the edmonds trade
jim edmonds stands 10th on the all-time franchise leaderboard in on-base percentage (.393), 7th in slugging (.555), 6th in ops (.948), 4th in homers (241), and 7th in walks (645).
the trade is bitter medicine, but it's necessary. the cards should have let edmonds walk last year, or simply picked up his one-year option; the extension was a mistake, and they're acknowledging as much. they're getting on with the overdue business of letting go of the past. since taking the reins mozeliak has jettisoned five position players from the 2006 championship team --- all of them over age 30 --- and created opportunities for younger players who might or might not pan out. it's not pretty, it's not exciting, it's not fun. but it's the right direction.
here's a breakdown of the cards' centerfielders last season:
| AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | AVG | OBP | SLG | |||
| edmonds | 352 | 88 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 49 | .250 | .324 | .403 | ||
| others | 285 | 85 | 16 | 1 | 7 | 36 | .298 | .338 | .435 |
the cards paid edmonds a lot of money last year to play worse than his understudies; smart organizations don't do things like that. as a group, st louis centerfielders posted a .747 ops in 2007; the holdovers are capable of matching or exceeding that production. the team hasn't lost anything in terms of present value; the money they would have paid edmonds can now be put toward upgrading somewhere else.
i'm too old to be terribly sentimental about these things; edmonds was a noteworthy player, and i'm grateful for the thrills he provided. he's part of a proud tradition stretching back to 1982, when a never-heard-of-him player named willie mcgee took over in centerfield. since then the cardinals have had just 3 centerfielders: mcgee, lankford, and edmonds. colby rasmus has a chance to extend that reign of excellence.
mozeliak's facing the future, not the past. brave man; thankless task.
276 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
jimmy
but its good for everyone
interested in seeing if this Freese kid will be worth something someday
Farewell Jimmy
by Jtip20 on Dec 15, 2007 9:43 AM EST reply actions
Interesting question about this trade...
We all loved us some Jimmy Ballgame, he was a GREAT Cardinal. The game 6 walk-off was one of the best Cardinal moments ever. Good luck to 15.
wwwjd vs wwcad
it's pretty obvious...
Waht?
IMHO, the idea that Antonetti walks on water and Mo blows is premature on both counts.
CA does not have the history or credentials to annoint him for saberhood yet, take a look 10 years from now. Im glad he used us, it'll be harder sneaking up on the next club GM position uness he DOES walk on water.
With all due respect, if Antonetti could, he'd bring Young to Cleveland, but the Padres have other ideas about that.
by cardschinmusic on Dec 16, 2007 5:00 AM EST up reply actions
should have used sarcasm tags
that was my point ;)
Moi' apologetti!
by cardschinmusic on Dec 17, 2007 4:08 AM EST up reply actions
My favorite Cardinal
But, life goes on. We'll always have the memories, won't we? And the memories with Jimmy are largely of the positive variety. Far too many to count, but despite all the defensive gems, the 2004 NLCS Game 6 HR will always be my favorite Edmonds highlight.
Good luck, Jimmy. We will miss you.
by player2bnamedl8r on Dec 15, 2007 9:49 AM EST reply actions
my favorite Cardinal as well
im not sure it was worth trading him to free up a few million unless we have a good use for the money
im not expecting his performance to be worth the money, but he has been the clubhouse leader on a team that seems to lack it by all reports
I can't be objective
by Irishman on Dec 15, 2007 9:53 AM EST reply actions
I don't buy it
It's pretty much a given we will be sub-par in 2008. It's doubtful we will best .500 or finish in the top half of the division.
It's also fairly likely Rolen might be moved by season's end.
Like azru and the rest of the statistically oriented crowd, I tend to think of things subjectively. However, intangibes are a part of the game and do have a financial impact. How much of a financial impact is the money saved? What does it come to? $6+ million?
So, in a subpar season, you hypothetically move two of the three franchise icons (Pujols, Edmonds, Rolen). What does this do to ticket sales? What does it do to merchandising sales? Edmonds stuff was a top seller. How much does this disenfranchise the common fan? Is the lost revenue from these things worth the difference when subtracted from the $6+ million? Does this curb the likelyhood Jimmy will come and wave with the rest of the folks in the convertibles?
This move seems to save marginal dollars for no real gain to me.
I lose confidence in Mo daily.
ray, i think he moved a player with no value
i'm a little puzzled here. walt was criticized for letting the team grow old and stale, relying too heavily on name-brand veterans, not taking any chances on kids. yet what are the biggest complaints about mozeliak so far? he cut ties w/ two name-brand veterans, eckstein and edmonds.
damned if you do . . . .
I agree
secondly, while mozeliak's hardly done anything to instantly transform this team into a champion, he is slowly making the right moves -- allowing the team to get younger. He's working for the long-run and doesn't appear to be willing to salvage the long-term for the short-term, ala Ed Wade. I was not a fan of Mozeliak in the beginning, but I'm beginning to come around.
Subpar in '08 anyway...
Why not let Edmonds retire as a Cardinal if you aren't a good team anyway?
by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 12:54 PM EST up reply actions
and
I don't get this obsession with "letting" Edmonds retire a Cardinal. He had a great run here. I loved the guy. But this is a business and it was the right business decision to trade him. I've seen what Edmonds can do. I haven't seen what Barton, Rasmus, etc. can do. It's time to see something else.
There are so many instances of teams holding on to players a year or so too many and it hindering the development of the franchise. This is about the franchise as a whole, not a feel-good, Jim Edmonds send-off.
How does....
As I've said before, I wouldn't rush Mr Rasmus and Barton/Ankiel were going to get plenty of playing time even with Jimmy on the team.
I'm not dead set against trading him, but if it's a pure salary dump then yeah, I'm against that.
by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 3:04 PM EST up reply actions
As AZ said....
by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 3:04 PM EST up reply actions
"Why Not..."
It's a business where PR and image
It's not like he
Sorry to think it
by jimmybaseball42 on Dec 16, 2007 5:33 PM EST up reply actions
Agreed entirely
Walt was relying on
Emotional Disconnect
However, I just can't buy that this particular dump is as black and white as a platooning declining 9 million dollar outfielder.
First of all, that's not what we are gaining. We don't save 9 million dollars. What is the exact dollar amount? Is it 6+? I am not sure.
A player that will push a team from a 90 win to a 94 win season is worth more than he is to an 80 win team. I feel the converse is probably true in this instance. A face-of-the-franchise player is probably worth more to a team that is going to royally suck and may be forced to dump another of it's icons (Rolen) than to a team that fans will cheer to contention. If we were going to knock down 90+ wins next year and clinch the division, the average rainy day fan would probably forget all about Jimmy Ballgame. This year, most fans who haven't ever heard of Barton, Rasmus and the like will probably just continue to feel the owners are cheap (which I do not believe).
It seems there is much more to consider financially than cutting the fat with the likes of Taguchi, Eck and Miles. Truthfully, I do not know the answers to these questions. Maybe they were wieghed...What kind of difference in ticket sales will result in a down year with this kind of PR hit? Edmonds was the number 2 in merchandise sales...How many people who would buy Edmonds T-shirts or other stuff will in turn spend that same money on Wainer, Rasmus or whomever? How much would keeping Edmonds during this transition year buffer trading Rolen to the average fan? In other words, how big of an impact on viewership, attendence, etc will cutting both Rolen and Edmonds result in? If you consider that marginal wins are costing 2-3 million these days...do you feel Jimmy could convey anything to Rasmus that might be worth 1-2 wins over the course of his team control?
How much does this really save the bottom line? I am sure they will still save some money, but I doubt it's 6 million.
A ton of money comes off the books next year. Jimmy said he's going to retire. His contract expires anyway. It's not like it was going to anchor us going forward.
It doesn't seem like this really gives us much more of an advantage. I know 2-6 million or so is a lot of money to me, but will it really make a difference between us winning say 88 games and 90 games in 2009? If it is that big of deal, how do you in turn explain the Izturis signing?
I agree with all the other cuts so far. As I said, I could just still be leading with my heart. I just don't buy this is a good move for this team.
I won't even get into the going rate of centerfielders and how much Jimmy would need to bounce back to justify 6 million dollars.
A later thought
What the hell is Isringhausen still doing on this team?
I know he has a trade clause and all, but teams seem to talk players out of those regularly.
exactly right
I would say if you have a top closer
I say we hang on to him til the deadline
i don't take this move in isolation
it might pan out, or it might not. but the only way to grow the talent base is to give the talent on hand a chance to blossom. this move opens up more at-bats for youngsters. and i wouldn't be so quick to dismiss freese as a nothing prospect. let's see what he can do. for all we know, he'll be pushing for playing time by mid 2009.
Larry
I understand where you are coming from. I agree it's where we need to head overall. I agree every move should be made with a long-term vision...and also wieghed individually.
I think the balance of this move probably wieghs to the positive. I don't feel it's by much. It's not 9 million dollars positive. I doubt it's even 4 when you consider the indirect losses from losing an iconic player.
I also think you could argue Ryan/Miles could equal Eck's performance for less money than Izturis/Ryan. That move seems inconsistant with the path we are hoping is the reason for these moves.
Does Edmonds really take that many at bats away from those guys? Several of them will get ABs even with Jimmy in the lineup. Maybe he hurts Schu? I don't see much chance of lightning striking there. But, if it were the issue forcing a decision...wouldn't you shed Speizio for a bucket of balls? He makes a couple million over, has no upside and youth could get his ABs. Is Rasmus only getting half a season knocked off his team control years instead of a whole in a year like this so bad? That seems almost a bigger financial decision than cutting Jimmy's difference in payroll...an extra year of Rasmus before free agency?
There is something I do not understand about free agency/draft picks. If Edmonds were to finish his contract, file for free agency but retire...would we get a pick (or two if he regains type A?)
But thats exactly the point
by Ray Lankford on Dec 16, 2007 11:23 AM EST up reply actions
At least they picked a side...
I had been yelling to the top of my lungs
Rasmus
Ankiel
Pujols
Duncan
Starting the top of the line-up off will generate a lot of runs. Hope I'm right...Might as well trade Rolen and get at least one highly touted pitching prospect to complete the change and see what Barden can do for awhile. Long as he is strong with the glove he won't hurt us to bad. Afterall Rolen wasn't that great with the bat last year.
It's for the best
by SpringfieldDude on Dec 15, 2007 4:44 PM EST up reply actions
I live for this
by player2bnamedl8r on Dec 15, 2007 10:01 AM EST reply actions
Thanks man
The Catch (Cincinatti) in video and
Thank you
by player2bnamedl8r on Dec 15, 2007 10:51 AM EST up reply actions
Where did you get those?
I dont' really wanna buy an Edmonds jersey; I've just got baseball cards right now. The DVDs might be nice.
Actually
The 2004 NLCS Game 7 is part of the Greatest Games of Busch Stadium box set. That particular DVD also has a lot of other highlights.
The Millions of Cardinals Memories DVD is another production of MLB Productions...and not one I expected to be able to find where I live, but I did. You can probably find it on amazon.com, although I haven't checked.
by player2bnamedl8r on Dec 15, 2007 11:42 AM EST up reply actions
Looks like
Millions of Cardinals Memories: Busch Stadium 1966-2005
I highly recommend this DVD...for anyone who grew up in the era of Busch II, it's a must-have. Great celebration of the stadium and the franchise.
by player2bnamedl8r on Dec 15, 2007 12:15 PM EST up reply actions
Don't like it
If they use this as a tool to get locked in to 4 or 5 years of Lohse/Silva then the move looks even worse.
It's a pure salary dump, plain and simple. They got nothing in return, and last time I checked...6M doesn't get you a difference maker. If we were locked into him for 2+years then I could understand, but why dump him for nothing when we aren't going anywhere in '08 anyway?
I can only hope that this move gives some of the young guys a legit chance of starting...we'll see.
by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 10:02 AM EST reply actions
man, i hope not
the guy should have retired here
im all about moving forward
but i think this move was completely unecessary
he was holding it down until rasmus came
he was the teamleader and an all time great cardinal
I agree...
Do you get marginally better in CF....maybe, but in a year where you aren't going anywhere why trade away a franchise figure head that was going to retire at the end of the year.
by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 10:18 AM EST up reply actions
Yes...
Even if they had to eat 6M of his salary to get it done.
As it sits now, it maybe makes the slightest difference in the present and doesn't help us in the future.
by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 10:20 AM EST up reply actions
$ for headley or kouzmanoff
prob way too much to ask
Nice thought but
agreed
What makes you think
by MikeG on Dec 15, 2007 3:39 PM EST up reply actions
Our share
http://www.signonsandiego.com/sports/weblog/2007/12/padres_get_2_million.html
by Jtip20 on Dec 15, 2007 4:30 PM EST up reply actions
Goodbye Jimmy, Hello Future third sacker
Jimmy's catches in centerfield will forever be in my memory; but, life (at least as I know it) moves on. He wanted to be back in California anyway and now he has his wish.
Now we have our replacement -a few years down the road - for Scott Rolen. This kid can hit!! (At least so far) Does anyone know if he is any relation to Gene Freese, who had a nice undistinguished 12 year career mostly with the Pirates in the 50's and 60's?
by treborsgonecruising on Dec 15, 2007 10:06 AM EST reply actions
Prospect
I know Erik said (Sickles?) he's rated as a C+ prospect and he tore up A ball...
But, he was a college player and it's taken him a whole season and a half to break out of A ball.
Furthermore, I am not all that impressed when a 24 year old posts an .800 or so OPS in a league of 19 year olds.
re: season and 1/2 to break out of A ball
by SmashedAtoms on Dec 15, 2007 3:18 PM EST up reply actions
Future third sacker?
They gave Edmonds to SD
by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 10:14 AM EST up reply actions
Early
Why?
I'll take the kid with the Defense
I'd take Braun too but just not at 3B
He could chop the ball in half
because barden
furthermore
where to play him
by Jtip20 on Dec 15, 2007 1:35 PM EST up reply actions
AAA
It's entirely possible
Damn I liked Edmonds
This Move
Jimmy's wishes
In a bit of irony, it seems like Tony's resigning partially contributed to this rebuilding trade. Regardless, I'm buying tickets for when the Padres come now.
I think
I do think they are salary dumping and are just gonna take the flack. I'm looking forward to an entire year of idiots like brian Mckenna calling me one of the many sheep.
Also, thank freaking God Kent Bottenfield had that one good year. None of these wonderful things would have happened to us without him. I sat behind him at a colts game a few years ago(the classic 38-34 contest against the Pats in Indy). Apparently he's a huge Colts fan. Me and my buddies kept saying to ourselves "that's gotta be him, nobody has a neck that thick". We thanked him for his tenure as a Cardinal, but really we were thanking him for bringing us Jimmy Ballgame. One of the greatest cardinals I have ever seen in my 33 years. Ok, I'm done.
Ahh, that feels better
Can't forget the other half
by That's a Winner on Dec 15, 2007 1:41 PM EST up reply actions
Cards' Center Fielders
by rockin the red on Dec 15, 2007 10:22 AM EST reply actions
typos
by rockin the red on Dec 15, 2007 10:51 AM EST up reply actions
Nope
I am shocked
Completely agree
B y Jimmy
by GhostofJimLinderman on Dec 15, 2007 10:36 AM EST reply actions
So long Jimmy
My favorite memory of watching Edmonds play was a game I got to see in Cincy back in '03. He hit a homer and made an awesome catch taking a homer away from one of the Reds. The Cards blew them out.
It's been a good run but unfortuately things like this are part of the game. I'll still wear my Edmonds jersey with pride.
by PujolsRules on Dec 15, 2007 10:37 AM EST reply actions
Larue...
Well, looks as if he'll get his chance again assuming Larue ever hits one that far.
by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 10:42 AM EST up reply actions
Rolen...
Seems like they want to blow out the veterans and clean house.
The Angels need a 3B.
Would something like this work?
Rolen, Duncan, Reyes and Cash for Brandon Wood, Ervin Santana and Miguel Gonzalez.
The cash payout would look like this...
'08 9M
'09 4M
'10 2M
What do you think?
by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 10:40 AM EST reply actions
I think we need Duncans bat to much
So...
I'd be very happy could they pull off that trade.
by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 12:14 PM EST up reply actions
I can't wait
by elderj on Dec 15, 2007 10:54 AM EST reply actions
Regardless of your feeling on Mo...
Despite having among the 5 greatest seasons any center fielder has ever had (2000-2004), I don't believe his excellence was sustained for a long enough period.
From BP's PECOTA Card entry for Jimmy in 2005:
In terms of offense alone, over the last five seasons Edmonds has been roughly as good as Duke Snider in his prime. Throw Edmonds' superior glovework into the mix, and he's been more valuable over that span than both Snider and Ken Griffey Jr. in their best seasons. In other words, he's had one of the greatest peaks of any center fielder in baseball history, short of the Mays-Mantle clash of titans, but historically notable.
I'd love for him to make it...but unless he plays a few more seasons, and recovers a dramatic power stroke, it's probably not going to happen.
by player2bnamedl8r on Dec 15, 2007 11:14 AM EST up reply actions
That's just silly!
Personally, I admire the fact he had the cajones to trade one of our heroes. As much as I love Jimmy Baseball, I don't see him rebounding. We can get better production from some combination of Rasmus, Barton, Ankiel and Schumaker.
I just hope he can get rid of Rolen for a decent return...then we'll see what kind of GM Moz is.
by matt reeder on Dec 15, 2007 11:42 AM EST up reply actions
Let me explain
As far as the trade itself goes, I believe it will be viewed as a very poor one. As you said yourself "if he begins to make moves that are truly horrible then you may purchase the firemo.com domain name" and I think that he just made a horrible move by trading away a HEALTHY centerfielder for absolutely nothing in return. The only reason in my mind as to why we even recieved this 3rd baseman in return is because the kid is from St. Louis. Had the kid been from Detroit, then Mo wouldn't have asked for him in return. It was quite frankly, simply a PR move - "The fans won't be quite so upset if we have this local kid on the team."
I don't think that Rasmus is ready to play center for the big club. Even if he was, we will no longer recieve the veteran advice from one of the greatest centerfielders of my generation. I believe that if Edmonds was tutoring Rasmus in CF, then that would greatly enhance Colby's developmental process. Now we'll never know.
I still stand be my phrase...FIRE MO.
by elderj on Dec 15, 2007 2:09 PM EST up reply actions
I like Mike Shannon
No offense
The man is an institution though, so maybe I just committed a sin or something...But quite frankly I'd rather gouge out my own eyes and smash my own eardrums than listen to Shannon every night.
by redbirdnation8206 on Dec 15, 2007 5:05 PM EST up reply actions
Shannon
I just can't stand listening to him doing a game. I think he's a dreadful announcer.
I think it was amazing that he was able to do any games this year considering what was going on with his wife. I was at the Cards/Crew game the day after his wife died. It was a pretty sad day.
by redbirdnation8206 on Dec 15, 2007 5:42 PM EST up reply actions
Get up baby GET UP!!!!
The Man in Black is in the breed of broadcasters like Harry Carry and Dizzy Dean. Many people don't like that but I love it.
by That's a Winner on Dec 16, 2007 2:00 PM EST up reply actions
Shannon can paint a picture
by elderj on Dec 15, 2007 7:23 PM EST up reply actions
Good point.
mike shannon
i like him but he ain't the best.
Mo's not the bad guy
Thankless, thankless job for Mo. But he's doing the right things. I'll always remember games 6 and 7 of the 04 NLCS. Homer and catch, sheesh. I'm excited about what this means for Rasmus and/or Ankiel.
by itsalemmon1019 on Dec 15, 2007 11:43 AM EST up reply actions
I agree
lboros was right: damned if you do, damned if you don't.
by Ray Lankford on Dec 15, 2007 2:36 PM EST up reply actions
ok, but
I wish they would have
I will miss Jimmy, but I miss the memory of him more; 04' Edmonds, as opposed to the Edmonds who struggled mightily last year.
by Ray Lankford on Dec 15, 2007 3:35 PM EST up reply actions
Had he....
Jimmy will get some votes, but in the end fall short.
by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 12:47 PM EST up reply actions
That remains to be seen...
by elderj on Dec 15, 2007 2:15 PM EST up reply actions
umm
why exactly?
deserved better than this?
As far as retiring as a Cardinal, Edmonds had control over that. He waived his no-trade clause. Seems he opted for another shot at the WS rather than a farewell tour.
As far as the 3B prospect we got back, he's hit well at all 3 levels in his year and a half of pro ball. He likely would have spent much of last season at AA, except the Pads #1 prospect was playing 3B at AA.
Now we seem to have a log-jam at 3B in the high minors. Craig and Freese both ought to be at AA with Rico Washington at AAA. Is Craig available to package in trade? or have they given up on him defensively at 3B?
Deserved Better?
by Ray Lankford on Dec 16, 2007 11:27 AM EST up reply actions
Trades
Arizon got Haren and pitcher Connor Robertson.
From Houston they received reliever Chad Qualls, infielder Chris Burke and right-hander Juan Gutierrez.
So Long Jimmy Ballgame
Anyway, I wish him the best, and will always remember running from work into a bar just in time to see him win Game 6 of the 2004 NLCS. One of the greatest moments (and reactions - the double fist pump) in Cards history. So long, Jimmy Ballgame!!
Mo vs. Tony
I'm as big a fan of Edmonds as anyone -- I think LB's nonchalance does not do justice to the excitement JEd brought to Cards fans, not to mention the hardware. But he was not going to be with us after 2008. Assuming we use the money we're saving (not yet announced, but must be $5-6M) on adding to mid-term nucleus, this is a good move. But I don't think it's Tony's move.
I am curious about the plan for the OF now: under Tony you basically have 1.5 OFs in Ankiel and Duncan. If Rasmus isn't ready, where's your backup? Are we really going to platoon Spezio, Ludwick, Shu and/or Barton? I still think pitching has to be the priority for what looks like ~$15M in payroll room, but that outfield is looking pretty suspect.
outfield - no problem
The main difference now is that the promising guys we don't really know about will now get to play every day. That's presuming that they don't sign someone like Cameron, of course.
So this is progress of a sort. But now I really don't understand why they were in such a hurry to sign Izturis. It's hard to see what the plan is here, other than to wait for the current crop of prospects in the minors to come on up.
Like the approach, but not the move
It seems to me that the best approach would have been to keep JEd here but not to over-expose him during the season (as they did in the first half last year) in order to give the other outfielders more playing time. However, this and other moves appear to be strongly influenced by Tony's propensity to play veterans over kids, as well as by his personal interactions with some of the players. These tendencies, combined with the comments on Rolen, which were said to have "horrified" Mo, strongly suggests that La Russa is indeed a barrier to rebuilding. At the very least, he is a barrier to Mo's leadership in developing and executing a consistent strategy for the organization.
Does anyone still wonder why Antonetti backed out?
That said, while I didn't like the extension it didn't work out too badly -- because the first-year salary was for less than the option on Edmond's prior contract, we will end up paying about the same or even a bit less for 1 year of him, and we got a (marginal) prospect out of it. I still don't see that we get the marginal value out of the trade to make it worthwhile, particularly because I don't see anyone who's really worth investing the money we saved by making the deal. And I too would have like to see Edmonds get his last hurrah with the team.
It's just a horrible trade
I'll preface this by saying that Jim Edmonds is my favorite current Cardinal and maybe my favorite Cardinal of All-Time so this trade is a huge emotional blow and I know I am not alone in Cardinal nation.
Yes, this trade makes room for Colby Rasmus, but the timing is horrible. Mo trades Edmonds at his lowest value and after a series of injuries.
I'll repost part of my comment from the "So Long Jimmy" and comparison with Paul Molitor.
Jim Edmonds should have been given the opportunity to bounce back after getting hit hard with injuries and resume his off season training. it was obvious that his legs were out of condition during Spring Training after having to take time off during the surgeries.
At age 37 and beyond, there are many cases of players coming back to have big years.
Age 37 .351/.422/.612
Age 38 .337/.423/.528
Who is this player?
Stan Musial.
Paul Molitor slumped to .270/.350/.423 at the age of 39 and then came back at age 40 to hit .341/.390/.468.
At age 38 Molitor hit .341/.410/.518. Edmonds and Molitor both had injury plagued careers and in the Brewers case were haunted by not re-signing Molitor.
OK, you can also make the case Edmonds won't come back and will have another mediocre year, but Edmonds has earned the chance to make a comeback. Now what the Cardinals have done is broken up the big three of Rolen, Pujols and Edmonds and have thrown in the towel for 2008.
All this trade did was officially end the DYNASTY that began in 2004 and start a full blown rebuilding project. Edmonds should have been allowed to retire as a Cardinal and the Cardinals DYNASTY should have been given one last chance to continue.
by DYNASTYLeagueBaseballMike on Dec 15, 2007 11:24 AM EST reply actions
Yes, but...
Re: your handle... I'm a big fan of Dynasty League, too. I also had PtP back in the day. Played the 1987 season like crazy back then.
by 26thMan on Dec 15, 2007 1:38 PM EST up reply actions
Edmonds defense
It certainly is tougher to play CF at an older age, but it's not an option moving Edmonds to first - much of his value is still on defense. Edmonds slipped range wise last year, but did get better during the end of the year when his legs started getting ikn better shape and still has a very good arm. Edmonds always relied on his superb jumps and great hands rather than speed so his defensive decline should not be as great as some other CF.
Great to hear you are a DYNASTY League Baseball and Pursue the Pennant fan!
by DYNASTYLeagueBaseballMike on Dec 15, 2007 3:12 PM EST up reply actions
I'm not sure this is a good trade...
Now, from a team perspective, I'm not sure how important that production would be, as I, like Larry, am fairly convinced 08 is a wash of a season. We are very unlikely to compete for a playoff spot.
That said, I believe that it makes a whole lot more sense to keep Jimmy and allow him to re-establish some of that value. In such a case we might have mustered a Larry Walker-like trade (3 prospects) around the trade deadline from a team looking to improve for their playoff run than we would have now.
So why did the Cardinal's trade Jimmy? In the scenario I mention above, while the Cardinals make out better in prospects...they don't make out as well in salary relief. As I see it, this is the same reason they passed up on Rick Porcello. When it comes to the question of talent versus savings, this team has become increasingly cost-concsious. And that doesn't bode well in my opinion. D.GOOCH
Have you actually noticed
by MikeG on Dec 15, 2007 3:55 PM EST up reply actions
Nobody loves Jim more than I do
The fact that the Cardinals got a decent third base prospect for him--one of the weaker positions in the system, might I add--seals the deal for me. We can argue about this if Mo goes and blows this money on Kyle Lohse, but I think this was a good move. It'll just be a huge adjustment to watch somebody else patrol center next year.
The SBNation's Atlanta Falcons Blog
Improve the team?
However, exactly how has the team improved? Have they gotten marginally better? Addition by subtraction?
I'll state it again, they MAY have gotten MARGINALLY better by turning CF over to in house options but if they use the 6M they are saving to have the pleasure of 4/5 years of Silva/Lohse it's one step forward two steps back.
Sure, they saved a decent chunk of money but who in the FA market is worth giving that money to.
People who are claiming that this team has made a major step forward by giving away their CF for a 24 yr old a baller are way off base.
by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 11:45 AM EST up reply actions
I don't claim this is a major step forward
I expect this to be a rebuilding year, and you can't rebuild without letting the young guys take a crack at producing for you.
The SBNation's Atlanta Falcons Blog
by Dave Choate on Dec 15, 2007 11:51 AM EST up reply actions
Disagree...
I'll address your your points one by one...
"We save a little money"
Irellevant. They did save money, but there isn't anything in the FA market worth spending it on. An argument could be made that saving that 6M was a bad thing if it means we get stuck with 4/5 years of Silva/Lohse.
"get a decent prospect back "
I just don't see him as much of a prospect. 24yr olds in A ball don't get me too excited. However, he was behind Headly and MAYBE that had something to do with his progression. He's nothing to get thrilled about, and he's behind Craig.
"fill up the production with in-house options."
That's no sure thing. Sure, I'd like to see what Barton/Rasmus can do, but to think they are sure to be an upgrade is a bit of a stretch.
"it made exactly zero sense to me to keep someone like Edmonds around. "
Let's just throw aside the fact that he was one of the greatest Cardinals of all time and it would have been cool to see him retire in Cardinal red. That seems to be getting brushed aside.
Forgetting that, this could be an economic windfall for the team as well. If the team isn't winning for the second year in a row attendance will start to decline. Giving Jimmy a sendoff would have been a good way to keep people coming to the park. Concessions will be affected as well as merchandise sales. It makes sense on alot of levels, especially since this team isn't going to compete and are not any closer to that goal after the deal.
"I expect this to be a rebuilding year, and you can't rebuild without letting the young guys take a crack at producing for you."
This is one part where I agree. If they were going into full out rebuild mode then they should have ate 6M of the salary and got a real prospect in return.
by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 12:10 PM EST up reply actions
Good points
Still, I'm not quite understanding the retirement talk. Who says he would've retired after his contract ran out? (If he did, I apologize for not spotting it.) Then the team is faced with another dilemma, because Rasmus is likely to be ready or damn close to it. Would they have re-signed him for a farewell tour, or would he have just walked to another team? In my eyes, it was no sure thing that Jimmy Ballgame was going to retire in Cardinal red.
Also, I get the sense that you're assuming I'm saying Barton/Rasmus/Ankiel/whoever can outproduce Edmonds. I simply think they can approximate his value, which isn't a stretch considering that his OPS has declined each of the last three seasons and he put up a .728 last year.
I know he's a Cardinal great. The team wouldn't have been where it was these last several years without Jim in center, and if we were a contender I'd argue long and hard for keeping him. With the team (I pray) looking to reload, it doesn't make a lot of sense to me to keep him around.
Enjoying the discussion, by the way.
The SBNation's Atlanta Falcons Blog
You make a good point...
by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 3:55 PM EST up reply actions
Retirement
And either way, you are right in this particular post. Most people have assumed that he was going to retire after this year, and supposedly he was leaning that way...But who knows? He wouldn't be the first player to realize that he's going to miss it too much/can still play/wants more money/wants another ring/whatever else.
by redbirdnation8206 on Dec 15, 2007 5:15 PM EST up reply actions
If they were able to exchange
by MikeG on Dec 15, 2007 3:59 PM EST up reply actions
If they were able to trade Edmonds
by Hardcore Legend on Dec 15, 2007 4:01 PM EST up reply actions
I didn't say for five or six years
by MikeG on Dec 15, 2007 4:21 PM EST up reply actions
No
It's Edmonds for 4/5 years at 10+ per of Lohse/Silva.
BEYOND TERRIBLE
by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 4:08 PM EST up reply actions
i think a lot of you
yes, he was probably the best CF in Cardinal history.
but from 8/1/06 to the present, jed has hit for a .736 OPS. and he's lost a step or five in the OF. i love jimmy ballgame...a lot. but it was either another season of him being below average in cf for about 100 games, or a chance to get a half decent prospect. that's the best they could probably get for him.
it's better then nothing, it's better then just watching the decline phase of jim run it's full course. to me that's just as sad to see. those of you calling for mo's head and whatnot are being totally unreasonable.
Agreed.
I thought it was telling the return prospect was 1) a third baseman and 2) from St. Louis. I think a Rolen trade is coming before too long.
by matt reeder on Dec 15, 2007 11:46 AM EST up reply actions
Agreed
For what one untrained observers eyes are worth, I watched Rick Ankiel play some very good center field in the minors last year.
Ouch...
by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 12:12 PM EST up reply actions
lankford
nobody disses lankford around me! :-)
OH, I'm not...
by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 12:44 PM EST up reply actions
If you could bat Ray 3 times in a row
That's not the Lankford I remember
by MikeG on Dec 15, 2007 4:03 PM EST up reply actions
Don't know how we can settle this I
Hey
BTW...Lankford and Brian Jordan made the 94-95 Cardinals bearable. I really liked both of those guys, in a completely manly-hetero-appreciatetheirbaseballabilities sort of way of course.
by redbirdnation8206 on Dec 15, 2007 5:20 PM EST up reply actions
Lankford
So I was excited in '04 when Old Ray returned to finish his career as a Redbird. But after watching a shell of his former talent struggle in left field, miss a month or so and then make token appearances as a pinch hitter, then be left of the playoff roster, I don't think watching him "retire as a Cardinal" was any kind of transcendent or important experience. For him or for me.
I agree
Good luck as a Friar, Jimmy. You won't be forgotten here.
by rockin redbird on Dec 15, 2007 12:16 PM EST up reply actions
I agree
It's insane to pay $9M per year for a platoon OF who's average defensively and poor offensively. I've got great memories of Edmonds but should we keep him 1 more year in hopes that he'll make another catch like the one against the Reds or against the 'stros in the '04 NLCS?
AZ said earlier that we should've paid more cash and gotten a better prospect. That's a good point. But it was time to let Edmonds go and I didn't think we had a prayer until the season ended. This is a good trade for the team.
Seems like....
Let's say it's not, and instead used to pay down the stadium debt. Do you still like the move?
Edmonds was probably going to be a part time player anyway, and I don't like the idea of starting Colby's arb clock jumping past AAA. There were going to be plenty oppurtunties for Barton/Rasmus even with Jimmy on the team.
by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 12:52 PM EST up reply actions
So what if does
This team is going nowhere in 2008 anyway, and the remaining items on the free-agent shelves aren't all that attractive.
I have no quarrel if DeWitt wants to put that $6M in his pocket. It's his dough. Hell, for all we know, that $6M could go "in the bank," as it were, for spending on someone worth a crap next year.
by 26thMan on Dec 15, 2007 1:47 PM EST up reply actions
Then stop raising ticket prices
by Hardcore Legend on Dec 15, 2007 2:27 PM EST up reply actions
If it...
If it's goes directly into old Billy Boy's wallet than I am not, and you shouldn't be either.
If you are going to lower payroll, then don't raise ticket, concession, merchandise prices etc...
by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 2:38 PM EST up reply actions
Rebuild for 2008
This trade, at best, made the Cardinals marginally better for 2008. It did nothing for them beyond that (no, a 24-yo drafted as 5th year senior isn't a real prospect). What's the point beyond putting a few dollars back in DeWitt's pocket?
by Rob H on Dec 15, 2007 12:58 PM EST up reply actions
It's sound as a baseball move
But if Edmonds hadn't planned on retiring or had no intention of being a part time player I can see why they felt he had to go-- and hey, if he somehow tears it up next year in San Diego we can always bring him back.
I'm just surprised that the Padres think he can be an effective everyday centerfielder in that giant ballpark.
by JI on Dec 15, 2007 1:02 PM EST up reply actions
Jimmy , be good !!
i hope you still have a lot of fun and great baseball in you, playing in your backyard. you deserve it.
... come back to StL as a coach or manager.
maybe they
by cm1000 on Dec 15, 2007 11:59 AM EST reply actions
Intangibles loss
Now hitting leadoff, Skip Schumaker.
reconstruction
I just hope
by vinniefromjersey on Dec 15, 2007 12:17 PM EST reply actions
Oh Shit....
by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 12:26 PM EST up reply actions
noo hell noo
by cm1000 on Dec 15, 2007 12:34 PM EST up reply actions
Bill DeWitt saves a few more dollars
The moment he said payroll would go up to $115 M, I knew that it was the first sign of a massive salary dump. Which is what makes the Izturis signing so incredibly stupid. Why pay Cezar the Suck $3.5 M if you are going to sell off parts to save dollars elsewhere?
If Skip Shumaker is on the opening day roster and Colby Rasmus is not, then DeWitt isn't trying to field the best team possible..he's trying to save the most dollars possible (keeping Rasmus controlled longer).
by Hardcore Legend on Dec 15, 2007 12:36 PM EST reply actions
Gee, Hardcore...
by matt reeder on Dec 15, 2007 12:42 PM EST up reply actions
That's what makes me angry too
it's my dead horse and i'll beat it if i want
I disagree
FYI springer was worth 4 WARP1's last year- in only 66IP- that's more than any other pitcher on the team not named Wainwright. You can't let a guy like that go for $3M. With springer in the bullpen and Ankiel/Rasmmus in CF we're probably 5-6 wins better (and maybe a lot more!) than with Jimmy in CF and a replacement-level bullpen arm.
i have to agree with the above
well maybe two or 3 arms..........
Yeah but,
So I can only hope that Mo has some sort of plan to make this a decent team next year. He now has the money to do it, so let's just hope he makes a move before everyone's taken. (and please don't let it be lohse).
I find it interesting
You are right HC...
by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 3:07 PM EST up reply actions
Ha!
by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 4:09 PM EST up reply actions
5-10 Guy
by saladdin69 on Dec 15, 2007 1:23 PM EST reply actions
"Wanted this" is a bit strong
Rasmus
stlfan
That's what I'm talking about
The trade
As far as Rasmus is concerned, while I expect him to get a shot in ST, I don't see him making the Opening Day roster; unless he pulls a Pujols and just blows everyone's doors off.
I'm sorry but I have to say
The whole origanzition from the front office all the way to the Quad Cities farm team is quite frankly is in a state of disarray.
A few points to back this up.
- The front office lies to it's loyal fans about various promises from adding "impact players" to getting a top on the rotation pitcher. Then they also have the nerve to raise the ticket prices and yet are going to field a team that will be lucky to finish 4th in what has been one of the worst divisions in baseball.
- You have LaRussa and Rolen fighting and making headlines like baseball's version Donald Trump and Rosie O'Donnell. Instead of making good headlines at the winter meetings about the Cards improving their team somehow, we just got a bad soap opera.
- They fire Jocketty and then go one this big search for a replacement and settle for the in-house guy in John Mozeliak mostly because the more attractive main canadates out there wanted nothing to do with the management politics going on right now.
- They trade a huge fan favorite in Jim Edmonds for basically nothing. Granted Jim was at the twilight of his career and probably wouldn't have put up huge numbers, but going with him to San Diego was the chance for a great farewell party and some special events in 2008 that they could have maketed similar to what the Astros did last year for Biggeo. This would have guaranteed some big crowds in late Spetember and gave the fans something to look forward to at the end of the season. Not to mention his leadership to the team and valuable mentorship that he could have given Ankeil & Rasmus.
I hope my view changes in the coming year.
"The front office lies...."
It's tough medicine
And as for Jimmy going out a Cardinal, who knows San Diego might be out of the race next August, DFA Jimmy, who then has a September farewell tour in STL
How can you say "everything" is a mess?
Was it a mess that that Springfield was in the Texas League championship?
As usual, Larry nailed it
It is not pretty, but I am glad he is being decisive and moving fast. I like the fact that young players will have the chance to accumulate some ML experience in 2008.
Letting Eck go ensures that Ryan will have a fair shot to win the SS job over Izturis. I doubt this happens if Eck is on the roster.
Letting Miles go opens up an opportunity for Jarrett Hoffpauir.
Trading Edmonds opens up room for Barton and potentially Rasmus, and reduces the left-handedness of the OF.
Extending Pineiro is a low-cost commitment ($$ and years) relative to what is likely to be available in this year's FA starter market, where guys like Lohse and Silva will likely get 3-5 years. If Pineiro returns to early Seattle form, the Cards will have caught lightning in a bottle.
The Springer signing is a bargain, considering guys like Linebrink got 4/19. He could have some value at the trade deadline.
This is still a work in progress, but I like the fact that Moz is breaking unproductive ties with a heroic past. Time to move on.
Bonds
It would just be way too much "bad publicity" for a team that is already in disarray and has one soap opeara (LaRussa/Rolen) going on already. DeWitt wouldn't want to add another. Especially one that relates to the steroid scandal.
Huh?
by redbirdnation8206 on Dec 15, 2007 5:33 PM EST up reply actions
Bad Trade
Without anything noticeable to spend the $6M (or whatever) on in the free agent market or on the trade market, I'd much rather bet $6M on a comeback by a Hall of Very Good OF who has come back from injury before. In this market, you don't have to do that much to be worth $6M, particularly at premium defensive position. He's still a plus CF defensively, even if he's lost a step.
A 24yo 3B in the California League who put up a sub-900 OPS is not a prospect, plain and simple, no matter where he went to high school.
This was a salary dump, nothing more.
by South Side Cards Fan on Dec 15, 2007 2:09 PM EST reply actions
Freese
It's not like his bat or defense held him back. There was speculation that he could start the 2007 season in Double-A and move quickly, but that didn't happen because the Padres were committed to sticking with top prospect Chase Headley at Double-A all year. The Padres were stacked with third basemen (enough to move Antonelli to a new position) - that's not Freese's fault.
In almost any other organization, Freese would be at the Double-A level or higher by now... perhaps looking like an older/good hit/ok defense type of minor leaguer that Kevin Kouzmanoff was one year ago.
by birdo on Dec 15, 2007 2:12 PM EST reply actions
Barry Lamar Bonds
Let's say Rasmus is given the CF job. Let's say they trade Ankiel or Duncan. Hell, let's say they don't trade either. The A's are out of the Bonds running. The only other rumored team was the St. Louis Cardinals.
So, let's say Bill DeWitt takes Edmonds $7 M and gives is to Bonds. The lineup changes over dramatically:
Ramsus CF
Bonds/Duncan LF
Pujols 1B
Ankiel RF
Rolen 3B
Molina C
Kennedy 2B
Pitcher P
Ryan/Izturis SS
With Rasmus on the team, we don't need a leadoff hitting SS..which makes Izturis even dumber of a move (if that is a word). You could have had Everett bat 8th and play SS and save us runs on defense.
Anyways, back to Bonds. There is an opening now in the OF where the offense can be improved. If they are serious about giving Rasmus the CF job, then Bonds makes some sense from an offensive standpoint.
What irks me the most is this team had two strengths (a glut in the OF and a glut in the bullpen). John Mozeliak found a way to give away one of our OF for nothing in return. How do you give away from a strength and get nothing for it?
by Hardcore Legend on Dec 15, 2007 2:17 PM EST reply actions
The A's have no interest in Bonds
The guy we should be shopping either this year or next is Duncan. He's a good hitter, but his defense is pretty terrible, and he hasn't hit much against LHP. He's a guy likely to be overvalued. I'd like to see what he can do over a course of a full season before we shop him though.
Believe it or not, I'm not totally oppposed to Bonds, but I have a hard time imagining him playing defense. I can really only see him DHing on an AL team looking for a sideshow to drum up interest in their team. I've read so far there's been zero interest in Bonds from all 30 teams.
by JI on Dec 15, 2007 2:40 PM EST up reply actions
Bonds
While Bonds would HELP the team's offense for 2008 and believe me we really need some help, I highly doubt DeWitt will authorize Bonds coming to the Cardinals.
It would just be way too much "bad publicity" for a team that is already in disarray and has one soap opeara (LaRussa/Rolen) going on already. DeWitt wouldn't want to add another. Especially one that relates to the steroid scandal.
How much bad publicity is it though?
If Bonds hits 35 HRs next year and accounts for 52 of Pujols RBI total, I don't think anyone will give a flying flip how much creamy white stuff he rubbed on his knees.
The genie is out of the bottle as far as steroids now. If the Mitchell Report did anything, it made Barry Bonds look more 'like everyone else'.
His an asshole, terrible husband and probably a felon. That doesn't mean he isn't a great ballplayer and a decent option for a 1 year fix.
by Hardcore Legend on Dec 15, 2007 3:38 PM EST up reply actions
I think Barry's best chance to play next year
by Irishman on Dec 15, 2007 2:56 PM EST up reply actions
His trial won't be until November 2008
by Hardcore Legend on Dec 15, 2007 3:36 PM EST up reply actions
If we did get Bonds I would flip him and Ank
I disagree
Albert isn't moving out of the #3 slot, so putting Bonds #2 ensures that teams MUST pitch to him or face Albert with a runner on.
by Hardcore Legend on Dec 15, 2007 2:34 PM EST up reply actions
Edmonds 7 Million going to Bonds would be...
Yeah he can't play D, but pull him out in late game situations. The dude raked it when he was in the lineup last year and a combo of him and Albert makes the middle of the lineup pretty scary for any pitcher.
by TommyBruno on Dec 15, 2007 4:14 PM EST up reply actions
Maybe but
A question for those who want to Edmonds retire...
What if Jim Edmonds doesn't want to retire after this year? Would you advocate throwing yet another contract at him, even though Rasmus is arriving?
People talk about him retiring here as if this was definitely his last year. I'd love to see Jimmy finish here too, in a sort of vague emotional way, but the reality is that keeping him around after this year would be insanity given our current glut of younger and equally talented outfielders. So why pay him the money this year when we're not going to pay him anything the year after? He's not going to take a $1 mil contract in 2009, and the Cards giving him anything more would be stupid.
I love Edmonds. He was my favorite Cardinal. I have his jersey. But this move makes nothing but sense. It would be one thing to keep him around if he said he was going to retire after '08 -- that way he could finish here, sure. But he hasn't said that (or even begun to suggest it), and it would be impossible for them to justify keeping him beyond that from a baseball standpoint. Save the money now, bid Jimmy a fond farewell, and give the man a roaring ovation every time he comes to the plate in Busch III as a Padre.
Decent point....
However, considering the return we got...I'd gladly let him play out his current contract.
by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 3:09 PM EST up reply actions
bad deal
by wannabeGedman on Dec 15, 2007 3:16 PM EST reply actions
the likes of ryan and izturis
I like the comments that we are ushering the youth
by KOA Cards on Dec 15, 2007 3:35 PM EST reply actions
Yes it would...
He's said his in the best shape (health-wise) that he's been in years. I don't think it's much of a stretch to think that Jimmy can have a productive year if he's handled correctly.
by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 15, 2007 3:51 PM EST up reply actions
We are currently acting like the type of franchise
by Hardcore Legend on Dec 15, 2007 3:57 PM EST up reply actions
I guess it all depends on what you think of
Put it this way, say we held on to J'Ed and he puts together a decent season in '08. Would you throw more money at him for two years to hold on to him? Would you even offer him arbitration?
I'd offer him arbitration
How many utility, backup infielders in the 24-27 year old range do we need?
by Hardcore Legend on Dec 15, 2007 5:36 PM EST up reply actions
Generally 2
Limited trading partners
On the subject of trades,
Joe Strauss isn't that bad
by Hardcore Legend on Dec 15, 2007 3:50 PM EST up reply actions
I forgot about DG
Huh?
I believe
I will add that I think Goold does very nice work, but I really dislike Strauss.
by the red baron on Dec 15, 2007 8:23 PM EST up reply actions
Goold really does some good work
The Commish(Hummel)
Rasmus
Mark Mulder for Dan Haren
Daric Barton
Kiko Calero
Brett Anderson
Greg Smith
Dana Eveland
Carlos Gonzalez
Aaron Cunningham
Chris Carter
by Hardcore Legend on Dec 15, 2007 4:04 PM EST reply actions
Indeed
So Billy traded away 3 months of a good pitcher for those 6 players plus 2 years of an ace...
that's why he is the one of the best, proven repeatedly throughout the past decade. just imagine if he had another $20 million to play with out there...
by DuncanDipper on Dec 15, 2007 6:28 PM EST up reply actions
Those
Leach reporting Edmonds came to Cards for trade.
The LaRussa factor
Jimmy has had his problems with TLR. Last year he was kept on the DL at a time when JED was telling the media he can play and can't understand why he is still on the DL. I would bet Rolen and JED have talked and the ugliness of that situation has led Jimmy to not want to be part of the soap opera next season. Remember that JED married an STL girl last year and just opened a restaurant here. The TLR factor must have been strong for him to ask for a trade.
It doesn't have to be about LaRussa
by Hardcore Legend on Dec 15, 2007 5:37 PM EST up reply actions
LaRussa
JED interview
http://www.stltoday.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=509333&postdays=0&postorder=asc&&star t=0
Jimmy ballgame wanted to know he would be the starting CFer and TLR made no promises. So TLR pushed Mozeliak's hand. I don't care how it happened, just that the team is now taking the painful yet necessary hard steps toward and getting younger and building for the future.
So Edmonds wanted out because
Didn't he say in the middle of last season that he'd be willing to move to RF?
Is there anyone in this organization that sticks to the same story for more than a month?
by Hardcore Legend on Dec 16, 2007 12:01 AM EST up reply actions
Well...
I still don't like just giving him away, but the fact he asked out changes my view immensely.
by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 16, 2007 12:39 AM EST up reply actions
What does Scott Rolen have to do then?
by Hardcore Legend on Dec 15, 2007 5:41 PM EST up reply actions
prove he can still play baseball?
Rolen is also, what, 4 years younger than
And his defense didn't take a hit. It was still Gold Glove caliber.
by Hardcore Legend on Dec 15, 2007 5:51 PM EST up reply actions
Rolen's a lot more productive
What about his last two months?
doesn't matter
baseball is a funny game
for those of you who think the birds wont compete next year is out of their minds.. it'll be harder now that fellas like eckstein and edmonds are gone.. they gave so much more to us than just mere statistics.. they have heart, guts, and most important, charisma.. they led this team.. i honestly believe that jimmy e will post better numbers than any of our outfielders next year despite playing in the dreaded pardres ball park, and play his immaculate d as usual
i cant give up on the birds.. they'll find ways to compete.. playing crucial games the past few sesason really gave them character.. sometimes, ONLY in baseball, its worth more than the talent..
i can only imagine
Rasmus
Bitter medicine, indeed. But so necessary,
by sjoshi on Dec 15, 2007 6:56 PM EST reply actions
Andy pettite and so called confession
TIMMMY K said that if guys take cortisone they are heroes but if they take HGH they are villians but its not that much different..ok that shocked me then he basically later said they are not like cortisone but not steroids...
OK HGH is legal through a doc right? so the question is did he get it from a doc..yes different from steroids but if he got it from a doc its somehwat different than oh say just shooting it.
bizarre day in stl
the blues traded weight (again).
two of my fav stl'ers gone in one day weird, just weird
(sorry about the hockey)
Anybody know where I can get a video of...
We'll regret this
Let's hope he hangs in there for 3 more seasons and builds the HOF resume and that he goes in with a Cardinals hat.
Thanks for the memories Jimmy Ballgame
I hope he does
i always thought he could hit lefties
You got it...
by bobbyballgame1 on Dec 16, 2007 2:12 AM EST up reply actions
i wonder...
I'm so glad
I look forward to the Rasmus era beginning, and am hopeful that this signals that Rasmus is indeed untouchable. This is now Mo's team, and it'll be interesting to see what he comes up with. Mo came in in a difficult situation without much hope for 2008 (beyond the positive of being in the NL Central). I'll start expecting results in 2009.
So long, Jimmy
Late to Jimmy's wake, but....
May the road rise up to meet you.
May the wind always be at your back.
May the sun shine warm upon your face,
and rains fall soft upon your fields.
And until we meet again,
May God hold you in the palm of His hand.
I heard
by enochyukt on Dec 17, 2007 9:42 PM EST reply actions



















