World Series p.m. stream-of-consciousness

i'll be updating this little post periodically this afternoon as my time permits. here's a first item:

the last two times the cardinals went to the world series, they opened on the road just one day removed from a game 7 win in the nlcs. in both cases (1987 and 2004) the cards went down 0-2 against a better-rested opponent.  they lost the four games by a combined score of 35-16. their runs-against of 9 per game in those four contests suggests a hangover effect from the long lcs -- worn-out pitching staffs plus short turnaround equals blowout losses. and there's some truth to that -- in both years, the game 2 starter (danny cox in '87, matt morris in '04) was pitching on short rest. they had to be relieved in the 4th (cox) and 5th (morris) innings. but the game 1 starters (rookie joe magrane in '87, woody williams in '04) both got bombed despite pitching on full rest; magrane lasted just 3 innings and gave up 5 runs, while woody was knocked out after only 2 and a third, with 7 runs across.

the cardinals' last win in a world series road game came 21 years ago today in game 2 of the 1985 world series. down 2-0 with three outs to go, they rallied for four off charlie liebrandt, taking the lead for good on terry pendleton's two-out bases-clearing double. that win put st louis ahead 2-0 in games, heading back to st louis . . . .

. . . cough.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

better start getting to know this team --- the 1973 new york mets.

they are, you've heard by now, the only world series participant in history to have a worse w-l record than the 2006 cardinals. the '73 mets had two of the league's top 10 finishers in era (seaver and koosman), two of the top 3 in strikeouts (seaver and matlack), two of the top 4 in complete games (seaver and matlack); they also had no .300 hitters and no player with more than 76 rbi. they ranked 11th out of 12 nl teams in runs scored but 3d in era; they had willie mays.

how do they compare to the 2006 cardinals? a few highlights; for the uniniated, OPS+ and ERA+ place those two stats in the context of league average; 100 is average, 101 and up is above average, 99 and down is below average; RS and RA ranks tell where the teams finished within their respective leagues in runs scored and runs allowed.

w-l Pyth
w-l
OPS+ ERA+ RS
rank
RA
rank
2006 stl 83-78 82-79 102 97 6 5
1973 ny 82-79 83-78 88 111 11 2

obviously much different types of .500 teams. the 2006 cardinals were pretty average in all respects; middle-of-pack league ranks in runs scored and allowed (RS and RA), nearly average in both OPS+ and ERA+. the mets, by contrast, combined the pitching staff of a .600 club with the offense of a .400 club to arrive at, more or less, a .500 record.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

the rotation:

if you hold carpenter for game 3 and supps for game 4 to keep both guys on full rest, then there's only one way to get both guys a second start in the series: pitch them both on short rest in games 6 and 7. like so:

VARIATION 1
1. reyes
2. weaver
3. carp
4. supps
5. reyes
6. carp (short)
7. supps (short)

i can't see doing that; the track record of short-rest pitchers is too emphatically bad. recipe for disaster. the best way to get 4 starts from carp / supps is like so:

VARIATION 2
1. reyes
2. carp (short)
3. supps
4. weaver
5. reyes
6. carp
7. supps

this is the rotation i would go with. you only have 1 pitcher on short rest this way in the whole series. you do have to give one of jeff weaver's starts to anth reyes, but let's face it: if reyes starts game 1, then either he's got to make a second start, or you have to have a whole bunch of guys on short rest. in the nlcs, weaver made 2 starts to reyes' 1; this rotation would reverse that ratio. but i don't think you lose more than a run or two in that exchange. i think that's a reasonable cost in order to set things up for carp/supps to pitch 4 of the 7 games -- and to be fully rested for the final 2.

if you insist on getting weaver in there twice, you could set it up this way:

VARIATION 3
1. weaver (short)
2. carp (short)
3. supps
4. reyes
5. weaver
6. carp
7. supps

this rotation takes one of the reyes starts from variation #2 and gives it to jeff weaver on short rest. pick you poison -- reyes on full rest, weaver on short. i'll take the former.

Update [2006-10-20 18:37:50 by lboros]: it's official --- reyes in game 1, weaver in 2, then carp, then supp. presumably games 5, 6, and 7 will remain unannounced, pending the series score etc etc. the temptation is going to be there to rush back weaver, carp, and supps on short rest for all 3 of the final games --- a terrible idea in my opinion, for the reasons stated above. under this scenario, either a) suppan will get only 1 start in the series, or b) a whole bunch of guys are gonna pitch on short rest. neither prospect gives the cardinals their best shot at this.

i should add, though: la russa is starting a rookie pitcher in game 1 of the world series. that's impressive --- best option for the team, and tony didn't talk himself out of it and opt for "experience" (ie marquis, who has made a world series start). so my hat's off to la russa again for taking some risks. roll 'em, tony.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Viva El Birdos

You must be a member of Viva El Birdos to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Viva El Birdos. You should read them.

Join Viva El Birdos

You must be a member of Viva El Birdos to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Viva El Birdos. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9351_tracker