pffffffft
if it takes a pounding of beer-league proportions to get reyes into the rotation, so be it. matt leach, for one, believes that's now a given. the la duncas remain circumspect -- after last night's game, i don't know why they wouldn't just say "we're excited to see reyes throw, maybe he can give us a lift" -- but they will need a 5th starter by no later than saturday, and their options at this point are
- reyes
- ponson
- wainwright
- bullpen game
- tankersley, leek, webb, narveson . . .
- russ ortiz
as for mulder, they insist he is healthy . . . . crockashit. it was just over a month ago, recall, that he left the team to have his back examined by a specialist, and only two weeks ago that his name mysteriously disappeared from the "probable pitchers" section of the team's official web site. i suspected then (and still do) that his absence from, and subsequent return to, the probables list was injury-driven; this regime has never been particularly forthcoming regarding injuries, nor particularly humane in treating them. in light of mulder's performance over the last month (an era in the 13.00 neighborhood), some organizations would consider disabling the guy for post-traumatic stress disorder.
but if they sit mulder down for a spell, and they keep ponson exiled from the rotation -- he may soon be exiled from the team after that gutless performance last night -- that leaves two holes to fill. reyes takes one; who takes the other? the obvious answer is wainwright, who was the team's best #5 in spring training and, pitching from the 'pen thus far, has established that he can get big-league hitters out. move him into the rotation, recall falkenborg and let him and hancock share wainwright's old role -- could that possibly make matters worse? what's the potential downside? let's see:
- taking mulder out of the rotation will ruin his trade value. ha ha; as if there's any market for the guy left after his last 5 games.
- it reeks of panic. nonsense; it reeks of common sense. no team can carry a pitcher who's performing at mulder's level, even a team (like the cards) that's 5 games up in a flimsy division.
- mulder has a key postseason role; gotta let him pitch through this. or gotta start making contingency plans. mulder's ability to handle the #2 starter role in october is clearly in doubt; the cards need to start evaluating other options.
those of you who can't fathom two rookies in the rotation, i direct you to yesterday's post about El Birdos. that pitching staff, recall, was stocked almost exclusively with unproven pitchers --- carlton, briles, hughes, willis, hoerner. despite a strong early-season performance, the cards still moved a couple of established but underperforming veterans (hal woodeshick and al jackson) out of key roles and gave their jobs to younger, more talented players. it wasn't panic; it was simply a realistic evaluation of the available talent. their decisions were correct, and the team prospered.
it has been done. it can be done.
speaking of the young and unproven, low-a phenom jaime garcia took the loss in the midwest league all-star game last night. like mulder, he had a difficult 3d inning -- struck out two of the 1st three hitters, but then yielded four consecutive singles, good for three runs. struck out the last man to fan the side; that was his only inning of work.
also of note, the cards' short-season a ball affiliate opened its season last night with a 5-3 loss. brad furnish, the cards' 2d-round selection out of tcu, started the game and took the loss -- 4ip, 5h, 3 er, 1 w, 4k; also a wp and an hbp. their supplemental 2d-rounder, 1bman mark hamilton (tulane), displayed some of the power potential the cardinals liked: he mashed a homer in his 2d at-bat, finished 1 for 4.
jocketty's going to be on bernie miklasz's show in about 15 minutes; i'll tune in and update this post if i hear anything of interest.
0 recs |
149 comments
Comments
rookies
Verlander in Detroit
Billingsley in LA
Soler in NY (mets)
Jered Weaver in LAA (he will return to the rotation this season)
Lester in BOS
Florida's rookie pitchers are among the best in the league.
need we go on?
by VanRam on Jun 21, 2006 9:03 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
I think Reyes will happen. But I think Wainwright, while I agree he should be in the rotation, is a longer shot. I can already hear TLR/DD saying how he's been training his arm for 1-2 inning stints and asking him to expend to 5-7 innings is a different propgram, blahblahblah.
More of that obstinance you mentioned. I really hope it works for Reyes and Wainwright. Mulder can't get anyone out, and Russ Ortiz is a RH version of Mulder.
Hancock does not inspire confidence though, so I say if they do this, they will need to trade for a good bullpen arm.
by BozCardsFanSF on Jun 21, 2006 9:09 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Sorry for the typos...
likelihood
expand
program
I hate spelling errors.
by BozCardsFanSF on Jun 21, 2006 9:11 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
hey i can't get
by lboros on Jun 21, 2006 9:11 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Walt's not on yet
by AUJarhead on Jun 21, 2006 9:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
thanks au jar
by lboros on Jun 21, 2006 9:59 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
no jock today
by gthedamned on Jun 21, 2006 9:30 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bernie hears from Walt
by AUJarhead on Jun 21, 2006 10:59 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
One bright spot from last night
Took the HBP like a man and then hit a HR. A lot of pop in his bat. I have more confidence in his bat than in J Rod's at this point. Especially in a PH role as we get closer to October.
And we're still in 1st place by a good margin.
Last night really stunk, but the sun rose this morning and it's a new day.
by BozCardsFanSF on Jun 21, 2006 9:16 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
OZZIE
by Schnake on Jun 21, 2006 9:22 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ozzie may be crazy...
He respects TLR (and saw the royal asschewing he gave DUI when he pulled him.)
by Quietude on Jun 21, 2006 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who says it was intentional?
Do we REALLY think that Ponson, after just hitting a guy to force in a run, would hit ANOTHER guy---on an 0-2 pitch!!---to force in another run? I sure as hell don't.
I don't think either one was intentional, but I do think that Ponson may have been trying to throw inside and didn't have enough command (or, perhaps, concern) to be precise enough.
by salvomania on Jun 21, 2006 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
by stanchar on Jun 21, 2006 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Duncan
As for Mulder . . . he's dead to me. I have been disappointed with him ever since game 6 of last year's NLCS. The team was fired up after Pujols' monster shot off of Lidge, only to come home and watch Mulder allow 6 hits and 3 runs in 4 innings. (the first run of the game scored on a Mulder wild pitch) Not that the series was his fault, but you'd expect more from your #2 starter in a "must win" game. (actually, a co-worker of mine pointed this out, and I think it makes a lot of sense).
by sportsmanspark on Jun 21, 2006 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bernie
by iron duke75 on Jun 21, 2006 9:30 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Big Suprise???
What can this team do? I have been criticized for saying that this team needs a rebuild. People say that any team with Jimmy, Pujols, and Rolen should be contending for the World Series is missing part of the picture. We don't have the pitching! The American Leauge is far superior to the National League. The Cardinals record is just a mirage of weak competition. Reyes and Wainwright in the rotation is a start. I don't see it though, these are the same idiots that traded Haren just because he was young. Good move? I would say trade Jimmy for young pitching. Maybe the Anglels would give up Santana. I don't know. I don't think the cards would do it. But we have to look at who has value and is on the decline to deal. AAAAGGGGHHHH!
by BigJawnMize on Jun 21, 2006 9:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
jimmy...
and yeah, the haren trade upsets me still, i knew it was a bad idea at the time but mulder was a good pitcher and was only 27 or 28 himself. sure do wish we had haren now though.
by lopey986 on Jun 21, 2006 10:07 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am frustrated
by BigJawnMize on Jun 21, 2006 10:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd make a list of things Edmonds has done
I don't see a lot of other centerfielders doing that.
by sdrone on Jun 21, 2006 10:23 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and im not saying...
by lopey986 on Jun 21, 2006 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jimmy has value
by BigJawnMize on Jun 21, 2006 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
you think...
by lopey986 on Jun 21, 2006 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Edmonds Options
by endlessticketscom on Jun 21, 2006 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
furcal...
you can't just compare two guys because they make the same amount of money.
by lopey986 on Jun 21, 2006 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why, when we lose one game...
What's that old saying again? You're only as good as your next days starter?
Well, Marquis has looked pretty damn good lately, so I liking our chances tonight. Keep in mind, if the pitching hadn't completely melted down, we did score 6 runs. The offense is still there, we just have to get a rotation that involves:
Carp
Suppan
Reyes
Marquis
someone
While Ponson gets back into shape and Mulder gets healthy.
As much as I want to throw Mulder under the bus, you don't have a 2:1 win/loss career average by luck. He isn't DONE around the age of 30. Hey, maybe this will be a blessing in disguise. The Cards stick with him during his rough spot and he throws them a bone with a discount.
He's not as bad as he is pitching right now. He's either going to get his velocity back or retool his pitching approach like that of Maddux and such to compensate for lack of heat.
by Hardcore Legend on Jun 21, 2006 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i dont think...
by lopey986 on Jun 21, 2006 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was thinking last night
A lot of IFs in there, but I was thinking the same thing.
This loss could be a blessing in disguise, both for the Cardinals and for Mulder. Besides, its just one game.
by effin fisk on Jun 21, 2006 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thinking blow the team up
by BigJawnMize on Jun 21, 2006 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
memphis has great bbq
As much as I hate that this thought even runs through my mind... cough Steve Blass cough Special circumstances, I hope.
I think a nice little DL trip/rehab assignment would be nice. Whatever the Cubs said was wrong with Rusch sounds like a nice injury excuse for Mulder too (or whatever the Royals said was up with Greinke). I don't care if Dr. Nick Rivera has to sign the doctor's note, he needs his confidence/stuff back and he's not going to get it by getting beat up in a major game.
by Elle on Jun 21, 2006 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
he better be...
by lopey986 on Jun 21, 2006 9:35 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
How about
by viva el rojo pajaro 42 on Jun 21, 2006 9:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
or maybe...
by lopey986 on Jun 21, 2006 9:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
scary
by gthedamned on Jun 21, 2006 9:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
not necessarily
by lboros on Jun 21, 2006 10:06 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Reyes
http://stlouis.cardinals.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/news/probable_pitchers.jsp?c_id=stl
by STLEdge on Jun 21, 2006 9:49 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Wainwright as starter
by unclegrubworm on Jun 21, 2006 9:53 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
wainwright...
by lopey986 on Jun 21, 2006 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
wainwright was very good
by lboros on Jun 21, 2006 10:07 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
well
and on the topic of rookie pitchers, the marlins have called up another one.
by lopey986 on Jun 21, 2006 10:13 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
marlins
by beanocook on Jun 21, 2006 10:23 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Currently in 4th
13-3 in June, winners of 19 of last 25 as the young players start to gel.
by salvomania on Jun 21, 2006 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ok, so 4th
by beanocook on Jun 21, 2006 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
it doesn't...
by lopey986 on Jun 21, 2006 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I dont think
However, the Cardinals and Marlins are at completely different stages for the franchise. The Cardinals are trying to win a World Series and the Marlins are trying to grow.
Things are different when you are expected to win 95 games, not 75.
by beanocook on Jun 21, 2006 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
fair point
i think la dunca (and maybe walt too, to an extent) are paralyzed --- they're sticking with known commodities to the detriment of the team. ie, they know they can get to the playoffs with the marquis/supps/mulder gang, and they know they're in 1st place with that gang . . . so they're sticking with that group, when they might have better alternatives available. it's obviously their judgment that the old gang still represent the best alternatives . . . . but then, it was also their judgment coming out of spring training that ponson was a better option at #5 than either reyes or wainwright.
by lboros on Jun 21, 2006 4:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know you've
by rockin redbird on Jun 21, 2006 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
that last phrase
by rockin redbird on Jun 21, 2006 4:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
well
Am I frustrated with Mulder? Of course. I feel he should go on the DL as well. No doubt. He has been awful. I also think Anthony Reyes will probably be in the rotation the rest of the year.
Let's remember, Reyes has shown NO signs of being able to pitch 200 innings a season. We have to remember this and I think Duncan/LaRussa know this.
As for Wainwright. I don't want him starting. Im not as sold as his startability as others. One tough stretch or not, his numbers at Memphis haven't been overwhelming.
The guy is 14-14 with a 4.65 ERA and 1.429 WHIP in two years at AAA. That doesn't project to great major league numbers. Heck, Dennis Tankersley has been a better minor league/AAA pitcher than Wainwright.
by beanocook on Jun 21, 2006 10:31 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
what about our bullpen?
We're in a position of closing one hole and opening another.
by sdrone on Jun 21, 2006 10:21 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd like Wainwright to stay in the pen...
Wainwright is infinently more valuable in the bullpen, getting to Izzy. You can't buy good closers anymore, there are only a handful in the league. If the Cardinals want to think longterm, keep Wainwright working that 8th inning or the 'shut down' inning until Izzy's contract is up.
You don't want to deplete the bullpen to save the rotation, especially since Larussa won't stretch starters past 115 pitches.
by Hardcore Legend on Jun 21, 2006 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
having three potential shut-down starters
Two pitchers with consistently good stuff and 90s-plus velocity (like Carpenter and Reyes) can give you a great chance in games 1 and 2, but if you have to punt in that 3rd game with a crappy No. 3---or if one series ends and you have to start the next one with your crappy No. 3---then you're at a big disadvantage against a team with a decent No. 3.
And most playoff-bound teans have at least a decent No. 3, and with a "potential shut-down" No. 3, you'd have a nice edge against a team with only a mediocre No. 3.
Right now Wainwright would POSSIBLY give us a potential shut-down No. 3---but we don't really know because the brass would rather throw Suppan, Mulder and Ponson out there.
You can't teach mid-90s velocity and great control---those are wonderful attributes to have in the postseason against deep, experienced lineups that don't swing at junk and that murder 87mph "fastballs."
That potential shut-down No. 3 starter is far more valuable than a set-up man that Tony won't even use on consecutive days.
I'd rather take my chances with a diffferent set-up man when we have a 2-1 lead in Game 3 than have Wainwright sitting in the bullpen in the 7th inning of a 6-1 Game 3 deficit.
by salvomania on Jun 21, 2006 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
There is no such thing as a 'shut-down' starter...
Lest we forget that Marquis is 6-0 in his last 7 starts, and should be 7-0 if not for the ballclub blowing it for him in late innings.
I honestly don't believe that Wainwright is a #3 pitcher right now. We are basing alot of this on what we 'hope' he could be, not what he realistically could be. Just scrolling back through the game-logs, it appears that Wainwright can be pretty hit and miss when he goes more than 1 inning.
by Hardcore Legend on Jun 21, 2006 5:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
marquis should not be 7-0
by lboros on Jun 21, 2006 5:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's not true....
:P
Still, 5-2 ain't bad. Mulder would kill for that record.
by Hardcore Legend on Jun 21, 2006 5:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Post-season Supp
I'm not saying that he is an ideal #3 but I haven't been disappointed by his postseason performance. He really is a gamer and handles the pressure well.
If we could get a solid #2 I wouldn't feel that letting him pitch a game would be 'punting.' Not overly dominating but a guy who's dependable and has experience.
by dontEATnachos on Jun 21, 2006 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Supp has been good, but
I agree with Salvomania (I think?) I'm okay with Supp, Marquis or Mulder as our third starter, because they've all come through in a big game one time or another. Despite all the criticism of Mulder last year, in game 7 of the NLCS, he pitched pretty well for most of the playoffs. I still considered Mulder a soft second starter last year, however, and with the way he's looked this year...
We need two aces, or close it, to be successful in the playoffs. Two guys who will give us an advantage in most playoff games and with a small disadvantage, at worst. I'm okay with the chances with our third starter, whoever it may be, against other team's aces, but we need to maximize our chances of winning by gaining the advantage in the majority of our games. I don't know who could fill this position, but Reyes may be the only possibility, unless WJ can swing a miracle that doesn't sell out our future.
by rob is back on Jun 21, 2006 9:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jocketty blowing off the show today
by BozCardsFanSF on Jun 21, 2006 9:55 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
geez
He ain't the first guy to miss/reschedule a radio interview. Grab some perspective please. His job is GM of the team, not a radio host.
If this were a common occurance we worry. But its not. Walt is MORE than accomdating to the media types.
by beanocook on Jun 21, 2006 10:22 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Perspective
Just come on like Brian Sabean or others do and give it the no comment, brusque treatment.
That's the way to do. Be open and accessible, but offer nothing.
Jocketty isn't the only GM doing radio stints. I have perspective living somewhere other than SF and seeing how other teams sdo it as well.
Your comment is ill-fitting.
by BozCardsFanSF on Jun 21, 2006 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
umm
Please don't let emotion from one awful game last night cloud everything. 99% of the time Walt is very good about this stuff. I will cut the guy some slack here.
Im guessing he is busy doing his actual job to miss a radio interview. It happens all the time in sports.
by beanocook on Jun 21, 2006 10:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Go ahead
Emotion has nothing to do with this. in fact, if you note, I posted about the positives from last night.
I don't care about his other 99%. A game like last night is an embarrassment, albeit it is limited to one game - we are still in 1st and have some bright spots, I think Chris Duncan is one of the brightest.
Say what you want, but the timing is poor.
And hey, if Sabean blows off a radio stint, he is called out here in SF. That's the deal.
I don't believe in giving a free pass, especially after this past offseason and the Mulder trade. I'm not enamored with Jocketty's recent performance.
by BozCardsFanSF on Jun 21, 2006 10:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Calm down, I can think of about 20
by MdRedbirdFreak on Jun 21, 2006 10:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh please
I think it's weak. You don't. But calm down? It would require me to be angry - which I'm not.
by BozCardsFanSF on Jun 21, 2006 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And please explain to me
by BozCardsFanSF on Jun 21, 2006 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So, would you like sauce with your crow...
Maybe he caught the Rolen Plague that everyone is getting. Who knows.
by Hardcore Legend on Jun 21, 2006 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's a Big IF
Even if Walt didn't want to do the radio piece as it might consitute an unwanted irritant for him, would he or the club freely admit it? Not hardly.
If an explanation is forthcoming, it will be for some "good reason".
by BozCardsFanSF on Jun 21, 2006 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jocketty
by endlessticketscom on Jun 21, 2006 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not arguing with his track record
I'm not calling for his head, but I have every right to call him out for conveniently skipping the interview. You have every right to disagree.
I'm not saying it's wimping out. I'm no testosterone filled alpha male who views everything as being a man or being a wimp.
My feeling was that the PR side and answering to Bernie as a media rep, and by proxy to the fan base, was an irritant today that perhaps Jocketty did not want to deal with. I'm not a fan of that, if in fact that's the deal and agree or disagree, it's my sneaking suspicion it was.
by BozCardsFanSF on Jun 21, 2006 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't panic, yet...
It's time to see what Reyes can do. Bring him up and let him start. Not just one game but maybe the rest of the season. Tony and Dunc need to forget about his youth and inexperience. Keep him in there and don't send him down unless he has a Mulder Meltdown.
As for Wainwright, I'm all for starting him as well if he can handle the extra innings.
Mulder's issues are a big problem for this team. He needs to get it fixed. He is our #2 starter. We cannot go into the playoffs without a solid Mulder or someone who can replace him and pitch like a # 2.
I agree with you lboros, DL Mulder and send him to AAA for some rehab assignments when healthy. Then pray he gets it back.
by jdubya on Jun 21, 2006 10:18 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Another thing...
We should not trade the future for a quick fix. Other GMs know that we are having major problems right now. They will try and use this to dump mediocre players for Reyes/Wain. Don't do it. Only trade Reyes/Wain if we can get a high caliber player like Willis, Cabrera, Buerle, etc. I don't think this will happen.
If we can trade some other AAA or AA players for a decent outfielder or another starter, then I'm all for it.
by jdubya on Jun 21, 2006 10:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Long-time reader...
Last night's mugging was kind of a numerologist's dream, wasn't it? On the 20th day of the 6th month, the Cardinals lose 20 to 6. Makes me wonder what will happen tonight. shudder Of course, as somebody noted, we haven't given up an 11-run inning since 1926 (that's nineteen 20 6, spooky!), so maybe last night was a good omen, since that was the year of our last WS victory. What's that? Oh, right, 1982. It only SEEMS like we've been waiting since '26.
With regard to inserting the rookies in the rotation, I'm no great shakes at statistical analysis, but if Mulder, Ponson, Reyes and Wainwright were the last four guys on the playground, I would take the rookies in a heartbeat at this point. Without even thinking about it.
Anyway, I want to thank all of you for all the thoughtful comments that are always being posted here. I wouldn't want to have to get through the season without VEB.
by PujolsFor President on Jun 21, 2006 10:26 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ha!
by effin fisk on Jun 21, 2006 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
what can you say
by sportsmanspark78 on Jun 21, 2006 10:26 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
was that an Ice Cube reference?!?
-crickets chirping-
oops wrong forum..... do you guys have directions to the 1980s hip-hop forum?
by Schnake on Jun 21, 2006 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hopefully
For those that don't know, that is one factor in Ice Cube declaring it a good day.
by secretweapon on Jun 21, 2006 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good
by sportsmanspark78 on Jun 21, 2006 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Even saw the lights of the Goodyear Blimp
by 26thMan on Jun 21, 2006 7:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
in '03 we beat Boston...
by kindred on Jun 21, 2006 6:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Midwest League All-Star Game
by Dweeze on Jun 21, 2006 10:34 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That's great to hear
by rob is back on Jun 21, 2006 5:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Perspective
One was this..on Sunday, June 11 the Sox got TROUNCED, at home, by the Indians. Down 10-0 late in the game. The Sox score some late.
Amazingly, the world didn't end for the Sox after a bad/blowout loss to the Indians. In fact, they have gone on to win seven of eight since then.
No doubt this team has some question marks. But why dont we see what the answer are before pointing fingers and jumping off the Poplar Street Bridge?
by beanocook on Jun 21, 2006 10:35 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
No only didn't it end but
by sdrone on Jun 21, 2006 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yo Folks...
Believe me, I didn't like last night any better than many of you--but there is a tendency to panic around here. Many of you guys were willing to concede Albert is a juicer on the flimsy suggestion that his trainer might have been named in a document as a guy who might know where to get greenies. Take a breath and see what the organization does and how the team does in the next week or so. There will be plenty of time to panic over the next 3 months if need be. I just don't think it's time for that yet. Disgust, yes; Panic, no.
by rockin redbird on Jun 21, 2006 11:37 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Out of your Rock
by salvomania on Jun 21, 2006 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well...
http://www.vivaelbirdos.com/story/2006/6/8/172357/5078
Sounds to me like some folks were willing to concede it was true waaaaaay before anything solid was offered. Maybe I'm wrong, but it reads that way to me.
by rockin redbird on Jun 21, 2006 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The comments
That's a far cry from most of us guys conceding that Albert is juicing.
by salvomania on Jun 21, 2006 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fair enough...
by rockin redbird on Jun 21, 2006 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Unhappy about the thought
I think most of us spent time debating what Mihlfeld being named in it would even have meant. I think it would have looked bad, and spoken about the type of trainer that Pujols were working with.
Lots of people disagreed with me and after the arguments, I came to see it more their way.
In the end though, we've decided that Mihlfeld probbably wasn't even listed in the article. Still, the fact that your favorite player and the best hitter in the game may have been somehow linked into all this is enough to make you upset.
I think it also doesn't help to have a board that can make permanent your knee jerk reaction to things. I don't know how many comments I've started to write and stopped and said, "Hmm, will I still want to have this written there in the morning?" Still, if no one posted in that state, we wouldn't have any posts at all and what fun would that be.
by dontEATnachos on Jun 21, 2006 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
True...
by rockin redbird on Jun 21, 2006 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right you are
Right now, I think we do have some pretty big fish to fry. We do not have a #2 starter right now. Even if Reyes were to come into the rotation, we still do not have a legitimate number two starter behind Carp. We need a pitcher more than we need a bat. Just a thought, but Smoltz has said that he'd be open to a trade. He would be mighty fine in Cardinal red. Granted, I think that a snowball has a better chance going through hell than the Cardinals picking him up. But, who knows? If and when we make the playoffs, it would be a damn shame if the pitching fails us and right now it is looking like that is going to happen.
by BigdJC on Jun 21, 2006 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Here here...
by MRCARD on Jun 21, 2006 1:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This was supposed to be a benchmark game ...
To start off like this with our supposed #2 starter is frustrating and makes it seem that even if we were to make it to the World Series, it would just be 2004 all over again.
by dontEATnachos on Jun 21, 2006 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's hard for me
Granted... I don't think Albert could have created 16 runs last night... but I'm still trying to reserve judgement on this team until all the pieces are in place.
by Matt on Jun 21, 2006 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well ...
by dontEATnachos on Jun 21, 2006 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rumors that I have seen ...
For what it's worth.
by tdzz1975 on Jun 21, 2006 12:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Thank You Rockin Redbird
by mdarshan on Jun 21, 2006 12:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
re panic
the frustration i hear -- and share -- has to do with inaction. the team's needs seem to be going unaddressed, and the decision-makers appear to be at best complacent, and at worst condescending toward the fans, offering "there, there" assurances. yes, the team is 5 games up and weathering albert's injury with surprising ease; but that does not mean it's a serious threat to win (or even reach) a world series.
personally i would like to hear a) some candid discussion of the team's obvious flaws, and b) a candid discussion of the cards' options for addressing those flaws. nobody's saying it will be easy; we just don't want to be insulted. and the team's current approach is insulting.
by lboros on Jun 21, 2006 12:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
and when i say
by lboros on Jun 21, 2006 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
All true...
by rockin redbird on Jun 21, 2006 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well......
by stanchar on Jun 21, 2006 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
that's a very fair assessment
i would also note that during the off-season and ST, when many people thought the cards should trade from their pitching depth to upgrade the offense, the front-office line was: "we'll be able to get a much better deal during the season, when other teams get desperate." maybe they should've dealt when their hand was strong . ..
finger-pointing, i know. doesn't accomplish anything; but why should they get a pass? they are very sensitive to criticism; maybe a little more of it would improve the decision-making . . .
by lboros on Jun 21, 2006 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I too am not optimistic about
But we got Larry Walker for a bag of baseballs to be named later... so I'll still trust Walt to do something. (I don't really have another option at this point.)
by Matt on Jun 21, 2006 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
2004 Red Sox
I think that our management has to be going through a similar period of assessment right now. I wouldn't be surprise to see a significant move made to upgrade the staff, if there is one to be made. I also don't think that any player except Carp, Izzy, Pujols, and Rolen would be untouchable depending on the talent at the other end.
I'm not coming out in favor of this or any trade. I'm just saying that the critical analysis could have become much more serioues in the front office even if it is only one game.
by bgh on Jun 21, 2006 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
"Trading from our pitching depth"
if Wainwright were to be a starter for a full season, i believe his ERA would be over 5.00. his ERA in AAA was 4.60, after all.
under that scenario, we wouldn't really be any better off than we are now (if Reyes does stick in the rotation). we're just subtracting Ponson instead of trading Marquis and adding Mench. and if you take away Mench's one amazing week, he looks a lot like Luna/J-Rod/Gooch, etc.
i'm not really sure what could have been done in the offseason. i'm not really sure what can be done now. we might just have to ride this out and see if Jock can pull off some miracle at the deadline.
by kindred on Jun 21, 2006 6:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Tank
In his last seven starts the lad hasn't won much (1-4) but he has a 2.76 ERA and 1.252 WHIP. 33 K's in 42.1 innings. Since May 1 his ERA is 3.58, 1.28 WHIP with 43 K's in 55 innings.
Put it this way, if we need another starter (assuming Reyes is in) then I would prefer Tankersley and leaving Wainwright in the pen. Am I out of my mind?
by beanocook on Jun 21, 2006 12:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
not necessarily
but he's not a guy who you'd want starting a game in october. wainwright might be a guy who could start in october. that's why i'd like to see him in there.
at this point, who would you start in a postseason series? carpenter game 1, marquis 2, suppan 3 . . . that's not gonna scare many teams.
by lboros on Jun 21, 2006 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
outside
Im not arguing either way, just wondering.
by beanocook on Jun 21, 2006 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Career minor league numbers...
by Quietude on Jun 21, 2006 12:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
what we've seen this year
the thing the deserts tank'sly is his control -- he has walked 61 men in 86 big-league innings. that suggests one of two things to me: either a) he doens't trust his stuff in the bigs (ie, it's mental), or more likely b) big-league hitters are less prone than minor-leaguers to chase the stuff he throws off the corners and in the dirt. either way, it's an established pattern and the odds are that it will continue to manifest itself next time he gets a shot.
wainwright, by contrast, seized his opportunity this spring, pitched aggressively and effectively in florida and has continued to do so in the reg season -- challenges hitters, and has good enough stuff to get them out with it.
bottom line, you've got one guy with a big league era of 7.61, and another with a big league era of about 3.00. i'll take the 2d guy.
by lboros on Jun 21, 2006 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
understood
But Wainwright has never proven he can be a starter in the bigs either. All Im suggesting is that if we need another starter I would rather it be Tankersley than Wainwright. Thats all.
by beanocook on Jun 21, 2006 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
If starting wainwright and reyes is good enough for next season, how can we say, with our current roster, they are not good enough for june 2006?
by Schnake on Jun 21, 2006 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tankersley
Ranking the postseason starter probables (can't believe I'm worried about it now, but here goes):
- Carpenter - duh!
- Marquis - some would say by default, but of the veterans left, he's the only one I think could rise to the occassion.
- Reyes - I think he could do enough to impress TLR/Dunc over the next three months to warrant inclusion. Unless TLR/Dunc are dead set against giving anyone new (less than 27-28) a chance to succeed.
- Suppan - he's dependable, but for what? Six innings, three runs? At the absolute best, seven & two? More likely, 6.2 & 5.
- Mulder - if he can stand and simulate a pitching motion come mid-September, he'll probably make the postseason roster.
- Wainwright - TLR/Dunc have a plan for him in the pen; at least somebody thinks that a plan is in place. But Adam could be lights out as a starter and it has to be easier to find a reliable, K-worthy reliever than a top flight starter. (I would rather he be higher on this list, but he's probably trapped in the bullpen.)
- Ponson - he would have to have a life-changing experience (I'm guessing within the next 48 hours) to reverse course enough to get back in the good graces of the coaching staff. If that were to happen, yeah, he could probably start for us come October. But I'm not liking the odds.
- Tankersley - if you're pondering his chances of starting for this club in the postseason, it's only because you either 1) just for the hell of it, thought he needed to be talked about, or 2) decided that you needed to talk about 8 guys.
by Solanus on Jun 21, 2006 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think.......
by stanchar on Jun 21, 2006 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think
by eeyorethedog on Jun 21, 2006 12:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
"Gutless"?
by nuke187 on Jun 21, 2006 12:31 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
hmmmm
On another note: how 'bout them white sox?
-Devoted Royals Fan
by frenchhornlkw on Jun 21, 2006 12:36 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
thanks for the spanish lesson
by lboros on Jun 21, 2006 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Since you enjoy teaching grammer.....
"If that's to hard, you could always change birdos to birdo and have it done that way."
Next time try..If that's TOO hard....
Man it must suck to attempt to annoy people and simply come out looking like an idiot, eh?
by BleacherBum on Jun 21, 2006 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And
by rockin redbird on Jun 21, 2006 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
see what I have to put up with
A "devoted royals fan" friend of mine told me the royals would have 10 more wins if they played in the NL central.
My reply?
"yup, so would the cardinals"
by Schnake on Jun 21, 2006 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The '67 Cards
I still have a big pin from '67 with an Amadee-drawn Cardinal wearing a sombrero and serape and swinging a giant maraca, with the words "Bravo, Bravo, El Birdos!"
by salvomania on Jun 21, 2006 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hey
by stlcardinalsfang on Jun 21, 2006 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
CoMo
I just don't understand how some people can applaud futility and criticize excellence the way Royals fans do.
Hey Royals fans: talk to me when you aren't the laughing stock of the sports universe.
by sportsmanspark on Jun 21, 2006 5:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tell the ROyals fans
by BozCardsFanSF on Jun 21, 2006 5:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
im not sure...
just curious how the site name came about anyhow...(it translates to "the birdos lives")
by lopey986 on Jun 21, 2006 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Birdos
(Elvis did not sing "Vivan Las Vegas")
by madridbend on Jun 21, 2006 8:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is a Royals fan
by 26thMan on Jun 21, 2006 8:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Brad Voyles
by DCGreg on Jun 21, 2006 1:33 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Livan Livan
Carp
Livan
(Mulder)
Reyes
Marquis
Supp
I dont know much about Livan's contract status, but if he is under contract for next season it would seem like there is a good fit, not only for the Nats but for us as well.
by BigMac545 on Jun 21, 2006 2:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Livan has a tendancy of catching...
by Hardcore Legend on Jun 21, 2006 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Livan! Livan! Livan! Hernandez' Contract
by bgh on Jun 21, 2006 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i think
by stlcardinalsfang on Jun 21, 2006 3:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought about Livian the other day
by sdrone on Jun 21, 2006 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've mentioned Hernandez a few times
by rob is back on Jun 21, 2006 6:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My thoughts
- Rebuild. We don't have the farm system or the bottom feeding place in the standings to pull that off, so forget that.
- Call up Reyes, plug in Wainwright/Tankersley/A Janitor, slap Mulder on the DL, and kick Ponson to the curb. This scenario generally makes sense to me, because whoever you have in there isn't going to get pounded much worse than Ponson or Mulder at this point, and there's always the chance Reyes will look exceptional in the bigs.
- Swing a trade...but not for a hitter. I know we need a bat. I know. But at this point, it's pretty clear that we could use a pitcher more than a Craig Wilson. We might even be able to swap one of our frustrating pitchers for a slightly less frustrating pitcher that another team has gotten tired of. I'd like to see another middle of the order bat as much as anyone, but it's going to be the pitching that kills us in the playoffs if we don't make a move to fix it.
by Lord Fortune on Jun 21, 2006 2:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Chi Trib article
Can anyone explain the article in the PD web site here.
Gar, makes me so frustrated. The MAN's league, too bad Pujols isn't around to show them El Hombre's League.
It makes me hope that we get the good Marquis tonight. Nothing would be better than having him come in and shut them down tonight.Plus, my brother and I spent $100 buying tickets to today's game for our dad for Father's Day. Really glad we didn't go with yesterday's game!
by dontEATnachos on Jun 21, 2006 3:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Half of Roger's stuff
by sdrone on Jun 21, 2006 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
hmm, score one for me being an idiot
by dontEATnachos on Jun 21, 2006 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hope this article makes it into each locker.
they are a terrific team. they do not believe in mercy. ozzie wants to make the city of chicago forget about TLR and their history. whatever.
nothing will make me feel better than if we go out and show the sox what we are made of. last night should be all the motivation they need. if they cant get up to play after a butt whipping like that, then maybe they should just blow it up and rebuild.
by Schnake on Jun 21, 2006 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
New subject.....
by BleacherBum on Jun 21, 2006 3:41 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Luna
by BigMac545 on Jun 21, 2006 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed....
by BleacherBum on Jun 21, 2006 5:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs



















