Mozeliak the new GM
Press Conference at 3pm.
This freaking stinks. He isn't bad I suppose, but I thought Antonetti would be a step in the right direction for this organization.
Oh well, here's hoping Mo will prove me wrong.
Update [2007-10-31 13:10:56 by lboros]: mozeliak has some talent, and he might work out just fine --- it's too soon to say what he will do. he deserves a chance. but the troubling thing is that the cardinals wanted antonetti, and he turned them down. that's inauspicious, to say the least.
Update [2007-10-31 13:34:12 by lboros]: rec'd this e-mail from a source outside of st louis: "Shapiro might be stepping to CEO to give Antonetti the reigns. It's more about CLE than STL."
0 recs |
222 comments
Comments
well......................
i think this doesn't change anything. this team needs on overhaul, a whole need direction. mo is just perpetuation of the same direction, just without jocketty's pride and strife.
blech. i'm mad.
by erik on Oct 31, 2007 12:55 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm not mad
by chuckb on Oct 31, 2007 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ugh...
by JMedwick on Oct 31, 2007 12:55 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
But it seems like a wast of time considering all the talk of Antonetti and what not the past few weeks.
I was kind of excited to see what an outsider could do.
by ICbirdfan on Oct 31, 2007 12:56 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Mozeliak!
by jjray on Oct 31, 2007 12:56 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Maybe I'm overreacting
by Mr Redbird on Oct 31, 2007 12:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
No sir...
I wish Bernie would be out of a job. Can't we find someone who isn't a blow-hard to fill his spot? I mean, even if they have to be wrong as much as Bernie is about the important matter... they're just straight forward about it.
"I don't really know this for sure... I thought I overheard someone talking but it probably wasn't true. So, here's this crap that I made up to feel important for a few days. Dig in!"
An honest Bernie, if you will.
by mynameistyler on Oct 31, 2007 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
this isn't bernie's fault
second, it wasn't bernie who reported that antonetti flew in with his wife to tour st louis neighborhoods; it wasn't bernie who reported that antonetti had "signed off" on la russa and luhnow. that was joe strauss's reporting. maybe we all jumped to conclusions, or maybe our conclusions were correct until antonetti had a change of heart. i'm trying to find out right now.
i'm as disappointed as any of you, but don't hold the media responsible. i don't believe anything was misrepresented.
by lboros on Oct 31, 2007 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're right lb
by Mr Redbird on Oct 31, 2007 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Same thing?
Not to say I told you so, but I told you so.
There are so many reasons not to like Bernie, I guess I just can't give him the benefit of the doubt regardless of your excuses.
by RedbirdRay on Oct 31, 2007 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think the thing that people fail to see
by OCCardsFan on Oct 31, 2007 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He is?
bernie stirs up controversial items and often reports things wrong, steals ideas and is generally a pompous blow hard.
I will dislike him if i want to regardless if you don't think he's accountable for things he puts in writing.
by RedbirdRay on Oct 31, 2007 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Post Dispatch is a newspaper first
At best, his pressbox material is well-placed gossip.
by bailorg on Oct 31, 2007 6:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ray, i'm not making excuses for bernie
if you want to blame bernie for that, be my guest. blame me too, because i issued the same "all-but-a-done-deal" proclamations here at VEB. i was wrong. i don't apologize.
also, i'm pretty certain that bernie never reported anything about AJ Burnett. brian walton made an erroneious report over at the Birdhouse. i don't think bernie was wrong about that.
by lboros on Oct 31, 2007 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with LB
my prelim take is CA wanted to stay in Cleveland all along and eventually take over for Shapiro. I'm not taking it personal as a Cards fan.
by MrPlow on Oct 31, 2007 4:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like Bernie
by Titus Pullo on Oct 31, 2007 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's disheartening,
Prove us wrong, Mo. Prove us wrong.
(But in my mind, all I can think is this really fuckings sucks right now. Get ready to welcome back David freaking Eckstein, So Taguchi, and Aaron Miles: 400 AB/per season "bench" player. Oh, and feel free to sign another 5th starter for 7 mil to fill out this "rotation" of ours.)
(I'm one of the more optimistic Cards fans out there... but... just... fuck.)
by Alxfritz on Oct 31, 2007 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Me too, man
by mynameistyler on Oct 31, 2007 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe this is a...
Maybe Mozeliak handles the contracts, and Luhnow gets a bigger voice on the major league side of the club.
by guayzimi on Oct 31, 2007 12:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
big win for LaRussa
There will be no overhaul. Not this year. Not until LaRussa leaves. He'll just reload with vets at the back end of their careers.
by jjray on Oct 31, 2007 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can you really blame him?
And when he does it will likely not come with a heavyweight manager, an assistant, and a minor league guru already in place. It wasn't that great of a deal for Antonetti to begin with. If they really wanted him they should have fired Luhnow as a condition of him getting the job.
by guayzimi on Oct 31, 2007 1:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't think Luhnow was the problem
If anything, I would think Luhnow would be an ally for an incoming Antonetti.
If Antonetti isn't coming in, it's because La Russa and his ilk still have a big voice in the organization.
Luhnow would be on Antonetti's side.
by arch support on Oct 31, 2007 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No...
If DeWitt likes Luhnow then Luhnow should be the GM. The problem is he's too new. So you put Mozeliak up as something of a figurehead while Luhnow's way of thinking and methods take over the organization...
by guayzimi on Oct 31, 2007 1:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just don't see it that way.
After the factionalism (don't know if that's a word) Luhnow had to deal with from Jocketty's camp, my assumption is he would welcome a kindred spirit with arms open.
If I were Antonetti and I looked at the Cards, I'd see an owner who wants to win with a moderate payroll, a player development director with a similar philosophy to my own, and an increasingly dinosaurish manager and pitching coach who are unenthusiastic about homegrown talent and prefer veterans.
Considering Antonetti's philosophy, which one of those personalities is going to be the most difficult to deal with?
I'm not saying La Russa, et al, is the reason Antonetti did not accept. Obviously, Cleveland wants to keep him around. But, if anyone within our organization was a deal-breaker, I don't think it would be Luhnow.
by arch support on Oct 31, 2007 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not so sure
by bailorg on Oct 31, 2007 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't even think...
by guayzimi on Oct 31, 2007 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wait a minute
That's exactly why Jocketty is no longer with the Cards.
Antonetti, who is much younger (read: probably less crotchety) and is coming from an organization that has made a strong team precisely by compromising between statistics and scouting, wants total control with no compromising?
Like I said, the person he would have to compromise the most with would be La Russa.
by arch support on Oct 31, 2007 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
antonetti was an assistant
by cdb on Oct 31, 2007 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just what I feared this organization would do
by MikeG on Oct 31, 2007 1:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That draft
by Dave Barry on Oct 31, 2007 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think
by Toddius396 on Oct 31, 2007 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
One nagging worry: Is DeWitt too involved?
The whole who has what powers question gets a whole lot simpler if Lunhow, LaRussa, and the new GM all answer to DeWitt.
by bailorg on Oct 31, 2007 1:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
sure seems that way...
by airhad on Oct 31, 2007 1:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
DeWitt is the GM
Who wants to be GM if every move has to be approved by DeWitt? He wanted a yes man and he got him.
by vinniefromjersey on Oct 31, 2007 9:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cards really wanted Antonetti
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/7394064?CMP=OTC-K9B140813162&ATT=49
by plaz on Oct 31, 2007 1:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Dear diary...
by silent_bob on Oct 31, 2007 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't like this at all.
I hope I'm wrong, but this does not look good.
by silent_bob on Oct 31, 2007 1:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
things are trending that way...
by airhad on Oct 31, 2007 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dare I bring back my quote from yesterday?
Am I missing something or did you jump the gun, lb?
It's kinda scary 'cause the last time somebody jumped the gun this year, they were saying that the Rockies would be playing the Indians in the world series.
So if you did make an assumption, let's hope it comes true."
Not accusing you of jinxing us or anything, but this site really needs to start knocking on wood . . .
by aet15 on Oct 31, 2007 1:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i don't believe in jinxes
but there were many overt indications that he was the guy:
- the cards delayed their search specifically to talk to him, waiting until the indians got knocked out of the playoffs. they obviously were very interested.
- antonetti flew in not only to interview, but also to look at houses with his wife --- he obviously was interested in the job. and don't forget, he had declined invitations to interview for other jobs; he accepted this invitation.
by lboros on Oct 31, 2007 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The factor that wasn't taken into account...
by airhad on Oct 31, 2007 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
LB - your opinion of Mo?
Will this franchise really take a new approach under Mo?
by silent_bob on Oct 31, 2007 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i don't know
i think people are jumping to a lot of conclusions about him --- none of us really knows what to expect. i have an open mind.
like everyone else, i was excited about antonetti; c'est la vie. that ship has sailed. we move on. in 6 months, i'll have a much firmer opinion about big mo than i do today.
by lboros on Oct 31, 2007 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
he also said a deal
by erik on Oct 31, 2007 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
oh I know.
"not an easy knot for mr. antonetti to untangle; he'll have to be creative."
You're not the only one, though. I think we all (through Bernie and other sources) thought the deal was all but an announcement away.
by aet15 on Oct 31, 2007 7:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
larry has jinxed us plenty
the offense is fixed, it gets broke.
the pitching is fixed, it gets broke.
we are finished - start selling, we get back in contention.
the zombies are back, we go on massive losing streak.
indians are going to the series, bosox come back.
antonetti has to fix this mess, mo gets hired.
Of course, this is all pure coincidence, but I'd love to hear larry say "There is no way this team will win the World Series next year, nor will Pujols hit 85 HRs and Edmonds and Rolen play 155 games each. Mark Mulder has no shot at winning the Cy Young award".
:D
by Hardcore Legend on Oct 31, 2007 7:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not lboros, but I'll try it...
stlfan
by stlfan on Oct 31, 2007 8:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
More Bernie BS
It's official.
3 pm newser at Busch
Mozeliak is hired ...
3-year contract...
Antonetti apparently backed out; concerns over autonomy (in other words: the Luhnow factor).
Much more later.
STLtoday.com reported this first, despite what you will hear elsewhere.
Thank you."
Surprise, surprise.
by silent_bob on Oct 31, 2007 1:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Not suprising really
How unfortunate. Looks like the major rebuilding will have to wait until 2010 or 2011 (right as Albert is really to leave) unless Mo and Luhnow are a better combo than most believe at infusing this team with the fresh perspective that it desperately needs.
by JMedwick on Oct 31, 2007 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Autonomy
by bgodar on Oct 31, 2007 8:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not good
by Cardinal70 on Oct 31, 2007 1:15 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I am so sick of "Standing pat"
by TICY on Oct 31, 2007 1:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Antonetti
...We get Jocketty Lite when the entire org needed a change of direction. 105 wins, 100 wins, 83 wins, 78 wins. $100 million already invested to a 2008 team which will be lucky to win 75 games. Yeah, lets stand pat in the front office.
Fuck.
(this post is easily going to past the most cursing post of all time.)
by Alxfritz on Oct 31, 2007 1:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
PS
by Alxfritz on Oct 31, 2007 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Intersting info LB
by JMedwick on Oct 31, 2007 1:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
wow....
Somehow I missed the part where MLB as a whole was something special to be admired for its integrity and high virtue these past few years.
Of course there are going to be trying times, but it ain't just the Cards, BUT... Wainwright DID jump in the air just a little over a year ago....I saw it happen.
The Braves announcers really got to you....or was it the D-backs?
by cardschinmusic on Nov 1, 2007 4:13 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Antonetti turned the Cards down
Luhnow or no Luhnow, TLR or no TLR, opportunities to build a team around one of the greatest hitters in a generation, and to have $30 million-plus to spend in his second off-season as GM, aren't going to come around that often.
And, as LB pointed out the other day, he is not going to be the "it" guy forever. Now all of the guys he developed look great; if the Indians have a couple of shitty years, the idea of hiring their #2 won't seem quite as compelling. For some reason, the lyric ""The Whiz man" never fit him like the "Whiz Kid" did" comes to mind . . .
by tdawg on Oct 31, 2007 1:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Robothal was just on XM
I'm not as upset about Mo, I wasn't as down as most on the Pineiro signing, the Izzy option, etc.
If he resigns Eckstein (other than just offering arbitration because WE HAVE TO), I'll be disgusted.
by Hardcore Legend on Oct 31, 2007 1:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
This information
If it's true that Luhnow was the catch, then I retract my argument.
Looking at it from the outside, it's just not what I would expect.
by arch support on Oct 31, 2007 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed on Springer/Izzy/Pineiro
But if the big free agent signing/"new player deal" is resigning Eckstein and bringing in some random player who isn't any good (a Wes Helms-type) then we're going to have serious issues.
by redbirdnation8206 on Oct 31, 2007 6:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sprizzyeiro
I just don't like the status quo feeling I get with this club. Something needs to change, and so far...absolutely nothing has.
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am excited
by StLHugo on Oct 31, 2007 1:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm sure...
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow!
by cardsgirl95 on Oct 31, 2007 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
maybe we can think into existence...
by airhad on Oct 31, 2007 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i agree
Lets face it - numbers crunchers aren't as rare as they once were and the be all and end all - there are plenty of posters on VEB that can crunch the hell out of numbers in their spare time. Imagine what they could do salaried!
Complete autonomy is never good - we now have a front office that at least can get along.
by cdb on Oct 31, 2007 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can we just all keep in mind
Jeez, the knee-jerk reactions about this are astonishing. I can understand disappointment, but to assume that any of have a clue what's in Mo's mind is just ridiculous.
by MdRedbirdFreak on Oct 31, 2007 1:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
But we do have a clue
by chuckb on Oct 31, 2007 9:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
At Least
by JBagKY on Oct 31, 2007 1:42 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The Cardinals...
by guayzimi on Oct 31, 2007 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was going for sarcasm
by JBagKY on Oct 31, 2007 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No point in blaming the media...
by tbell61 on Oct 31, 2007 1:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Sickening...
TLR is now in TOTAL control of this team. We'll be the last team to come around to the new way of doing things and we'll pay for it badly.
More news within the next week.
Hello Taguchi, Miles, a new extension Eck. Hell, we might as well extend Jimmy for 3 more years.
This is now one of the worst run organizations in baseball.
Get ready for 5 more seasons of station to station, pitch to contact snoozefests.
I'm not the only one who feels this way. The rest of baseball is laughing in our face. We can't even get another teams assistants to take the job.
This makes me not even want to follow baseball. Stupid, stupid, stupid.
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 1:44 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I was wondering
by arch support on Oct 31, 2007 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We wait with baited breath
by MdRedbirdFreak on Oct 31, 2007 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
MO
Izzy was a good signing.
Frankin: Could have been worse
Just because Mo worked with Walt does not mean he is Walt JR. Yes he probably took some of Walt's good and bad traits and developed his own style. Also CA probably stayed in Cleveland because he was going to be a GM there. Why would he want to leave the org he came up in? I don't blame him for being loyal and wanting to stay where he has opportunity and is comfortable. He has not hit the ceiling in that org yet. Maybe he is not looking to be a GM more than a couple years. He may have other goals.
But back to it, Let's sit back let Mo make some actual moves and then evaluate. Everyone was saying if CA came over we would need to give him time. So why is eveyone jumping on Mo. Some moves may be made to make things better in the future.
FYI signing IZZY & Franking cost us no prospect and not a lot of $$ in the grand scheme of things. If you want to look at our bad contracts look no further than Carp or Mulder who can't pitch and are raking in a ton of $$$. Now those hurt us. Aaron Miles at 1.2 Mill chickenfeed. So people stop talking about Aaron Miles contract because in the overall picture he is being paid $1.
by ICbirdfan on Oct 31, 2007 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Since when do the Cardinals...
Mozelaik is there because noone else wanted the job. Have the Cardinals slipped that far? Hell, Rick Hahn withdrew himself from consideration.
The Pirates have a better front office.
Give me a break.
At least Mizzou Football is heading in the right direction.
How long before we are cellar dwellars and AP demands out. I give it 2 years.
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 1:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Hahn
by StLHugo on Oct 31, 2007 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
NEVER?
Oh well, doesn't make sense to do everything in their power to keep this craptastic team together either.
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn't have wanted
I can;t blame this on TLR, either. Most possible GMs would love to work for a HoF manager.
Either DeWitt refused to give up enough power for him or he has a better offer (read: Cleve this year or NY next year). I wish we would have had him, but thinking about it now, it's understandable.
I hate to say it -- and hope this changes in a month or two -- but it's play of '09 time. Sucks.
by Alxfritz on Oct 31, 2007 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
More from Bernie
Madison, 32, will assist Jeff Luhnow.... Cardinals have made changes in their scouting department and Madison figures to have a prominent role in the player-development operation.
-----------------
Looks like we might be fully embracing this player development philosophy after all.
by StLHugo on Oct 31, 2007 1:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Um...
by JMedwick on Oct 31, 2007 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Makes sense
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Office
by Birds on the Matt on Oct 31, 2007 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This was announced last night
by MikeG on Oct 31, 2007 5:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Perhaps
by Dave Barry on Oct 31, 2007 1:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Actually...
I'll quit with the sky is falling attitude for now. In truth, we don't know much about Mozeliak. Maybe he is on board with player development and statistical scouting.
However, the two signings he had made so far scream Jocketty lite.
I'll wait until they give Eck 3 years to denounce baseball. What do I have? A week?
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 1:53 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The Cardinals just hired...
It is depressing that we can't get one of the top candidates out there. I hope I'm proved wrong, but I think this is terrible.
by MRCARD on Oct 31, 2007 2:03 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Good Point
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Think about this...
Sometimes not getting your first choice is ok...
by guayzimi on Oct 31, 2007 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
well,
by tnek5 on Oct 31, 2007 2:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Here, here....Mo was in charge of that draft
by jillsinmo on Oct 31, 2007 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
come on
by willievinceterry on Oct 31, 2007 10:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Damn
by rockin redbird on Oct 31, 2007 2:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Walt Jocketty
One thing he did was scoop up players he viewed as undervalued. Sometimes they worked out (Carp) and sometimes they didn't (Wells).
Walt Jocketty put the best team on the field in 2004. He brought a new era of playoff baseball to StL.
The Cards main weakness under Jocketty was the farm system. I think that is being addressed. I think statistical analysis will be used more readily. Mo gets to hire an Assistant GM. Maybe that way will be more slanted towards stats. Mo has some relationships, and that's one thing Jocketty was known as being great for - having good relationships with other GMs.
I don't think this is the end of the world. CA got a better offer - that's just how markets work. We went with a guy who already knows everyone - I don't think it's the end of the world.
CA may not end up being a good GM - there are no sure things. We'll see.
by Toddius396 on Oct 31, 2007 2:11 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I wrote
by Toddius396 on Oct 31, 2007 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Key Word
Sure, he was great when teams were giving away the Jim Edmonds and Scott Rolens of the world for peanuts. That's not happening anymore, and Walt really never did well in the FA market.
Let's just imagine that a scrap heap pitcher never turned into Cy Young, and a 13th round draft pick never turned into the best player in the NL.
There was alot of luck that led to Walt's success here.
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Luck
I don't know if it was Walt, or Dewitt but the Cards just seemed to miss out on the FA market by just a bit on a lot of guys. Maybe a lot of guys think STL is a nice place to play but they just hate the idea of living in Missouri. There are a lot of factors that paly in to FA signing and I think it is hard to say you fell short for any reason other than $$$. Now I know Walt/Dewitt did not like to set the market price on guys. Like the Cubs signed Alfonso for $136 Mill he was overpaid for but the Cubs wanted him so they chose to overpay. The Cards never liked to overpay that if for sure.
by ICbirdfan on Oct 31, 2007 2:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Luck
Walt was a good GM - I think he would have adapted moving forward. You can see what works. The best time to be a moneyball GM was before everyone else was. Calling what he did here luck is ridiculous to me. Why tear him down. What does it accomplish. Everyone thinks they know the best moves for the Cards - sometimes we're wrong, too. I think you can look at his track record and it speaks for himself.
by Toddius396 on Oct 31, 2007 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes!!!
Recent history is the Cards punishment for the way Walt built the team. He raised them up only to sink them in the end.
If you are going to give him praise then you have to hold him accountable for the current situation. Can't have it both ways.
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 11:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And if the Cubs weren't so stupid
...Bing Devine would have been known as the GM that traded for Dick Groat and traded away HOF'er Steve Carlton.
by Hardcore Legend on Oct 31, 2007 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Luck
The 1a starter for the Indians was a failed closer who was trying to re-learn starting at AAA when Cliff Lee went down with an injury, forcing him into the rotation this year.
The best pitcher on the planet was Rule 5ed to Florida and dealt to Minnesota for essentially a bag of baseballs, Flippy the Perfoming Chimp, and a big bag of saltine crackers.
The recent WS MVP was a throw in on the Ramirez for Beckett trade.
And on, and on, and on...
by redbirdnation8206 on Oct 31, 2007 6:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So...
When is the Taguchi press conference?
When will we trade for Niefi Perez?
by RedbirdRay on Oct 31, 2007 2:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You came to the right place to
by MdRedbirdFreak on Oct 31, 2007 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dinner...
Bank on it.
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
TOO LATE
Dusty loves Nefi.
by ICbirdfan on Oct 31, 2007 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is
by redbirdnation8206 on Oct 31, 2007 6:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
what's the big deal?
by barry whiteteeth on Oct 31, 2007 2:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
MO = Team player.
Plus, we all need to remember that his name offers much better "nickname" potential than Antonetti's did..
Think of it..
Somehow finds players we like to fill all of the holes? = BIG MO!
Makes a faux pas in the press or doesn't take a player we like in the draft? = little mo.
Trades Rasmus or re-signs Eckstein? = No Mo..
Just a thought.
Boomer.
by glamboomer on Oct 31, 2007 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
good point
by SleepyCA on Oct 31, 2007 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm a LaDunkiak
by Hardcore Legend on Oct 31, 2007 3:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How about this one..
- Goes to 2 names, which may or may not be a good thing...
- Includes Luhnow, since he's apparently involved in everything except pricing LP's at my work..
- Throws "Moz" in there as an alternative to "Mo" which may or may not be played out at this point & gives a subtle hat-tip to Morrissey..
- Sounds like "Toulouse-Lautrec", which I've always thought was one of the coolest sounding names ever...
by glamboomer on Oct 31, 2007 3:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Toulouse-Lautrec
by stlfan on Oct 31, 2007 8:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Been waiting for all this.....
I also think you have to give him time now to form his own personality as a GM. Just because he worked for Jocketty doesn't mean he's going to be of like mind or manner in carrying out his duties. Lets all take a deep breath here...and give the guy a chance to show us who he is before we start assuming what he's going to be like in the position.
by Timbo02 on Oct 31, 2007 2:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Antonetti
Antonetti turned down an offer to be GM of the Cardinals, despite calling it "one of the best jobs in the game" and admitting to being "blown away" and "immensely impressed" with Cardinals chairman Bill DeWitt.
It appeared Antonetti was leaning toward moving to St. Louis until Indians owner Paul Dolan stepped up, defined the succession process under which Mark Shapiro will eventually be the club president and Antonetti the GM and made other promises.
Antonetti said he was "very fortunate to have a choice of two of the best jobs there are with two of the best owners to work with," Antonetti said. "The Cardinals may be one of the top five GM jobs in the business, but we are very happy where we are and Paul Dolan made it impossible to leave."
by holden on Oct 31, 2007 2:56 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That makes sense
by Hardcore Legend on Oct 31, 2007 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Umm, he'd rather live in Cleveland?!!!
by Titus Pullo on Oct 31, 2007 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Everyone's a model...
That is a GREAT show. After that episode I was dying to "flee to the Cleve."
by effin fisk on Oct 31, 2007 7:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What smells so good?
by the red baron on Nov 1, 2007 7:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Damn...
A few points on this thought:
- If Dewitt didn't low-ball him, then CA made a mistake. He should have taken the job. All organizations with openings have warts. His declining of other and this job smacks of a fear of failure situtation from him. If that was the case, I didn't want him anyway. I was a little of a shot at his honor.
- What I suspect is that Dewitt did low-ball him in terms of years. A longer contract would have ensured that he whould have the most front office power. I bet he was offered the same three year contract that Mo got and realized he wouldn't be able to reshape the front office in his image before his contract was up.
- One of the big things that CA offered was basically setting up a version of the Indians Diamondview. The Cardinals already have developed a similar system. It probably wasn't deployed at the major league level because of Jockety. I would bet Luhnow already has it set up.
- If Dewitt didn't remove Luhnow from consideration would we be complaining as much if he was named the GM today? He has similar qualifications to CA.
by BigJawnMize on Oct 31, 2007 3:03 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
wake-up call
Mozeliak hasn't done anything bad yet, but this front office really needed a shakeup. I hope we finish last in the central next year. This organization thinks too highly of itself.
by stlknows on Oct 31, 2007 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He didn't make a mistake
by sdrone on Oct 31, 2007 3:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree...
by BigJawnMize on Oct 31, 2007 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Everyone acknowledges
by sdrone on Oct 31, 2007 5:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
im so pissed right now
by stlcardinalsfang on Oct 31, 2007 3:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
this luhnow guy is really getting on my nerves
Dewitt needs to check himself & ask himself why he's given one man so much power. if no one besides MO wants to work with the guy one would think Dewitt could see this as ask himself if he hasn't made a mistake & given jeff way, WAY to much power. if the guys not the GM why the hell does he have so much freaking power? it obvious to every one now whos really running the Cards.
i cant blame Antonetti for walking away. i mean come on, if he cant control the farm system, & he cant control the major league roster because thats Tony's job, and MO handles all the contracts & the other day-to-day activities, what was he going to do all day? get Dewitt coffee? pick up his dry cleaning?
this is all Dewitts doing. if & when the Cards fail miserably to reach the playoffs in the next five years we have one man & only one man to blame.
Bill Dewitt Jr.
by gdm426 on Oct 31, 2007 3:20 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Take a deep breath.
by cardsgirl95 on Oct 31, 2007 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lunhow
by Birds on the Matt on Oct 31, 2007 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
here are the facts
so due to the fact Dewitt chose Lunhow over two very good GM's, shouldn't that send up red flags?
i never questioned Lunhow's ability to restock the farm system. he's done OK so far. but his only boss shouldn't be Dewitt. he should have to answer to the GM, and the fact that Dewitt doesn't want him to really bothers me & a lot of other big names around MLB.
nothing against MO. dudes cool in my book. but he's a puppet. he's got four masters, Tony, Mark Lamping, Dewitt & Lunhow. the guy running the Cardinals should not be a puppet for any body.
it should really concern every one that Dewitt ran off two guys like Jocketty & Antonetti because he placed all his bets on Luhnow.
by gdm426 on Oct 31, 2007 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Here's what I don't get
by mikedallas23 on Oct 31, 2007 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Luhnow
To your point that he should have to answer to the GM, that is true. I'm not sure if he'll answer to Mozeliak or not. But he doesn't have more power than Mozeliak -- not even close.
by chuckb on Oct 31, 2007 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i hear what you are saying
mark lamping just told bernie on the radio that Luhnow reports to MO and does not have more power than him. and it was only because Walt was upset at how Luhnow was hired is the reason he spoke to Dewitt only. he said Dewitt was acting like a GM when Walt was there because Walt refused to work with Luhnow. he said Dewitt & MO had to be a go betweens & Dewitt & MO were not going to do that any more.
of course when asked at the press conference why Antonetti turned down the job every one said he was never offered the job. well if he wasn't offered the job, why the hell was he looking at homes in the st louis area?
OK. so who do we believe? the outsiders or the Cardinals? both have given us reasons in the past to not believe what they are saying. the outsiders dont know half of what they say they know. and the Cards spin every thing so much that we really dont know what to believe.
by gdm426 on Oct 31, 2007 5:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
positive spin?
by Birds on the Matt on Oct 31, 2007 5:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who ever said
Luhnow has no control over the major-league roster, therefore his power is severely limited and is less than Mozeliak's and would have been less than Antonetti's. If Antonetti was concerned that Luhnow would report to DeWitt and not to him, that's legitimate -- and a problem DeWitt should have rectified. That does not mean, however, that Luhnow has powers that he simply doesn't have. Anybody who suggests that Luhnow is, in any way, in control over the major-league roster, is creating a fiction.
by chuckb on Oct 31, 2007 6:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Branch Ricky ----> Bing Devine
This is a different situation though, because Lunhow isn't some old buzzard trying to hold on to baseball. But the problem could be the same.
by Hardcore Legend on Oct 31, 2007 6:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But wait a minute here, folks......
by jillsinmo on Oct 31, 2007 6:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
well, about 30 posts up
by willievinceterry on Oct 31, 2007 11:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
was referring to jillsinmo
by willievinceterry on Oct 31, 2007 11:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Skill Sets
There's been a lot of discussion already about how Lunhow/Antonetti would either be competitive/complimentary with their similar bent toward statistics. But could that skill have become redundant? Did we really need two stat-masters?
Perhaps our current arrangement will allow the complimentary skills of Lunhow (player development) and Mozeliak (player relationships, contracts) to meld.
That said, I was hoping for Antonetti too. But the Indians (well run orgnization that they are) made sure to keep him. I think of it as their win rather than our loss, if that makes any sense.
The Eckstein decision should prove an excellent and immediate baromoter for the Mozeliak's tone from now own. I'm net yet sure how much we can blame him for the Piniero/Springer deal, those may have been just to show that we plan to stay competitive to LaRussa and GM candidates.
I'm excited for this off-season, whoever's running it.
by joshuadivine on Oct 31, 2007 3:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
now that i'm calm
mo seems like he's an open guy to both the new and the old, stats and scouting based on the googling i've done. and he's not going to be a cancer. he worked well with both sides in a toxic situation. it's not the end of the world.
by erik on Oct 31, 2007 3:33 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Plan B?
If we can all agree on one thing it's that the Cards "settled" when they gave the job to Mo.
I equate signing Mo to taking the fat girl home from the bar. You spend all night trying to get in with a couple of hotties, but by the end of the night you just end up taking the only person willing to come because you had to take someone.
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm 25
Not so sure what is immature about that.
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for just posting
by Titus Pullo on Oct 31, 2007 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was going to just let it speak for itself
by tdawg on Oct 31, 2007 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It was one of those...
by guayzimi on Oct 31, 2007 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Go ahead and Judge...
Like I said, I'm 25, I have fun and the analogy is spot on.
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 5:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe I'm just stupid...
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 5:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think the source
IMO, most of the time its just some healthy feather-ruffling. I appreciate many of the points you bring up. But this isn't the first time you've come off as "immature" due to some content in your posts.
by silent_bob on Oct 31, 2007 5:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe...
I'm sure if someone else had said it it would have been taken in jest.
You make a good point.
Oh well, I apologize if my comments offended anyone in anyway. Although, if you were offended I think you have VERY thin skin.
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 7:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thin skin
by spants on Oct 31, 2007 7:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm sorry...
It was a joke, and it wasn't taken well by most.
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 8:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i liked
by rocKStark5 on Oct 31, 2007 6:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Now this guy...
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 7:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If this is the reaction we had over the GM
Zoinks!
by Hardcore Legend on Oct 31, 2007 3:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The GM...
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lunhow
The next most ready guy besides Rasums is Jarrett Hoffpauir and most people who are considered experts rank him as a back up league average MLB player. And they say he can only play 2B. So he really is not better than Miles. He would be about $830,000 cheaper and that is about it.
Minor Leagues need to be built up asap.
by ICbirdfan on Oct 31, 2007 3:39 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Luhnow is the future
yes i wanted antonetti but this isn't the end of the world.
also, i think the eckstein situation will tell us whether Mo is committed to a youth movement or following in his predecessors footsteps (sure hope not)
by kalmavet on Oct 31, 2007 3:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Latin America
by BigJawnMize on Oct 31, 2007 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well said
by Yellow Dog on Oct 31, 2007 4:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well...
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
As erik points out below
by chuckb on Oct 31, 2007 9:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
they are in latin america
by erik on Oct 31, 2007 3:56 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
furthermore
by erik on Oct 31, 2007 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice
It is always hard to predict but it seems other systems have multiple can't miss type guys where our system is just weak. We have a bunch of solid guys but no one that just make you say "wow" besides Rasmus. Anderson sound like he is close to being a "wow" guy or just another solid guy.
Who knows.
by ICbirdfan on Oct 31, 2007 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
NP
none so far, which isn't good but here goes who i think will make it -
07, kozma, mortensen, todd
06, ottavino, perez, craig...and possibly furnish, and hamilton is a nice trading chip.
05 rasmus, anderson, boggs and probably herron.
04 (gasp) hoffpauir, worrell (?)
there isn't a lot of wow, but there is some help on the way. it's not all bad. maybe with his new helper from SD the drafting will improve. the pads go also very college heavy, but they've done well recently with chase headley and mark antonelli. i think luhnow has time to make his mark, but i too share a bit of a skeptical eye.
by erik on Oct 31, 2007 4:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is there a chance you are confusing lunhow with
by Hardcore Legend on Oct 31, 2007 6:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What About Asia, Erik?
the cards were way late to the party in L.America.
Are we going to be late to the Asian game too?
I'm interested in hearing what our plans are on that fertile front. Anyone know anything?
by MrPlow on Oct 31, 2007 10:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe I'm down on Mo because his name,
by Yellow Dog on Oct 31, 2007 4:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That's the problem...
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's a plus in my book...
About the only plus.
by DiscoJer on Oct 31, 2007 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh crap...
by guayzimi on Oct 31, 2007 4:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Eck, Percy, Wells, and Cairo filed for free agency
by Pujols on Oct 31, 2007 4:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
don't forget Russell Branyan
by madding on Oct 31, 2007 5:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the bright side of Mo
And what's the deal with Bernie blaming Antonetti's backdown on "the Lunhow Factor"? I guess I saw Lunhow and Antonetti as of the same mind (both stat-headish). Guess we know that's not true based on what Rosenthal said, but for Bernie to just throw it out there unsubstantiated is ridiculous! Blog or column, a journalist should be held to the same standards and accountability for whatever he writes in whatever medium.
by lightbulb on Oct 31, 2007 4:32 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i don't know
Dealing with scientists/engineers on a daily basis, you find that the most violent disagreements are often between two people with like mindsets who see minor variations in the data differently, who interpret results in ways that would seem virtually identical to people with no background in the field but result in almost religious levels of conflict between otherwise rational individuals. It's amazing.
Anyway, I think we may have dodged a bullet with CA. Guys like him (and Luhnow) probably make great advisers, and having guys like them around is a requirement for a modern front office to be successful, but there are talents necessary to run an organization that there is no proof that either of them have. Part of that is being able to listen to alternative viewpoints, imo, which is one reason WJ had to go, but there are others such as leadership and judgment and negotiation etc that none of us are in a position to evaluate...
by SleepyCA on Oct 31, 2007 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
MO's talkin to Bernie live right now
by gdm426 on Oct 31, 2007 5:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
sometimes i cant get
http://www.streamaudio.com/site/Stations.aspx?format=Sports
by gdm426 on Oct 31, 2007 5:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i don't think philosophy
as stated before, the problem was the fact that lunhow had dewitt's ear. So whenever there was a question about anything within the organization that lunhow and CA didn't agree with, lunhow could also pull the dewitt card and get his way. that was probably the sticking point for a lot of candidates.
also, it seems like whoever got the gm position was just going to be keeping it warm for lunhow for the next three years till he is ready to take the position.
i like mo and i agree that his and lunhow's skill sets will work well together but i still think we had to "settle" for him.
by FutureMan on Oct 31, 2007 5:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If this is truly the case...
Tony hates him for sure, but if he has more power than the GM what's the difference?
by bobbyballgame1 on Oct 31, 2007 5:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
par for the course
this franchise is headed south and quick.
mo is a mouthpiece and no more.
and that is a real shame.
by semohawg on Oct 31, 2007 6:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Lets make that a poem
Antonetti was the consensus pick
but Cleveland make him an offer to stick
now cardinals fans are sick
(thats not supposed to be good, btw)
by Born in 82 on Oct 31, 2007 6:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tony
by chuckb on Oct 31, 2007 9:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
thank you, hc
by willievinceterry on Oct 31, 2007 11:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did DeWitt choose Mo last week?
Excerpts:
"He knows all the people here," DeWitt said, beginning a list of Mozeliak's qualifications. "He's got a good working relationship. He works well with people. He's decisive and knows baseball. He's got a lot to offer.
"He's done a great job in the interim. Signing free agents isn't easy, particularly ones you're pretty sure you want. So the fact that he's here and has taken this interim (title) gives him a good shot. He had a good shot going in, but he's done some things since he's been here, too."
...DeWitt said interviewing candidates like Antonetti, 32, and Woodfork could provide a benefit to the Cardinals even if neither gets the job.
"I don't want to get into specific attributes of these candidates, but I think it's always helpful to get views from someone from the outside," DeWitt said. "Just in the interview process, you get an external opinion of the organization and how they view it and how maybe the industry views it. That's all good information.
"There are 30 different teams, 30 different approaches. Some are more similar than others. When you go through this process --I know how things have been done here over the years --it's good to hear other candidates talk about how they approach it, if it's similar (to the Cardinals), maybe not as good or maybe they have some views that would enhance what we've done."
by CardsWin on Oct 31, 2007 6:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
DeWitt's comments on ESPN1380 within the last hour
"I think scouting and stats are equally important."
"Jeff Luhnow was brought in two develop our statistical analysis and to find international players.... We hadn't been too happy with (our drafting).... This year we had three of the youngest stars at AA.... Jeff was handling a lot.... He's moved the analytical group and it will now report directly to Mo."
"Rolen should be much healthier. Edmonds should be much improved. Carpenter won't be available until later in the season, but we're hopeful Mark Mulder will be much more productive next year.... We've been given high odds that (his shoulder) will be fixed."
"It's a pretty thin market from a free agent standpoint but we have more assets than we've had in the past from a trade standpoint."
"I think after next year some of the kids from AA this year will step up (and contribute on the big league team)."
[This seems to indicate that any trades will not sacrifice most of the top talent that was at AA this year.]
by CardsWin on Oct 31, 2007 6:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And the Bill DeWitt annual reversal has
October
"We're going to improve the team, make a big splash, bump up payroll to fill holes."
February
"There just wasn't anything out there we wanted to get in on. There were a few, but the bidding got out of control. We are going to keep the powder dry and make a move at midseason. We can improve from within."
This year, it just didn't take as long.
by Hardcore Legend on Oct 31, 2007 6:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
All of the useful FA reupped with their old teams
by Valatan on Oct 31, 2007 7:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
40 Million in payroll
by Alxfritz on Nov 1, 2007 12:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sounds good to me
by Hardcore Legend on Nov 1, 2007 12:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That type of gamble
by Alxfritz on Nov 1, 2007 12:43 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bonds...
I'll take Schilling and Glavine though.
Moot point anyway, they won't be adding 40M in payroll.
by bobbyballgame1 on Nov 1, 2007 12:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Schilling and Glavine
Give him the same contract in '08. $9 M 1 year plus additional $1M (up to $13M) for each additional 10 IP in 2008.
You'd be looking at $22 M in payroll upfront, which added to the current $99 M, puts payroll at $121 M. Trade Braden Looper. $115.5 M. Bill can pick up the extra 500k.
Rotation
Schilling
Wainwright
Glavine
Pineiro
Mulder/Thompson/Wellemeyer
by Hardcore Legend on Nov 1, 2007 12:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm on board...
Probably the most realistic shot we have of putting a competitive team on the field and the best part is it doesn't hinder our future either.
by bobbyballgame1 on Nov 1, 2007 1:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Still an easy mark
by cariocacardinal on Oct 31, 2007 6:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i don't think
by FutureMan on Oct 31, 2007 6:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Catch 22
by cariocacardinal on Oct 31, 2007 6:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let's recap
First, no matter what we all think of Mo, this represents a big failing for the Cardinals organization. We had a chance to hire THE consensus top available GM candidate, and we couldn't get it done.
Second, it appears that this largely has to do with decision-making authority. No surprise there -- why would a top candidate take the job if they don't get to make all the key decisions? The only way to get a top person is to be aggressive about the hire and to make a strong commitment to them. So, in a sense, DeWitt did choose Lunhow and LaRussa over Antonetti.
Third, Mo's strength will clearly be to unify the organization, and that is definitely valuable. We don't really know exactly how much the organization will change, but it will definitely change to some extent. In fact Jocketty's dismissal had a lot to do with the fact that he wouldn't accept the organizational change. Also we don't really know how much of the rent-a-veteran strategy came from LaRussa vs. Jocketty, so we don't really know how much the new regime will push player development. Hopefully Mo will sit down with LaRussa and Luhnow and map out a strategy to balance short-term and long-term objectives. That would be positive.
Given all the above, the bottom-line question here is whether you think Antonetti or the Mo/Luhnow tandem will be better at player development and procurement in the long run. Me, I'd take Antonetti, but of course I'm rooting that Mo and Luhnow both develop into top-notch execs. But our recent draft history and also the contracts we've just given out don't make me overly hopeful about this. We'll see...
by apack on Oct 31, 2007 6:53 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Recap
- Mozeliak's skills probably compliment Luhnow better than Antonetti's would.
- Mozeliak and Luhnow will somewhat be 'co-executive's', each with different responsibilities, but both needing to work together. Mozeliak and Luhnow have already proven they can do this.
- LaRussa is NOT the one gaining power to do things 'the same ole way' here. DeWitt has clearly pushed for new thinking - that's why Luhnow was hired. LaRussa does have a two-year contract, but that's just to avoid all the speculation of re-hire that a one-year contract would bring. You can bet if things don't work out, LaRussa and DeWitt will part company at the end of this seasons. Part of LaRussa being welcomed back certainly rested on him agreeing to go with the 'new' thinking, or else DeWitt would not have brought him back at all.
- In most front-offices, the GM does not have absolute power. Just look at Boston, with Epstein contending with Lucchino, Allard Baird, Lou Gorman, Bill James, etc. It's a TEAM of front-office personell working together.
by KJOK on Oct 31, 2007 7:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the sky is not falling...
by wwbd on Oct 31, 2007 10:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
little miss pellings says
l-u-H-N-ow.
by willievinceterry on Oct 31, 2007 11:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Rejected due to spelling
Note I used his initials to make sure I didn't piss him off for 2010.
by ubeddie on Oct 31, 2007 11:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Recap...
- Putting any of the "blame" for this on Bernie, Rosenthal et al is ludicrous. What the hell do they have to do with hiring a GM?
- More than one GM candidate has said, under anonymity, that the Cardinals front office situation is pretty much a clusterfuck;
- Hard as it may be to accept, the Cardinals organization is no longer(and hasn't been for a while now) one of THE places to go for either players OR front office people. Up and comers like Antonetti or Kim Ng will continue to look elsewhere for GM jobs or stay where they are because they've been promised advancement, and "big name" FA will continue to sign elsewhere, because they know they can get more money, for more years. Signing for less just because it's the Cardinals ceased being the drawing card it once was years ago. You may not like it, but that's the way it is these days.
by cardsrul on Oct 31, 2007 11:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
as true as all this may be
by punchinjudy on Nov 1, 2007 12:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Eck is Type B according to Elias
by Hardcore Legend on Nov 1, 2007 12:37 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
reply to H-Town
gammons, bernie & roesnthal have indeed hinted that luhnow has too much power & can do what ever he wants. i cant remember if any one of the three ever came right out & said if he did or not, so i'm not going to put words in their mouths. but they have strongly hinted at it & it has been a widely assumed belief that luhnow can do what ever & when ever he wants when it comes to the minors.
today (in case you didnt hear) on his afternoon show bernie asked mike lamping, dewitt & MO if the rumor was true that luhnow had the run of the house. they all flatly denied that claim & said luhnow only has control over the minor leagues. but not total power. he has to clear every thing with MO now. both lamping & dewitt said today luhnow lost some power & responsibility. and luhnow was very happy about that because he's in south america trying to get some players.
lamping & dewitt guess the rumor that luhnow had ultimate power was because of Walt's refusal to work with him. luhnow was supposed to report directly to Walt, but Walt never wanted him to, so thats how the rift in the front office started & why luhnow began to report directly to dewitt. as of right now luhnow reports directly to MO. both lamping & dewitt said that was the plan all along. luhnow was suspossed to report to Walt, but Walt refused to work with him.
my beef is not with jeff luhnow. but he is obviously in the middle of all of this. i dont know the guy & dont really have an opinion of the man. i dont think this is his fault. if he is indeed an innocent bystander in all of this i think he's taken far to much heat. if dewitt had hired some other guy to do luhnow's job & things still turned out this way he'd be getting all the heat instead of luhnow. my beef is with dewitt & the way he's handled things. i think he could have gone about hiring luhnow in a different way that didn't piss off Walt & half of the front office.
my beef is the fact this all makes the Cardinals look like a less than desirable place to work for top GM candidates. when in my opinion this should be the best GM job out there. gammons, roesenthal & others have written columns & have gone on tv trashing the Cardinals for how this has gone down. and if Walt really did leak some info to them or had one of his friends leak some info, then shame on him. this whole mess has made the Cardinals look bad. and that really pisses me off.
roesenthal reported today on FSN Midwest right after MO's press conference that the two main reasons why antonetti turned down the job was
#1 the perception that luhnow had ultimate power & would only report to dewitt & not the GM. and that MO & Tony would have most of the control of the 40 man roster. thus antonetti feared he really wouldnt have any power or control over the Cardinals.
and,,,
#2 that the indians didnt want to lose antonetti, so they made him an offer he couldn't refuse. but he would have refused & taken the Cards GM job if the perceptions & fears he had about the Cardinals GM job were false.
lamping & dewitt also said antonetti was never offered the job. but the questions remains, if he wasn't offered the job, why the hell was he looking at houses & schools in the st louis area? it's obvious some kind of offer was made or hinted at otherwise he never would have wasted his time looking at schools & houses. this is another example of the Cardinals lying to their fans & spinning the facts to make them look good.
i never said luhnow had all the power over the Big Birds. i said & others reported & believed it, that luhnow has total control over the minor leagues & only answers to dewitt. and thats the problem. no GM wants a guy working under him who he has no control over. some one, probably Walt started the rumor & it turned into a common belief that luhnow had ultimate power regarding the minor leagues. lamping & dewitt shot down that today after the press conference.
i guess it's up to each individual whether they believe the Cardinals front office, or the press. i for one dont know who to believe.
by gdm426 on Nov 1, 2007 1:07 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
visits to houses and schools....
Kudos to Antonetti, I wish we had someone that shrewd working for us.
by HoosierCardFan on Nov 1, 2007 2:52 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Visualizing a Sweet Future
In short, just because Mr. DeWitt was unable to recruit another "whiz kid" (Antonetti) to join the family, (because of this, and ONLY this: "it happens all the time, in every industry --- a hotshot up-n-comer gets wooed by an outside employer, lands an offer, takes it back to his current boss, and extracts a promotion (or the promise of one) and a bigger salary. that's all that happened here. it's not as if antonetti spurned the cardinals in order to wait for a more attractive job with some other team. he chose to stay with the organization he knows and is familiar with, in the city where he and his family already have roots. can't hardly blame him for that.")...does not mean that we are in bad shape at all. What is important, as is to any organization, is that we all share the same vision. And by our continued support and loyalty as fans to the Cardinals organization, we will all help build a #1 World Class Team!
by proathlete on Nov 1, 2007 8:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yes
by Evelynhas523 on Nov 1, 2007 8:55 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 
















