Starting Rotation Debate
I want to debate two things.
- What has to be done this year. Looking at who we got and what they have done, what is the perfect senario for us to succeed this year. (This is where I hope the stat guys find optimum pitching performances ie. Weavers only good till the fifth or If Marquis gets past the third he's good till the eighth.)
- What could happen next year. People have been throwing names all over this blog. (Schmidt has been the favorite) I want a starting rotation that we can afford, but has the right mix of talent that there is no quote un quote blaring weaknesses. Obviously I don't know every players contract, but I always feel if theres a will theres a way.
0 recs |
23 comments
Comments
Maybe this'll work
- Carpenter
- Suppan
- Wainwright
- Bipolar Betty (until Reyes shows)
- Bipolar Betty (after Reyes returns)
by philbobilbo on Aug 24, 2006 5:20 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Maybe
- Carp
- Suppan
- Reyes
- Gil Meche
- Pettitte or Buehrle
by Edmonds is baseball on Aug 24, 2006 5:42 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Mark
by aet15 on Aug 24, 2006 5:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pettitte won't be a cardinal
by EckEqualsClutch on Aug 25, 2006 8:00 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Disagree on Meche as an ace
2003SEA 186.1 IP 63BB 130K 4.59ERA 1.34WHIP .263BAA
2004SEA 127.2 IP 47BB 99K 5.01ERA 1.46WHIP .273BAA
2005SEA 143.1 IP 72BB 83K 5.09ERA 1.57WHIP .275BAA
2006SEA 143.0 IP 67BB 117K 4.66ERA 1.48WHIP .263BAA
Even figuring in that he's in the AL, that's still not great numbers. Or even a positive trend toward great numbers. And he's clearly no workhorse. I would say he appears to be more like a young Suppan.
by blove121 on Aug 25, 2006 5:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
oh yeh
by Edmonds is baseball on Aug 24, 2006 5:42 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
this should work
1.carp
2.buerhle/pettite
3.westbrook
4.reyes
5.sosa
by jcarro100 on Aug 24, 2006 6:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
the rest of this year and next (pitchers)
Weaver,/ really you must be kidding,, Izzie should be traded now, i dont mean later i mean now someone may want him. (good luck) I see where tony say's Izzie is his closer for the rest of the year, all i can say Tony, If you worked for me , you would be gone, you have been a good manager for some time but your dead wrong on this
by billy t on Aug 24, 2006 7:22 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Agree somewhat
by OKCardsfan on Aug 24, 2006 11:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the real closer
by billy t on Sep 6, 2006 4:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good
by OKCardsfan on Aug 24, 2006 11:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
DK
I guess here's another question. Had DK not died, would we have picked up Carp during that offseason in 02?
by cardsfan84 on Aug 25, 2006 12:30 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Most teams cannot afford two aces
Jason Schmidt will cost a lot but he's also a bonafide ace. So if you sign him at above market value - lets say 13-14 million for 5 years - your rotation next year would be
- Carpenter - 7million
- Schmidt - 12 million (first year would be less)
- Reyes - league minimum 350k
- Wainwright - league minimum 350k
- FA ~ 5 million
That's not unreasonable for next year. Now that could very very easily cripple us for the future if Schmidt gets hurt or declines rapidly but WOW what a rotation. 2 hammers at the top and league average from the 3 & 4 spots (probably) and then whatever the 5 spot gives you is gravy. Let's build a team that can win in the post season - tweak it along the way to make sure we win the regular season and go for the gold.
Worry about Carpenter's contract and the rotation later. Keep Tank/Narveson/Sosa/Hancock around for spot starts if someone gets hurt. With Pujols, Rolen, Encarnacion, Edmonds and role players we could afford to be cheap at other positions esp. if Dunc keeps producing.
That's my 2 cents worth...
by azruavatar on Aug 24, 2006 11:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
umm how about...
by DJ87 on Aug 25, 2006 3:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How much money would we have to spend
I guess we could call up Brad Thompson.
by EckEqualsClutch on Aug 25, 2006 8:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
good bullpen's are not made with money
Who has been producing: Wainwright, Hancock, Sosa (to a lesser extent)
TLR and DD can put together a good bullpen with the parts we have on hand. Hancock, Sosa, Thompson, Falkenborg, Kinney, Cavasoz are all RHP that have a chance of being servicable for near league minimum. The LHP are a little uglier but why not try out Narveson in that role...can he be any worse than what we are watching now.
$$$ go to great offensive players and starting pitching not relief, imho.
by azruavatar on Aug 25, 2006 9:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
azruavatar, are you related to Schmidt?
Just kidding. I like Schmidt as well. Carp & Schmidt would make a killer 1-2 combo.
I also agree that we should concentrate on starting pitching. We have decent guys in the minors to fill out the bullpen. Although, I'd like to see at least 1 or 2 young flame throwers in the bullpen. Mark Worrell comes to mind. Maybe Chris Perez? Probably not ready.
by jdubya on Aug 25, 2006 9:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
hell I wish I was his agent
I think that this was the mistake that the Twins made (although they lacked the hitting core). When they had perhaps the best SP in all of baseball signed for so very very little, I think that is when you splurge and sign someone big but they haven't done that imo.
The cardinals have a special oppurtunity to build around some older, still productive veterans while complimenting them with some talented cheap young players. It's a golden oppurtunity. The front office was headed in the right direction by trying to get Burnett but when that fell through they made some less than stellar signings. They've exacerbated that problem by not kicking some players to the curb/DL when needed (Marquis, Mulder) and demoting players who have a better chance to perform than others (Reyes).
Gotta have that 1-2 punch in the rotation and some pop in the lineup. We've got some pop, we've got #1 and we're missing that second ace at the top.
by azruavatar on Aug 25, 2006 4:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
that's really all it comes down to
by lboros on Aug 25, 2006 6:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm with you
by OKCardsfan on Aug 25, 2006 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm with you.
$25 mil for an effective starting rotation is not unreasonable to ask.
by taiko on Aug 25, 2006 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Next year
- Carpenter
- Big Name Starter Type or otherwise proven guy
- Reyes
- Wainwright
- Mulder
by DanUpBaby on Aug 25, 2006 3:41 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
but if mulder's no good
he'll need to have an era north of 5.50 after 20 starts before they'd consider replacing him --- and even then they might stick w him.
it's not a bad idea at all, but this management group is the wrong one to implement it
by lboros on Aug 25, 2006 7:40 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 

















