J-Rod: the next Lenny Harris/Manny Mota?
For some reason I just can't shake my J-Rod fixation. Earlier this year, I wrote a diary arguing for John Rodriguez to get a shot as our full-time left fielder. Obviously that didn't happen - and I'm glad, given how well Young Duncan has performed. So has J-Rod lost his best chance to stick around for a while in The Show?
Maybe not. I think he might be on his way to becoming a great pinch-hitter, in the mold of Lenny Harris and Manny Mota.
A few folks noted J-Rod's good pinch-hitting qualities in last night's game thread, after he doubled pinch-hitting for Suppan in the 8th inning. And twice in one week earlier this month, J-Rod pinch-hit in the ninth with the Cardinals down a run and facing a tough closer (Washington's Chad Cordero and Houston's Brad Lidge). Both times, he hit solid singles after getting into 2-strike counts, setting the table for a later batter to get the go-ahead/game-winning hit (P-Wilson's homer in Washington, which would've been the game-winner had Izzy not later imploded, and Albert's broken-bat double against Lidge). LaRussa seems to like J-Rod in this role, and so far he's flourished in it. He has a great approach at the plate, and responds well to the pressure of hitting against a tough pitcher after coming off the bench cold.
Great pinch hitters like Mota, Harris, and Smokey Burgess hung around the big leagues for a long time (15+ years) b/c of their pinch-hitting ability. Maybe our favorite Bronx Redbird can do the same.... it's not the same as starting, but it's also not a bad way to make a living and stay in the majors.
For a very thorough overview of the history of pinch-hitting (and some thoughts on its future), see this piece that Steve Treder wrote for the Hardball Times back in February.
0 recs |
8 comments
Comments
I agree, he might be ok to keep around
317 ab / 7 hr / 41 rbi / .300 ba
would make him a WAY WAY below average starting left fielder. his value would be almost solely as a pinch hitter, which i guess as you point out isn't a terrible thing.
by jojo5492 on Sep 21, 2006 12:31 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
haha
by PGeorge on Sep 21, 2006 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
below average?
I do feel like he's bound to end up far below average, though he's not there yet... the problem with his high(ish) batting average is that I feel like he gets waaaay luckier than he should. His BABIP is an absurd .395. That'll come down and bring the batting average down with it. So I don't think he's a waste of space yet, but he might be soon.
still, he's probably not a bad option for our bench... he's cheap.
by ilillillli on Sep 21, 2006 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i'm glad they have him
by lboros on Sep 21, 2006 3:36 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't know if it means much, but...
It feels wrong to compare the two, but rodriguez takes 4.03 pitches/PA this season to Pujols' 3.77
I guess that's not terribly profound, but I think that at the very least it indicates that he doesn't crack under the pressure of an at bat and "waits for his pitch," at least to some degree.
...for the record Juan'cion is at 3.64
I think J-Rod's a swell kinda guy to keep around. You're right, when he steps up to the plate I don't abandon hope of a positive result. He seems to give a good at bat. He knows how to wait for his pitch, and if he doesn't get it, he knows how to walk, too.
by ilillillli on Sep 21, 2006 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
sorry...
by ilillillli on Sep 21, 2006 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
give him credit
by El Hombre on Sep 22, 2006 10:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 

















