Viva El Birdos: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Sounder At Heart for Seattle Sounders Fans!

pffffffft

if it takes a pounding of beer-league proportions to get reyes into the rotation, so be it. matt leach, for one, believes that's now a given. the la duncas remain circumspect -- after last night's game, i don't know why they wouldn't just say "we're excited to see reyes throw, maybe he can give us a lift" -- but they will need a 5th starter by no later than saturday, and their options at this point are

  • reyes
  • ponson
  • wainwright
  • bullpen game
  • tankersley, leek, webb, narveson . . .
  • russ ortiz
tony and dave might not like reyes, but he's clearly the best option they've got. they're stubborn, but they'll pitch him.

as for mulder, they insist he is healthy . . . . crockashit. it was just over a month ago, recall, that he left the team to have his back examined by a specialist, and only two weeks ago that his name mysteriously disappeared from the "probable pitchers" section of the team's official web site. i suspected then (and still do) that his absence from, and subsequent return to, the probables list was injury-driven; this regime has never been particularly forthcoming regarding injuries, nor particularly humane in treating them. in light of mulder's performance over the last month (an era in the 13.00 neighborhood), some organizations would consider disabling the guy for post-traumatic stress disorder.

but if they sit mulder down for a spell, and they keep ponson exiled from the rotation -- he may soon be exiled from the team after that gutless performance last night -- that leaves two holes to fill. reyes takes one; who takes the other? the obvious answer is wainwright, who was the team's best #5 in spring training and, pitching from the 'pen thus far, has established that he can get big-league hitters out.  move him into the rotation, recall falkenborg and let him and hancock share wainwright's old role -- could that possibly make matters worse? what's the potential downside? let's see:

  • taking mulder out of the rotation will ruin his trade value. ha ha; as if there's any market for the guy left after his last 5 games.
  • it reeks of panic. nonsense; it reeks of common sense. no team can carry a pitcher who's performing at mulder's level, even a team (like the cards) that's 5 games up in a flimsy division.
  • mulder has a key postseason role; gotta let him pitch through this. or gotta start making contingency plans. mulder's ability to handle the #2 starter role in october is clearly in doubt; the cards need to start evaluating other options.
honestly now; you've got one guy who throws 85 and has a 6.00 era, and another guy who throws 93 and has an era in the 2.00s; one guy who's totally erratic with his location, and another with a 6-1 k/bb ratio (and that applies either to wainwright or to reyes). doesn't common sense trump at some point? put mulder on the DL, let him take a few rehab starts at springfield or memphis; he can pitch through his problems down there, where the 11-run innings won't hurt so bad.

those of you who can't fathom two rookies in the rotation, i direct you to yesterday's post about El Birdos. that pitching staff, recall, was stocked almost exclusively with unproven pitchers --- carlton, briles, hughes, willis, hoerner. despite a strong early-season performance, the cards still moved a couple of established but underperforming veterans (hal woodeshick and al jackson) out of key roles and gave their jobs to younger, more talented players. it wasn't panic; it was simply a realistic evaluation of the available talent. their decisions were correct, and the team prospered.

it has been done. it can be done.

speaking of the young and unproven, low-a phenom jaime garcia took the loss in the midwest league all-star game last night. like mulder, he had a difficult 3d inning -- struck out two of the 1st three hitters, but then yielded four consecutive singles, good for three runs. struck out the last man to fan the side; that was his only inning of work.

also of note, the cards' short-season a ball affiliate opened its season last night with a 5-3 loss. brad furnish, the cards' 2d-round selection out of tcu, started the game and took the loss -- 4ip, 5h, 3 er, 1 w, 4k; also a wp and an hbp. their supplemental 2d-rounder, 1bman mark hamilton (tulane), displayed some of the power potential the cardinals liked: he mashed a homer in his 2d at-bat, finished 1 for 4.

jocketty's going to be on bernie miklasz's show in about 15 minutes; i'll tune in and update this post if i hear anything of interest.

0 recs  |  Comment 149 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

rookies
it's being done this year by the league's top teams.
Verlander in Detroit
Billingsley in LA
Soler in NY (mets)
Jered Weaver in LAA (he will return to the rotation this season)
Lester in BOS

Florida's rookie pitchers are among the best in the league.

need we go on?

by VanRam on Jun 21, 2006 9:03 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Agreed
I would think (but I do not profess in any way to understanding how TLR and DD think) that a Mulder stint on the DL is a foregone conclusion.  And I think there is a high likelihoiod that Ponson is gone, DFA or otherwise of the team in the very near future.

I think Reyes will happen.  But I think Wainwright, while I agree he should be in the rotation, is a longer shot.  I can already hear TLR/DD saying how he's been training his arm for 1-2 inning stints and asking him to expend to 5-7 innings is a different propgram, blahblahblah.

More of that obstinance you mentioned.  I really hope it works for Reyes and Wainwright.  Mulder can't get anyone out, and Russ Ortiz is a RH version of Mulder.

Hancock does not inspire confidence though, so I say if they do this, they will need to trade for a good bullpen arm.

by BozCardsFanSF on Jun 21, 2006 9:09 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Sorry for the typos...
The words should read

likelihood
expand
program

I hate spelling errors.

by BozCardsFanSF on Jun 21, 2006 9:11 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

hey i can't get
1380's worthless audio feed to stream . . . . if anybody's listening to the interview with jocketty, what's he saying?

by lboros on Jun 21, 2006 9:11 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Walt's not on yet
Great site, lboros, first time poster, long time reader.  I'll post when Walt comes on.

by AUJarhead on Jun 21, 2006 9:17 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

thanks au jar
guess walter didn't show up today -- you're off the hook. hope you'll keep reading

by lboros on Jun 21, 2006 9:59 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

no jock today
Bernie thinks perhaps he has "other things on his mind."

by gthedamned on Jun 21, 2006 9:30 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bernie hears from Walt
Says Walt called in to apologize, had a meeting come up.  Maybe on Friday.

by AUJarhead on Jun 21, 2006 10:59 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

One bright spot from last night
I'm really starting to like Chris Duncan's makeup.

Took the HBP like a man and then hit a HR.  A lot of pop in his bat.  I have more confidence in his bat than in J Rod's at this point.  Especially in a PH role as we get closer to October.

And we're still in 1st place by a good margin.

Last night really stunk, but the sun rose this morning and it's a new day.

by BozCardsFanSF on Jun 21, 2006 9:16 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

OZZIE
really dealt with ponson's headhunting with class.  hit duncan in the thigh and be done with it.  he could have aimed at rolen or edmonds, which is what dusty baker would have done.  heck, dusty might have thrown at el hombre in the dugout and whined about it afterwards.

by Schnake on Jun 21, 2006 9:22 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ozzie may be crazy...
but he's got some class and sense.  He knows DUI's little beanball "excursion" last night wasn't called from the dugout, and I don't expect him to send his pitchers out there throwing at us because of it.

He respects TLR (and saw the royal asschewing he gave DUI when he pulled him.)

by Quietude on Jun 21, 2006 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Who says it was intentional?
Both HBP forced in runs... both HBPs were pitches that broke wickedly inside---as opposed to fastballs thrown directly at the hitter---and the last one came on an 0-2 pitch.

Do we REALLY think that Ponson, after just hitting a guy to force in a run, would hit ANOTHER guy---on an 0-2 pitch!!---to force in another run? I sure as hell don't.

I don't think either one was intentional, but I do think that Ponson may have been trying to throw inside and didn't have enough command (or, perhaps, concern) to be precise enough.

by salvomania on Jun 21, 2006 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed
He's a keeper.  Everyday player? Well, hard to say yet.  But he's a cheap bench alternative with pop.

by stanchar on Jun 21, 2006 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Duncan
I went to spring training this year and got to see Chris Duncan in action for the first time.  I was shocked watching some of the bombs he was hitting in batting practice.  Some of them cleared a two-story clubhouse that is about 30 feet beyond the right-center field wall.  Amazing!

As for Mulder . . . he's dead to me.  I have been disappointed with him ever since game 6 of last year's NLCS.  The team was fired up after Pujols' monster shot off of Lidge, only to come home and watch Mulder allow 6 hits and 3 runs in 4 innings.  (the first run of the game scored on a Mulder wild pitch)  Not that the series was his fault, but you'd expect more from your #2 starter in a "must win" game.  (actually, a co-worker of mine pointed this out, and I think it makes a lot of sense).

by sportsmanspark on Jun 21, 2006 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bernie
just said that Jocketty is a no-show today.
In Nepal the villagers call me 'Kin-tan-tee', which means 'noble man who is loved by many animal...'

by iron duke75 on Jun 21, 2006 9:30 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Big Suprise???
The management of this team is so far up on my shit list they smell worse than hog manure.  Jockety dodged this.  I wanted call in and say, "Come on admit it, Billy Beane took you to the cleaners."

What can this team do?  I have been criticized for saying that this team needs a rebuild.  People say that any team with Jimmy, Pujols, and Rolen should be contending for the World Series is missing part of the picture.  We don't have the pitching! The American Leauge is far superior to the National League.  The Cardinals record is just a mirage of weak competition.  Reyes and Wainwright in the rotation is a start.  I don't see it though, these are the same idiots that traded Haren just because he was young.  Good move?  I would say trade Jimmy for young pitching.  Maybe the Anglels would give up Santana.  I don't know.  I don't think the cards would do it.  But we have to look at who has value and is on the decline to deal.  AAAAGGGGHHHH!  

by BigJawnMize on Jun 21, 2006 9:49 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

jimmy...
is old, hurt, and expensive. i just dont see any team willing to take that on for a young pitcher. anaheim wont even give up ervin santana for carl crawford so i dont see them parting with sanatana for jimmy.

and yeah, the haren trade upsets me still, i knew it was a bad idea at the time but mulder was a good pitcher and was only 27 or 28 himself. sure do wish we had haren now though.

by lopey986 on Jun 21, 2006 10:07 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I am frustrated
I agree, I just look at this team and don't see anyone with real value outside of Carp, Pujols, and Rolen.  Can't trade those guys.  

by BigJawnMize on Jun 21, 2006 10:12 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd make a list of things Edmonds has done
for this team before I'd write him off . Walk off homers in playoff games.  Gamesaving catches in playoff games.   Robbing home runs with jumps over the wall.  

I don't see a lot of other centerfielders doing that.

by sdrone on Jun 21, 2006 10:23 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

and im not saying...
that the cardinals should write him off or look to move him. just looking at his value from a realistic standpoint and it is probably as low as it can get due to the lingering injuries and the drop in production the past two seasons. jimmy has been one of my favorite cardinals since he came here and i hope he finishes out his career in st louis.

by lopey986 on Jun 21, 2006 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jimmy has value
I love Jimmy, but lets be pragmatic about this.  He plays good "D", still has some pop, gets on-base, and has an opition next year that is reasonable.  Package this with a Double A pitcher and you might have something.  I rather have a half season were we restock a bit and give ourselves a chance to go for it in the next two years.  Look at the marlins they reloded fairly well.  The cards could do this if they are willing to take the risk.  You could trade Eckstien, maybe.  You might be able to get something for Marquis and a Double A guy.  We are going to have to do a rebuild on the staff soon.  I am just saying lets start now.

by BigJawnMize on Jun 21, 2006 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

you think...
his 13 million dollar option is "reasonable" for a 36 year old center fielder with decreased production and injury problems?

by lopey986 on Jun 21, 2006 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Edmonds Options
His option is for 10 million not 13.  He has a 3 million dollar buy out if they decide not to pay the 10. That is really pretty reasonable for one season considering the dodgers are paying Furcal 13 million a year for three years.

by endlessticketscom on Jun 21, 2006 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

furcal...
is also 27 years old and not 36 and plays a different position, has a different skill set, pretty much has nothing in common with jimmy...

you can't just compare two guys because they make the same amount of money.

by lopey986 on Jun 21, 2006 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why, when we lose one game...
....everyone decides it is time to blow-up the roster.

What's that old saying again?  You're only as good as your next days starter?

Well, Marquis has looked pretty damn good lately, so I liking our chances tonight.  Keep in mind, if the pitching hadn't completely melted down, we did score 6 runs.  The offense is still there, we just have to get a rotation that involves:

Carp
Suppan
Reyes
Marquis
someone

While Ponson gets back into shape and Mulder gets healthy.

As much as I want to throw Mulder under the bus, you don't have a 2:1 win/loss career average by luck.  He isn't DONE around the age of 30.  Hey, maybe this will be a blessing in disguise.  The Cards stick with him during his rough spot and he throws them a bone with a discount.

He's not as bad as he is pitching right now.  He's either going to get his velocity back or retool his pitching approach like that of Maddux and such to compensate for lack of heat.

by Hardcore Legend on Jun 21, 2006 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i dont think...
we should blow up the roster. i think mulder should take a dl trip and work his stuff out in the minors. i dont want to trade jimmy and i dont believe he has any value anyway. you don't blow up your roster when it is 5 games up in the division.

by lopey986 on Jun 21, 2006 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I was thinking last night
that this might end up great for the Cards. It's easy to be a Mulder hater right now, but he isn't a terrible pitcher. This bad month might be good for next year, so we won't have so many empty rotation spots to worry about. He's not going to be a Carpenter, but if we could resign him cheap(er) to a one or two year deal after this year, he might help plug some holes until better options become available. Plus if he bounces back he could regain some trade value (again, maybe next year) and maybe the front office will be smart enough to trade him earlier.

A lot of IFs in there, but I was thinking the same thing.

This loss could be a blessing in disguise, both for the Cardinals and for Mulder. Besides, its just one game.

by effin fisk on Jun 21, 2006 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I thinking blow the team up
This comes down to the idea that I am not satisfied with getting to the freaking playoffs.  We could throw Pujols and Rolen out there with a bunch of stiffs and make the playoffs.  I want a World Series.  If you think "this team has got a chance" or that "this team with a left fielder has got chance", you are misguided.  I think the reason is we need to reload while we have rolen and pujols under contract and in their primes.  If we hold off, we will have a team that hasn't won a ring and its two cornerstone in decline.  

by BigJawnMize on Jun 21, 2006 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

rolen
is 31, hardly in his prime. pujols still hasnt even gotten into his PRIME years which is just ridiculous when you think about it (although, he could really be 30 already*).

*joking, joking :)

by lopey986 on Jun 21, 2006 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

memphis has great bbq
"He isn't DONE around the age of 30."

As much as I hate that this thought even runs through my mind... cough Steve Blass cough  Special circumstances, I hope.

I think a nice little DL trip/rehab assignment would be nice.  Whatever the Cubs said was wrong with Rusch sounds like a nice injury excuse for Mulder too (or whatever the Royals said was up with Greinke).  I don't care if Dr. Nick Rivera has to sign the doctor's note, he needs his confidence/stuff back and he's not going to get it by getting beat up in a major game.

by Elle on Jun 21, 2006 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

he better be...
working out a trade for a left fielder then!

by lopey986 on Jun 21, 2006 9:35 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

How about
a starting pitcher?

by viva el rojo pajaro 42 on Jun 21, 2006 9:38 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed
looks like we need one pretty badly...

by cmat on Jun 21, 2006 9:42 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

or maybe...
he is just arranging to fly Reyes in...that would be acceptable too. and getting Mulder onto the DL. man, pitching was supposed to be the cardinals strong point this year and right now it looks like the weakest part of the team. they need to just go with a carp, marquis, soup, reyes, wainwright rotation while mulder works out his problems in the minors.

by lopey986 on Jun 21, 2006 9:42 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

scary
that version of the rotation (and our reality) makes marquis our #2 guy...

by gthedamned on Jun 21, 2006 9:51 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

true
but marquis has been getting wins, which is more than you can say about mulder and ponson.

by lopey986 on Jun 21, 2006 10:03 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

not necessarily
reyes and wainwright might be #2 and #3 in that configuration . . .  if they both put up 4.00ish eras (well within reach of both) and turn in quality starts 2/3 of the time, i guess they'd be 2d and 3d best.

by lboros on Jun 21, 2006 10:06 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Reyes
If it was ever really in doubt, the official site now lists Reyes as the probable starter tomorrow.  This is the first time I've checked so I don't know if it's been that way for awhile, but it's still comforting.

http://stlouis.cardinals.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/news/probable_pitchers.jsp?c_id=stl

by STLEdge on Jun 21, 2006 9:49 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Wainwright as starter
It's definitely time to see what Reyes and Wainwright can do in the starting rotation.  Success, of course, is certainly not guaranteed, especially for Wainwright.  He has the big hook and a decent fastball but appears to need another pitch to be a consistent starter.  He was less than overwhelming at Memphis and has been getting hit a little bit harder up here as opponents have gotten more familiar with his pitches.  And left-handed batters have a .289 BAA and a .919 OPS against him.  But we need to see if he can adjust.  Get him in there.

by unclegrubworm on Jun 21, 2006 9:53 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

wainwright...
is definately going to be a hit or miss starter, more likely miss. he struggled at triple a as a starter and has been struggling lately in relief now that teams have seen him. but if mulder were to require a dl stint then we would have to put him in there. i would certainly like to see what wainwright and reyes can do.

by lopey986 on Jun 21, 2006 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

wainwright was very good
for most of 2005 at memphis, but he had one bad run --- see http://www.vivaelbirdos.com/story/2006/2/1/8579/23816

by lboros on Jun 21, 2006 10:07 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

well
maybe we will see a rotation consisting of wainwright and reyes by this weekend then.

and on the topic of rookie pitchers, the marlins have called up another one.

by lopey986 on Jun 21, 2006 10:13 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

marlins
How are they doing this year?
to give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift.

by beanocook on Jun 21, 2006 10:23 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Currently in 4th
Leapfrogging ahead of Washington and Atlanta.

13-3 in June, winners of 19 of last 25 as the young players start to gel.

by salvomania on Jun 21, 2006 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

ok, so 4th
Thanks :) How does that to compare to 1st?
to give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift.

by beanocook on Jun 21, 2006 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

it doesn't...
the whole point is that using rookies as starters has been proven succesful in numerous organizations this year. the marlins are a good example of this. while their overall record is nothing to get excited about, their recent surge is nothing to ignore. if the team keeps all those players together and they continue to build chemistry they may very well be back in the playoffs in 3 years before they blow the team up again.

by lopey986 on Jun 21, 2006 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I dont think
Anyone has said you can't use a rookie starter. I think everyone agrees Anthony Reyes deserves a shot now, and he will get it.

However, the Cardinals and Marlins are at completely different stages for the franchise. The Cardinals are trying to win a World Series and the Marlins are trying to grow.

Things are different when you are expected to win 95 games, not 75.

to give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift.

by beanocook on Jun 21, 2006 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

fair point
but the expecation of 95 wins need not be paralyzing. if making a change will improve the team, you make the change.

i think la dunca (and maybe walt too, to an extent) are paralyzed --- they're sticking with known commodities to the detriment of the team. ie, they know they can get to the playoffs with the marquis/supps/mulder gang, and they know they're in 1st place with that gang . . . so they're sticking with that group, when they might have better alternatives available. it's obviously their judgment that the old gang still represent the best alternatives . . . . but then, it was also their judgment coming out of spring training that ponson was a better option at #5 than either reyes or wainwright.

by lboros on Jun 21, 2006 4:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I know you've
read 3 Nights In August, and what you're saying about paralysis would go right along with the TLR and Dunc described there. They are pretty inflexible about changing anything that might go against their accepted wisdom on a player. Ponson had to be better to them because, even with his troubles, he's a veteran. He's pitched in the Majors, therefore is used to the pressure. Same with Mulder--he will somehow pitch his way out of it. I really hope they're taking stock of these written in stone precepts, cuz I think they may just have painted themselves into a corner where it's either crap your pants and dive in or stick with what they've been doing--to the detriment of the team.

by rockin redbird on Jun 21, 2006 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

that last phrase
should have read "--as you note, to the detriment of the team."

by rockin redbird on Jun 21, 2006 4:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

well
You have to be fair on both ends. Can't you say Mulder has been good despite a tough stretch...or Marquis has been good despite a tough stretch...or Suppan has been good despite a tough stretch.

Am I frustrated with Mulder? Of course. I feel he should go on the DL as well. No doubt. He has been awful. I also think Anthony Reyes will probably be in the rotation the rest of the year.

Let's remember, Reyes has shown NO signs of being able to pitch 200 innings a season. We have to remember this and I think Duncan/LaRussa know this.

As for Wainwright. I don't want him starting. Im not as sold as his startability as others. One tough stretch or not, his numbers at Memphis haven't been overwhelming.

The guy is 14-14 with a 4.65 ERA and 1.429 WHIP in two years at AAA. That doesn't project to great major league numbers. Heck, Dennis Tankersley has been a better minor league/AAA pitcher than Wainwright.

to give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift.

by beanocook on Jun 21, 2006 10:31 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

what about our bullpen?
Isn't Wainright one of our most dependable bullpen guys?  

We're in a position of closing one hole and opening another.

by sdrone on Jun 21, 2006 10:21 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd like Wainwright to stay in the pen...
...the Yankees of the 90's were at their best when they could go Rivera/Wettland in the 8th and 9th.  You, in essence, have two closers, so you aren't caught on any night in the playoffs with a tired arm in the 9th.

Wainwright is infinently more valuable in the bullpen, getting to Izzy.  You can't buy good closers anymore, there are only a handful in the league.  If the Cardinals want to think longterm, keep Wainwright working that 8th inning or the 'shut down' inning until Izzy's contract is up.

You don't want to deplete the bullpen to save the rotation, especially since Larussa won't stretch starters past 115 pitches.

by Hardcore Legend on Jun 21, 2006 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

having three potential shut-down starters
is infinitely more valuable, in the postseason, than having two shut-down starters, then a bunch of dogs, and a great set-up man.

Two pitchers with consistently good stuff and 90s-plus velocity (like Carpenter and Reyes) can give you a great chance in games 1 and 2, but if you have to punt in that 3rd game with a crappy No. 3---or if one series ends and you have to start the next one with your crappy No. 3---then you're at a big disadvantage against a team with a decent No. 3.

And most playoff-bound teans have at least a decent No. 3, and with a "potential shut-down" No. 3, you'd have a nice edge against a team with only a mediocre No. 3.

Right now Wainwright would POSSIBLY give us a potential shut-down No. 3---but we don't really know because the brass would rather throw Suppan, Mulder and Ponson out there.

You can't teach mid-90s velocity and great control---those are wonderful attributes to have in the postseason against deep, experienced lineups that don't swing at junk and that murder 87mph "fastballs."

That potential shut-down No. 3 starter is far more valuable than a set-up man that Tony won't even use on consecutive days.

I'd rather take my chances with a diffferent set-up man when we have a 2-1 lead in Game 3 than have Wainwright sitting in the bullpen in the 7th inning of a 6-1 Game 3 deficit.

by salvomania on Jun 21, 2006 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

There is no such thing as a 'shut-down' starter...
....unless he can go the whole game.  If he can't, who are you giving the ball to in the 7th, 8th and 9th?

Lest we forget that Marquis is 6-0 in his last 7 starts, and should be 7-0 if not for the ballclub blowing it for him in late innings.

I honestly don't believe that Wainwright is a #3 pitcher right now.  We are basing alot of this on what we 'hope' he could be, not what he realistically could be.  Just scrolling back through the game-logs, it appears that Wainwright can be pretty hit and miss when he goes more than 1 inning.

by Hardcore Legend on Jun 21, 2006 5:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

marquis should not be 7-0
at best he should be 5-2 -- he gave up 5 runs in two of those "wins" . . .

by lboros on Jun 21, 2006 5:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's not true....
...he's deserved 5 of his wins, and was robbed of 1 he didn't get and just kinda muddled through that last one.  Even he felt lucky getting through his rocky start against Colorado.

:P

Still, 5-2 ain't bad.  Mulder would kill for that record.

by Hardcore Legend on Jun 21, 2006 5:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Post-season Supp
You have to admit that in the playoffs the past two years Suppan has been quite good as our #3.  He's only 2-2 but his era is only 3.45.

I'm not saying that he is an ideal #3 but I haven't been disappointed by his postseason performance. He really is a gamer and handles the pressure well.

If we could get a solid #2 I wouldn't feel that letting him pitch a game would be 'punting.'  Not overly dominating but a guy who's dependable and has  experience.

by dontEATnachos on Jun 21, 2006 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Supp has been good, but
He pitched over his head a lot and hasn't come close to doing that this year.

I agree with Salvomania (I think?) I'm okay with Supp, Marquis or Mulder as our third starter, because they've all come through in a big game one time or another. Despite all the criticism of Mulder last year, in game 7 of the NLCS, he pitched pretty well for most of the playoffs. I still considered Mulder a soft second starter last year, however, and with the way he's looked this year...

We need two aces, or close it, to be successful in the playoffs. Two guys who will give us an advantage in most playoff games and with a small disadvantage, at worst. I'm okay with the chances with our third starter, whoever it may be, against other team's aces, but we need to maximize our chances of winning by gaining the advantage in the majority of our games. I don't know who could fill this position, but Reyes may be the only possibility, unless WJ can swing a miracle that doesn't sell out our future.

by rob is back on Jun 21, 2006 9:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jocketty blowing off the show today
is as gutless as Mulder's performance last night.  You called it lboros.  He gave up in that 3rd inning.

by BozCardsFanSF on Jun 21, 2006 9:55 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

geez
Come on guys. How many GM's actually go on the air live? Not many. Walt is one of the most accesible and "open" league executives I've ever heard.

He ain't the first guy to miss/reschedule a radio interview. Grab some perspective please. His job is GM of the team, not a radio host.

If this were a common occurance we worry. But its not. Walt is MORE than accomdating to the media types.

to give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift.

by beanocook on Jun 21, 2006 10:22 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Perspective
Don't give me the perspective lecture.  To be scheduled and then cancel to not answer questions about pitiful pitching or starter health is weak.

Just come on like Brian Sabean or others do and give it the no comment, brusque treatment.

That's the way to do.  Be open and accessible, but offer nothing.

Jocketty isn't the only GM doing radio stints.  I have perspective living somewhere other than SF and seeing how other teams sdo it as well.

Your comment is ill-fitting.

by BozCardsFanSF on Jun 21, 2006 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

umm
I dont live in St. Louis. I have found Walt Jocketty to be nothing but accomdating. Outside of this one instance (Today) have you found him to be different.

Please don't let emotion from one awful game last night cloud everything. 99% of the time Walt is very good about this stuff. I will cut the guy some slack here.

Im guessing he is busy doing his actual job to miss a radio interview. It happens all the time in sports.

to give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift.

by beanocook on Jun 21, 2006 10:32 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Go ahead
and cut the guy slack.  I choose not to.  Part of the job of the team and their senior management is PR.  Jocketty is not excused from this.  

Emotion has nothing to do with this.  in fact, if you note, I posted about the positives from last night.

I don't care about his other 99%.  A game like last night is an embarrassment, albeit it is limited to one game - we are still in 1st and have some bright spots, I think Chris Duncan is one of the brightest.

Say what you want, but the timing is poor.

And hey, if Sabean blows off a radio stint, he is called out here in SF.  That's the deal.

I don't believe in giving a free pass, especially after this past offseason and the Mulder trade.  I'm not enamored with Jocketty's recent performance.

by BozCardsFanSF on Jun 21, 2006 10:39 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

who
Has said Jocketty should be given a free pass.

You choose to make a big deal out of him missing a radio interview. I don't. I guess we have to disagree.

to give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift.

by beanocook on Jun 21, 2006 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Calm down, I can think of about 20
reasons a guy would cancel a radio interview, only one of them being gutlessness.  The other 19 are entirely legitimate -- an important meeting, a conference call, a personal or staff emergency, a trade negotiation, etc.  Jocketty has plenty of guts, and to think he's intimidated by talking to Miklasz on the radio for 10 minutes is laughable.  Calm down.

by MdRedbirdFreak on Jun 21, 2006 10:38 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh please
perhaps you are correct - but I think the timing is all too convenient.

I think it's weak.  You don't.  But calm down?  It would require me to be angry - which I'm not.

by BozCardsFanSF on Jun 21, 2006 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And please explain to me
where I suggested he would be intimidated?  Your interpretation is laughable.

by BozCardsFanSF on Jun 21, 2006 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

So, would you like sauce with your crow...
...if it turns out Walt blew off the meeting for a variety of reasons such as roster moves (activate Albert, send down other, bring up Reyes) or to discuss trade with another team?

Maybe he caught the Rolen Plague that everyone is getting.  Who knows.  

by Hardcore Legend on Jun 21, 2006 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's a Big IF
I don't think we'll ever hear the reason, nor is it of earth shattering importance.  

Even if Walt didn't want to do the radio piece as it might consitute an unwanted irritant for him, would he or the club freely admit it?  Not hardly.

If an explanation is forthcoming, it will be for some "good reason".

by BozCardsFanSF on Jun 21, 2006 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jocketty
With out knowing the facts i think it is hard to call him out for cancelling the interview. You say it is too convenient? That is laughable. Because you think it is too convenient then that means Jocketty is wimping out of an interview. He is one of the top 3 GM's in the game. All Gm's make mistakes but he gives us a chance to make the playoffs every year.

by endlessticketscom on Jun 21, 2006 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not arguing with his track record
over the course of a number of years.  You are right the Cards are contenders in most years.  I feel this last year and a half have been less than successful, but I still feel Jocketty is a good GM.

I'm not calling for his head, but I have every right to call him out for conveniently skipping the interview.  You have every right to disagree.

I'm not saying it's wimping out.  I'm no testosterone filled alpha male who views everything as being a man or being a wimp.

My feeling was that the PR side and answering to Bernie as a media rep, and by proxy to the fan base, was an irritant today that perhaps Jocketty did not want to deal with.  I'm not a fan of that, if in fact that's the deal and agree or disagree, it's my sneaking suspicion it was.

by BozCardsFanSF on Jun 21, 2006 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don't panic, yet...
I am not happy with our team right now but I'm not ready to panic, yet. It's a 162 game season.

It's time to see what Reyes can do. Bring him up and let him start. Not just one game but maybe the rest of the season. Tony and Dunc need to forget about his youth and inexperience. Keep him in there and don't send him down unless he has a Mulder Meltdown.

As for Wainwright, I'm all for starting him as well if he can handle the extra innings.

Mulder's issues are a big problem for this team. He needs to get it fixed. He is our #2 starter. We cannot go into the playoffs without a solid Mulder or someone who can replace him and pitch like a # 2.

I agree with you lboros, DL Mulder and send him to AAA for some rehab assignments when healthy. Then pray he gets it back.

by jdubya on Jun 21, 2006 10:18 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Another thing...
Jocketty should not make a panic trade right now. Many people think that he should trade Reyes and/or Wainwright. I say NO WAY!

We should not trade the future for a quick fix. Other GMs know that we are having major problems right now. They will try and use this to dump mediocre players for Reyes/Wain. Don't do it. Only trade Reyes/Wain if we can get a high caliber player like Willis, Cabrera, Buerle, etc. I don't think this will happen.

If we can trade some other AAA or AA players for a decent outfielder or another starter, then I'm all for it.

by jdubya on Jun 21, 2006 10:25 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Long-time reader...
first-time poster. And what could get me to finally post, you wonder? Yesterday was my BIRTHDAY! Thanks, Mulder. You shouldn't have.

Last night's mugging was kind of a numerologist's dream, wasn't it? On the 20th day of the 6th month, the Cardinals lose 20 to 6. Makes me wonder what will happen tonight. shudder Of course, as somebody noted, we haven't given up an 11-run inning since 1926 (that's nineteen 20 6, spooky!), so maybe last night was a good omen, since that was the year of our last WS victory. What's that? Oh, right, 1982. It only SEEMS like we've been waiting since '26.

With regard to inserting the rookies in the rotation, I'm no great shakes at statistical analysis, but if Mulder, Ponson, Reyes and Wainwright were the last four guys on the playground, I would take the rookies in a heartbeat at this point. Without even thinking about it.

Anyway, I want to thank all of you for all the thoughtful comments that are always being posted here. I wouldn't want to have to get through the season without VEB.

"Players like Pujols don't come along once in a lifetime. They never come along." -Buzz Bissinger

by PujolsFor President on Jun 21, 2006 10:26 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Ha!
nice Observations/conspiracy theories. No offense, but i'm glad your birthday is just once a year.

by effin fisk on Jun 21, 2006 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

what can you say
i listened to the 1st inning got to my friends for a pool party and its 9-1.I said it last night this is a test and Walt and Tony need to think fast.We got humiliated last night and peeps i just think this is a wake up call but on a bigger scale.It was the Reds a week ago now its the Sox's time to either role over for the Reds or get some SP help or just fold and rebuild.Last night made me sick and reminded me of 03 when we played the Red sox and got are arses handed to us in Boston for 3 nights.Walt got took by Beane and anally raped with no vasiline.

by sportsmanspark78 on Jun 21, 2006 10:26 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

was that an Ice Cube reference?!?
so does that mean we are NWA?

-crickets chirping-

oops wrong forum.....  do you guys have directions to the 1980s hip-hop forum?

by Schnake on Jun 21, 2006 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hopefully
The Cards woke up today and momma cooked a breakfast with no hog.  

For those that don't know, that is one factor in Ice Cube declaring it a good day.

by secretweapon on Jun 21, 2006 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good
catch guys and actually that line is the diss to NWA and more so Dre and easy for f'in him over on some cash.Maybe today will be a good day and my breakfast was without hog so well see.

by sportsmanspark78 on Jun 21, 2006 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

in '03 we beat Boston...
2 of 3 at Fenway (Edmonds homer over the Monsta)but got swept by the Yanks (Clemens's 300 win/ 4,000 K start). in '04 we got swept by Boston in WS. in '05 we took 2 of 3 from both of them (i think) at Busch.

by kindred on Jun 21, 2006 6:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Midwest League All-Star Game
They showed the midwest league all-star game here on tv in eastern Iowa, and Garcia's third inning wasn't as bad as it looks. He was the victim of a horrible call at first base on the second of the singles. The announcers were even joking about trying to come up with a possible reason why the umpire would have called the runner safe. If the correct call is made he gets out of the inning giving up only one run.

by Dweeze on Jun 21, 2006 10:34 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

That's great to hear
Btw, didn't Rasmus score the only run for his team also?

by rob is back on Jun 21, 2006 5:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Perspective
I actually heard Hawk and DJ say a few decent things last night.

One was this..on Sunday, June 11 the Sox got TROUNCED, at home, by the Indians. Down 10-0 late in the game. The Sox score some late.

Amazingly, the world didn't end for the Sox after a bad/blowout loss to the Indians. In fact, they have gone on to win seven of eight since then.

No doubt this team has some question marks. But why dont we see what the answer are before pointing fingers and jumping off the Poplar Street Bridge?

to give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift.

by beanocook on Jun 21, 2006 10:35 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

No only didn't it end but
the Sox scored like 4 or 6 runs in the 9th.  That was kind of a fun game to watch.

by sdrone on Jun 21, 2006 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yo Folks...
Calm down. I know it's tough after getting our asses handed to us in such ignominious fashion, but so far IT IS ONE GAME. A horrible travesty of a game, but one game nonetheless. And there is, believe it or not, some good to be taken from it: 1)It's still the first half. Last year at this time Matty Mo was pitching like Cy Young. If this kind of horror has to be dealt with, it's better now than later. 2)Decisions will have to be made. If Mulder had been so-so or bad but not awful, whatever the problem is would still go unaddressed. Now, the organization HAS to do something. 3)The Reyes question is likely to be answered. He'll get his shot and we'll see what he can bring. 4)This may somehow end with a deal that will bring the power arm we've all been clamoring for. How? Who? Got me. But Walt has worked magic before, give him a chance to get something going before throwing him under a bus. If he fails or does something really stupid, then throw him under a bus--but give him a chance to do something first. 5) IT IS ONE GAME. Even if the next two are embarrassing blowouts, it's one series in June. There is a lot of ball to go and worse-off ships than this have been righted. The rest of the division is sucking ass too, so even a few losses in a row will probably find our boys still in first place or well within striking distance to get it back.

Believe me, I didn't like last night any better than many of you--but there is a tendency to panic around here. Many of you guys were willing to concede Albert is a juicer on the flimsy suggestion that his trainer might have been named in a document as a guy who might know where to get greenies. Take a breath and see what the organization does and how the team does in the next week or so. There will be plenty of time to panic over the next 3 months if need be. I just don't think it's time for that yet. Disgust, yes; Panic, no.

by rockin redbird on Jun 21, 2006 11:37 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Out of your Rock
"Many of you guys"? I don't remember one comment on this board that was conceding that Albert was---or even LIKELY was---juicing after the trainer info came out.

by salvomania on Jun 21, 2006 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well...
I dunno--read this again:

http://www.vivaelbirdos.com/story/2006/6/8/172357/5078

Sounds to me like some folks were willing to concede it was true waaaaaay before anything solid was offered. Maybe I'm wrong, but it reads that way to me.

by rockin redbird on Jun 21, 2006 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The comments
are more along the lines of "I sure hope Albert isn't involved, that would really suck";

That's a far cry from most of us guys conceding that Albert is juicing.

by salvomania on Jun 21, 2006 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fair enough...
You read it that way; I read it another. However, people claiming to be physically ill sounds more like concession than hope to me. Whatever.

by rockin redbird on Jun 21, 2006 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Unhappy about the thought
I commented a lot in that thread and I got the feeling that everyone was afraid that it could turn out to be true.  The thought that maybe this could happen again was too much.  We don't want to believe it, but we've already gotten burned on it once.

I think most of us spent time debating what Mihlfeld being named in it would even have meant.  I think it would have looked bad, and spoken about the type of trainer that Pujols were working with.

Lots of people disagreed with me and after the arguments, I came to see it more their way.

In the end though, we've decided that Mihlfeld probbably wasn't even listed in the article.  Still, the fact that your favorite player and the best hitter in the game may have been somehow linked into all this is enough to make you upset.

I think it also doesn't help to have a board that can make permanent your knee jerk reaction to things.  I don't know how many comments I've started to write and stopped and said, "Hmm, will I still want to have this written there in the morning?"  Still, if no one posted in that state, we wouldn't have any posts at all and what fun would that be.

by dontEATnachos on Jun 21, 2006 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

True...
After re-reading my "Don't Panic" post, I realized the tone was way more accusatory than I intended. But there it is. Ah well. If nothing else, all this in-fighting shows that we care a great deal and tend to get a bit too emotionally worked-up when the team hits a skid or even the potential of bad news looms. We're human--it happens. And with no re-edit function once a post is up, well, as you say--that's sometimes the fun of it. At least we're mostly civil about it all--you wanna see fans tear each other new buttholes over nothing, visit BCB a few days in a row. Yikes.

by rockin redbird on Jun 21, 2006 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Right you are
I was in the same boat as most of you all watching the game last night and listening to the announcers keep saying "You can put it on the booooaaarrrddd...Yes," "Mulder has lost five to six INCHES off his fastball," etc.  I wanted to shoot myself in the face.  I kept thinking the season is over, but in reality it is only one loss.  

Right now, I think we do have some pretty big fish to fry.  We do not have a #2 starter right now.  Even if Reyes were to come into the rotation, we still do not have a legitimate number two starter behind Carp.  We need a pitcher more than we need a bat.  Just a thought, but Smoltz has said that he'd be open to a trade.  He would be mighty fine in Cardinal red.  Granted, I think that a snowball has a better chance going through hell than the Cardinals picking him up.  But, who knows?  If and when we make the playoffs, it would be a damn shame if the pitching fails us and right now it is looking like that is going to happen.

by BigdJC on Jun 21, 2006 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Here here...
A little dose of reality is a nice change of pace.  If you really want to see how this board's mood swings, check out the comments after the Colorado sweep and compare them to last night's debaucle.  The Cardinals have holes, but a little perspective people.  It's one game, the Cardinals have a good team and aren't done filling the pieces in.  The playoffs don't start tomorrow and the best player in the game might be back in our lineup soon...
"It takes pitching, hitting and defense. Any two can win. All three make you unbeatable". Joe Garagiola

by MRCARD on Jun 21, 2006 1:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This was supposed to be a benchmark game ...
to judge how ready we are for playing Championship caliber teams if we make it to the postseason.  Even if we can handily win our division or win the NL, we'll be facing a team that is as good as the White Sox or better.

To start off like this with our supposed #2 starter is frustrating and makes it seem that even if we were to make it to the World Series, it would just be 2004 all over again.

by dontEATnachos on Jun 21, 2006 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's hard for me
to see this as a benchmark series when our best player is still disabled.

Granted... I don't think Albert could have created 16 runs last night... but I'm still trying to reserve judgement on this team until all the pieces are in place.

by Matt on Jun 21, 2006 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well ...
If Mr. Pujols has his way and comes back too soon, it could be a reasonable possibility that he'll just injure himself again.

by dontEATnachos on Jun 21, 2006 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rumors that I have seen ...
are that Mulder's back is killing him and he may need surgery after the season.

For what it's worth.

by tdzz1975 on Jun 21, 2006 12:00 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Thank You Rockin Redbird
For some much needed sanity here.  And a radio segment seems to be the least of Walt Jocketty's concern right now.  Anyways he did call to apologize to Bernie for missing the interview.  There's no reason to panic.  Just wait and see how things work out from this point on.  Might be better than anyone can imagine right now.  

by mdarshan on Jun 21, 2006 12:06 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

re panic
i don't hear anybody panicking. i hear people voicing legitimate concerns about the team -- weaknesses that have been topics of discussion in this forum for sev'l weeks in some cases, sev'l months in other cases. i don't hear knee-jerk reactions to a single bad loss; i hear pent-up frustration that has been building for quite some time.

the frustration i hear -- and share -- has to do with inaction. the team's needs seem to be going unaddressed, and the decision-makers appear to be at best complacent, and at worst condescending toward the fans, offering "there, there" assurances. yes, the team is 5 games up and weathering albert's injury with surprising ease; but that does not mean it's a serious threat to win (or even reach) a world series.

personally i would like to hear a) some candid discussion of the team's obvious flaws, and b) a candid discussion of the cards' options for addressing those flaws. nobody's saying it will be easy; we just don't want to be insulted. and the team's current approach is insulting.

by lboros on Jun 21, 2006 12:06 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

and when i say
"i would like to hear . . ." i mean, i would like to hear that from la russa; from jocketty; from bill dewitt. i don't want to hear patronizing happy talk, or vapid platitudes. a little honesty, please

by lboros on Jun 21, 2006 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

All true...
I just wanted to point out that this embarrassment may be the start of some good things. Probably not, but I tend to get, perhaps unreasonably, hopeful in the darkest hours. You're right though--it's time for the organization to fess up about what the hell is going on. Didn't intend for the post to be so accusatory. I'm sometimes the guy who is yelling DON'T PANIC the loudest when I'm the real culprit.

by rockin redbird on Jun 21, 2006 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well......
I'm usually one to be very impatient with my team's inaction/inability to make a move to improve the ballclub.  However, I do think (and I know you would concede this) that Jocketty is in a very difficult position.  First of all, there are not a lot of trading partners out there.  A lot of teams think they are in it, and even some that are not in it, are not prepared to trade because they still have three months of tickets to sell.  Also, we simply don't the cards (bad pun) to deal at this point.  I absolutely do not want to part with Wainwright/Reyes and most posters likely would agree.  And, it's also true that our big league roster has little from which to deal.  Further, we just don't have a deep minor league system.  We Cards fans can get excited about a few solid outings by Lambert, Narveson, Hawksworth and the like, but the reality is that other GM's might not be that interested.....

by stanchar on Jun 21, 2006 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

that's a very fair assessment
the cardinals are in a terrible position, trade-wise. they probably can't make a big splash. but that doesn't mean they can't make any moves at all.

i would also note that during the off-season and ST, when many people thought the cards should trade from their pitching depth to upgrade the offense, the front-office line was: "we'll be able to get a much better deal during the season, when other teams get desperate." maybe they should've dealt when their hand was strong . ..

finger-pointing, i know. doesn't accomplish anything; but why should they get a pass? they are very sensitive to criticism; maybe a little more of it would improve the decision-making . . .  

by lboros on Jun 21, 2006 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I too am not optimistic about
trades in that we don't have much to deal with.

But we got Larry Walker for a bag of baseballs to be named later... so I'll still trust Walt to do something. (I don't really have another option at this point.)

by Matt on Jun 21, 2006 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

2004 Red Sox
Remember when Theo Epstein looked that team, decided that, as constructed, it was not going to win a World Series, and made some bold moves that he felt put them in a position to win a title?

I think that our management has to be going through a similar period of assessment right now. I wouldn't be surprise to see a significant move made to upgrade the staff, if there is one to be made. I also don't think that any player except Carp, Izzy, Pujols, and Rolen would be untouchable depending on the talent at the other end.

I'm not coming out in favor of this or any trade. I'm just saying that the critical analysis could have become much more serioues in the front office even if it is only one game.

by bgh on Jun 21, 2006 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

"Trading from our pitching depth"
would have meant trading Marquis or Suppan for an OF. we were looking at Mulder as our #2 for a W.S. push, we weren't going to trade Reyes or Wainwright, and we couldn't get anything out of Ponson, so Marquis and Soup would be the only options for trades. so now, if it'd happened how everyone had planned, we'd have Mench in LF and no Marquis, but we'd be stuck with Ponson in the rotation and no other options. Reyes hasn't had a complete season without injury, but we'd be relying on him to do just that, AND go deep into the playoffs. Wainwright would be in AAA waiting for Ponson to crack.

if Wainwright were to be a starter for a full season, i believe his ERA would be over 5.00. his ERA in AAA was 4.60, after all.

under that scenario, we wouldn't really be any better off than we are now (if Reyes does stick in the rotation). we're just subtracting Ponson instead of trading Marquis and adding Mench. and if you take away Mench's one amazing week, he looks a lot like Luna/J-Rod/Gooch, etc.

i'm not really sure what could have been done in the offseason. i'm not really sure what can be done now. we might just have to ride this out and see if Jock can pull off some miracle at the deadline.

by kindred on Jun 21, 2006 6:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Tank
I just did some looking at the Memphis Redbirds site. How about DL'ing Mulder and bringing up ole' Dennis Tankersley. I realize his overall numbers aren't good but lately he has pitched quite well.

In his last seven starts the lad hasn't won much (1-4) but he has a 2.76 ERA and 1.252 WHIP. 33 K's in 42.1 innings. Since May 1 his ERA is 3.58, 1.28 WHIP with 43 K's in 55 innings.

Put it this way, if we need another starter (assuming Reyes is in) then I would prefer Tankersley and leaving Wainwright in the pen. Am I out of my mind?

to give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift.

by beanocook on Jun 21, 2006 12:08 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

not necessarily
tankersley has pitched well . . . he could be a spaceholder for some or all of the remaining reg-season schedule.

but he's not a guy who you'd want starting a game in october. wainwright might be a guy who could start in october. that's why i'd like to see him in there.

at this point, who would you start in a postseason series? carpenter game 1, marquis 2, suppan 3 . . . that's not gonna scare many teams.

by lboros on Jun 21, 2006 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

outside
Of what we've seen this year (and I admit its alot)..what makes Wainwright a more viable starting option than Tankersley? As noted, Tank has had better career minor league numbers than Adam?

Im not arguing either way, just wondering.

to give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift.

by beanocook on Jun 21, 2006 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Career minor league numbers...
and $5 will buy you a cup of coffee.  I don't think Dennis Tankersley can produce better at the major league level than Adam Wainwright at this point.

by Quietude on Jun 21, 2006 12:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

what we've seen this year
means a lot . . . while tankersley's minor-league record is impressive, he has already had 3 separate opportunities to claim a spot in a big-league rotation. he never came close to capitalizing on that opportunity. he has even pitched badly in spring training --- 8.61 era in 23 big-league ST innings.

the thing the deserts tank'sly is his control -- he has walked 61 men in 86 big-league innings. that suggests one of two things to me: either a) he doens't trust his stuff in the bigs (ie, it's mental), or more likely b) big-league hitters are less prone than minor-leaguers to chase the stuff he throws off the corners and in the dirt. either way, it's an established pattern and the odds are that it will continue to manifest itself next time he gets a shot.

wainwright, by contrast, seized his opportunity this spring, pitched aggressively and effectively in florida and has continued to do so in the reg season -- challenges hitters, and has good enough stuff to get them out with it.

bottom line, you've got one guy with a big league era of 7.61, and another with a big league era of about 3.00. i'll take the 2d guy.

by lboros on Jun 21, 2006 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

understood
I never suggested Tankersley is a better pitcher than Wainwright. I dont think he is.

But Wainwright has never proven he can be a starter in the bigs either. All Im suggesting is that if we need another starter I would rather it be Tankersley than Wainwright. Thats all.

to give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift.

by beanocook on Jun 21, 2006 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree
Wainwright has been a trooper this year.  He pitched well enough in the spring to be the 5th starter.  He was gracious when he was put in the 'pen.  He has been one of, if not the best, reliever for months.  he strikes people out.  he does not walk many.  there is plenty of time to get him into starting shape for a playoff run. it is much easier to trade for a quality arm for the pen.  

If starting wainwright and reyes is good enough for next season, how can we say, with our current roster, they are not good enough for june 2006?  

by Schnake on Jun 21, 2006 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Tankersley
is probably not going to even smell the postseason roster, unless he completely kicks ass; all that would do is put him in the bullpen for the postseason.

Ranking the postseason starter probables (can't believe I'm worried about it now, but here goes):

  1. Carpenter - duh!
  2. Marquis - some would say by default, but of the veterans left, he's the only one I think could rise to the occassion.
  3. Reyes - I think he could do enough to impress TLR/Dunc over the next three months to warrant inclusion. Unless TLR/Dunc are dead set against giving anyone new (less than 27-28) a chance to succeed.
  4. Suppan - he's dependable, but for what? Six innings, three runs? At the absolute best, seven & two? More likely, 6.2 & 5.
  5. Mulder - if he can stand and simulate a pitching motion come mid-September, he'll probably make the postseason roster.
  6. Wainwright - TLR/Dunc have a plan for him in the pen; at least somebody thinks that a plan is in place. But Adam could be lights out as a starter and it has to be easier to find a reliable, K-worthy reliever than a top flight starter. (I would rather he be higher on this list, but he's probably trapped in the bullpen.)
  7. Ponson - he would have to have a life-changing experience (I'm guessing within the next 48 hours) to reverse course enough to get back in the good graces of the coaching staff. If that were to happen, yeah, he could probably start for us come October. But I'm not liking the odds.
  8. Tankersley - if you're pondering his chances of starting for this club in the postseason, it's only because you either 1) just for the hell of it, thought he needed to be talked about, or 2) decided that you needed to talk about 8 guys.
Yes, we would be better off if we had a real #2. No, I don't happen to have one in my pocket. Adam won't be starting for us unless Walt can steal a power arm for the bullpen. Chris-Jason-Anthony-Jeff give us 1/3/3/4 (maybe that's a little optimistic, but ... eh); all we'd be asking Tank to do is be a #5.

by Solanus on Jun 21, 2006 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think.......
he's a reasonable option.

by stanchar on Jun 21, 2006 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think
the Sox used up all their runs for this series last night.  We're home free

by eeyorethedog on Jun 21, 2006 12:30 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

"Gutless"?
We all know that's just not so. Say what you will about Ponson, the one thing you can't accuse him of is not having a gut...

by nuke187 on Jun 21, 2006 12:31 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

hmmmm
I heard about this on the radio (I believe it was 1580 in Columbia, Missouri), and just wanted to make a comment about the grammatical errors. First of all, it should be los birdos, not el. Secondly, if birdos is plural, that would mean that viva should be vivan. If that's to hard, you could always change birdos to birdo and have it done that way.

On another note: how 'bout them white sox?

-Devoted Royals Fan

by frenchhornlkw on Jun 21, 2006 12:36 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

thanks for the spanish lesson
but "El Birdos" is correct.

by lboros on Jun 21, 2006 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Since you enjoy teaching grammer.....
Perhaps you should take a look at your post...

"If that's to hard, you could always change birdos to birdo and have it done that way."

Next time try..If that's TOO hard....

Man it must suck to attempt to annoy people and simply come out looking like an idiot, eh?

"Forget about the curveball Ricky...Give him the heater!!"

by BleacherBum on Jun 21, 2006 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And
from a "Devoted Royals Fan" troll as well. If it wasn't so pathetic, it might be funny.

by rockin redbird on Jun 21, 2006 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

see what I have to put up with
in columbia mo.

A "devoted royals fan" friend of mine told me the royals would have 10 more wins if they played in the NL central.

My reply?

"yup, so would the cardinals"

by Schnake on Jun 21, 2006 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The '67 Cards
called themselves "El Birdos," and that's where the blog name comes from---not from a high school Spansih workbook.

I still have a big pin from '67 with an Amadee-drawn Cardinal wearing a sombrero and serape and swinging a giant maraca, with the words "Bravo, Bravo, El Birdos!"

by salvomania on Jun 21, 2006 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hey
i didn't know that in spite of having an AWFUL team, Royal fans are also quite stupid.

by stlcardinalsfang on Jun 21, 2006 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

CoMo
I go to school at Mizzou, and it is unbelievable to hear the Royals fans talk.  One of them even suggested that Pujols was over-rated because he "doesn't do anything in the playoffs."  (Of course I reminded him about the train track shot off Lidge)

I just don't understand how some people can applaud futility and criticize excellence the way Royals fans do.  

Hey Royals fans: talk to me when you aren't the laughing stock of the sports universe.

by sportsmanspark on Jun 21, 2006 5:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Tell the ROyals fans
to review Pujols' performance in the 2004 playoffs, especially against Houston.  And he was practically the only offensive option in the World Series for the Cards.

by BozCardsFanSF on Jun 21, 2006 5:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

im not sure...
but i dont think birdos is even a spanish word. the correct term for "birds" is "Pájaros"...

just curious how the site name came about anyhow...(it translates to "the birdos lives")

by lopey986 on Jun 21, 2006 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Birdos
It's LBoros's blog, and his call, but to me "Birdos" means the Cardinals team, and "Viva El Birdos" is as correct as "Viva Las Vegas"

(Elvis did not sing "Vivan Las Vegas")

by madridbend on Jun 21, 2006 8:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Is a Royals fan
actually trying to troll?

by 26thMan on Jun 21, 2006 8:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Brad Voyles
Anyone have any insight into what happened to him? He was impressive in spring training, had four solid starts in Memphis (1.50 ERA), then apparently hurt himself. A few weeks later he was released.  
DCGreg

by DCGreg on Jun 21, 2006 1:33 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Livan Livan
According to ESPNs rumor Central Bowden is itching to make an impression on the new Managment in Washington, and wants to make a trade. Livan Hernandez is on the list of guys avaliable. Why not make a run at Hernandez? He he has had postseason success, is a workhorse and Bowden is trigger happy (and has been known to make bad trades in the past) Can Hernandez be had for Chris Lambert and/or Stu Pomeranz? Hernandez would be a de-facto number 2 starter in our rotation (and is a pretty close to a natural number 2). Furthermore, if somehow Mulder and work out his problems (he HAS to go on the DL and work in AAA to work out his problems doesn't he?) and return to his old (April and May) self then we have a pretty good rotation going into the post season.

Carp
Livan
(Mulder)
Reyes
Marquis
Supp

I dont know much about Livan's contract status, but if he is under contract for next season it would seem like there is a good fit, not only for the Nats but for us as well.

by BigMac545 on Jun 21, 2006 2:26 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Livan has a tendancy of catching...
...Ponson's disease.  Formally known as Ray King's disease.  It's called eatitis.

by Hardcore Legend on Jun 21, 2006 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Livan! Livan! Livan! Hernandez' Contract
I think it's $8M this season and next, which not overly expensive. Of course, his ERA this season in a Cardinal-esque 5.64.

by bgh on Jun 21, 2006 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

but...
he started against the cardinals and threw 7 innings of 3 hit/1 run ball in busch. maybe he likes busch?

but yeah, he has pitched worse than most of the cardinal rotation besides mulder as of late. not really worth 8 million.

by lopey986 on Jun 21, 2006 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i think
he just needs a change of scenery.

by stlcardinalsfang on Jun 21, 2006 3:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I thought about Livian the other day
and then I've seen him get really smacked around lately.

by sdrone on Jun 21, 2006 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I've mentioned Hernandez a few times
He may not be our dream ace, and he isn't a high-strikeout guy, but he puts up respectable numbers and could probably be had at a more reasonable price than Willis, Schmidt, etc. I see him as someone who could fill the position we all hoped Mulder would fill this year.

by rob is back on Jun 21, 2006 6:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

My thoughts
A definite undertone of dejection today...which I understand. My power came back on this morning and I spent a good five minutes swearing at Mulder. I'm going to go ahead and agree with lboros and most everyone else and say we need to do something. As I see it, we could:
  1. Rebuild. We don't have the farm system or the bottom feeding place in the standings to pull that off, so forget that.
  2. Call up Reyes, plug in Wainwright/Tankersley/A Janitor, slap Mulder on the DL, and kick Ponson to the curb. This scenario generally makes sense to me, because whoever you have in there isn't going to get pounded much worse than Ponson or Mulder at this point, and there's always the chance Reyes will look exceptional in the bigs.
  3. Swing a trade...but not for a hitter. I know we need a bat. I know. But at this point, it's pretty clear that we could use a pitcher more than a Craig Wilson. We might even be able to swap one of our frustrating pitchers for a slightly less frustrating pitcher that another team has gotten tired of. I'd like to see another middle of the order bat as much as anyone, but it's going to be the pitching that kills us in the playoffs if we don't make a move to fix it.
There are other options, of course, but none I see realistically happening.

by Lord Fortune on Jun 21, 2006 2:43 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Chi Trib article

Can anyone explain the article in the PD web site here.

Gar, makes me so frustrated. The MAN's league, too bad Pujols isn't around to show them El Hombre's League.

It makes me hope that we get the good Marquis tonight. Nothing would be better than having him come in and shut them down tonight.

Plus, my brother and I spent $100 buying tickets to today's game for our dad for Father's Day. Really glad we didn't go with yesterday's game!

by dontEATnachos on Jun 21, 2006 3:18 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Half of Roger's stuff
is written to be, I dunno, sarcastic.

by sdrone on Jun 21, 2006 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

hmm, score one for me being an idiot
me and sarcasm online don't get along too well. I guess I shouldn't try to read articles while skyping with my boss.

by dontEATnachos on Jun 21, 2006 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hope this article makes it into each locker.
They had an ego check last night.  The white sox will step on your neck and apply pressure until you pass out.  

they are a terrific team. they do not believe in mercy. ozzie wants to make the city of chicago forget about TLR and their history. whatever.

nothing will make me feel better than if we go out and show the sox what we are made of. last night should be all the motivation they need.  if they cant get up to play after a butt whipping like that, then maybe they should just blow it up and rebuild.  

by Schnake on Jun 21, 2006 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

New subject.....
I was having a discussion with someone the other day about Hector Luna. First of all, I am a fan. He has been great this year, playing and batting wherever TLR puts him. Why aren't teams interested him? Maybe they are and I just don't hear about it, but it seems that he would/could bring decent trade value, packaged with someone else of course. Don't get me wrong I would hate to see him go, but if the right deal came along why not use him? Just a thought.
"Forget about the curveball Ricky...Give him the heater!!"

by BleacherBum on Jun 21, 2006 3:41 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Luna
I think they would be a little hesitant to trade Luna. I expect that luna will start seeing more AB and playing time at 2nd with Miles falling back down to earth. I think that starting next year Luna is going to be our starting second baseman

by BigMac545 on Jun 21, 2006 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed....
but the fact that you would be hesitant to trade him, more or less shows that he holds decent value. I think he has shown great improvement and has potential to be a very good player, but if by placing him in a packaged deal you can get a great player I would say do it.
"Forget about the curveball Ricky...Give him the heater!!"

by BleacherBum on Jun 21, 2006 5:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.
Start posting about the Cardinals »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Stl_ia_card_45_-_dark_small
Jeff Pearlman Thinks Of Hair Clumps When He Thinks Of The Thief McGwire
Black-spider-monkey_small
Losing my religion (w/ baseball)

Recent FanPosts

Knights-09_small
Disenchanted Blue Jays Fan Looking For A New Team
Painterlance_small
The Holliday Dilemma (Rocks Fan Perpsective)
375830-r1-025-11_011_small
Anybody read Bob Gibson's new book yet?
Flanders_small
Yadi2first
Small
40 Man Question..
Cathybachebay1_small
The current Busine$$ of Baseball...how long can it last?
Avatar_small
VEB CheBird T-Shirt for Sale - Red or Powder Blue, CLEARANCE
Stl_ia_card_45_-_dark_small
October Lore: One In A Million

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Jack_benny_small DanUpBaby

Editors

Bender1_small azruavatar

Adam1_small chuckb

Trigun_001_small the red baron