHO, that trade does not make sense
HC,
Even if that trade (Reyes + Rolen for Cap + Hall) turns out to be a "fair" one, I doesn't think it makes much sense.  We have already seen that Mo' wants to build for 2009 or 2010.  With two years to go before FA for each guy, I am not sure if that really helps us in the years we need it.
The St. Louis Cardinals- 11 time World Champions!

by Zubin on Dec 2, 2007 1:16 PM EST reply actions  

Because
better teams now mean more revenue later.  
"How depressing is it being you? Would you equate it to being a lifelong Cubs fan?"

by rocKStark5 on Dec 2, 2007 2:23 PM EST up reply actions  

It's 3 for Bill Hall
my mistake in the story.  That's the same as Rolen, BTW.  I've been going back and forth on this.  Originally, I was opposed -- I didn't care for Reyes for Capuano and I didn't really like Hall.  The more I looked at Capuano's and Hall's numbers, the more I liked them -- and it would reduce the payroll slightly.

Don't get me wrong, if Reyes and Rolen are to be traded, I'd much prefer they get players further from FA than Hall and Capuano are.  But I have visions of trading Reyes for Padilla -- worse.  If we can get younger players than these, we absolutely should.  

The more I look at it, my gut tells me Reyes for 5 years is better than Capuano for 2.  Over the next 3 years would I rather have Rolen or Hall?  Rolen.  The more I think about it, they win with this trade and that was really the purpose of the post -- to explore it in greater detail and, if nothing else, help me come to a conclusion about it.  It's definitely not a slam dunk either way.

Reyes, though, is such a wild card.  He might never make it or he might be a league-average starter.  Accordingly, it's tough to estimate his true value.  If it comes down to trading him for Millwood, Padilla, or Capuano, I choose Capuano even w/ Reyes in the same division.  But, yes, I'd rather have younger players -- how about Reyes and Rolen for Chad Billingsley?  The only advantage Hall offers is a 3B for the next 3 years -- obviously Billingsley doesn't offer that.

by chuckb on Dec 2, 2007 4:12 PM EST up reply actions  

All Team Needs & Available Players
Want to know what each team needs and has to offer + free agents by position?

Just posted:

http://www.colby-rasmus.com/Available_Players.html

robster

by rrumfelt on Dec 2, 2007 1:25 PM EST reply actions  

kennedy
just a question:  is kennedy's salary guaranteed?

by sportsman on Dec 2, 2007 1:46 PM EST reply actions  

If Mench reads this,
he'll be crying himself to sleep tonight on his huge pillow.

by 26thMan on Dec 2, 2007 2:44 PM EST reply actions  

back to the Braun issue
I don't see the Brewers much at all, so my question is about how they feel about their stud 3B Defensively.
Is he 'hopeless' ? So bad that he will never get better in the infield ?
And if moved to LF, would he be another Chris Duncan out there?  At least until he learns it?

My premise is that getting Reyes and Rolen for Capuano and Hall would be a good deal for Milwaukee. BUT, the question(s) about Braun, above, are in the decision picture, too.  If there is reason to believe his defense will improve, then maybe the trade is not so good a move for them.

by the Tewk on Dec 2, 2007 3:46 PM EST reply actions  

Braun
What I had heard from Yost was that Braun had the athleticism to be a good infielder, the arm, and the hands.  The issue was that he had bad technique and didn't really know how to set his feet to throw.  Its also my opinion that having Fielder at first hurt his error total somewhat.  So basically they don't feel its hopeless.

However, this just shows me that Yost doesn't really know what the hell he's doing.  If a guy has bad technique, you move his ass b/c that is something you should have learned a very very long time ago.  And not knowing how to set your feet to throw?  Good lord, you learn that shit in HS!!!  

As much flak as TLR takes (and rightfully so sometimes) he could outmanage Yost with a blindfold on and his tongue temporarily paralyzed.  

by redbirdnation8206 on Dec 2, 2007 4:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Braun is a converted SS
He's only been a 3B since his soph/junior year of college, and even then he played both positions, I believe.

by NTNgod on Dec 2, 2007 8:53 PM EST up reply actions  

True
3B does require different reaction times.  But the thing is this: Yost's assessment on Braun's shortcomings aren't things that are the function of switching positions...they're the function of not being a fundamentally sound infielder.  If you can set your feet to throw to 1st from the SS position, you can do it at third.  If you can't at SS, you're going to struggle doing it from 3rd.  I don't doubt that switching positions hasn't helped his problems, but the fact of the matter is that he's not a good infielder and is pretty damn far away from becoming one.  

by redbirdnation8206 on Dec 2, 2007 9:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Postion switching...
Braun's got an absolute cannon of an arm, and with the longer reaction times at SS, one wonders if he never bothered to learn how to throw properly - he could get away with just gunning it most of the time.

The move to third, with learning to adjust to its shorter reaction times, combined with prior bad habits, would be a potentially horrible combination.

Despite the gaudy slugging PCT, he is extremely fast (he's likely to have a few 30/30 seasons in his future) and not particularly big, and could probably make a hell of a CFer, if he could run decent routes.

by NTNgod on Dec 2, 2007 9:38 PM EST up reply actions  

I've always thought
That playing OF had more do with athleticism and instincts, whereas infield is based on these combined with technique.  If your technique is bad, you'll have struggles in the IF.  I think a decent comparison with Braun is Soriano.  He was a dreadful 2nd baseman, but is a decent enough outfielder.  I think that Braun's arm strength and athletic skills could make him at worst a passable outfielder.  A bad outfielder is easier to hide than a bad infielder.  

by redbirdnation8206 on Dec 2, 2007 10:00 PM EST up reply actions  

True
I think it is more detrimental to have a bad infielder opposed to a bad outfielder.  Obviously you prefer to have to have good solid defense around the horn, but teams are generally willing to sacrifice defense at LF and 1B.  Those are the postions where they like to plug hitters and say most MLB players who are very good can learn to play 1B & LF.  The only problem for Braun and Milwaukee is that Prince is at 1B so they can't simply shift Braun to 1B.  Braun has a very good throwing arm but it is a bit wild at times, and it does not help that Prince is not great around the bag.  I figure Prince could have saved Braun at least 3 errors this year if he was a bit better around the bag.

Good infielders will always have good feet and good hands.  If you have those traits you can be pretty good.  If Bruan played SS you think he should be able to make the jump to 3B as SS if going to be your best athlete/fielder in the IF.  The hard thing to adjust to from SS to 3B is the reaction time is a lot less, and you have to really just react oppsed to getting more of a chance to set up a hop for yourself.  I guess Braun may still be in the learning process of seeing balls come off a wood bat and adjusting to balls coming at him fater than he has see a ball hit.  I have not seen enough of Braun to really tell you how bad he really was.  I saw him play a few times this year and I thought he looked to have good hands and a very solid arm so I don't know why he struggled so much.  If I watched a full season of Braun I could probably get a better idea of if he could stick at 3B or if he needs to move.  Stats don't really tell the whole story as there are a lot of things that could have just been a bit off that resulted in error.  It is easy to look at stats and what not and say the guy is "awful" but I will hold any comment as I did not see Mr. Braun play enough to really comment in a inteligent manner.

by ICbirdfan on Dec 2, 2007 10:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Chris Duncan in LF
is better than Chris Duncan at 3B and that's what he is now, a one-armed, blind Chris Duncan at 3B. Until now, I hadn't seen any indication that they were considering moving Braun away from 3B but this trade makes sense from their perspective.

by chuckb on Dec 2, 2007 4:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Trade
If the Brew Crew would do a Hall/Capuano for Rolen/Reyes I would be all for it, and here's why:

Hall can play a couple of infield positions and fill in in the outfield, and has more power potential than Rolen at this point.  The drawback is that he's not much of an OBP guy...But, his 06 season saw a higher walk total than any other year, and coincidentally that was his best year.  In this classic correlational argument, I would say that it is possible that if Hall were to do a decent job working the count he could have another successful year.  

Capuano was the victim of the worst infield ever assembled last year.  As bad as the BOB was last year defensively, they looked like a squad of Gold Glovers.  In terms of ZR, they had the 3rd worst 1Bman, the worst 2Bman, the worst 3Bman (probably the worst fielder at any position last year), and the 3rd worst SS.  Capuano's FIP was somewhere around 4.40 and he still had a pretty good K raten (7.92K/9).  Even in front of an average defense, his numbers would likely improve.  I mean other than walking more guys, he performed the same way in 07 as he did in 06/05, but the results were worse.  At worst he'd be the new #2 starter, and at best he'd be the new ace.  

I'm also of the opinion that Rolen and Reyes may never have good years again.  Rolen's shoulder is a huge question mark, and if he has another year like 07, or worse, 05 he's a huge drag offensively.  As for Reyes, I think there are two factors at play here.  I don't think his arm is sound, and I don't think he and Duncan see eye to eye as far as approach goes.  I think there's a possibility that Reyes can still be a good pitcher, but chances are slim to none that it will be as a Cardinal.  With that said, what is the point of keeping him around thinking he may be better at some point and never proving it?  Then you're just wasting a roster spot.  

by redbirdnation8206 on Dec 2, 2007 4:22 PM EST reply actions  

Dumb question
If Hall can hit so well and play SS, why wouldn't we try to slot him in there?

Yeah, we'd have to trade Izturis away somehow, but I'm sure we'd all feel terrible about that.

by sdrone on Dec 2, 2007 5:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Hell
Why not?  Izturis could just kind of be the utility IFer or some damn thing.  Or he could take Batboy Josh's job, which as far as I know hasn't been filled yet.  Or maybe he could throw BP on weekends.  I really don't care!  

I think w/ or w/ out Rolen they are going to have an offensive hole on the infield.  They could put Hall at SS or 3rd and have crapitude at the other spot, or they could keep Rolen and get nothing out of the SS spot.

by redbirdnation8206 on Dec 2, 2007 5:20 PM EST up reply actions  

my 2 cents
If we're trading for Hall then he's going to be the starting SS, no question about it.  There are plenty of FA and trade targets to fill the hole at 3B.  They could look at signing someone like Mike Lamb to a 1-3 year deal at around $4-$6 million per, which is about what they'd be saving by moving Rolen's contract.  Lamb is serviceable on defense and has a decent bat; his three year average is better than Rolen's.  

The club could also look and see what it would take to pluck Chad Tracy away from the D-Backs -- he should be available since the skinny seems to be that Reynolds is the guy for them at 3B.  Tracy would probably be better than Lamb, but I'm not sure the Cards would have enough trade bait left to be able to offer them a decent deal.  They could offer Duncan, who would probably platoon at 1B for them like Tony Clark did last year.  Not sure the D-Backs would go for that however

"The Cardinals have won a World Series in THEIR new stadium!" --my Uncle Jim to a heckling Cubs fan

by fourstick on Dec 3, 2007 9:42 AM EST up reply actions  

exchange rates
like many, i hope signing the iz isn't the best idea mo comes up with.  that said, i also hope mo looks at the landscape and realizes all his "assets" are in dollars and everything he wants to buy is in euros.  there may be a few nice pieces out there,  but all his currency is devalued severely.  his only hope is to make a plan based on the exchange rate turning around, i.e.,  his assets grow between now and 30 june so he can buy the things he really needs.
right now:
rolen's value is negative
kennedy's value is negative
edmunds value is negative
reyes is at best neutral, but he is just a hope to get better, not better (so too ankiel)
the best miracle to hope for is that one or more of these guys plays well for the first couple of months, so they can be moved for value.  taking this risk seems better than giving up anything for capuano or hall or ???  if you're going to gamble on someone who can actually help the pitching, you are better off going for colon or others that don't cost as much as our undervalued assets.  sell low, buy high is not the way to get rich.

by sportsman on Dec 2, 2007 10:30 PM EST reply actions  

And anyone who was thinking Jake Peavy
might be available for 2009 and beyond, just keep dreaming.  The Pads are trying to lock him up until 2012-at approximately 17 million a year.  It looks like he's about ready to sign an extension.  I think I'm going to cry.

by jillsinmo on Dec 2, 2007 10:34 PM EST reply actions  

Yep
Yes I did see that and it is not that surprising.  I think for STL to get a top notch pitcher they will have to make a trade.  There are no great options.  I have the 2009 FA list below and it is not good.  Just look at the names and tell me how it is good as I think Peavy will be signed soon along with C.C. Sabathia.  Santana will be traded or be a FA I either way I don't think STL has a shot at him.  So take a look at the list and tell me who "jumps" out at you as a top notch guy you really feel comfortable gambling on?  I would say Lackey would be #1 but I am not sure if STL has a shot at him.  After that I may say Brad Penny.  It does not look good!! STL will need to make a trade or draft a HS stud and hope to heck he rockects to the majors.

Kris Bensen BAL
A.J. Burnett TOR (may opt out)
Paul Byrd CLE
Jon Garland CWS
Tom Glavine NYM
Mike Hampton * ATL
Rich Harden * OAK
Orlando Hernandez NYM
Jason Jennings HOU
Randy Johnson ARZ
John Lackey * LAA
Esteban Loaiza OAK
Braden Looper STL
Derek Lowe LAD
Pedro Martinez NYM
Matt Morris * PIT
Mike Mussina NYY
Jamie Moyer PHI
Mark Mulder * STL
Carl Pavano NYY
Jake Peavy * SD
Brad Penny * LAD
Odalis Perez KC
Oliver Perez NYM
Andy Pettitte NYY
Mark Prior CHC
Horatio Ramirez SEA
C.C. Sabathia CLE
Johan Santana MIN
Ben Sheets MIL
John Smoltz * ATL
Julian Tavarez BOS
Steve Trachsel BAL
Brett Tomko LAD
Claudio Vargas MIL
Woody Williams HOU
Randy Wolf LAD

by ICbirdfan on Dec 2, 2007 10:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Tim Melville goes to Holt High
practically in our back yard.  He's one of the top high school pitchers in the country.  I say we tear a page out of the Braves book-the chapter that says you don't let local talent leave your area.  Take a chance and draft him.  It's a high/risk high/reward kind of move.  The kind of move the Cardinals have to at least think about making because it's the best way to get yourself a supply of ML pitching.  He may not sign; I know he's already committed to college, but he's from a family that has groomed him to play baseball.  And he is good.

by jillsinmo on Dec 2, 2007 11:09 PM EST up reply actions  

ATL
If Atlanta does it I say it is in your best interest to copy it.  

I don't know anything about the kid you speak of but I have been saying STL needs to start targeting HS kids that pitch.  It is in your best interest to get an 18 yr old in the minors so he has time to develope.  It beats trying to develope 22 year olds like STL does with the drafting college pitchers.

Any one who looks at that FA pitcher list I posted has to be really worried.  People talk about saving $$ to get FA next year and all I can say is what FA do you want?  They all have flaws and I think anyone can figure out what guys STL has no chance at.

by ICbirdfan on Dec 2, 2007 11:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Melville
I love Melville; I actually drove up to Wentzville to see him pitch.  Phenomenal talent.  Unfortunately, I don't think he'll still be on the board when the Cardinals pick at 13.  If he is, they have to take him, throw a big sack of money at him, and get him into the system.  Like I said, though, as good as this kid already is, and the kind of ceiling he has, I'm afraid he'll be gone.  (Although, with him being from here, the Cards would probably have the best chance of buying him out of a college commitment, if he really is serious about it.)  
You bring home the turkey and I'll bring home the bacon.

by the red baron on Dec 3, 2007 1:45 AM EST up reply actions  

THIS BLOWS!!!

We should be in the hunt for Miguel Cabrera! Give them Rolen, Reyes and 2 minor leaguers. Just not Rasmus!

by onebigdummy on Dec 3, 2007 8:27 AM EST reply actions  

was that an attempt at humor?
The Dodgers are willing to give up Kemp, Kershaw and God knows who else, but a potentially washed up 3B, a struggling young SP and 2 minor leaguers that doesn't include the only guy that any other team would want out of our minor league system should get it done huh?  
"The Cardinals have won a World Series in THEIR new stadium!" --my Uncle Jim to a heckling Cubs fan

by fourstick on Dec 3, 2007 9:46 AM EST up reply actions  

well
I would be desparate, but I'm on my five year "no bitching" hiatus after winning the '06 World Series...call me in '11 when Albert is shopping for a $300 million deal after winning the triple crown. LOL
"The Cardinals have won a World Series in THEIR new stadium!" --my Uncle Jim to a heckling Cubs fan

by fourstick on Dec 4, 2007 1:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Hahaha_small
These were a few of my favorite things (fink reminisces about the 2011 regular season)
N1046613005_8392_small
Our 2010-2011 strays
649494__1__small
Hall of WAR: Part 2

Recent FanPosts

Dsc01844_small
Cardinals take the Governor's Joplin Challenge, will help build 35 homes for torando victims
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals of All-Time - Relief Pitching Edition
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals of All-Time - Starting Pitching Edition
Small
Two Trades That Set the Cards Back in the 70s
Nyc_small
Cardinals Offense vs. Reds Offense - 2012
Nyc_small
Cardinals Rotation vs. Reds Rotation - 2012
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals by Position - Center Fielders

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Jack_benny__1__small DanUpBaby

Editors

Bendermad_small azruavatar

Trigun_001_small the red baron

Images_small tom s.

Authors

1989_bgh_cropped_small bgh

Valverde_medium_small vivaelpujols