In Defense of Juan
It's a tough time to be Juan Encarnacion. First, people said that they'd rather have Reggie Sanders. Now that Juan has definitively outplayed Sanders in 2006, people still can't stop talking about being rid of him at the first opportunity. For Juan, it seems that every time he meets the bar the fans just set it higher.
Bernie Miklasz speculates that the rancor is due to Enc's laid back demeanor. Because he always looks relaxed and impassive, the fans don't think he's trying. You just never see a lot of passion. Maybe Bernie's right. But animosity toward Encarnacion requires an explanation, because it can't be explained by his actual play in 2006.
Don't get me wrong. Enc is not a superstar. But, damn it, he's a quality player.
In 2006, Enc hit .278, with a .317 OBP, and slugged .443. He had 155 total hits, 19 dingers, and 79 rbi. His homerun total is equal to Edmonds, and he topped Edmonds in RBI. Despite his relatively low OBP, he scored more runs than Eckstein (74 vs. 68). Among outfielders in the National League, Enc finished 8th in number of hits, and 17th in rbi. He played in 155 games, missing only 6 (the cards played only 161 in '06). This is no glass jawed player.
If you compare Enc to the Cardinals' most important NL rival, Encarnacion compares favorably with either of the Mets' left or right fielders, Chavez, Floyd, or Green.
Second, Encarnacion is grossly underrated in defense. Per this VEB entry , Enc was the most valuable glove on the team in '06, saving 9 runs above replacement. Query this: If Enc's defense truly is worth more than Molina's, then, logically, Molina's the problem the Cards should address first, not Enc.
Lastly, the beef against Encarnacion can't be due to Juan's contract. As per this VEB entry, the Card's netted $1.2 [million based upon] win shares [over the amount paid during] the first year of Juan's contract. The team got more than they paid for.
So, I'll stop pussyfootin' around and just throw down the gauntlet: Juan's a better option in the OF than J-Rod. (how's that for shaking a hornet's nest?)
This will likely to be an unpopular post. But I'm open to other folks' views as to what their beef with Encarnacion is, especially you, OBP obsessed sabrematricians of the world. If there's a case to be made, I don't see it.
0 recs |
30 comments
Comments
Errata
by Titus Pullo on Jan 15, 2007 4:03 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
i agree
As far as perception goes, I think he messed up by not whooping albert's arse in spring training. No one is scared of him, he hasn't really done anything to make people love or hate him, so the only real emotion they have towards him is annoyance when he chases a bad pitch or loses a ball in the corner.
by SleepyCA on Jan 15, 2007 4:11 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I disagree
by mikedallas23 on Jan 15, 2007 4:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Actually he could breakout
by redbirdnation on Jan 15, 2007 4:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Mike, I agree that Juan is consistent
In an ideal world, Juan would be our third most productive outfielder. So hopefully, Edmonds and Dunc will out-produce him next year. I think that, more than anything, will do a world of good for the fans' regard for him.
by Titus Pullo on Jan 15, 2007 5:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
my thoughts on juan
i think its more because he swings and misses on breaking balls and seems to have a hard time getting to balls hit in the corner.
--His homerun total is equal to Edmonds, and he topped Edmonds in RBI.--
juan is a corner outfielder. you expect your corner outfielder to hit more than an injured centerfielder, but that is sort of irrelevant anyway. juan is either good or he isnt good. it doesnt matter what edmonds or eckstein or anyone else did. them not doing good in certain stats doesnt make juan a better player.
--Second, Encarnacion is grossly underrated in defense. --
thats a matter of opinion. some of the stats say he is good. some of the stats in fact say he stinks. my eyes also tell me he isnt that great.
--So, I'll stop pussyfootin' around and just throw down the gauntlet: Juan's a better option in the OF than J-Rod. --
i dont know about that. j.rod has .298/.378/.434 career line in 158 games (basically a seasons worth). i guess it is still a little uncertain as to what type of player he can be if given a full time job, but i think he is at least as good juan. a j.rod/juan platoon wouldnt be a bad idea.
juan isnt a godawful player, but i dont think we would miss him if he were gone. it has nothing to do with his attitude. he just didnt produce last year. he hasnt really produced much his entire career.
by dmb60614 on Jan 15, 2007 4:42 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
J-Rod's line...
- He's mostly a platoon guy -- Whether he can handle lefties or not, TLR doesn't let him. He has 40 career at-bats against lefties(although his numbers are good there, so no definite answer on whether he can hit lefties or not).
- His 158 games is a little bogus. In 158 career games, he has 332 at bats. That's nowhere near enough for him to qualify for a batting title in a season. To give comparison, Juan had 557 at-bats in 2006.
I don't know that I'm willing to say Juan is better than Rodriguez if they were given the same playing time over their careers, but I am willing to say Juan is a better baseball player right now, and with J-Rod being 28, it's not exactly like he's the kind of player we should be developing for the future.
I'm not a big Juan fan either and if he were traded, I certainly wouldn't be upset, but let's get off his back, other than having an offensive walk rate, he really doesn't have any huge flaws in his game that you'd expect a player making about 4M to be without.
by mtalken on Jan 16, 2007 7:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
that ignores all the time JRod was in the minors
I don't have or know where to get L/R splits from the minors but his walk rates are born out by his record in the minors for the most part.
by azruavatar on Jan 16, 2007 10:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'll agree
by chuckb on Jan 15, 2007 4:44 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Juan is Frustrating...
1). He's wildly inconsistant within one season. This goes for both offense and deffense. He'll put up a spectacular OPS one month, then the next fall flat. One week on, one week off. Admiting that some of this is the nature of the beast that is proffesional baseball, but more of it appears to be Juan's attention and zeal towards the game fading in and out seemingly at random, without regard to relavence of the game either on the standings or on team morale. The same goes for defense. One day he'll make a spectacular diving catch, the next he'll lose a can-of-corn in the lights and walk to go get it, without regard to consequences.
2). He's hopelessly average from season to season. Juan doesn't excite me because he doesn't offer the expectation of anything new. We've seen what he brings to the table. Its amazingly predictable. He's probably never going to hit below .260 again, but he'll probably never get higher than .290. He's a fairly safe bet to hit 15 homeruns in regular playing time, but I never expect him to slug 25.
Overall, he's not bad, but he's simply nothing special. But its not just that. It's the inconsistantcy, which from what I can tell comes from a lack of commitment and carring. The cardinals got below-average ofense from catcher, second base, and centerfield, and left last year. I'm not mad at Molina, nor am I disapointed in Miles. David Eckstein produced at a league-average rate for shortstop, and yet I couldn't think of two players at more oposite ends of the spectrum (Eck and Enc). While his ability remains high, his effort, and the ensuing production vary wildly with in the season, but from year to year they remain the same. Its hard to expect anything different. Sorry if that went on too long.
Plus, he looks a little too much like snoop...

Tell me I'm wrong.
by ilillillli on Jan 15, 2007 5:04 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
fwiw
by SleepyCA on Jan 15, 2007 5:16 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
speak of the devil
afaik this is the first time he has admitted to being injured, but it was pretty obvious. I wish he had said when exactly he hurt it, since that would help to figure out how much we can expect him to improve. Still, he slugged over .500 all 3 months this season in which he was healthy. He'll never be an all-star, but he has the potential to be a .300/.330/.500 guy- a steal for $5 or $6M/year.
And he hit .367/.385/.551 in June, when pujols was injured- if he hadn't had that great month, we probably wouldn't have made it to the playoffs. We at least owe him the benefit of the doubt.
by SleepyCA on Jan 15, 2007 5:13 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
He also said
by cardsrul on Jan 15, 2007 6:10 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Peoplealways complain on how he plays defense....
My one irk about him is his strikeout and walk levels, but if thats the worst thing he does, hes fine in my book.
Bottom line is hes an average/above average outfielder, we could do a lot worse.
by gbaby on Jan 15, 2007 10:32 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Who cares if you LOOK like you hustle?
by sdrone on Jan 16, 2007 2:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Juan is
We will need outfield help next year. I have been worried about it all off season.
by nybirdfan on Jan 16, 2007 12:50 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Jose Crzuz Jr.
by gbaby on Jan 16, 2007 12:58 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
he's average
by Phillycardfan on Jan 16, 2007 3:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
he batted
by SleepyCA on Jan 16, 2007 6:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
here's the
#2 on the team and #22 in the NL among qualified batters"
by SleepyCA on Jan 16, 2007 6:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
imo
i'd take him over j.d. drew, 06 reggie sanders, retiring larry walker, and j-rod.
j-rod might have had 155 at bats but they were also at bats where the numbers and situations were in his favor. he wasn't in there everyday giving people a chance to find the holes in his swing. he's been protected from those kind of situations by tony.
he might not be the best RF in the game but he is far from the worst.
by FutureMan on Jan 16, 2007 1:05 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Regarding the fans' negative reaction to Juan
by iron duke75 on Jan 16, 2007 3:08 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
That's it exactly
He was touted by the organization as an "impact bat." He simply is not an impact bat. He's not a terrible player, either. But building him up so high, he could only fail to meet expectations. It wasn't fair to him, really.
As for many people's obsession/longing for more playing time for J-Rod, I liken that to football, where the most popular guy in town is always the backup quarterback. Sure, he looks great in preseason and occasional mop-up duty, but there's a reason why he's the backup.
by blove121 on Jan 16, 2007 10:10 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
My animosity toward Juan,
His laid-back demeanor and apparent slowness in the outfield remind me of George Hendrick more than anything else, and I know that players with certain body types or body language can appear to the casual fan to be "lazy" even when they are in fact hustling, so I try not to judge his defense too harshly.
But those ABs, man, they make me cringe.
by MdRedbirdFreak on Jan 16, 2007 10:23 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
His VORP
Corner outfield glove guys are a dime a dozen, even giving him a whole win with the glove, it doesn't make it that much better.
VORP is a counting stat, and JRod was worth exactly 8.8 runs as well. In 212 plate appearances.
by plh903 on Jan 17, 2007 5:48 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Dime's Not Worth What It Once Was
by Titus Pullo on Jan 17, 2007 10:24 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
PECOTA
I said corner outfield glove guys are a dime a dozen anyway. I must have missed when they were looking for an upgrade. Point is, there should be players that give you his level of production (+9 VORP, right-field, $15 million bucks!) for free. Pay for difference makers, Juan isn't one. We can get a .750 OPS in left-field for free.
What's the point? He's a proven mediocrity? Great, let's give him some money and block some kids who play for free and have upside.
by plh903 on Jan 17, 2007 10:53 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
A little misleading...
I'm still a little surprised that he scored more runs than Eck did considering his OBP was .033 lower, and he was batting lower in the order.
Count me with the group that considers him nothing spectacular, but worth $5 mil if for no other reason than you can count on him for 500 AB's.
by cardzfanbub on Jan 17, 2007 1:29 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I AM NOT A JUAN FAN BUT
by BRINGBACKWILSON on Jan 20, 2007 5:22 AM EST reply actions 0 recs


















