SI Ballpark Rankings
Thought you Viva El Birdos readers would find this interesting:
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2005/baseball/mlb/08/31/fvi/
I was surprised Busch Stadium rated so highly--above Fenway, Camden, and The Sacred Pile Of Bricks. I wasn't surprised because I think badly of Busch (quite the opposite as astute readers know), but because I'm so used to hearing about nothing but the old ballparks' "traditional" value, which I usually agree with (to a point). Anyhow, SI uses some weirdo criteria. Check it out for yourselves.
0 recs |
4 comments
Comments
Thanks for the list...
Looking at this list, and just the two parks I reviewed: Miller and Busch, I cannot believe that Busch lost the battle of the beer barons. The abundance of cheap seats at Miller takes down the average ticket price by far. Sixteen bucks to sit in the fourth ring at Busch is quite high, but then again supply and demand factors huge here. The food I find to be a even split in terms of price with the CLEAR advantage to Busch in terms of selection (drooling on the keyboard right now for some Super Smokers Bar-B-Que), and have never ever priced souveniers except for the program and the scorecard. (Moment aside, the best scorebard value is the Cubs scorecard which is 2 bucks and gets you the scouts look at the next four teams coming into Wrigely, pretty cool read.)
What I find funny in the Miller review is the East coast mentality when it comes to parking. SI lists 12 bucks at Miller as cheap. Busch is ten, which granted is only two bucks cheaper, but if you are willing to walk three blocks you can get six dollar parking. Also, if you are going alone or with just one other person, the Metro Link is a good option.
by Brock20 on Sep 2, 2005 11:26 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i think
by cardsrul on Sep 2, 2005 1:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Clarification....
I don't much care for the forced acitivities between innings which SI seems to rank high in their rating. So what if a park gives away more free, corporate sponsored crap between innnings. I think its an excuse to cover up the fact that the product on the field is weak.
by Brock20 on Sep 3, 2005 2:46 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
agreed
by matty fred on Sep 6, 2005 9:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 
















