Merriman v. Big Mac
Well, this is my first diary and it may not be Pulitzer prize worthy, but it is something that I have wanted to get off my chest and hear others opinions on. Obviously, Big Mac is up for HOF Induction and it isn't looking like he is going to get in due to his alleged steroid use and his debacle in the court room. Yet, in another popular sport, a steroid user has been sent to a Pro Bowl and was even in the running for Defensive Player of the Year...Shawne Merriman. I feel this is the biggest slap in the face to anyone who is a Big Mac/Bonds/Sosa fan. How can sports writers hang all over the jock of Merriman when he was CAUGHT cheating with steroids yet constantly berate Mac/Bonds/Sosa due to their alleged steroid use. They say there is no way those guys could hit those homers without roids, but they believe that Merriman can get 17 sacks in 12 games without the help of 'roids? This is the biggest pile of crap I have ever witnessed. How do others feel about this? I believe if a sports writer will defend Merrimans action, he should punch Big Mac on the HOF ballet.
0 recs |
10 comments
Comments
Merriman v. Big Mac
by SleepyCA on Jan 8, 2007 3:38 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
hypocrisy abounds
by sdesserman on Jan 8, 2007 3:51 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
great point
by TheFranchise9 on Jan 8, 2007 4:13 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Wow
by aet15 on Jan 8, 2007 5:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah my friend pointed that out to me one day
by Frerken on Jan 8, 2007 6:17 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Biggie Mac
Also...
Football is a less dignified sport than baseball, as baseball has anways been the gentleman's sport. It is acceptable because they're all huge, bulky guys trying to kill one another...makes sense to me
by Dttl89 on Jan 8, 2007 11:28 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Baseball is romanticized
Baseball isn't any of those things, of course, and baseball players aren't any better as people than any other athletes.
Another point: Merriman didn't shatter his sport's most hallowed and over-hyped record.
Both of these are by way of explanation, not justification.
by blove121 on Jan 9, 2007 9:59 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
voting
by drw13 on Jan 9, 2007 3:50 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
MAC Should Be In!!!
I'm sorry to say that Mark probably doesn't even care whether he gets in the hall or not but he still deserves to be there! Gaylord Perry even admitted to cheating in his own book and still he was regarded as a great pitcher of his day! And he was!
Some great players of yesteryear drank more alcohol than the human body should ingest but they performed on the field and were noted as super stars and are even in the HOF! Were they good 'role models'?? Did they 'cheat' or gain an edge to be able to play the game??
The baseball gurus should look around before they throw rocks in a glass house!
Mac is a HOFer in my book and I'm the only opinion that I need!
***11 Time Champs in '07!!!!!!!
by cardfan20 on Jan 9, 2007 8:49 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Merriman
by liam on Jan 11, 2007 10:36 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 



















