Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jeremy Lin And How The Pac-12 Missed Him

hobby horses I: the ground game

before we jump fully into the sign-and-trade season, i'd like to wrap up some unfinished 2005 business and put away the season's hobby horses. to begin with: double plays. on august 23 i looked at the cards' freakishly high turn-two rate and the tremendous run-saving value thereof. they finished the year with 196 twin-killings, the 19th-highest total in history according to mlb.com. (if you click the link, ignore the 1999 dp totals in positions 1-30, all of which are obviously erroneous.) their pace dropped off in september; they had been headed for upwards of 200 double plays and a slot in the all-time top 10.

as i noted in the original post, the cards' feat was all the more amazing because they gave up so few baserunners -- they allowed the national league's 2d-lowest obp and hence had a far below-avg numer of guys on base to double up on. leaguewide, double plays erased 9.7 percent of all runners to reach 1st base -- ie, hits (excluding doubles triples and homers), walks, and hbps. the cardinals wiped out 13.4 percent of such baserunners, or 38 percent above the norm. had they turned two at the league average rate, the cardinals would have finished the year with just 142 double plays -- 54 fewer than they actually turned. if we assume that those 54 double plays only saved half a run on average (and that's a verrrry conservative estimate, as i explained in the original post), the cards' dp premium was worth 27 runs, or about 3 wins over the course of the season. it's more likely the actual savings was 35 to 40 runs, or 4 to 5 wins in the standings.

how valuable is that? roughly the difference between jim edmonds and willy taveras, or between chris carpenter and jeff weaver.

by the way, baseball prospectus's net dp totals back up my estimate of a 54-dp premium. by BP's figures, the cardinals turned an estimated 52 double plays above the number you'd expect for a team with their number of dp opportunities.

the high dp rate leads us to a second remarkable thing about the 2005 cardinals: their off-the-charts groundball-flyball ratio. mlb has only been tracking this stat since 1999, but in that time only two teams had ever recorded gb/fb quotients higher than 1.5 (ie, 3 groundouts for every 2 flyouts) before this year: the 2002 pittsburgh pirates (1.54) and the 2003 la dodgers (1.51). st louis in 2005 recorded a gb/fb ratio of 1.72 -- nearly 2 groundouts for every flyout. the next highest ratio in 2005 belonged to the diamondbacks at 1.35. all five st louis starters ranked in the top 21 in the league in this category.

as a league, the nl registered about 1.2 groundouts for every flyout. if you multiply the cardinals' outs on balls in play by the league ratio, you get roughly 1800 groundouts to 1480 flyouts. in fact, the numbers were 2017 groundouts and 1280 flyouts -- or ~220 groundballs above the norm.

and that's how we can explain the majority of those 54 "bonus" double plays.

(disclaimer: baseball prospectus obviously calculates this stat diff'tly; all their g/f rates for individual pitchers are higher than the figures at mlb.com, and BP puts the league rate at 1.6. i don't know how BP calculates the stat; i can tell you that mlb.com excludes bunt ground outs and caught line drives from the equation. but there are probably other diff'nces as well.)

more in this vein to come.

Comment 13 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Ah, double plays
This is why I wanna keep Grudz.    I'm of the opinion that he had a slightly off year offensively, but his huge range in the field really complements Eckstein and I like his arm.  Defense, defense, defense up the middle.

by sdrone on Oct 31, 2005 10:29 AM EST reply actions  

Yeah, I was pretty impressed
by Grudz' defense, without ever having paid too much attention to it before his arrival.

His arm is way stronger than the Birds' 2B the last few years; my impression of Vina his last year or two was that he had gone way down defensively, as well as making a lot of really boneheaded plays (anyone remember his patented "fake the throw to 2nd on a GB with a runner on 1st, then run with the ball toward the oncoming baserunner, who evades the tag, the panic and throw the ball late in an attempt to get the batter at first"? That was a classic that guaranteed some laffs a few times each year).

by salvomania on Oct 31, 2005 1:07 PM EST up reply actions  

If it's defense we're looking for
I'd prefer letting Grud and his pathetic bat hit the road, sign Nunez to play 2nd.  Younger, great arm, cheaper...

by sdesserman on Oct 31, 2005 6:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Defense is one thing
but not at the exepnse of a black hole in the lineup.

2005 was Nunez' "career year," and he still only had a .704 OPS---far lower than anything Grudz has put up the last few years.

Nunez had a great first half---with far better numbers than he'd ever put up in his 8-year career---before stumbling down the stretch: just .231/.284/.269 for a .553 OPS in August, and just .238/.273/.250 for a .523 OPS in September. Those two months also happened to be his most playing-time-intensive of the season.

On a team with already one light bat behind the plate and question marks at two outfield spots---and maybe also at 3B---I wouldn't be too quick to hand over a starting position to a 30-year old veteran with a .650 career OPS, even if he was a slick fielder.

by salvomania on Oct 31, 2005 9:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Free Agent Ground Ball Pitchers?
Any come to mind that we could have at a reasonable discount? Combine the ground ball tendency with Dunc's ability to rehab an older pitcher and I think we have our fourth or fifth starter.  Here's the want ad I would run for the Cards.

Help Wanted:  Are you looking to recapture a little of the glory-ah?  We are a mid-sized Midwest organization that prides itself on its commitment to excellence and its employees.  We seek like minded individuals who are willing to throw small white ball approximately 100-130 times every five days and have recently experienced a downturn in their performance.  Willing to train.  Prefence given to candidates who are able to keep the ball down in the zone and enduce ground ball outs.  

by Brock20 on Oct 31, 2005 11:34 AM EST reply actions  

nice
you could add: new state-of-art office space, 1st-rate bat/glove support provided

by lboros on Oct 31, 2005 12:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Latest
FA signing rumor: AJ Burnette

http://cardinals.mostvaluablenetwork.com/

Hmmmmnnnn...that could be interesting.

by rockin redbird on Oct 31, 2005 2:31 PM EST reply actions  

Sorry RR....
but I think the odds of that happening are slim to none, and none just left town.  Reason 1) AJ, if you listen to the MSM, is the number one pitcher on the market right now.  2)  The Red Sox and the Yankees are starved for pitching. 3) Even if they aren't starved for pitching, the two fight over any big name free agent like two siblings, with Veruca Salt like manors, fighting over the newest toy.  4)  I don't think the Cards could afford the type of money that AJ Burnett will command.  5) I think Walt realizes that his money is spent better elsewhere.  

On that note, "Gooses, geeces, I want a goose that will lay gold eggs for Easter."  

by Brock20 on Oct 31, 2005 3:16 PM EST reply actions  

The only way I can see it
is as a set-up for a trade of one of the other starting pitchers.  

by Valatan on Oct 31, 2005 3:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Burnett
He's not Cardinal material - I can't see them going after a guy like this.

by STLEdge on Oct 31, 2005 4:00 PM EST reply actions  

eh,
I remember hearing about the exact same things about Jim Edmonds before the trade to the Cardinals.  He'll probably be way overpriced, but if he's willing to sign for a reasonable price, and if looking at the video, and talking to the guy, shows that he's coachable, I think he's worth the risk, particularly if it allows us to pawn Mulder for an outfielder.  

But he's probably going to sign for some crazy, ill-advised contract, so this is moot.

by Valatan on Oct 31, 2005 4:34 PM EST up reply actions  

IMHO
Burnett will get a boatload (maybe the QE2!) of money to be about a .500 pitcher... or to use the old scouting phrase, he's got "a million-dollar arm and a ten-cent head."  Whoever signs him will likely be moaning by the All-Star break.  Matt Clement is still Matt Clement, no matter how much money he makes or where he pitches...

by The Ol Goaler on Oct 31, 2005 4:10 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Internet's #1 St. Louis Cardinals blog.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

N1046613005_8392_small
Our 2010-2011 strays
649494__1__small
Hall of WAR: Part 2

Recent FanPosts

Hahaha_small
These were a few of my favorite things (fink reminisces about the 2011 regular season)
Dsc01844_small
Cardinals take the Governor's Joplin Challenge, will help build 35 homes for torando victims
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals of All-Time - Relief Pitching Edition
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals of All-Time - Starting Pitching Edition
Small
Two Trades That Set the Cards Back in the 70s
Nyc_small
Cardinals Offense vs. Reds Offense - 2012
Nyc_small
Cardinals Rotation vs. Reds Rotation - 2012
St-louis-cardinals-script_small
Best Cardinals by Position - Center Fielders

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Jack_benny__1__small DanUpBaby

Editors

Bendermad_small azruavatar

Trigun_001_small the red baron

Images_small tom s.

Authors

1989_bgh_cropped_small bgh

Valverde_medium_small vivaelpujols